Selective opportunistic screening for hypercholesterolemia in primary care practice.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the performance of selective opportunistic screening in a primary care group practice. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of coronary heart disease risk factors and retrospective chart audit of cholesterol testing. SETTING: Capitation-funded primary care group practice in Ontario, Canada. SUBJECTS: 7785 enrolled patients between the ages of 20 and 69 years. INTERVENTION: Protocol-based selective opportunistic screening program for hypercholesterolemia of 45 months duration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Targeting (proportion of screening tests that were appropriate), coverage (proportion of those meeting screening criteria who had a screening test performed), over-screening (proportion of those not meeting screening criteria who had a screening test performed), and screening ratio (likelihood that a screening test was performed on an individual who met screening criteria rather than one who failed to meet screening criteria). RESULTS: 64.7% of patients tested met the practice criteria for screening. 37.7% of patients who met the practice screening criteria were tested and 24.9% of those not meeting practice screening criteria had a cholesterol test performed. The screening ratio was 1.52. CONCLUSION: Our findings bring into question the effectiveness of opportunistic approaches to preventive care.

Casting the screening net: separating big fish from little fish.

Screening tests are a rapidly growing part of medical practice. If we are going to make the best use of resources, screening tests need to be considered in terms of effectiveness, efficiency and equity. We present a framework as a way to think about screening programmes. The framework expands on existing literature that recognizes two categories of screening: universal and opportunistic. By adding the dimension of 'selectivity', we identify four categories of screening: active non-selective (universal or mass screening), active selective, opportunistic non-selective and opportunistic selective. We illustrate the framework by categorizing screening recommendations for high serum cholesterol levels. We conclude there is no one ideal strategy for screening that simultaneously satisfies criteria of effectiveness, efficiency and equity. However, our framework allows a systematic consideration and balancing of these objectives in the development and assessment of screening programs. In this way, it may assist decision-makers by making this trade-off more explicit.

Screening for hypercholesterolaemia in primary care: randomised controlled trial of postal questionnaire appraising risk of coronary heart disease.

OBJECTIVES: To validate a self administered postal questionnaire appraising risk of coronary heart disease. To determine whether use of this questionnaire increased the percentage of people at high risk of coronary heart disease and decreased the percentage of people at low risk who had their cholesterol concentration measured. DESIGN: Validation was by review of medical records and clinical assessment. The questionnaire appraising risk of coronary heart disease encouraged those meeting criteria for cholesterol measurement to have a cholesterol test and was tested in a randomised controlled trial. The intervention group was sent the risk appraisal questionnaire with a health questionnaire that determined risk of coronary heart disease without identifying the risk factors as related to coronary heart disease; the control group was sent the health questionnaire alone. SETTING: One capitation funded primary care practice in Canada with an enrolled patient population of about 12 000. SUBJECTS: Random sample of 100 participants in the intervention and control groups were included in the validation exercise. 5686 contactable patients aged 20 to 69 years who on the basis of practice records had not had a cholesterol test performed during the preceding 5 years were included in the randomised controlled trial. 2837 were in the intervention group and 2849 were in the control group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity and specificity of assessment of risk of coronary heart disease with risk appraisal questionnaire. Rate of cholesterol testing during three months of follow up. RESULTS: Sensitivity of questionnaire appraising coronary risk was 87.5% (95% confidence interval 73.2% to 95.8%) and specificity 91.7% (81.6% to 97.2%). Of the patients without pre-existing coronary heart disease who met predefined screening criteria based on risk, 45 out of 421 in the intervention group (10.7%) and 9 out of 504 in the control group (1.8%) had a cholesterol test performed during follow up (P<0.0001). Of the patients without a history of coronary heart disease who did not meet criteria for cholesterol testing, 30 out of 1128 in the intervention group (2.7%) and 18 out of 1099 in the control group (1.6%) had a cholesterol test (P=0.175). Of the patients with pre-existing coronary heart disease, 1 out of 15 in the intervention group (6.7%) and 1 out of 23 in the control group (4.3%) were tested during follow up (P=0.851, one tailed Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSIONS: Although the questionnaire appraising coronary risk increased the percentage of people at high risk who obtained cholesterol testing, the effect was small. Most patients at risk who received the questionnaire did not respond by having a test.

Role of lipoxygenase metabolism in platelet function: effect of aspirin and salicylate.

Aspirin inhibits thromboxane A2 (TxA2) production whereas its salicylate moiety inhibits 12-hydroxy-eicosatetraenoic acid (12-HETE) production in the platelet. The significance of the latter effect on platelet function is unclear. We examined the effects of aspirin and salicylate on (i) platelet/collagen adhesion using 3H-adenine-labelled human platelets and collagen-coated discs, (ii) platelet aggregation induced by thrombin, collagen, ADP and arachidonic acid, and (iii) platelet TxA2 and 12-HETE synthesis as measured by radioimmunoassay and high pressure liquid chromatography respectively. Aspirin (50 uM) decreased platelet aggregation and increased platelet adhesion. The decrease in aggregation was associated with inhibition of TxA2 production and the increase in adhesion was associated with enhanced 12-HETE production. Salicylate had the opposite effects. Platelet aggregation was increased and platelet adhesion decreased. The increased aggregation was associated with enhanced TxA2 production and the decrease in aggregation was associated with inhibition of 12-HETE production. These observations suggest that 12-HETE facilitates platelet adhesion which can be altered by salicylate treatment.