Developing the Aesthetic Postoperative Complication Score (APeCS) for Detecting Major Morbidity in Facial Aesthetic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Facial aesthetic surgery encompasses a variety of procedures with complication rates that are difficult to estimate due to a lack of published data. OBJECTIVES: We sought to estimate major complication rates in patients undergoing facial aesthetic procedures and develop a risk assessment tool to stratify patients. METHODS: We utilized the Tracking Operation and Outcomes for Plastic Surgeons (TOPS) database from 2003-2018. The analytic database included major facial aesthetic procedures. Univariate analysis and a backward stepwise multivariate regression model identified risk factors for major complications. Regression coefficients were utilized to create the score. Performance robustness was measured with area under receiver operating characteristic curves and sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: A total of 38,569 patients were identified. The major complication rate was 1.2% (460). The regression model identified risk factors including over 3 concomitant surgeries, BMI ≥25, ASA class ≥2, current or former smoker status, and age ≥45 as the variables fit for risk prediction (n = 13,004; area under curve: 0.68, standard error: 0.013, [0.62-0.67]). Each of the 5 variables counted for 1 point, except over 3 concomitant surgeries counting for 2, giving a score range from 0 to 6. Sensitivity analysis showed the cutoff point of ≥3 to best balance sensitivity and specificity, 58% and 66%, respectively. At this cutoff, 65% of cases were correctly classified as having a major complication. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an acceptable risk prediction score with a cutoff value of ≥3 associated with correctly classifying approximately 65% of those at risk for major morbidity when undergoing face and neck aesthetic surgery.

Virtual Reality Planning in Reconstructive Surgery for Orbital Prosthetic Rehabilitation Using ImmersiveTouch Platform: Preliminary Report.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Virtual reality (VR) is emerging as an effective and intuitive surgical planning and 3D visualization tool. Digital surgical planning is the gold standard for planning the placement of implants in maxillofacial prosthetics, but the field lacks a platform exclusively designed to perform the task. Virtual reality planning (VRP) specific for maxillofacial prosthetics offers the clinician improved control of the presurgical planning and the potential to limit the need to adapt other advanced segmentation software. Furthermore, the virtual plan can be directly translated to the patient through custom 3D printed (3DP) surgical guides and visual aids. To the best of our knowledge, this article outlines the development of the world's first virtual reality planning platform and workflow for pre-operatory planning within a VR environment for clinical use specific to facial prosthetics and anaplastology. METHOD: The workflow was applied to managing 2 patients presenting with unilateral total exenteration and severe contracture enucleation, respectively (n=2). A cone-beam CT was acquired for each patient, and their data set was directly imported into the ImmersiveView Surgical Plan VR environment (ImmersiveTouch Inc, Chicago, IL). The clinicians virtually selected appropriately sized craniofacial implants and placed the implants in the desired orientation. Various measurement tools are available to aid in clinical decision-making. The ideal location of craniofacial implants was set according to an orbital and auricular prosthetic reconstruction. The resultant VR plan was exported for 3DP. The patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using the proposed VRP treatment. The workflow's data accuracy was validated postoperatively by comparing posterative CT data and the proposed VRP. Analysis was performed using Mimics software (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). RESULT: It takes, on average, 10 minutes to place 4 implants in the virtual reality space. The 3DP files resulting from VRP take ~2 hours to print and are constructed with a biocompatible resin appropriate for clinical use as surgical guides. Our user-friendly VRP workflow allows for an accurate simulation of surgical and nonsurgical procedures with an average displacement in XYZ of 0.6 mm and an SD of 0.3 mm. In addition, VRP is an excellent tool to simulate the craniofacial placement procedure and improves unsupervised self-learning teaching. CONCLUSION: VRP is an exciting tool for training clinicians and students in complex surgical procedures. This study shows the promising applicability and efficiency of VR in clinical planning and management of facial rehabilitation. Patients allowed to interact with VR have been engaged, which would aid their treatment acceptance and patient education. A valuable advantage of surgical simulation is the reduced costs associated with renting instruments, buying implant dummies, and surgical hardware. The authors will explore VR to plan and treat surgical and nonsurgical reconstructive procedures and improve soft tissue manipulation. This study outlines the development of an original platform and workflow for segmentation, preoperative planning, and digital design within a VR environment and the clinical use in reconstructive surgery and anaplastology.

Comparison of Collagen and Human Amniotic Membrane Nerve Wraps and Conduits for Peripheral Nerve Repair in Preclinical Models: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Collagen and human amniotic membrane (hAM) are Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved biomaterials that can be used as nerve wraps or conduits for repair of peripheral nerve injuries. Both biomaterials have been shown to reduce scarring and fibrosis of injured peripheral nerves. However, comparative advantages and disadvantages have not been definitively shown in the literature. The purpose of this systematic review is to comprehensively evaluate the literature regarding the roles of hAM and collagen nerve wraps and conduits on peripheral nerve regeneration in preclinical models. METHODS: The MEDLINE database was queried using the PubMed search engine on July 7, 2019, with the following search strategy: ("amniotic membrane" OR "amnion") OR ("collagen conduit" OR "nerve wrap")] AND "nerve." All resulting articles were screened by two independent reviewers. Nerve type, lesion type/injury model, repair type, treatment, and outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-eight articles were identified, and 44 studies remained after application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Seventeen studies utilized hAM, whereas 27 studies utilized collagen wraps or conduits. Twenty-three (85%) of the collagen studies utilized conduits, and four (15%) utilized wraps. Six (35%) of the hAM studies utilized conduits and 11 (65%) utilized wraps. Two (9%) collagen studies involving a conduit and one (25%) involving a wrap demonstrated at least one significant improvement in outcomes compared with a control. While none of the hAM conduit studies showed significant improvements, eight (73%) of the studies investigating hAM wraps showed at least one significant improvement in outcomes. CONCLUSION: The majority of studies reported positive outcomes, indicating that collagen and hAM nerve wraps and conduits both have the potential to enhance peripheral nerve regeneration. However, relatively few studies reported significant findings, except for studies evaluating hAM wraps. Preclinical models may help guide clinical practice regarding applications of these biomaterials in peripheral nerve repair.

Outcomes of perineal wound closure techniques after abdominoperineal resections in rectal cancer: an NSQIP propensity score matched study.

Perineal defects following abdominoperineal resections (APRs) for rectal cancer may require myocutaneous or omental flaps depending upon anatomic, clinical and oncologic variables. However, studies comparing their efficacy have shown contradictory results. We aim to compare postoperative complication rates of APR closure techniques in rectal cancer using propensity score-matching. The American College of Surgeons Proctectomy Targeted Data File was queried from 2016 to 2019. The study population was defined using CPT and ICD-10 codes for patients with rectal cancer undergoing APR, stratified by repair technique. Perioperative demographic and oncologic variables were controlled for by propensity-score matching. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed for wound and major complications (MCs). Of the 3291 patients included in the study, 85% underwent primary closure (PC), 8.3% rectus abdominis myocutaneous (RAM) flap, 4.9% pedicled omental flap with PC, and 1.9% lower extremity (LE) flap repair. Primary closure rates were significantly higher for patients with stage T1 and T2 tumors (p < 0.001). RAM and LE flaps were most used with multi-organ resections, 24% and 25%, respectively (p < 0.001). Similarly, cases with T4 tumors used these flaps more frequently, 30% and 40%, respectively (p < 0.001). After propensity score matching for comorbidities and oncologic variables, there was no significant difference in 30-day postoperative wound or MC rates between perineal closure techniques. The complication rates of the different closure techniques are comparable when tumor stage is considered. Therefore, tumor staging and concurrent procedures should guide clinical decision making regarding the appropriate use of each technique.

Comparison of Perineal Closure Techniques after Abdominoperineal Resections for Carcinoma of the Anus.

BACKGROUND: Perineal reconstruction following salvage APR's for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) are scant with conflicting results from large and single center studies. We analyzed these techniques taking into account sociodemographic and oncologic variables. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study from 2016-2019 using a targeted ACS/NSQIP database stratified into primary closure (PC), abdominal myocutaneous (AM), lower extremity (LE), and omental pedicled (OP) flaps. We analyzed major and wound complications through univariate and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 766 patients were analyzed, 512 (67%) had PC, 196 (25%) AM, 36 (5%) OP and 22 (3%) LE. Rates of chemotherapy and radiation within 90 days were similar between the groups. Having 2 or more additional organs resected was more common for the AM group (AM 4.1%, PC 1.6%, OP 3.3%, LE 0%). Overall, major complication rate was 41% (n = 324). Primary closure had 35.0%, OP 47.2%, AM 52.6%, and LE 45.5%. Wound complication rate was highest in AM with 11.7%, followed by OP 8.3%, PC 5.9%, and LE 0%. The multivariate regression analysis demonstrated none of the closure techniques to be associated with increasing or decreasing the probability of having a major or wound complication. Morbidity probability was the sole predictor of major complication (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.04-1.1). CONCLUSIONS: Myocutaneous and omental flaps are associated with comparable wound and major complications when taking into account the baseline, oncologic and perioperative variables that drive the clinical decision making when selecting a perineal reconstruction.

Comparison of human amniotic membrane and collagen nerve wraps around sciatic nerve reverse autografts in a rat model.

Human amniotic membrane (hAM) and collagen nerve wraps are biomaterials that have been investigated as therapies for improving outcomes of peripheral nerve regeneration; however, their efficacy has not been compared. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of collagen and human amniotic membrane nerve wraps in a rodent sciatic nerve reverse autograft model. Lewis rats (n = 29) underwent sciatic nerve injury and repair in which a 10-mm gap was bridged with reverse autograft combined with either no nerve wrap (control), collagen nerve wrap or hAM nerve wrap. Behavioral analyses were performed at baseline and 4, 8 and 12 weeks. Electrophysiological studies were conducted at 8, 10 and 12 weeks. Additional outcomes assessed included gastrocnemius muscle weights, nerve adhesions, axonal regeneration and scarring at 12 weeks. Application of both collagen and hAM nerve wraps resulted in improvement of functional and histologic outcomes when compared with controls, with a greater magnitude of improvement for the experimental group treated with hAM nerve wraps. hAM-treated animals had significantly higher numbers of axons compared to control animals (p < 0.05) and significantly less perineural fibrosis than both control and collagen treated nerves (p < 0.05). The ratio of experimental to control gastrocnemius weights was significantly greater in hAM compared to control samples (p < 0.05). We conclude that hAM nerve wraps are a promising biomaterial that is effective for improving outcomes of peripheral nerve regeneration, resulting in superior nerve regeneration and functional recovery compared to collagen nerve wraps and controls.