Structural and functional connectivity in hydrocephalus: a scoping review.

Optimizing the treatment of hydrocephalus remains a major challenge in adult and pediatric neurosurgery. Currently, clinical treatment relies heavily on anatomic imaging of ventricular size and clinical presentation. The emergence of functional and structural brain connectivity imaging has provided the basis for a new paradigm in the management of hydrocephalus. Here we review the pertinent advances in this field. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines for scoping reviews, we searched PubMed for relevant literature from 1994 to April 2023 using hydrocephalus and MRI-related terms. Included articles reported original MRI data on human subjects with hydrocephalus, while excluding non-English or pre-1994 publications that didn't match the study framework. The review identified 44 studies that investigated functional and/or structural connectivity using various MRI techniques across different hydrocephalus populations. While there is significant heterogeneity in imaging technology and connectivity analysis, there is broad consensus in the literature that 1) hydrocephalus is associated with disruption of functional and structural connectivity, 2) this disruption in cerebral connectivity can be further associated with neurologic compromise 3) timely treatment of hydrocephalus restores both cerebral connectivity and neurologic compromise. The robustness and consistency of these findings vary as a function of patient age, hydrocephalus etiology, and the connectivity region of interest studied. Functional and structural brain connectivity imaging shows potential as an imaging biomarker that may facilitate optimization of hydrocephalus treatment. Future research should focus on standardizing regions of interest as well as identifying connectivity analysis most pertinent to clinical outcome.

Neural signal data collection and analysis of Percept™ PC BrainSense recordings for thalamic stimulation in epilepsy.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) using Medtronic's Percept™ PC implantable pulse generator is FDA-approved for treating Parkinson's disease (PD), essential tremor, dystonia, obsessive compulsive disorder, and epilepsy. Percept™ PC enables simultaneous recording of neural signals from the same lead used for stimulation. Many Percept™ PC sensing features were built with PD patients in mind, but these features are potentially useful to refine therapies for many different disease processes. When starting our ongoing epilepsy research study, we found it difficult to find detailed descriptions about these features and have compiled information from multiple sources to understand it as a tool, particularly for use in patients other than those with PD. Here we provide a tutorial for scientists and physicians interested in using Percept™ PC's features and provide examples of how neural time series data is often represented and saved. We address characteristics of the recorded signals and discuss Percept™ PC hardware and software capabilities in data pre-processing, signal filtering, and DBS lead performance. We explain the power spectrum of the data and how it is shaped by the filter response of Percept™ PC as well as the aliasing of the stimulation due to digitally sampling the data. We present Percept™ PC's ability to extract biomarkers that may be used to optimize stimulation therapy. We show how differences in lead type affects noise characteristics of the implanted leads from seven epilepsy patients enrolled in our clinical trial. Percept™ PC has sufficient signal-to-noise ratio, sampling capabilities, and stimulus artifact rejection for neural activity recording. Limitations in sampling rate, potential artifacts during stimulation, and shortening of battery life when monitoring neural activity at home were observed. Despite these limitations, Percept™ PC demonstrates potential as a useful tool for recording neural activity in order to optimize stimulation therapies to personalize treatment.

Implantation accuracy of novel polyimide stereotactic electroencephalographic depth electrodes-a human cadaveric study.

Introduction: Stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) is a minimally invasive procedure that uses depth electrodes stereotactically implanted into brain structures to map the origin and propagation of seizures in epileptic patients. Implantation accuracy of sEEG electrodes plays a critical role in the safety and efficacy of the procedure. This study used human cadaver heads, simulating clinical practice, to evaluate (1) neurosurgeon's ability to implant a new thin-film polyimide sEEG electrode according to the instructions for use (IFU), and (2) implantation accuracy. Methods: Four neurosurgeons (users) implanted 24 sEEG electrodes into two cadaver heads with the aid of the ROSA robotic system. Usability was evaluated using a questionnaire that assessed completion of all procedure steps per IFU and user errors. For implantation accuracy evaluation, planned electrode trajectories were compared with post-implantation trajectories after fusion of pre- and postoperative computer tomography (CT) images. Implantation accuracy was quantified using the Euclidean distance for entry point error (EPE) and target point error (TPE). Results: All sEEG electrodes were successfully placed following the IFU without user errors, and post-implant survey of users showed favorable handling characteristics. The EPE was 1.28 ± 0.86 mm and TPE was 1.61 ± 0.89 mm. Long trajectories (>50 mm) had significantly larger EPEs and TPEs than short trajectories (<50 mm), and no differences were found between orthogonal and oblique trajectories. Accuracies were similar or superior to those reported in the literature when using similar experimental conditions, and in the same range as those reported in patients. Discussion: The results demonstrate that newly developed polyimide sEEG electrodes can be implanted as accurately as similar devices in the marker without user errors when following the IFU in a simulated clinical environment. The human cadaver ex-vivo test system provided a realistic test system, owing to the size, anatomy and similarity of tissue composition to that of the live human brain.

Utilizing kinematic analysis of postural instability as an objective measure to aid in distinguishing between normal pressure hydrocephalus and Parkinson's disease.

Objective: Patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) and Parkinson's Disease (PD) can clinically appear quite similar at baseline evaluation. We sought to investigate the use of kinematic assessment of postural instability (PI) using inertial measurement units (IMUs) as a mechanism of differentiation between the two disease processes. Methods: 20 patients with NPH, 55 patients with PD, and 56 age-matched, healthy controls underwent quantitative pull test examinations while wearing IMUs at baseline. Center of mass and foot position data were used to compare velocity and acceleration profiles, pull test step length, and reaction times between groups and as a function of Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale Pull Test (UPDRSPT) score. Results: Overall, the reactive postural response of NPH patients was characterized by slower reaction times and smaller steps compared to both PD patients and healthy controls. However, when patients were grouped by UPDRSPT scores, no reliable objective difference between groups was detected. Conclusion: At their initial evaluation, very few NPH patients demonstrate "normal" or "mild" PI as they appear to be older upon presentation compared to PD patients. As a result, kinematic assessment utilizing IMUs may not be helpful for differentiating between NPH and PD as a function of UPDRSPT score, but rather as a more fine-tuned method to define disease progression. We emphasize the need for further evaluation of incorporating objective kinematic data collection as a way to evaluate PI and improve patient outcomes.

DiMANI: diffusion MRI for anatomical nuclei imaging-Application for the direct visualization of thalamic subnuclei.

The thalamus is a centrally located and heterogeneous brain structure that plays a critical role in various sensory, motor, and cognitive processes. However, visualizing the individual subnuclei of the thalamus using conventional MRI techniques is challenging. This difficulty has posed obstacles in targeting specific subnuclei for clinical interventions such as deep brain stimulation (DBS). In this paper, we present DiMANI, a novel method for directly visualizing the thalamic subnuclei using diffusion MRI (dMRI). The DiMANI contrast is computed by averaging, voxelwise, diffusion-weighted volumes enabling the direct distinction of thalamic subnuclei in individuals. We evaluated the reproducibility of DiMANI through multiple approaches. First, we utilized a unique dataset comprising 8 scans of a single participant collected over a 3-year period. Secondly, we quantitatively assessed manual segmentations of thalamic subnuclei for both intra-rater and inter-rater reliability. Thirdly, we qualitatively correlated DiMANI imaging data from several patients with Essential Tremor with the localization of implanted DBS electrodes and clinical observations. Lastly, we demonstrated that DiMANI can provide similar features at 3T and 7T MRI, using varying numbers of diffusion directions. Our results establish that DiMANI is a reproducible and clinically relevant method to directly visualize thalamic subnuclei. This has significant implications for the development of new DBS targets and the optimization of DBS therapy.

Assessing expert reliability in determining intracranial EEG channel quality and introducing the automated bad channel detection algorithm.

Objective.To evaluate the inter- and intra-rater reliability for the identification of bad channels among neurologists, EEG Technologists, and naïve research personnel, and to compare their performance with the automated bad channel detection (ABCD) algorithm for detecting bad channels.Approach.Six Neurologists, ten EEG Technologists, and six naïve research personnel (22 raters in total) were asked to rate 1440 real intracranial EEG channels as good or bad. Intra- and interrater kappa statistics were calculated for each group. We then compared each group to the ABCD algorithm which uses spectral and temporal domain features to classify channels as good or bad.Main results.Analysis of channel ratings from our participants revealed variable intra-rater reliability within each group, with no significant differences across groups. Inter-rater reliability was moderate among neurologists and EEG Technologists but minimal among naïve participants. Neurologists demonstrated a slightly higher consistency in ratings than EEG Technologists. Both groups occasionally misclassified flat channels as good, and participants generally focused on low-frequency content for their assessments. The ABCD algorithm, in contrast, relied more on high-frequency content. A logistic regression model showed a linear relationship between the algorithm's ratings and user responses for predominantly good channels, but less so for channels rated as bad. Sensitivity and specificity analyses further highlighted differences in rating patterns among the groups, with neurologists showing higher sensitivity and naïve personnel higher specificity.Significance.Our study reveals the bias in human assessments of intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) data quality and the tendency of even experienced professionals to overlook certain bad channels, highlighting the need for standardized, unbiased methods. The ABCD algorithm, outperforming human raters, suggests the potential of automated solutions for more reliable iEEG interpretation and seizure characterization, offering a reliable approach free from human biases.

Alzheimer's disease CSF biomarkers correlate with early pathology and alterations in neuronal and glial gene expression.

INTRODUCTION: Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) patients undergoing cortical shunting frequently show early AD pathology on cortical biopsy, which is predictive of progression to clinical AD. The objective of this study was to use samples from this cohort to identify CSF biomarkers for AD-related CNS pathophysiologic changes using tissue and fluids with early pathology, free of post-mortem artifact. METHODS: We analyzed Simoa, proteomic, and metabolomic CSF data from 81 patients with previously documented pathologic and transcriptomic changes. RESULTS: AD pathology on biopsy correlates with CSF ß-amyloid-40/42, neurofilament light chain (NfL), and phospho-tau-181(p-tau181)/ß-amyloid-42, while several gene expression modules correlate with NfL. Proteomic analysis highlights 7 core proteins that correlate with pathology and gene expression changes on biopsy, and metabolomic analysis of CSF identifies disease-relevant groups that correlate with biopsy data.. DISCUSSION: As additional biomarkers are added to AD diagnostic panels, our work provides insight into the CNS pathophysiology these markers are tracking.