Penetrating and blunt trauma to the neck: clinical presentation, assessment and emergency management.

Penetrating and blunt trauma to the neck: clinical presentation, assessment ana emergency management. In Belgium, and even in Western Europe, penetrating and blunt injury to the neck is relatively uncommon in both the civilian and military populations. Pre-hospital and emergency assessment and management will therefore always prove challenging, as individual exposure to this specific type of injury remains low. Historically, the neck has been divided into three anatomical zones with specific landmarks to guide the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to penetrating neck injuries. Most penetrating injuries need to be explored surgically, although with the advent of multi-detector computed tomographic angiography (MDCTA), which yields high diagnostic sensitivity, this inflexible approach has recently changed to a more targeted management, based on clinical, radiographic and, if deemed necessary, endoscopic findings. However, some authors have addressed their concern about this novel, 'no-zone' approach, since the risk of missing less apparent aerodigestive tract injuries may increase. It is recommended, therefore, that all patients with penetrating neck injuries be closely observed, irrespective of the initial findings. The incidence of blunt neck injury is much lower, and this makes risk assessment and management even more difficult in comparison with penetrating injuries. Again, MDCTA is most often the first diagnostic tool if a blunt neck injury is suspected, due to its good sensitivity for blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVI) as well as for aerodigestive tract injuries. Specific patterns of injury and unexpected neurological and neuro-radiological findings in trauma patients should always warrant further investigation. Despite ongoing debate, systemic anticoagulation is recommended for most BCVI, sometimes combined with endovascular treatment. Aerodigestive tract injuries may present dramatically, but are often more subtle, making the diagnosis more difficult than other types of neck injuries. Treatment may be conservative if damage is minimal, but surgery is warranted in all other cases.

Differences in emergency nurse triage between a simulated setting and the real world, post hoc analysis of a cluster randomised trial.

OBJECTIVES: In the TRIAGE trial, a cluster randomised trial about diverting emergency department (ED) patients to a general practice cooperative (GPC) using a new extension to the Manchester Triage System, the difference in the proportion of patients assigned to the GPC was striking: 13.3% in the intervention group (patients were encouraged to comply to an ED or GPC assignment, real-world setting) and 24.7% in the control group (the assignment was not communicated, all remained at the ED, simulated setting). In this secondary analysis, we assess the differences in the use of the triage tool between intervention and control group and differences in costs and hospitalisations for patients assigned to the GPC. SETTING: ED of a general hospital and the adjacent GPC. PARTICIPANTS: 8038 patients (6294 intervention and 1744 control).Primary and secondary outcome measures proportion of patients with triage parameters (reason for encounter, discriminator and urgency category) leading to an assignment to the ED, proportion of patients for which the computer-generated GPC assignment was overruled, motivations for choosing certain parameters, costs (invoices) and hospitalisations. RESULTS: An additional 3.1% (p<0.01) of the patients in the intervention group were classified as urgent. Discriminators leading to the ED were registered for an additional 16.2% (p<0.01), mainly because of a perceived need for imaging. Nurses equally chose flow charts leading to the ED (p=0.41) and equally overruled the protocol (p=0.91). In the intervention group, the mean cost for patients assigned to the GPC was €23 (p<0.01) lower and less patients with an assignment to the GPC were hospitalised (1.0% vs 1.6%, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Nurses used a triage tool more risk averse when it was used to divert patients to primary care as compared with a theoretical assignment to primary care. Outcomes from a simulated setting should not be extrapolated to real patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03793972.

The effect of team and leadership training of advanced life support providers on patient outcomes: A systematic review.

AIM: To conduct a systematic review evaluating improvement in team and leadership performance and resuscitation outcomes after such a training of healthcare providers during advanced life support (ALS) courses. METHODS: This systematic review asked the question of whether students taking structured and standardised ALS courses in an educational setting which include specific leadership or team training, compared to no such specific training in these courses, improves patient survival, skill performance in actual resuscitations, skill performance at 3-15 months (patient tasks, teamwork, leadership), skill performance at course conclusion (patient tasks, teamwork, leadership), or cognitive knowledge PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane database were searched until April 2020. Screening of articles, analysis of risk of bias, outcomes and quality assessment were performed according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. Only studies with abstracts in English were included. RESULTS: 14 non-randomised studies and 17 randomised controlled trials, both in adults and children, and seven studies involving patients were included in this systematic review. No randomised controlled trials but three observational studies of team and leadership training showed improvement in the critical outcome of "patient survival". However, they suffered from risk of bias (indirectness and imprecision). The included studies reported many different methods to teach leadership skills and team behaviour. CONCLUSION: This systematic review found very low certainty evidence that team and leadership training as part of ALS courses improved patient outcome. This supports the inclusion of team and leadership training in ALS courses for healthcare providers.

Clinical outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in low-resource settings - A scoping review.

AIM OF THE SCOPING REVIEW: Scientific recommendations on resuscitation are typically formulated from the perspective of an ideal resource environment, with little consideration of applicability in lower-income countries. We aimed to determine clinical outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in low-resource countries, to identify shortcomings related to resuscitation in these areas and possible solutions, and to suggest future research priorities. DATA SOURCES: This scoping review was part of the continuous evidence evaluation process of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR), and was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. We identified low-resource countries as countries with a low- or middle gross national income per capita (World Bank data). We performed a literature search on outcomes after OHCA in these countries, and we extracted data on the outcome. We applied descriptive statistics and conducted a post-hoc correlation analysis of cohort size and ROSC rates. RESULTS: We defined 24 eligible studies originating from middle-income countries, but none from low-income regions, suggesting a reporting bias. The number of reported patients in these studies ranged from 54 to 3214. Utstein-style reporting was rarely used. Return of spontaneous circulation varied from 0% to 62%. Fifteen studies reported on survival to hospital discharge (between 1.0 and 16.7%) or favourable neurological outcome (between 1.0 and 9.3%). An inverse correlation was found for study cohort size and the rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ρ = -0.48, p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: Studies of OHCA outcomes in low-resource countries are heterogeneous and may be compromised by reporting bias. Minimum cardiopulmonary resuscitation standards for low-resource settings should be developed collaboratively involving local experts, respecting culture and context while balancing competing health priorities.

European Resuscitation Council COVID-19 guidelines executive summary.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had a substantial impact on the incidence of cardiac arrest and survival. The challenge is to find the correct balance between the risk to the rescuer when undertaking cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on a person with possible COVID-19 and the risk to that person if CPR is delayed. These guidelines focus specifically on patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. The guidelines include the delivery of basic and advanced life support in adults and children and recommendations for delivering training during the pandemic. Where uncertainty exists treatment should be informed by a dynamic risk assessment which may consider current COVID-19 prevalence, the person's presentation (e.g. history of COVID-19 contact, COVID-19 symptoms), likelihood that treatment will be effective, availability of personal protective equipment (PPE) and personal risks for those providing treatment. These guidelines will be subject to evolving knowledge and experience of COVID-19. As countries are at different stages of the pandemic, there may some international variation in practice.

The effect of ventilation rate on outcome in adults receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

AIM: To investigate whether a ventilation rate ≤10 breaths min-1 in adult cardiac arrest patients treated with tracheal intubation and chest compressions in a prehospital setting is associated with improved Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC), survival to hospital discharge and one-year survival with favourable neurological outcome, compared to a ventilation rate >10 breaths min-1. METHODS: In this retrospective study, prospectively acquired data were analysed. Ventilation rates were measured with end-tidal CO2 and ventilation pressures. Analyses were corrected for age, sex, compression rate, compression depth, initial heart rhythm and cause of cardiac arrest. RESULTS: 337 of 652 patients met the inclusion criteria. Hyperventilation was common, with 85% of the patients ventilated >10 breaths min-1. The mean ventilation rate was 15.3 breaths min-1. The corrected odds ratio (OR) of ventilating >10 breaths min-1 for achieving ROSC was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.49 - 1.71, p = 0.78), the uncorrected OR of ventilating >10 breaths min-1 for survival to hospital discharge was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.30 - 2.77, p = 0.78), and the uncorrected OR of ventilating >10 breaths min1 for one-year survival with a favourable neurological outcome was 0.59 (95% CI: 0.19 - 1.87, p = 0.32). A logistic regression with continuous ventilation rate showed no significant relation with ROSC, and a ROC curve for ROSC showed a poor predictive performance (AUC: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.46 - 0.58), suggesting no other adequate cut-off value for ventilation rate. CONCLUSION: A ventilation rate ≤10 breaths min-1 was not associated with significantly improved outcomes compared to a ventilation rate >10 breaths min-1. No other adequate cut-off value could be proposed.

External artifacts by advanced life support providers misleading automated external defibrillators.

BACKGROUND: The ECG analysis algorithm of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) shows reduced sensitivity and specificity in the presence of external artifacts. Therefore, ECG analyses are preceded by voice prompts. We investigated if advanced life support (ALS) providers follow these prompts, and the consequences if they do not. METHODS: In a two-tiered EMS system all 510 ECG analyses from 135 resuscitation attempts with a Laerdal FR2 AED (applied by emergency medical technicians [EMTs] and subsequently used by ALS providers) were prospectively evaluated. The ALS data were compared with data before arrival of ALS providers (EMT data) using Mc Nemar test. RESULTS: In the presence of ALS providers, 286 ECG rhythm analyses were performed. In the 96 analyses with shockable rhythms, artifacts were detected in 35 (36%), leading to a wrongful no shock decision in 19 (20%). Corresponding EMT data were 67 analyses with shockable rhythms, with artifacts in 18 (27%; p<0.001) but a wrongful no shock decision in only 3 (4%; p<0.001). ALS providers also failed to deliver the AED shock in 7 of the 77 analyses with an appropriate shock decision (9%). This was never found in the EMT data. In the 190 analyses of a non-shockable rhythm in the presence of ALS providers, artifacts were detected in 120 (63%) leading to one spurious shock (0.5%). Corresponding EMT data were 157 analyses, with artifacts in 87 (55%; p=0.20) but no spurious shocks. CONCLUSIONS: External artifacts were frequently found, sometimes leading to important errors. Consequently, more training is needed, especially for ALS providers.

Determinants of the quality of basic life support by hospital nurses.

INTRODUCTION: Good quality basic life support (BLS) results in better survival. BLS is a core competence of nurses but despite regular refresher training, the quality of BLS is often poor and the reasons for this are not well known. We therefore investigated the relation between BLS quality and some of its potential determinants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a BLS refresher course, 296 nurses from non-critical care wards completed a questionnaire including demographic data and a "self-confidence" score. Subsequently, they performed a BLS test on a manikin connected to a PC using Skillreporting System software (Laerdal, Norway). The following variables were recorded: number of ventilations/min, tidal volume, number of compressions/min, compression rate, compression depth, "good ventilation" (n >or=4 min(-1) and tidal volume=700-1000 ml) and "good compression" (n >or=40 min(-1) and rate=80-120 min(-1) and compression depth=40-50mm). To detect independent determinants of BLS quality, associations between the demographic data and the objective variables of BLS quality were examined. RESULTS: Forty-three percent of the nurses rated their confidence as good or very good. Male gender was associated with good compression (P<0.001). Greater self-confidence was also associated with good ventilation (P<0.03) and with good compression (P<0.001). A short time since last BLS training was associated with a higher number of ventilations/min (P=0.01). A short time since last experience of CPR was associated with a higher number of compressions (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Male gender, greater self-confidence, recent BLS training and recent CPR were associated with better quality of BLS.

Gly341Arg mutation indicating malignant hyperthermia susceptibility: specific cause of chronically elevated serum creatine kinase activity.

We report on three families with the Gly341Arg ryanodine receptor gene (RYR1) mutation. Thirteen individuals were heterozygote carriers of the Gly341Arg mutation and had clearly positive in vitro contracture tests, indicating malignant hyperthermia susceptibility. Nine Gly341Arg mutation positive individuals from two families had elevated serum creatine kinase (CK) activity at rest (up to six times the normal upper limit). Their clinical and neurological examinations as well as detailed muscle histology were normal. The third family did not show increased CK activity. These findings indicate that the Gly341Arg mutation can be a specific cause of chronically elevated serum CK activity in asymptomatic individuals.

Malignant hyperthermia susceptibility in a patient with concomitant motor neuron disease.

Laboratory confirmation of a clinical suspicion of malignant hyperthermia (MH) susceptibility by the standard in vitro contracture test remains inconclusive in patients reacting only to caffeine or halothane (called 'Equivocal') or in patients with concomitant neuromuscular disease. The detection of point mutations in the ryanodine receptor gene potentially provides additional information in these cases. The diagnostic value of the Gly341 Arg mutation in a patient reacting in vitro only to caffeine was reported previously by Quane et al. (1994). The present report describes a patient with motor neuron disease carrying the Gly341 Arg mutation, expanding the diagnostic value of this mutation to the group of patients with neuromuscular diseases.

Variation in defibrillation modes after synchronized cardioversion: a potential hazard.

We conducted a survey of all defibrillators currently on the European market that offer synchronized cardioversion. The mode after cardioversion can be classed into one of four categories: (1) remain in synchronized mode; (2) defer to asynchronized mode; (3) 'intelligent'; and (4) configurable. The different modes and the lack of standardization present a potential hazard because they cause confusion among the user of the defibrillator. Uniformity should be obtained after broad agreement between clinicians and manufacturers of defibrillators.