Humanitarian Needs: The Arthroplasty Community and the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: As the world struggles with the COVID-19 pandemic, health care providers are on the front lines. We highlight the value of engaging in humanitarian medical work, contributions of the hip and knee arthroplasty community to date, and future needs after the resolution of the pandemic. We sought to understand how the arthroplasty community can contribute, based on historical lessons from prior pandemics and recessions, current needs, and projections of the COVID-19 impact. METHODS: We polled members of medical mission groups led by arthroplasty surgeons to understand their current efforts in humanitarian medical work. We also polled orthopedic colleagues to understand their role and response. Google Search and PubMed were used to find articles relevant to the current environment of the COVID-19 pandemic, humanitarian needs after previous epidemics, and the economic effects of prior recessions on elective surgery. RESULTS: Hip and knee arthroplasty surgeons are not at the center of the pandemic but are providing an invaluable supportive role through continued care of musculoskeletal patients and unloading of emergency rooms. Others have taken active roles assisting outside of orthopedics. Arthroplasty humanitarian organizations have donated personal protective equipment and helped to prepare their partners in other countries. Previous pandemics and epidemics highlight the need for sustained humanitarian support, particularly in poor countries or those with ongoing conflict and humanitarian crises. CONCLUSION: There are opportunities now to make a difference in this health care crisis. In the aftermath, there will be a great need for humanitarian work both here and throughout the world.

Use of an Automated Surgical Impactor Reduces Femoral Broaching Time in Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty: Results From a Randomized, Multicenter Study.

Background: Impaction in total hip arthroplasty has typically been conducted using a mallet. A surgical automated impactor has been developed with the goal of reducing surgeon variability, fatigue, and injury. There is also potential to reduce the variability of each impaction step in which automated impaction is used, through reproducible and consistent application of force. Methods: Patients were randomized into either the mallet control group, or the automated impaction study group (1:1 randomization). The primary endpoint analysis was conducted to demonstrate that femoral broaching time (in minutes) with an automated impactor is noninferior to femoral broaching time with manual instruments (mallet) under a noninferiority (NI) margin of 1.25 minutes, with a subsequent test of superiority. A total of 218 patients were randomized and treated (109 in each group). Results: Mean femoral broaching time was 5.8 minutes in the automated impaction study group (automated), and 8.1 minutes in the mallet control group (mallet), a 28.4% reduction (P = .0005). However, there was not a difference in surgery duration between the groups. Three fractures were reported in the mallet group and 1 in the automated group. Conclusions: In this randomized multicenter study, an automated impactor was shown to reduce femoral broaching time in primary total hip arthroplasty, with no increase in fractures, but no decrease in operating room time was noted.

High Rates of Aseptic Loosening in Modern Posterior-stabilized Femoral Components From a Single Manufacturer.

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in the United States. There are concerns and reports of early aseptic loosening due to debonding at the cement-implant interface in a specific posterior-stabilized femoral design. This study describes failure at the cement-implant interface with 2 femoral implant designs produced by a single manufacturer. Methods: This is a review of failed primary total knee arthroplasties performed with Optetrak Logic and Truliant posterior-stabilized femoral components between 2010 and 2020. Cases with revision surgery performed for femoral component loosening were reviewed. Results: Seventeen of 896 knees were revised for femoral component loosening. The mean time from index arthroplasty to revision was 73 months. Patients presented with knee pain and recurrent aseptic effusions. More than half of patients had no evidence of component loosening on plain radiographs. Bone scans were positive in 77% of patients with loosening. Femoral components were easily disimpacted from the cement mantle at the time of revision surgery. Patients were treated with femoral only revision or femoral and tibial revision. Two complications occurred in this series. Conclusions: Providers should maintain vigilance in the surveillance of patients with these implants. Clinicians should have a low threshold for additional diagnostic testing if these patients develop pain and/or recurrent effusions. Isolated femoral or complete revision both seem to be acceptable treatment strategies for this failure mechanism.

Revision total hip arthroplasty for pelvic discontinuity.

BACKGROUND: Revision of a failed total hip arthroplasty with massive acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity is a reconstructive challenge. This report presents the mid-term to long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty with a custom-made porous-coated triflange acetabular prosthesis in a consecutive series of patients with pelvic discontinuity. METHODS: Twenty-eight consecutive patients (thirty hips) with a failed total hip arthroplasty and pelvic discontinuity underwent revision total hip arthroplasty. The prosthesis was custom-manufactured on the basis of a three-dimensional model of the hemipelvis created with computed tomography. Initial stability of the implant was provided with screw fixation. Two patients did not return for follow-up after three months, and eight died and were followed for less than seven years, leaving twenty hips in eighteen patients followed for a mean of ten years. Harris hip scores and sequential radiographs were used to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results. RESULTS: Definite healing of the pelvic discontinuity was indicated by the presence of bridging callus in eighteen of the twenty hips. There were no broken screws and no cases of implant migration, even when the discontinuity persisted. Small nonprogressive radiolucent lines were observed in six hips. Complications included one partial sciatic nerve palsy that resolved completely and one case of loose ischial screws in a radiographically stable implant in the same patient. Five patients had one or more dislocations postoperatively. The mean Harris hip score improved from 41 points preoperatively to 80 points at the time of the latest follow-up. Eleven of the eighteen patients required ambulatory aids postoperatively. No component was revised. CONCLUSIONS: Performance of a revision total hip arthroplasty with a custom triflange acetabular prosthesis to treat massive acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity can provide a durable solution with good clinical results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Usefulness of intraoperative radiographs in reducing errors of cup placement and leg length during total hip arthroplasty.

Traditional methods of component placement during total hip arthroplasty (THA) can lead to errors in cup abduction angle and leg length. Intraoperative radiographs were used to assess and correct errors during surgery in a consecutive series of 278 THAs performed by a single surgeon. After exclusions, 262 cases were available for cup abduction angle assessment and 224 for leg length discrepancy (LLD) assessment. Components were initially placed in a position determined as appropriate by the surgeon. Intraoperative radiographs were taken and appropriate corrections made. Postoperative radiographs were assessed at 6 weeks. Mean abduction angle on intraoperative radiographs was 39.6°±5.9° versus 38.6°±4.1° on postoperative radiographs. Thirty-eight cups were outside the target abduction range on intraoperative radiographs versus 4 on postoperative radiographs. Mean LLD was 3.7 mm ± 3.6 mm on intraoperative radiographs and 2.5 mm ± 2.7 mm on postoperative radiographs. Use of intraoperative radiographs is a valid, useful technique for minimizing errors in THA.

Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty.

The ideal bearing surface for total hip arthroplasty still is being sought. This bearing would be durable, cost-effective, easy to implant, inert, and produce minimal wear debris. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings have continued to evolve and have enjoyed success in many European centers throughout the past 3 decades. A limited number of early reports from the United States discouraged widespread acceptance and use of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Once critically analyzed most of the failures from the early reports are attributable to design and material specific flaws. Vast improvements have been made in ceramic manufacturing leading to even more superior wear characteristics and higher burst strengths. The case for alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings is becoming stronger as data accumulate clinically and in vitro. In a multicenter, prospective and randomized study, an alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearing is compared with a cobalt chrome-on-polyethylene bearing. After as many as 48 months there has been no significant difference in clinical performance between the two study groups. No ceramic head fracture or ceramic bearing failure has occurred. Therefore, this new alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearing is a safe option for total hip arthroplasty and may provide a more durable prosthesis especially in young and active patients.