Effects of multidisciplinary pain treatment can be predicted without elaborate questionnaires.

PURPOSE: Low back pain is one of the most common and expensive diseases of Western societies. Psychosocial factors such as low social status, depression, or work dissatisfaction are known to promote chronicity of low back pain. With a multidisciplinary approach, better outcomes can be achieved than with purely biomedical treatment. Optimal patient selection for multidisciplinary therapy reduces costs and labour. This study investigated whether elaborated questionnaires exceed simple items in predicting multimodal therapy success. METHODS: In this prospective longitudinal clinical study, 330 patients were followed up for six months after multidisciplinary therapy. We applied the patient questionnaire Heidelberg Short Early Risk Assessment Questionnaire for the Prediction of Chronicity in Low Back Pain (HKF-R10) that is approved and established for predicting chronicity in patients with acute low back pain to forecast the therapeutic outcome. Outcome criteria were QOL, pain reduction and back to work. RESULTS: With regard to outcome criteria, the HKF-R10 was unable to anticipate therapeutic success, but education level, depression, best pain condition, and helplessness predicted therapy success with an 80% probability for QOL improvement. CONCLUSIONS: It is not necessary to confront patients with an extensive and complicated questionnaire to predict the outcome of multidisciplinary therapy. In fact, assessing a few specific items allows better and easier prognosis estimation.

[Efficacy of an internet-delivered aftercare program for patients with chronic back pain]. / Wirksamkeit eines Internet-gestützten Nachsorgeangebots für Patienten mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen.

Chronic back pain leads to high societal costs and severely decreased quality of life for the sufferers. Pain treatment aims at sustainable behaviour changes in order to positively affect pain development in the medium term. A multicenter, randomised control trial was conducted. Participants (N=334) were recruited at 6 German hospitals and randomly assigned to an Internet-based aftercare intervention or treatment-as-usual. Primary endpoint was 12 months after treatment termination, primary outcome was pain intensity, and secondary outcomes were physical functioning, quality of life, and ability to work.The intervention was well accepted by the participants. Its efficacy could not be demonstrated. Neither pain intensity nor the secondary outcomes differed between the 2 study groups.Possible reasons for disappointing efficacy and preconditions for Internet-based programs will be discussed.

Internet-based aftercare for patients with back pain-a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: In order to maintain treatment gains achieved during multidisciplinary treatments for chronic back pain, patients are challenged to implement the behavioral changes they learned during treatment into their daily life. Offering support during the critical time after treatment conclusion helps patients deal with relapses, provides them with practical advice and social support, and helps to master this transfer. As in-person offerings are not always feasible, innovative concepts are needed to enable hospitals to provide aftercare to their patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: An Internet-based aftercare intervention following multidisciplinary therapy for back pain was constructed, implemented, and evaluated. The aftercare program comprised two modules: (1) an individualized self-monitoring module and (2) a weekly, 90-min chat session moderated by a therapist whom participants already knew from treatment. A randomized controlled trial (n=75) was conducted that compared the post-treatment symptom developments of program participants with symptom developments of controls (treatment as usual [TAU]). RESULTS: The program was proven to be feasible and well accepted by participants; on average, 68.2% of the participants rated the previous chat session as helpful. Intention-to-treat analyses demonstrated significant effects on post-treatment courses of disability. The largest effects were found for pain-related disability: for TAU participants, disability increased an average of 1.25 scale points (Roland-Morris Questionnaire) per 100 days; for program participants, disability decreased an average of 0.39 scale points (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The aftercare intervention was shown to be feasible and well accepted. Its efficacy should be tested with a larger-scale randomized controlled trial.

Efficacy of multidisciplinary treatment for patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective clinical study in 395 patients.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of multidisciplinary treatment programs varies throughout the literature, and it remains controversial how therapy outcome is affected by patients' individual parameters and which treatment settings work best. OBJECTIVES: We set out to examine the impact of patient variables on the effectiveness of a 3-week multidisciplinary treatment program in patients with chronic low back pain. By presenting effect sizes, we aimed to enable the comparison of our findings with other studies across disciplines. METHODS: Data on 395 patients were prospectively collected at study entry, at the end of the program (T1) and after 6 months' follow-up (T2). Relevant therapy outcomes were analyzed by presenting effect sizes with Cohen's d. Group comparisons were performed for sociodemographic and clinical features to determine the impact on therapy outcome. RESULTS: Medium effect sizes (d = -0.6 to -0.7) were shown for visual analog scale (VAS) after treatment and at T2, indicating clinically relevant pain relief. Significant changes in pain-related disability were observed immediately at T1 with a strong treatment effect (d = 0.8). Functional capacity was improved with low to medium effect sizes (0.4-0.5). Quality-of-life subscales (36-item Short Form Health Survey) improved significantly at T1 for physical function, vitality, and mental health (d = 0.5-0.8). Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression Scale scores improved significantly with strong effect sizes of d = 0.7. Sociodemographic parameters displayed a significant impact on effect sizes for visual analog scale at T2, with females (d = -0.9), age group 30 to 39 years (d = -1), and patients with low physical job exposure (d = -0.9) benefiting most. An increase in number of pain locations (-0.7) and severity of accompanying pain (-0.7) in other body areas significantly impaired therapy outcome and effect sizes of VAS. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, multidisciplinary treatment ameliorates pain, functional restoration, and quality of life with medium to high effect sizes even for patients with a long history of chronic back pain. Effect sizes are higher than for monodisciplinary treatments and treatment effects remained stable at 6-month follow-up in a longitudinal uncontrolled study design. Thus, we believe that multidisciplinary treatment is vital for the treatment of patients with chronic low back pain. The impact of sociodemographic and pain-related parameters needs to be taken into account when including patients in an appropriate treatment program. We emphasize the presentation of effect sizes as a vital treatment evaluation to enable cross-sectional comparison of therapy outcomes.

Multidisciplinary Pain Management of Chronic Back Pain: Helpful Treatments from the Patients' Perspective.

Multidisciplinary pain management programs (MPMP) for patients suffering from chronic back pain include a variety of treatment modalities. The patients' perceived helpfulness of these treatment modalities remains unclear. The aims of this prospective observational cohort study were to assess (i) the patients' perceived helpfulness of different treatment modalities, (ii) the influence of sociodemographic characteristics on the patient's perspective and (iii) whether treatment outcomes are affected by helpfulness ratings. Treatment modalities of this three-week MPMP consisted of individual physiotherapy, group-based physiotherapy, relaxation therapy, aquatic therapy, back education, medical training therapy, biofeedback, psychological pain therapy and music therapy. The study comprised 395 patients. The main outcome was the patients' perceived treatment helpfulness at the end of the program measured by a self-reported questionnaire ranging from 1 (not at all helpful) to 6 (extremely helpful). Secondary outcomes were treatment effects on pain, pain related disability, functional ability and level of depressive symptoms measured by self-reported questionnaires (NRS, PDI, FFbH-R, ADS-L). A total of 276 patients (22-64 years, 57% female) were available for overall analysis. Multivariate-analysis-of-variance- (MANOVA-) related results revealed that perceived treatment helpfulness (range 1-6) differed significantly between treatment modalities: individual physiotherapy (M = 5.00), group-based physiotherapy (M = 4.87), relaxation therapy (M = 4.6), aquatic therapy (M = 4.54), back education (M = 4.43), medical training therapy (M = 3.38), biofeedback (M = 3.31), psychological pain therapy (M = 3.15), music therapy (M = 3.02). Pain, pain related disability and levels of depressive symptoms significantly improved after the program (p < 0.001) whereas functional ability decreased (p < 0.01). Significant correlations were found between helpfulness ratings and sociodemographic data indicating that perceived treatment helpfulness was influenced by patient-related factors. Importantly, the degree of pain-related improvements was affected by the patients' perceived treatment helpfulness. In conclusion, patients' perceived treatment helpfulness differs significantly between treatment modalities and corresponds to treatment outcome.

The value of physical performance tests for predicting therapy outcome in patients with subacute low back pain: a prospective cohort study.

Considering the enormous costs of intensive multidisciplinary treatment, predictive tests for therapy outcome are needed to evaluate patients' performance potential and increase cost effectiveness. Somatic parameters are commonly used to evaluate health status and serve as an additional means of forecasting the prognosis, yet little is known of their validity. In this study, we investigated the prognostic value of somatic parameters regarding the outcome of multidisciplinary treatment in patients with subacute low back pain. The study was designed as a prospective cohort study of 162 patients. Somatic parameters were assessed with three physical performance tests (Villiger test, Oesch test, Biering-Sørensen test) before treatment (T0), after 3 weeks' inpatient therapy (T1) and at 6-month follow-up (T2). Psychometric characteristics of subjective pain perception (VAS), a pain disability index (PDI) and a physical capability index (FFbH-R) were recorded. Correlation coefficients between the physical performance test scores and psychometric characteristics were calculated. To predict therapy outcome, discriminant analyses were performed. A control group (n = 30) was evaluated at similar time points without receiving any therapy. Our results demonstrate good discrimination between patients and controls by means of the investigated performance tests and exhibit a significant negative correlation with the psychometric data. Lower outcome values at study entry correlated with higher pain intensity and disability after multidisciplinary treatment. However, the statistical magnitude of correlation was relatively low and further discriminant analysis did not reveal any predictive value. Consequently the physical performance tests do not have a prognostic value regarding therapy outcome.

Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain Therapy.

Attachment theory provides a useful framework for understanding individual differences in pain patients, especially with insecure attachment shown to be more prevalent in chronic pain patients compared to the general population. Nevertheless, there is little evidence of attachment-informed treatment approaches for this population. The present study compares outcomes from two different attachment-informed treatment modalities for clinicians, with outcomes from treatment as usual (TAU). In both intervention groups (IG1 and IG2), clinicians received bi-monthly training sessions on attachment. Additionally, clinicians in IG1 had access to the attachment diagnostics of their patients. All treatments lasted for four weeks and included a 6-month follow up. A total of 374 chronic pain patients were recruited to participate in this study (TAU = 159/IG1 = 163/IG2 = 52). Analyses were carried out using multilevel modeling with pain intensity as the outcome variable. Additionally, working alliance was tested as a mediator of treatment efficacy. The study was registered under the trial number DRKS00008715 on the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS). Findings show that while IG2 was efficient in enhancing treatment outcomes, IG1 did not outperform TAU. In IG2, working alliance was a mediator of outcome. Results of the present study indicate that attachment-informed treatment of chronic pain can enhance existing interdisciplinary pain therapies; however, caveats are discussed.

Impact of attachment behavior on the treatment process of chronic pain patients.

BACKGROUND: Insecure attachment patterns are related to the onset and development of chronic pain. However, it is less documented on how short- and long-term effects of pain therapy might differ with the attachment style in interaction with specific pain conditions. We therefore examined how two different groups of chronic pain patients differ in their treatment trajectories and in regard to attachment. METHOD: N=85/76/67 (T1/T2/T3) patients with medically unexplained musculoskeletal pain (UMP group) were compared to n=89/76/56 patients with joint pain from osteoarthritis (OA group), using multilevel modeling. UMP patients received a multimodal pain program, and OA patients received surgery. Pain intensity before (T1) and after (T2) treatment and at a 6 months follow-up (T3) was assessed by using a visual analog scale of pain. RESULTS: Pain patients report a significant reduction in pain intensity upon the completion of the treatment compared to T1. Over the next 6 months, the pain intensity has further declined for patients with low attachment anxiety. In contrast, patients with highly anxious attachment report an increase in pain intensity. This main effect of anxious attachment on pain is significant when predicting changes both in acute treatment and during follow-up while controlling for group effect. In addition, there is also an interactive effect of group by avoidant attachment. In the UMP group, high scores in avoidant attachment were associated with the lower reduction in pain severity, while in the OA group, high scores in attachment avoidance were associated with a steeper reduction in pain severity. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that insecurely attached patients with pain symptoms only benefit from a multimodal pain therapy in limited ways in regard to posttreatment trajectories. Maintaining positive results over a period of 6 months is a challenge, compared with securely attached patients. SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study suggest the importance of direct and indirect mechanisms of attachment and its relevance for the management of pain experiences. Therefore, to include the individual attachment patterns in the treatment may be a promising way to enhance the treatment prospects.

Age as a predicting factor in the therapy outcome of multidisciplinary treatment of patients with chronic low back pain--a prospective longitudinal clinical study in 405 patients.

This prospective longitudinal clinical study evaluates the prognostic value of age in the therapy outcome of patients with chronic low back pain treated with a multidisciplinary therapy. Four hundred five patients with chronic low back pain for 3 months or longer and a corresponding sick leave for longer than 6 weeks underwent a 3-week standardized multidisciplinary therapy. Patients were assigned into three groups of age with comparable baseline values at T0. At the 6-month follow-up (T1) five different therapy outcomes were analysed and compared in the three groups: back-to-work status, generic health status (SF36), pain intensity, functional capacity, and satisfaction with the therapy. All three treatment groups improved significantly in all outcome criteria between T0 and T1 except of functional capacity, which did not improve in the older patients. In the total group, the back-to-work rate was 61.7%. At the final follow-up, there were significantly better results in terms of functional capacity and pain level in younger patients, whereas back-to-work rate and satisfaction with therapy did not show a significant difference between the groups analysed. According to the results of this study, older patients with chronic low back pain also derive significant benefit from a multidisciplinary treatment strategy, although in some outcome criteria results were inferior to those obtained in younger patients.

The cognitive impact of chronic low back pain: Positive effect of multidisciplinary pain therapy.

OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the affected cognitive problems in chronic low back pain patients. For this patient cohort research mostly focused on memory of pain, rather than cognitive difficulties related to pain. Chronic pain may be associated with specific (yet undefined) cognitive deficits that affect everyday behaviour. We set out to compare the cognitive function of patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP) in the course of multidisciplinary pain treatments before and after therapy. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with cLBP and 25 healthy controls between 20 and 70 years were recruited into the study. The inclusion criteria for patients were: (1) a history of at least 12 weeks of chronic myofascial low back pain without radicular pain sensation before enrolment; (2) grade II and higher chronicity according to von Korff; (3) no opioid medication. The patients recruited had a mean pain duration of 7.13±7.16 years and reported a mean pain intensity of 6.62±2.04 (visual analogue score, VAS). Their mean back function according to the Funktionsfragebogen Hannover (FFbH, a questionnaire comparable with the Health Assessment Questionnaire) was 52.39±20.23%. At three time points (before therapy, 3 weeks and 6 months after therapy) the study subjects were assessed prospectively with a battery of visual memory tests from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB). These included choice reaction time (CRT), pattern recognition memory (PRM) and spatial span (SSP). In parallel, the Trail-Making Test (TMT-A, TMT-B) and the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-III) were used to evaluate intelligence and cognitive flexibility. RESULTS: At the beginning of MDPT (T1), it took patients with cLBP significantly longer than HC to complete TMT-A (38.29±19.99s vs 30.25±14.19s, p=0.047) and TMT-B (72.10±26.98s vs 55.99±22.14s, p=0.034). There were no significant differences between patients and HC in CRT, PRM and SSP. Three weeks (T2) and 6 months (T3) after MDPT, TMT-A reaction time of patients significantly improved by 6.5s and 8.1ms (38.3 ±19.9s vs 31.8±12.3s, p=0.02 and 31.8±12.3s vs 30.2±8.9s, p=0.021, respectively). The patients' working memory was also better 6 months after MDPT (48.8±11.1% at T1, 51.2±11.9% at T2, 57.1±10.9% at T3, p=0.008). Significant correlations among pain, depression/anxiety, medication and neuropsychological tests were found. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that patients with cLBP have slowed speeds of information processing and working memory, but no alteration in attention and recognition memory. There are clearly interactions of cognitive function with pain, depression, anxiety, and medication. MDPT may improve the impaired cognitive function of patients with cLBP. IMPLICATION: Health professionals should contemplate the results from this study when planning therapy strategies especially when prescribing pain medications such opioids to patients with chronic low back pain.

HKF-R 10 - screening for predicting chronicity in acute low back pain (LBP): a prospective clinical trial.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To develop a short instrument to reliably predict chronicity in low back pain (LBP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Health care expenditures on the treatment of low back pain continue to increase. It is therefore important to prevent the development of chronicity. In Germany, there is at present no early risk assessment tool to predict the risk of developing chronic LBP for patients presenting with acute LBP. Undertaken in an orthopedic practice setting, this study examined known risk factors for chronicity. It resulted in the development of a short questionnaire that successfully predicted the course of chronicity with an accuracy of 78%. METHODS: A cohort of 192 orthopaedic outpatients was assessed for clinical, behavioral, emotional, and cognitive parameters bsed on a self-report test battery of 167 established items predictive for chronicity in LBP. Chronicity was defined as back pain persisting for longer than six months. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive value of all items significantly associated with the dependent variable. RESULTS: The study found the following items to have the strongest predictive value in the development of chronicity: "How strong was your back pain during the last week when it was most tolerable?" and the question "How much residual pain would you be willing to tolerate while still considering the therapy successful?" These were followed by the variables for "Duration of existing LBP" (more than eight days), the patient's educational level (low levels are related to higher risks of chronicity) and pain being experienced elsewhere in the body. Other significant factors were five items assessing depression (Zung) and the palliative effect of therapeutic massage (where a positive correlation was found). Female patients have a higher risk for chronicity, as do patients with a high total score on the scales assessing "catastrophizing thoughts" and thoughts of "helplessness". CONCLUSION: Using the items listed above, the study was able to predict a patient's risk of developing chronic LBP with a probability of 78%. These items were assembled in a brief questionnaire and were paired with a corresponding evaluative tool. This enables practitioners to assess an individual patient's risk for chronicity by means of a simple calculator in just a few minutes. A validation study for the questionnaire is currently being prepared. MINI ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was the development of a brief questionnaire to assess the risk for chronicity for LBP.

Study protocol - efficacy of an attachment-based working alliance in the multimodal pain treatment.

BACKGROUND: The concept of attachment is relevant for the onset and development of chronic pain. Insecure attachment styles negatively affect therapeutic outcome. Insecurely attached patients seem to be less able to sustain positive effects of a multimodal treatment program. However, it has never been tested before if an attachment-oriented approach can improve treatment results of insecurely attached patients in a multimodal outpatient setting. To test this assumption, we compare the short- and long-term outcomes for pain patients who will receive multidisciplinary, attachment-oriented treatment with the outcomes for patients in a control group, who will receive the multidisciplinary state-of-the-art treatment. METHODS: Two patient groups (baseline, attachment intervention) are assessed before treatment, after treatment, and at a 6 month follow-up. The study is conducted in a block design: After data collection of the first block (controls) and before as well as during data collection for the second block (treatment group), the health care personnel of the outpatient pain clinic receives training on attachment theory and its use in the therapeutic context. Pain intensity as measured with visual analogue scales and physical functioning will serve as the primary outcome measures. DISCUSSION: The design of our study allows for a continuous exchange of experienced team members, which may help bring about concrete attachment related guidelines for the enhancement of therapeutic outcome. This would be the first attempt at an attachment-oriented improvement of multimodal pain programs. CONCLUSION: An attachment-based approach may be a promising way to enhance long-term treatment outcomes for insecurely attached pain patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00008715 (registered on the 3(rd) of June 2015).

Attachment, symptom severity, and depression in medically unexplained musculoskeletal pain and osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Attachment insecurity relates to the onset and course of chronic pain via dysfunctional reactions to pain. However, few studies have investigated the proportion of insecure attachment styles in different pain conditions, and results regarding associations between attachment, pain severity, and disability in chronic pain are inconsistent. This study aims to clarify the relationships between insecure attachment and occurrence or severity of chronic pain with and without clearly defined organic cause. To detect potential differences in the importance of global and romantic attachment representations, we included both concepts in our study. METHODS: 85 patients with medically unexplained musculoskeletal pain (UMP) and 89 patients with joint pain from osteoarthritis (OA) completed self-report measures of global and romantic attachment, pain intensity, physical functioning, and depression. RESULTS: Patients reporting global insecure attachment representations were more likely to suffer from medically unexplained musculoskeletal pain (OR 3.4), compared to securely attached patients. Romantic attachment did not differ between pain conditions. Pain intensity was associated with romantic attachment anxiety, and this relationship was more pronounced in the OA group compared to the UMP group. Both global and romantic attachment anxiety predicted depression, accounting for 15% and 17% of the variance, respectively. Disability was independent from attachment patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that global insecure attachment is associated with the experience of medically unexplained musculoskeletal pain, but not with osteoarthritis. In contrast, insecure attachment patterns seem to be linked to pain intensity and pain-related depression in unexplained musculoskeletal pain and in osteoarthritis. These findings suggest that relationship-informed focused treatment strategies may alleviate pain severity and psychological distress in chronic pain independent of underlying pathology.

Awareness of the German population of common available guidelines of how to cope with lower back pain.

BACKGROUND: Several countries developed guidelines in order to provide a systematic approach for treatment of (chronic) lower back pain. The risk of suffering from (chronic) lower back pain differs significantly within the general population. A serious lack of research exists concerning the risk factor "dysfunctional behavior of the subjects in terms of acute lower back pain." OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge of the German population regarding the availability of guidelines about managing lower back pain. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: We interviewed 983 subjects by phone. The study population included 50 - 70-year-old men and women with German residency and sufficient language ability. RESULTS: Of all the subjects, 70.2% claimed that they suffered at least once in their lifetime with lower back pain. Lower back pain with radiating symptoms occurred in 28.7%. Women were affected significantly more frequently compared to the epidemiological data. Of all the subjects with lower education, 82.9% suffered from lower back pain at least once in their lifetime compared to only 62.4% of people with university degrees. Education was also a protective factor for lower back pain with radiating pain. People who completed secondary modern school were 42% less likely to suffer from lower back pain than those who did not graduate. Knowing active rules of conduct occurred significantly more often at higher educational levels (i.e. all kinds of sports and exercises requiring physical strength, flexibility, power, agility, coordination, grace, balance and control, in particular stretching exercises) odds ratio = 7.78, physical activities odds ratio = 3.92, relaxation exercises odds ratio = 3.51). LIMITATIONS: Data acquisition was performed by an external company and therefore provided only limited options for external validity. Furthermore data acquisition was restricted to 50 - 70-year-old patients, since this age group is at higher risk of suffering from lower back pain. A conclusion upon the knowledge of the whole population has to be drawn with caution, especially when considering the size of the study population. The life-time prevalence of lower back pain was assessed by interviewing patients about prior episodes of lower back pain. Slightly biased results may have occurred since the memory of prior episodes might result in too many or too few episodes. CONCLUSION: The study revealed a lack of awareness of common available guidelines and an uneven distribution of existing knowledge throughout the population. Passive coping strategies like taking pain medication or ointment therapy were favored over active coping strategies like gymnastics, physical activities, and relaxation exercises. Respondents with a higher level of education suffered significantly less often from lower back pain and tended toward active treatment strategies. Respondents with lower levels of education more often demanded passive treatment strategies. The general population, especially those with lower education, is not sufficiently aware of behavioral strategies for managing lower back pain as proposed in available guidelines.

Evidence of specific cognitive deficits in patients with chronic low back pain under long-term substitution treatment of opioids.

BACKGROUND: There is a growing number of patients worldwide being treated with long-term opioids for chronic non-cancer pain, although there is limited evidence for their effectiveness in improving pain and function. Opioid-use related adverse effects, especially in cognitive functioning in these patients, are rarely evaluated. OBJECTIVES: The present study investigated the cognitive functions of patients with chronic back pain who underwent long-term opioid treatment in comparison with those patients without opioid usage and healthy controls. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, nonrandomized, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Multidisciplinary pain management clinic, specialty referral center, University Hospital in Germany. METHODS: In a prospective cross-sectional design, 37 patients with chronic back pain who underwent long-term opioid therapy (OP) were compared with 33 patients with chronic back pain without opioid therapy (NO) and 25 healthy controls (HC). Assessment of primary outcome included cognitive function such as information processing speed, choice reaction time, pattern recognition memory, and executive function. Other data included pain, back function, depression and anxiety, use of medication, and education status. The relationship between cognitive functions and anxiety/depression was analysed. RESULTS: Both patient groups needed significantly longer time in information processing when compared to HC (Group 1: 41.87 ± 20.47 Group 2: 38.29 ± 19.99 Group 3: 30.25 ± 14.19). Additionally, OP patients had significantly reduced spatial memory capacity, flexibility for concept change, and impaired performance in working memory assessment compared to NO patients and HC. The impaired cognitive outcomes were significantly associated with pain intensity, depression scores, and medication use. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include small number of patients with heterogeneous opioid therapy and the nonrandomized observational nature of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings give a differential view into the cognitive changes from chronic back pain with and without long-term opioids treatment. Chronic back pain itself impairs some distinct cognitive functions. Long-term opioid therapy adds further cognitive impairment.

The impact of pain spread on the outcome of multidisciplinary therapy in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain - a prospective clinical study in 389 patients.

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal pain represents a continuous process ranging from single-site to multiple-site pain, with an increase in pain sites accompanied by an increasing risk of chronification and the development of further comorbidities. Within this context, the impact of pain spread on therapy outcome is still unknown. AIMS: This prospective clinical study aimed to evaluate whether and to what extent patients with pain at multiple sites would also benefit from multidisciplinary therapy or whether therapy success is limited by pain spread. METHODS: Patients' characteristics were assessed, including socio-demographic variables, occupational and workplace characteristics, pain intensity and dimensions of pain, psychological aspects and functional back capacity, as well as the generic health status. Data were prospectively collected at day 1 (baseline) and at 6-month follow-up from a sample of 389 patients undergoing multidisciplinary treatment. Patients were distributed into three groups based on the number of pain sites (single-site, dual-site and multiple-site) and the outcome parameters were compared. RESULTS: All three groups improved significantly from baseline to the 6-month follow-up. Compared to patients with multiple-site pain, patients with single-site and dual-site pain displayed significantly better outcome on almost all measures. Only the subcategory mental health of the SF-36 did not show any statistically significant differences among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results display that patients with two or more pain sites also improve significantly in the outcome measures. Therefore, treatment should be offered independent of the extent of pain spread. However, therapy is significantly less successful in patients with pain at multiple sites.

The influence of the grade of chronicity on the outcome of multidisciplinary therapy for chronic low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal clinical study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to analyze the outcome of different stages of chronicity in patients with chronic low back pain treated with a multidisciplinary therapy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Results of studies comparing different grades of chronicity in therapy for chronic low back pain have not been published so far. METHODS: A total of 387 patients with chronic low back pain for 3 months or longer and a corresponding sick leave for longer than 6 weeks underwent a 3-week standardized multidisciplinary therapy. At baseline (T0), patients were assigned into 3 groups of chronicity grades according to the classification of von Korff et al (Group A, Grades I and II; Group B, Grade III; Group C, Grade IV) and were prospectively followed. At the the 6-month follow-up (T1), 5 different therapy outcomes were analyzed and compared in the 3 groups: back-to-work status, generic health status (SF-36), pain intensity (visual analogue scale), functional capacity (Hannover back capacity score), and satisfaction with the therapy. RESULTS: At T0, patients in Group C had a higher pain level, a longer history of pain, and more general and more psychosomatic comorbidities than patients with lower levels of chronicity. All 3 treatment groups improved significantly in all outcome criteria between T0 and T1. In the total group, the back-to-work rate was 67.4%. At the final follow-up, there were significantly better results in terms of functional capacity and pain level in patients with lower grades of chronicity but mostly due also to worse initial baseline values. Back-to-work rate, satisfaction with therapy, and the Mental Component Summary of the SF-36 did not show a significant difference at T1 between the groups analyzed. CONCLUSION: According to the results of this study, patients with chronic low back pain also derive significant benefit from a multidisciplinary treatment strategy in higher stages of chronicity. Therefore, therapy should not be limited to the patients in lower stages of chronicity.