RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A left common pulmonary vein (LCPV) accounts as the most frequent pulmonary vein (PV) variation. Our aim was to compare the performance of radiofrequency (RF) versus second-generation cryoballoon (CB-A) ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and LCPVs. METHODS: In a total cohort of 716 patients undergoing PV isolation with preprocedural CT-scanning, LCPV+ patients were selected with measurement of PV ostial area and trunk distance. All LCPV+ patients were matched between RF and CB-A group in a 1:1 ratio based on propensity scores, and compared for outcome. RESULTS: Left common pulmonary veins were found in 31% (88/283) RF versus 34% (146/433) CB-A patients, respectively, (P = .44). In the matched population of 83 LCPV+ patients in each group, electrical isolation could be achieved in all left-sided PVs. No significant difference was noted for the rate of AF/left atrial tachyarrhythmia (LAT) recurrence between RF and CB-A group (30% vs 28%, P = .86), with similar AF/LAT-free survival (log rank, P = .71). There were 48 patients with AF/LAT recurrence (29%) during the follow-up. Recurrence rate between paroxysmal versus persistent AF was 27/120 (22.5%) versus 21/46 (46%), P = .004. Cox proportional regression analysis withheld LA volume and persistent AF as independent variables to predict AF/LAT recurrence. No increased hazard for AF/LAT recurrence was observed for patients with a long (>15 mm) vs short (5-15 mm) LCPV trunk (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.6-2.2, P = .7). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, equal efficacy and outcome was noted in LCPV+ patients between RF and CB-A technology.
Asunto(s)
Variación Anatómica , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter , Criocirugía , Venas Pulmonares/anatomía & histología , Anciano , Criocirugía/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Venas Pulmonares/cirugíaRESUMEN
Resumen Objetivo: Determinar seguridad y eficacia del marcapasos temporal mediante cable de fijación activa vía yugular y/o subclavia. Métodos: Se analizaron pacientes desde 2017 a 2021 postextracción de marcapasos dependientes de estimulación. Resultados: Se colocó estimulación temporal en 25 pacientes con una edad media de 68 ± 16 años. La media de duración de la estimulación temporal fue cinco días. No se registró mortalidad asociada a la estimulación temporal, sin embargo en un paciente se presentó desplazamiento de cable y falla de captura a los cuatro días de la colocación. Conclusiones: La estimulación temporal mediante cable de fijación activa es segura y eficaz.
Abstract Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of temporary pacing with an active fixation lead placed trough the internal jugular vein and/or subclavian vein. Methods: We analyzed a consecutive series of 25 out of 73 patients that had a pacemaker extraction and were pacing dependent requiring temporary pacing with an active fixation lead until the new pacemaker implant, from 2017 to 2021. Results: After extraction 25 patients age 68 years ±16 years, required temporary pacing, the media for temporary pacing was 5 days. There were no mortality associated to temporary stimulation. Only one patient (4%) had a complication 4 days after the implant with capture fail due to a microdislogement requiring reintervention. Conclusion: Temporary stimulation through active fixation pacemaker lead it is safe and effective.