RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive approaches to lung resection have become widely acceptable and more recently, segmentectomy has demonstrated equivalent oncologic outcomes when compared to lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, studies comparing outcomes following segmentectomy by different surgical approaches are lacking. Our objective was to investigate the outcomes of patients undergoing robotic, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), or open segmentectomy for NSCLC using the National Cancer Database. METHODS: NSCLC patients with clinical stage I who underwent segmentectomy from 2010 to 2016 were identified. After propensity-score matching (1:4:1), multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of 30-d readmissions, 90-d mortality, and overall survival. RESULTS: 22,792 patients met study inclusion. After matching, approaches included robotic (n = 2493; 17%), VATS (n = 9972; 66%), and open (n = 2493; 17%). An open approach was associated with higher 30-d readmissions (7% open versus 5.5% VATS versus 5.6% robot, P = 0.033) and 90-d mortality (4.4% open versus 2.2% VATS versus 2.5% robot, P < 0.001). A robotic approach was associated with improved 5-y survival (50% open versus 58% VATS versus 63% robot, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with clinical stage I NSCLC undergoing segmentectomy, compared to the open approach, a VATS approach was associated with lower 30-d readmission and 90-d mortality. A robotic approach was associated with improved 5-y survival compared to open and VATS approaches when matched. Additional studies are necessary to determine if unrecognized covariates contribute to these differences.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Robótica , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Neumonectomía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: With growing application of endoscopic therapy for early-stage esophageal cancer, we sought to review our experience of endoscopic mucosal resections (EMRs). The aim of our study was to understand the natural course of these patients, especially with positive margins. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database of all patients undergoing endoscopic therapies at Georgetown University Hospital for esophageal cancer was used for the analysis between 2010 and 2020. RESULTS: Of 80 patients in the EMR database, 35 were performed as index cases for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Majority (74.3%) had a pre-treatment ultrasound confirming absence of regional adenopathy. There were no post-EMR bleeding or perforation events requiring re-intervention. Complete R0 resection was achieved in 22/35 (62.9%) after initial EMR. Thirteen patients had positive margins. Of these 13 patients, only 7 patients underwent repeat endoscopic resection, 2 underwent subsequent esophagectomy, 2 received definitive radiation given poor surgical candidacy, and 2 were lost to follow-up. Overall and 5-year survival of all patients undergoing EMR was 67.9 months and 85%, respectively. Subset analysis of the 13 patients with R1 resection demonstrated an overall survival of 49.2 months and 60% 5-year survival vs overall survival of 78.9 months and 93% 5-year survival for R0 resection. At a median follow-up of 60.5 months, cancer recurrence occurred in 3 patients. All of them were successfully managed with repeat EMR. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic resections represent a safe and effective treatment for early-stage esophageal cancer. Patients with high-risk features should be counseled to undergo an esophagectomy if they are operable candidates.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Multiple surgical approaches have been used in the management of thoracic outlet syndrome. These approaches have traditionally been "open" approaches and have been associated with the inherent morbidities of an open approach, including a risk of injury to the neurovascular structures due to traction and trauma while resecting the first rib. In addition, there has been concern that recurrence of symptoms may be related to incomplete resection of the rib with conventional open techniques. With the advent of minimally invasive thoracic surgery, surgeons began to explore first-rib resection via a thoracoscopic approach. Unfortunately, the existing video-assisted thoracic surgery technology and equipment was not well suited to working in the apex of the chest. With the introduction and subsequent progress in robotic surgery and instrumentation, this dissection can be performed with all the advantages of robotics, but also with minimal traction and trauma to the neurovascular structures, and incorporates almost complete resection of the rib with minimal residual stump. Robotics has developed as a reliable, safe, and less invasive approach to first-rib resection, yielding excellent results while limiting the morbidity of the procedure.
Asunto(s)
Descompresión Quirúrgica , Costillas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video , Humanos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Osteotomía , Costillas/cirugía , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/cirugía , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/fisiopatología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Purpose: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a deadly malignancy that is frequently diagnosed in patients with significant medical comorbidities. When delivering local and regional therapy, an exceedingly narrow therapeutic window is encountered, which often precludes patients from receiving aggressive curative therapy. Radiation therapy advances including particle therapy have been employed in an effort to expand this therapeutic window. Here we report outcomes with the use of proton therapy with curative intent and immunotherapy to treat patients diagnosed with high-risk NSCLC. Methods and Materials: Patients were determined to be high risk if they had severe underlying cardiopulmonary dysfunction, history of prior thoracic radiation therapy, and/or large volume or unfavorable location of disease (eg, bilateral hilar involvement, supraclavicular involvement). As such, patients were determined to be ineligible for conventional x-ray-based radiation therapy and were treated with pencil beam scanning proton beam therapy (PBS-PBT). Patients who demonstrated excess respiratory motion (ie, greater than 1 cm in any dimension noted on the 4-dimensional computed tomography simulation scan) were deemed to be ineligible for PBT. Toxicity was reported using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0. Overall survival and progression-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 29 patients with high-risk NSCLC diagnoses were treated with PBS-PBT. The majority (55%) of patients were defined as high risk due to severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction. Most commonly, patients were treated definitively to a total dose of 6000 cGy (relative biological effectiveness) in 30 fractions with concurrent chemotherapy. Overall, there were a total of 6 acute grade 3 toxicities observed in our cohort. Acute high-grade toxicities included esophagitis (n = 4, 14%), dyspnea (n = 1, 3.5%), and cough (n = 1, 3.5%). No patients developed grade 4 or higher toxicity. The majority of patients went on to receive immunotherapy, and high-grade pneumonitis was rare. Two-year progression-free and overall survival was estimated to be 51% and 67%, respectively. COVID-19 was confirmed or suspected to be responsible for 2 patient deaths during the follow-up period. Conclusions: Radical PBS-PBT treatment delivered in a cohort of patients with high-risk lung cancer with immunotherapy is feasible with careful multidisciplinary evaluation and rigorous follow-up.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: As more patients undergo anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) procedures and more devices are created for that purpose, it is important to understand the complications that can arise and the variables that mitigate risk for major and minor complications. PURPOSE: To assess complication rates after ALIF with or without posterior instrumentation and variables associated with increased likelihood of postoperative complications. We aim to provide this data as benchmarking to improve patient safety and surgical care. STUDY DESIGN: A single-center retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: All adult patients who underwent ALIF between 2017 and 2019 was performed OUTCOME MEASURES: Post-operative major and minor complications were evaluated. METHODS: Complications were recorded and presented as percentages. Patient demographics, perioperative, and postoperative data were also collected and analyzed between patients who had no complications and those that had any complication. Subgroup analysis of surgical complications were performed by nonparametric Chi-square tests. Continuous variables were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: Ninty-five of three hundred sixty-two (26.2%) of patients experienced a minor or major complication. Among the most common complications found were surgical site infections (5.8%), neurological complications (4.1%), vascular complications (3.6%), and urinary tract infections (3.3%). Patients undergoing ALIF alone with post-operative complications had higher mean age, higher BMI, higher ASA status, and experienced higher estimated blood loss. Patients undergoing ALIF and posterior instrumentation with post-operative complications were more likely to have diabetes and had a higher ASA status. Patients with any complications from both groups had longer length of stay, discharge to a non-home setting and were more likely to be readmitted or return to the operating room. CONCLUSION: Our study reveals variables associated with complications at our institution, including age of the patient, BMI, and ASA status leading to higher complications and greater LOS, higher readmission rates, and disposition to skilled facilities.
Asunto(s)
Fusión Vertebral , Adulto , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Región Lumbosacra , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Open window thoracostomy (OWT) is indicated for patients with bronchopleural fistula (BPF) or trapped lung in the setting of empyema refractory to non-surgical interventions. We investigated the role of OWT in the era of minimally invasive surgeries, endobronchial valves and fibrinolytic therapy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent OWT at a single institution from 2010 to 2020 was performed. Indications for the procedure as well as operative details and morbidity and mortality were evaluated to determine patient outcomes for OWT. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were identified for the study. The most common indication for OWT was post-resectional BPF (n = 9). Prior to OWT, n = 11 patients failed other surgical or minimally invasive interventions. Patient comorbidities were quantified with the Charlson Comorbidity index (n = 11 score ≥ 5, 10-year survival ≤21%). Three (16.7%) patients died < 30 days post-operatively and 12 (66%) patients were deceased by the study's end (overall survival 24.0 ± 32.2 months). Mean number of ribs resected were 2.5 ± 1.2 (range 1-6) with one patient having 6 ribs removed. Patients were managed with negative pressure wound therapy (n = 9) or Kerlix packing (n = 9). Eleven patients (61.6%) underwent delayed closure (mean time from index surgery to closure 4.8 ± 6.7 months). CONCLUSIONS: Our study illustrates the significant comorbidities of patients undergoing OWT, the poor outcomes therein, and pitfalls associated with this procedure. We show that negative pressure wound therapy can be utilized as potential way to obliterate the pleural space and manage an open chest in the absence of an airleak; however, OWT procedures continue to be extremely morbid.
Asunto(s)
Fístula Bronquial/cirugía , Empiema Pleural/cirugía , Toracostomía , Adulto , Anciano , Fístula Bronquial/complicaciones , Comorbilidad , Empiema Pleural/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , Neumonectomía/efectos adversos , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Costillas/cirugía , Tasa de Supervivencia , Toracostomía/efectos adversos , Toracostomía/métodos , Toracotomía/efectos adversos , Terapia Trombolítica , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is considered standard of care for medically inoperable early stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC). Central tumor location is a known risk factor for severe SBRT related toxicity. Bronchoscopy allows for visualization of the central airways prior to treatment. Five fraction SBRT approaches have been advocated to mitigate treatment induced toxicity. In this report, we examine the mature clinical outcomes of a diverse cohort of ES-NSCLC patients with both peripheral and central tumors treated with a conservative 5 fraction SBRT approach and evaluate the role of lobar gross endobronchial disease (LGED) in predicting overall survival and treatment-related death. METHODS: Medically inoperable biopsy-proven, lymph node-negative ES-NSCLC patients were treated with SBRT. Bronchoscopy was completed prior to treatment in all centrally located cases. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS), local control (LC), regional control (RC), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Overall survival was stratified based on clinical stage, histology, tumor location and LGED. Toxicities were scored according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 5.0. RESULTS: From December 2010 to December 2015, 50 consecutive patients were treated uniformly with a 50 Gy in 5 fraction SBRT approach (tumor BED10 ≥ 100 Gy) and followed for a minimum of 5 years or until death. At a median follow up of 42 months for all patients, 3-year OS was 50%. Three-year OS did not statistically differ between stage I and stage II disease (51% vs. 47%; p=0.86), adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (50% vs. 45%; p=0.68), or peripheral and central tumors (56% vs. 45%; p=0.46). Five central tumors were found to have LGED, and 3-year OS for this cohort was quite poor at 20%. Cox regression analysis identified LGED as a predictor of OS while controlling for age, stage and location (OR:4.536, p-value=0.038). Despite the relatively low dose delivered, treatment likely contributed to the death of 4 patients with central tumors. Lobar gross endobronchial disease was an independent predictor for grade 5 pulmonary toxicity (n=4, p=0.007). Specifically, 3 of the 5 patients with LGED developed fatal radiation-induced bronchial stricture. Three-year LC, RC, DMFS and DFS results for the group were similar to contemporary studies at 90%, 90%, 82% and 65%. CONCLUSIONS: Central location of ES-NSCLC is a well-established predictor for severe SBRT-related toxicity. Here we identify LGED as a significant predictor of poor overall survival and grade 5 pulmonary toxicity. The relatively high rates of severe treatment-related toxicity seen in patients with central ES-NSCLC may be due in part to LGED. Underlying LGED may cause irreparable damage to the lobar airway, unmitigated by SBRT treatment thus increasing the risk of severe treatment-related toxicity. These findings should be verified in larger data sets. Future prospective central ES-NSCLC clinical trials should require staging bronchoscopy to identify LGED and further assess its clinical significance.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The conventional management of a post-pneumonectomy (PPE) and post-lobectomy empyema (PLE) necessitates an open window, wound packing, frequent wound debridement, and prolonged hospitalization. We studied the feasibility of outpatient therapy in this patient population using the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy system. METHODS: From September 2005 to November 2007, six patients with PPE and PLE with or without a bronchopleural fistula underwent outpatient therapy using a VAC system. After debridement and closure of the bronchial fistula, a VAC system was applied and the patient was discharged. The patient returned for debridement under anesthesia and VAC replacement every 7-10 days. Once the pleural space was cleaned, the residual space was obliterated, and the wound was closed over suction catheters. Of the six patients, two developed recurrent infection after the closure that required repeated VAC dressings and flap closures. RESULTS: The outpatient use of the VAC system in patients with PPE and PLE avoided the need for any daily painful dressing changes and significantly decreased the total length of hospitalization and the time to closure of the empyema space, and thus increased the overall patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that outpatient VAC therapy of PPE and PLE is feasible and beneficial.
Asunto(s)
Empiema Pleural/cirugía , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas/instrumentación , Neumonectomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Adulto , Anciano , Empiema Pleural/etiología , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas/métodos , Pacientes Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Anastomotic leak is one of the most feared complications of esophagectomy, leading to prolonged hospital stay, increased postoperative mortality, and additional cost both to the patient and the hospital. Historically, anastomotic leaks have been treated with several techniques including conservative measures, percutaneous or operative drainage, primary surgical repair with buttressing, T-tube drainage, or excision of the esophageal replacement conduit with end esophagostomy. With advances in treatment modalities, including endoscopic stenting, clips and suturing, endoluminal vacuum-assisted closure (EVAC), such leaks increasingly are being managed without operative re-intervention and with salvage of the esophageal replacement conduit. For the purposes of this review, we identified studies analyzing the management of postoperative leak after esophagectomy. We then compared the efficacy of the various newer modalities for closure of anastomotic leaks and gastric conduit defects. We found both esophageal stent and EVAC sponges are effective treatments for closure of anastomotic leak. The chosen treatment modality for salvage of the esophageal replacement conduit is entirely dependent on the patient's clinical status and the surgeon's preference and experience. Emerging endoscopic and endoluminal therapies have increased the armamentarium of tools the esophageal surgeon has to facilitate successful resolution of anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy with reconstruction. While some literature suggests that EVACs have a slightly superior result in conduit success, we question this endorsement as EVACs mostly are utilized for contained leaks, many of which may have healed with conservative measures. This poses a challenge as there is clearly a bias given patient selection.
RESUMEN
In this paper, we report the first case of a robot-assisted thoracoscopic resection of intralobar sequestration. By virtue of greater dexterity and three-dimensional visualization, the da Vinci robot enables a safer, more precise dissection of sequestered tissue in the face of chronic inflammatory adhesions than conventional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery does. Thus, in expert hands, such robotic technology is likely to result in less bleeding complications and less conversions to open surgery in cases of sequestration.
Asunto(s)
Secuestro Broncopulmonar/cirugía , Robótica , Toracoscopía/métodos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study sought to evaluate the effect of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) density and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on the prognosis of esophageal cancer. METHODS: Banked tissue specimens from 53 patients who underwent esophagectomies for malignancy at a single institution over a 6-year period were stained for cluster of differentiation 3 (CD3), CD8, and PD-L1. Tumors were characterized as staining high or low density for CD3 and CD8, as well as positive or negative for PD-L1. TIL density and PD-L1 expression were analyzed in the context of survival, recurrence, and perioperative characteristics. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 823 days, with 92.5% survival and 26.8% recurrence rates. All tumors were adenocarcinomas. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given in 56.6% of cases, and neoadjuvant radiotherapy was given in 37.7%. High CD3 density was found in 83%, whereas high CD8 density was found in 56.6%. A total of 18.9% of the tumors stained positive for PD-L1. Survival was significantly shorter in Kaplan-Meier analysis for patients with primary tumors staining positive for PD-L1 (log rank: p = 0.05). Multivariable analysis controlling for neoadjuvant therapy, TIL markers, PD-L1, age, and sex found no significant difference in recurrence or survival. CONCLUSIONS: Positive staining for PD-L1 may be a prognostic marker for decreased survival in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Additional TIL cell types should be investigated for creation of an esophageal cancer Immunoscore. PD-L1 has potential as a therapeutic target.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/inmunología , Antígeno B7-H1/metabolismo , Neoplasias Esofágicas/inmunología , Inmunidad Celular/fisiología , Linfocitos Infiltrantes de Tumor/patología , Adenocarcinoma/metabolismo , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Anciano , Antígeno B7-H1/inmunología , Biomarcadores de Tumor/inmunología , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Neoplasias Esofágicas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Recuento de Linfocitos , Linfocitos Infiltrantes de Tumor/inmunología , Linfocitos Infiltrantes de Tumor/metabolismo , Masculino , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: During general thoracic surgery procedures, devices are often placed in the airway and oesophagus. This creates an opportunity for foreign body entrapment (FBE) during pulmonary and foregut surgery. Like retained foreign bodies (RFB), FBE is an entirely preventable event. Unlike RFB, there is minimal literature on FBE, thus little is known about its occurrence, risk factors, and prevention. METHODS: A survey was distributed to 215 surgeons of the General Thoracic Surgical Club. The survey included questions about socio-demographics, procedural volume, occurrence of FBE and factors leading to FBE. RESULTS: There were 110 responses (51%, 110/215). The majority of respondents worked in academic hospitals (75%, 82/110), in urban environments (63%, 69/110), and were male (85%, 94/110). One hundred and four respondents performed pulmonary resections and 92 performed foregut surgeries. In the pulmonary group, 40% (42/104) reported FBE with 67% (23/42) in open procedures. In the foregut group 38% (35/92) reported FBE with 69% (24/35) in open procedures. With both groups combined, 54.5% (60/110) of respondents reported FBE at least once and 29% (24/110) reported more than one FBE in their career. The most frequently reported contributing factor was communication errors between the surgical and anaesthesia teams. CONCLUSIONS: FBE during general thoracic procedures occurs in both minimally invasive and open pulmonary and foregut procedures. The greatest risk factor is communication error. Specific routine closed loop communication with the anaesthesia team prior to stapling/suturing the airway or oesophagus would minimize the risk of FBE.
Asunto(s)
Cuerpos Extraños , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Seguridad del Paciente , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Cuerpos Extraños/epidemiología , Cuerpos Extraños/prevención & control , Humanos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica/prevención & control , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this research is to compare liposomal bupivacaine and bupivacaine/epinephrine for intercostal blocks related to analgesic use and length of stay following video-assisted thoracoscopic wedge resection. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic wedge resection from 2010 to 2015 was performed. We selected patients who stayed longer than 24 h in hospital. Primary outcomes were length of stay and postoperative analgesic use at 12-h intervals from 24 to 72 h. RESULTS: Intercostal blocks were performed with liposomal bupivacaine in 62 patients and bupivacaine/epinephrine in 51 patients. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test evaluated differences in median postoperative analgesic use and length of stay. Those who received liposomal bupivacaine consumed fewer analgesics than those who received bupivacaine/epinephrine, with a statistically significant difference from 24 to 36 h (20.25 vs 45.0 mg; P = 0.0059) and from 60 to 72 h postoperatively (15.0 vs 33.75 mg; P = 0.0350). In patients who stayed longer than 72 h, the median cumulative analgesic consumption in those who received liposomal bupivacaine was statistically significantly lower than those who received bupivacaine/epinephrine (120.0 vs 296.5 mg; P = 0.0414). Median length of stay for the liposomal bupivacaine and bupivacaine/epinephrine groups were 45:05 h and 44:29 h, respectively. There were no adverse events related to blocks performed with liposomal bupivacaine. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic surgery patients who have blocks performed with liposomal bupivacaine require fewer analgesics postoperatively. This may decrease complications related to poor pain control and decrease side effects related to narcotic use in our patient population.
Asunto(s)
Bupivacaína/administración & dosificación , Epinefrina/administración & dosificación , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video/efectos adversos , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Liposomas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vasoconstrictores/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Although similar strategies are used in the management of PPE and PLE, these conditions need to be viewed as two separate entities. For the purpose of devising the appropriate management strategy, PPE should be divided into early and late, with and without mediastinal induration and extensive pleural space contamination. If at all possible, PLE should be managed as a postpneumonic empyema with prolonged chest tube drainage. The key to these conditions is prevention.
Asunto(s)
Empiema Pleural/etiología , Empiema Pleural/terapia , Neumonectomía/efectos adversos , Desbridamiento , Drenaje , Empiema Pleural/diagnóstico , Humanos , Cavidad Pleural/cirugía , ToracotomíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Little is known of the success rates of oral anticholinergics for the treatment of primary hyperhidrosis and facial blushing as alternatives to surgical intervention. We examine predictors of success with these medications. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed at a single institution, including all patients presenting with symptoms of primary hyperhidrosis, facial blushing, or both from 2004 to 2015. All patients were offered a trial of oral anticholinergics. If oral anticholinergic therapy was not successful, patients were offered surgery. Statistical analyses were performed to compare patients who declined surgery given the trial of oral anticholinergics with those who proceeded with surgery. RESULTS: A total of 381 patients presented with symptoms of primary hyperhidrosis (86.6%), facial blushing (2.4%), or both (11.0%). A total of 230 patients (60.4%) declined surgery after using oral anticholinergics, and 151 patients (39.6%) chose surgery. Patients who declined surgery were more likely to have symptoms of primary hyperhidrosis without facial blushing (89.6% vs 82.1%; P = .02) or have primary symptoms involving the axilla, torso, scalp, or groin. Patients who proceeded with surgery had higher rates of palmar symptoms as a primary site (77.6% vs 61.1%; P = .01) and were more likely to have facial blushing alone or in combination with primary hyperhidrosis. Presentation with palmar symptoms and greater number of prior therapy attempts were independent predictors of proceeding with surgery after controlling for concomitant symptom type and location (P = .01 and P < .0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients presenting with sympathetic overactivity decline surgery when a trial of oral anticholinergics is included in the treatment algorithm. Facial blushing and palmar symptoms were each associated with choosing surgery.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Colinérgicos/administración & dosificación , Rubor/tratamiento farmacológico , Glicopirrolato/administración & dosificación , Hiperhidrosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital , Sudoración/efectos de los fármacos , Sistema Nervioso Simpático/efectos de los fármacos , Administración Oral , Adulto , Algoritmos , Conducta de Elección , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/efectos adversos , Vías Clínicas , Femenino , Rubor/diagnóstico , Rubor/fisiopatología , Rubor/cirugía , Glicopirrolato/efectos adversos , Humanos , Hiperhidrosis/diagnóstico , Hiperhidrosis/fisiopatología , Hiperhidrosis/cirugía , Masculino , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sistema Nervioso Simpático/fisiopatología , Sistema Nervioso Simpático/cirugía , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The technique, safety, and oncologic efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy are controversial. Issues include operative time, lymph node yield, conversion to thoracotomy, resource utilization, recurrence, complications, and survival. METHODS: From January 1995 to December 2001, 179 patients underwent VATS lobectomy for preoperative stage I lung cancer (T1N0, 118 patients; T2N0, 61 patients). Mean age was 64.34 years (range, 38 to 87); 91 were female and 88 were male. Contraindications to VATS lobectomy included any suggestion of hilar, endobronchial, or central lesions. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy was performed using three ports, partial anatomic hilar dissection, and mediastinal node dissection. RESULTS: Distribution of lobectomies was as follows: left upper lobe, 50 patients; left lower lobe, 27 patients; right upper lobe, 33 patients; right upper and right middle lobe, 29 patients; right middle lobe, 9 patients; right lower lobe, 30 patients; right middle lobe and right lower lobe, 1 patient. Mean operative time was 75 +/- 6 minutes. Mean lymph node yield was 11 +/- 5 nodes. Pathologic upstaging was noted in 14 of the 179 patients (7.8%). Mean hospitalization was 4.1 days (range, 2 days to 4 months). There were no conversions to thoracotomy and there was 1 death (1 of 179, 0.05%). Complications included air leak in 24 of 179 (13.4%), subcutaneous emphysema in 4 of 179 (2.2%), pneumonia in 10 of 179 (5.6%), wound infection in 5 of 179 (2.8%), respiratory failure in 3 of 179 (1.7%), pulmonary embolism in 2 of 179 (1.1%), and myocardial infarction in 1 of 179 (0.5%). At a mean follow-up of 37 months, local recurrence rate was 0.013 per person per year. Actuarial recurrence-free survival was 88% and 85% at 36 and 60 months respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For carefully selected patients VATS lobectomy for early stage lung cancer is a safe and effective strategy. Long-term follow-up is required to fully evaluate recurrence and survival.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Neumonectomía/métodos , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) has not been widely used in esophageal cancer because of concerns about safety of dilatation, suitability of the stomach as an esophageal replacement, and potential for inoculation metastasis. METHODS: Experience with PEG in consecutive patients presenting with new esophageal cancer from March 1991 to March 2001 was reviewed retrospectively. PEG was planned in 119 of 179 (66%) of these patients excluding those presenting moribund and those for whom early resection was planned. The PEG was placed using an endoscopic method with wire-guided endoscopic bougienage or laser ablation or both as needed. Success of placement, requirement for dilatation and ablation, PEG-related complications, tolerance of enteral feeds, and impact on therapy were evaluated. RESULTS: PEG placement was possible in 87% of patients (103 of 119). Dilatation or laser ablation or both was required in 46% (47 of 103). There was no procedure-related mortality. Thirty-day mortality was 13.5%. Major PEG-related complications were observed in 4% (4 of 103) and minor PEG-related complications in 12% (12 of 103). PEG removal was required in 4 patients and interruption of enteral feeds required in 33 (32%). No instances of esophageal disruption or tumor inoculation metastasis were noted. PEG takedown and site closure at the time of operation was uncomplicated and use of the stomach as an esophageal substitute was possible in all 61 resected patients. Rates of anastomotic leak, stricture, and gastric emptying delay were similar to those for patients proceeding to resection without prior PEG (leak: PEG = 8% [5 of 61] versus non-PEG = 10.5% [2 of 19]), (stricture: PEG = 37% [22 of 61] versus non-PEG = 32.5% [6 of 19]), (delay: PEG = 9.8% [6 of 61] versus non-PEG = 10.5% [2 of 19]). Analysis of variables showed PEG to be significantly related to attainment of target doses of chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.034), and survival at 12 months (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: PEG in esophageal cancer is safe and useful and does not compromise the stomach or esophagogastric anastomosis. Further study is required to define the efficacy of PEG as a means of nutritional support and its impact on survival.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía/métodos , Gastrostomía/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Análisis de Varianza , Estudios de Cohortes , Nutrición Enteral/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Gastroscopía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in young adults has been controversial. Conventional treatment consisting of chest tube thoracostomy may be associated with morbidity at the time of tube insertion, prolonged hospitalization, and interval operation in many patients. As spontaneous pneumothorax in young adults is usually associated with apical blebs, we hypothesized that video-assisted thoracic surgical (VATS) resection of the blebs at the time of the first pneumothorax may be an effective treatment associated with low morbidity and short hospital stays. METHODS: From July 1992 to February 2001, 156 young adults were treated for spontaneous pneumothorax. Within 12 hours of presentation to the emergency department patients underwent semielective VATS with bleb resection and pleuradesis. During follow-up patients were observed for recurrent pneumothorax. RESULTS: There were 69 men (44%) and 87 women (56%). The median age was 19 years old (range 14 to 38 years old). Patients were predominantly tall and thin. Patients were mildly symptomatic at the time of presentation. Apical blebs were seen in all patients and the presence of blebs was confirmed in the pathologic specimen. In 23 patients bleeding was associated with bleb rupture. There were no postoperative air leaks. The mean hospital stay was 2.4 +/- 0.5 days. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 96 months (median 62 months). There were no recurrences on the index side. CONCLUSIONS: VATS resection of apical blebs is associated with low morbidity and short hospitalization and provides an attractive alternative to the conventional treatment of initial tube thoracostomy and possible interval repeat thoracostomy or operation. VATS may be an effective first line treatment for spontaneous pneumothorax in young adults. Due to the pathophysiology of this disease, patients should be closely followed for the occurrence of pneumothorax on the contralateral side.
Asunto(s)
Neumotórax/diagnóstico , Neumotórax/cirugía , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The surgical management of hyperhidrosis is controversial. Robotic surgical systems with their high-definition magnified 3-dimensional view and increased maneuverability in a confined space may facilitate the technique of selective sympathectomy (ramicotomy). We present a case series of patients undergoing selective postganglionic thoracic sympathectomy using robotic technology. METHODS: This study is a case series analysis of patients who underwent selective postganglionic thoracic sympathectomy from July 2006 to November 2011. The operation was performed on a video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) platform. The robot was used for pleural dissection and division of the postganglionic sympathetic fibers and the communicating rami. The success of sympathectomy was assessed by intraoperative temperature measurement of the ipsilateral upper extremity, patient interviews, and scoring of the symptomatic nature of hyperhidrosis based on the Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale. RESULTS: There were 110 sympathectomies performed in 55 patients (25 men, 30 women). Simultaneous bilateral sympathectomy was performed in all patients. Median age was 28 years (range, 16 to 65 years). There was no conversion to thoracotomy. Complications were minor and were seen in 5 of 55 patients (9%). There were no deaths. Median hospital stay was 1 day (range, 1 to 4 days). Of the 55 patients, 53 (96%) had sustained relief of their hyperhidrosis at a median follow-up of 24 months (range, 3 to 36 months), and compensatory sweating was seen in 4 patients (7.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Robotic thoracoscopic selective sympathectomy is an effective, feasible, and safe procedure with excellent relief of hyperhidrosis and low rates of compensatory sweating and complications.