(VISIION-S): Viz.ai Implementation of Stroke augmented Intelligence and communications platform to improve Indicators and Outcomes for a comprehensive stroke center and Network - Sustainability.

OBJECTIVES: As Comprehensive Stroke Centers (CSCs) strive to improve neuro-intervention (NIR) times, process improvements are put in place to streamline workflows. Our prior publication (VISIION) demonstrated improvements in key performance indicators (KPIs). The purpose VISIION-S was to analyze whether those results were sustainable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive Direct Arriving LVO (DALVO) and telemedicine transfer LVO (BEMI) stroke NIR cases were assessed, including subgroups of DALVO-OnHours, DALVO-OffHours, BEMI-OnHours, and BEMI-OffHours. We analyzed times for the original 6 months pre (6/10/20-1/15/21) and compared them to a 17 month post-implementation period (1/16/21- 6/25/22) to evaluate for sustainability. Mann-Whitney U was utilized. RESULTS: 150 NIR cases were analyzed pre (n = 47) v. post (n = 103) implementation (DALVO-OnHours 7 v. 20, DALVO-OffHours 10 v. 25, BEMI-OnHours 13 v. 20, BEMI-OffHours 17 v. 38). For Door-to-groin (DTG), improvement was noted for DALVO-OffHours 39%(157 min,96 min;p < 0.001), DALVO-ALL 25%(127 min,95 min;p = 0.006), BEMI-OffHours 46%(45 min,25 min;p = 0.023), and BEMI-ALL 40%(42 min,25 min;p = 0.005). Activation-to-groin (ATG), door-to-device (DTD), and door-to-recanalization (DTR) also showed statistical improvements. For DALVO-OffHours, there were reductions in door to CT (DTC) 80%(26 min,5 min;p < 0.001), ATG 32%(90 min,61 min;p = 0.036), DTG 39%(157 min,96 min;p < 0.001), DTD 31%(178 min,123 min;p = 0.002), and DTR 32%(197 min,135 min;p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: We noted sustainability over a 17 month period with sustained reduction in KPIs for even more NIR time interval comparisons. In the greatest opportunity subgroup (DALVO-OffHours), we noted a reduction in all 5 time interval metrics. Our sustainability finding is important to show that process improvements continued even after the immediate period, adding credibility to the results. Models such as this could be useful for other centers striving to optimize workflow and improve times.

Call to Action: SARS-CoV-2 and CerebrovAscular DisordErs (CASCADE).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2), now named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), may change the risk of stroke through an enhanced systemic inflammatory response, hypercoagulable state, and endothelial damage in the cerebrovascular system. Moreover, due to the current pandemic, some countries have prioritized health resources towards COVID-19 management, making it more challenging to appropriately care for other potentially disabling and fatal diseases such as stroke. The aim of this study is to identify and describe changes in stroke epidemiological trends before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This is an international, multicenter, hospital-based study on stroke incidence and outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. We will describe patterns in stroke management, stroke hospitalization rate, and stroke severity, subtype (ischemic/hemorrhagic), and outcomes (including in-hospital mortality) in 2020 during COVID-19 pandemic, comparing them with the corresponding data from 2018 and 2019, and subsequently 2021. We will also use an interrupted time series (ITS) analysis to assess the change in stroke hospitalization rates before, during, and after COVID-19, in each participating center. CONCLUSION: The proposed study will potentially enable us to better understand the changes in stroke care protocols, differential hospitalization rate, and severity of stroke, as it pertains to the COVID-19 pandemic. Ultimately, this will help guide clinical-based policies surrounding COVID-19 and other similar global pandemics to ensure that management of cerebrovascular comorbidity is appropriately prioritized during the global crisis. It will also guide public health guidelines for at-risk populations to reduce risks of complications from such comorbidities.

Accuracy of Stroke Diagnosis in Telestroke-Guided Tissue Plasminogen Activator Patients.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study is to assess the accuracy of final diagnosis in telestroke-guided tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) patients compared with bedside evaluation using computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a surrogate for final stroke diagnosis. The overall goal was to determine if telestroke had similar diagnostic accuracy as bedside evaluations in diagnosing rt-PA-treated patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed all acute stroke code calls who received intravenous rt-PA at our center from October 2013 to June 2015. Calls were grouped into patients who were initially evaluated by telestroke at a spoke partner site (spoke) and patients evaluated in person at the hub. Patients receiving additional neurointervention were excluded to avoid confounding. Relevant variables included severity of stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS]), rt-PA times, presence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and primary outcome of CT or MRI evidence of stroke after rt-PA administration. Post-rt-PA imaging used included CT or MRI within 72 hours after treatment. RESULTS: Overall, 80 patients received intravenous rt-PA (spoke [n = 23] and hub [n = 57]). There was no difference in mean NIHSS score prior to treatment (10.3 ± 9.2 and 9.8 ± 8.4; P = .936), "onset-to-treatment" time (143.6 ± 53.5 minutes and 141.0 ± 54.1 minutes; P = .915), and ICH rate (13% and 8.8%; adjusted P = .898). The presence of radiographic evidence of stroke at spoke versus hub was not different (78.3% and 66.7%; adjusted P = .338). The most commonly used radiographic modality was MRI (MRI: 80%, CT: 20%). CONCLUSIONS: Using imaging as a surrogate for final diagnosis resulted in no difference in final stroke diagnosis rate between the groups, reinforcing that telestroke evaluations are as accurate as bedside evaluations in diagnosing acute stroke.