Lived experiences of caregivers with infants treated at home with continuous invasive or noninvasive ventilation.

RATIONALE: Caring for children dependent upon continuous invasive ventilation in the home setting requires extensive expertise, coordination, and can result in impaired caregiver quality of life. Less is known regarding the experiences of caregivers with children requiring continuous noninvasive ventilation. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate caregiver experiences with invasive and noninvasive home mechanical ventilation, and to compare parental quality of life based on the child's mode of ventilation. METHODS: Caregivers of infants who were discharged home with continuous ventilatory support were recruited to complete semi-structured qualitative interviews. Interviews explored their decision-making process, the transition to home, and health related quality of life. RESULTS: Caregivers of 16 children were interviewed, of whom eight were treated with continuous invasive ventilation, and eight with continuous noninvasive ventilation. The decision to pursue home ventilation in both groups was greatly influenced by the desire to be discharged and reunite the family at home. Following the transition to home, caregivers from both groups described high rates of insomnia, emotional distress, work disruption and familial hardship. Despite this, parents were overwhelmingly pleased with the decision to proceed with home ventilation and perceived their children to be living enriched lives outside of the hospital. Factors associated with easing the transition to home were in-hospital training and the presence of a robust support system. CONCLUSIONS: Lives of families with children dependent on continuous mechanical ventilation are characterized by isolation, lifestyle disruption, adverse mental and physical health consequences, and impaired interpersonal relationships, irrespective of the mode of ventilation.

Pediatric pulmonology year in review 2021 and 2022: Physiology.

Pulmonary physiology is a core element of pediatric pulmonology care and research. This article reviews some of the notable publications in physiology that were published in Pediatric Pulmonology in 2021 and 2022.

Safety of live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) in children and adults with asthma: a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis.

INTRODUCTION: Asthma is one of the most common chronic respiratory conditions worldwide and can be exacerbated by influenza. Findings from early trials demonstrated a higher risk of medically significant wheezing in otherwise healthy young children (aged 6 - 23 months) following administration of the Ann Arbor-backbone live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV-AA). In more recent years, several additional studies have investigated the safety of LAIV-AA in older children (2 - 17 years of age) and adults with asthma or prior wheezing, but these findings have not yet been systematically evaluated. AREAS COVERED: We conducted a systematic literature review to assess and synthesize the evidence from all available studies on the safety of LAIV-AA in people aged 2 - 49 years with a diagnosis of asthma or recurrent wheezing. EXPERT OPINION: Fourteen studies over 20 years, involving a total of 1.2 million participants, provided evidence that LAIV-AA was well tolerated with no safety concerns in individuals aged 2 - 49 years with a diagnosis of asthma or recurrent wheezing. These data can help inform guidelines for use of LAIV-AA in children and adults with a history of asthma or recurrent wheezing.

Outcomes of aortic root replacement after previous aortic root replacement: the "true" redo root.

BACKGROUND: Aortic reoperations are technically challenging. This study evaluated outcomes after "true" redo root replacement (previous full root replacement) stratified by cause of prosthesis failure. METHODS: Data were compared for 793 patients who underwent a first-time sternotomy (de novo group) and 120 patients who had previously undergone full aortic root replacement (redo group), of which 76 underwent reoperation due to structural valve deterioration (degenerative group), and 44 due to endocarditis (infection group). RESULTS: Overall mortality was 4% (n = 28) in the de novo group and 5% (n = 6) in the redo group (p = 0.43) (degenerative group, 3%, infection group, 9%; p = 0.19). The infection group had an increased incidence of renal failure, sternal infection, prolonged ventilation, reoperation for bleeding, multisystem failure, and sepsis, and an increased hospital length of stay. The degenerative group and the de novo group had a similar risk of perioperative death and major complications. The 5-year survival was 86.3% ± 1.3% for the de novo group and 77.3% ± 4.6% for the redo group (p ≤ 0.01; degenerative, 86.3% ± 5%; infection, 65.3% ± 7.7%; p < 0.01; p = 0.98 for de novo vs degenerative). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that reoperation for degenerative failure did not increase the risk of perioperative or late death. CONCLUSIONS: Redo aortic root replacement can be performed with low perioperative morbidity and death. The presence of infection increases the risk of complications and worsens survival. However, redo root replacement for degenerative failure can be performed with similar short-term complication risk and midterm survival as de novo root replacement.

Graft selection for aortic root replacement in complex active endocarditis: does it matter?

BACKGROUND: Endocarditis affecting the aortic valve, with abscess formation and root destruction, remains a challenge to treat. Aortic root homografts have been advocated because of a perceived lower risk of infective complications than with other root replacement grafts. However, the theoretical advantage of homografts has not been re-evaluated in the modern era. This report is based on an examination of our results for all aortic root replacements in complex, active endocarditis affecting the aortic valve. METHODS: From 2000 to 2010, 134 patients (70.9% male; mean age 58.3±14.8 years) at our institution underwent aortic root replacement for active endocarditis. Ninety of the patients (67.2%) had a previously implanted prosthetic aortic valve. Our findings for these patients included one or more of the following: abscess (n=110, 82.1%), valve vegetation (n=98, 73.1%), and pseudoaneurysm or rupture or both (n=62, 46.3%). We retrospectively reviewed data for the patients from hospital records and the social security data base. RESULTS: A mechanical composite graft (MC) was used in 43 of the patients (32.1%), a non-homograft biologic valve conduit (BC) in 55 patients (41.0%), and a homograft (HG) valve in 36 patients (26.9%). There was no significant difference among the groups in the incidence of major complications or in-hospital mortality. During a mean follow-up of 32.1±29.4 months, the rates of readmission, reinfection, and reoperation were similar for the three groups. The mean 5-year survival in the study was 58±9% for the MC group, 62±7% for the BC group, and 58 ± 9% for the HG group, respectively (p=0.48). CONCLUSIONS: Aortic root replacement in the presence of complex active infection is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We report that the rates of major complications and late mortality were similar among MC, BC, and HG groups in our study.