Obliterative bronchiolitis in fibreglass workers: a new occupational disease?

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Obliterative bronchiolitis (OB) is a rare disease with a small number of established occupational aetiologies. We describe a case series of severe OB in workers making glass-reinforced plastics. METHODS: Workplace exposures were the likely cause after the independent diagnosis of OB in two workers laying up the fibreglass hulls of yachts; the second worker took over the job of the first after he left following a lung transplant. Presentation of these two cases at international meetings led to others identifying similar workers. MAIN RESULTS: We identified six workers with good evidence of OB. All were involved in preparing fibreglass with styrene resins, five as boat builders laying up fibreglass hulls and one during cooling-tower fabrication. The disease came on rapidly without unusual acute exposures. Two patients had lung transplants, while another died while waiting for one. Histology confirmed OB in the four with biopsies/post-mortem examinations or explanted lungs. CONCLUSIONS: A rare, potentially fatal disease occurring in six workers laying up fibreglass with styrene resins from five different worksites suggests that work exposures were the cause of their OB. The precise agent responsible awaits identification.

Diffuse pleural fibrosis--an unreliable indicator of heavy asbestos exposure?

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed at testing the hypothesis that diffuse pleural fibrosis is associated with a heavier exposure to asbestos than that of benign pleural plaques, and hence diffuse pleural fibrosis can be used as a marker of heavy exposure. METHODS: Asbestos burden was estimated for 192 naval dockyard workers (96 with diffuse pleural fibrosis, 96 with plaques) by calculating the exposure ratings from the trade and the years spent in that trade. In 53 cases the diffuse pleural fibrosis was bilateral. RESULTS: No difference was found in the mean estimated asbestos burden between all diffuse pleural fibrosis and plaques, nor between plaques and unilateral and bilateral diffuse pleural fibrosis, analyzed separately by a one-factor analysis of variance. The mean asbestos burden was significantly greater for bilateral than for unilateral diffuse pleural fibrosis. A wide spread of asbestos exposure was noted among the men with diffuse pleural fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Diffuse pleural fibrosis may arise after widely varying exposure to asbestos. The mean exposure ratings for diffuse pleural fibrosis do not differ from those for pleural plaques, although the ratings are significantly higher for men with bilateral diffuse pleural fibrosis than for those with unilateral diffuse pleural fibrosis. Diffuse pleural fibrosis cannot be used as a reliable marker of heavy asbestos exposure.