RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION & IMPORTANCE: Primary Sino-nasal metastases are rare. The most common anatomical sites that metastasise to this region are the kidneys followed by the lungs, breast, thyroid and prostate. Metastases from laryngeal cancer are even rarer. We report a unique case of sphenoid and cavernous sinus metastases in a patient with glottic cancer. Herein we describe to the authors' knowledge the first reported case of supraglottic metastases to the sphenoid and cavernous sinus. This study will help further our understanding metastatic spread outside of those well described in literature. CASE PRESENTATION: A 75-year-old with a right neck swelling and hoarseness, treated for glottic SCC and represented with cranial nerve involvement suspicious for sinonasal metastases. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Metastases to the sinonasal cavity are rare representing 3 % of head and neck malignancies. The most common primary sites include breast, colon, thyroid and prostate. Metastases from the larynx are exceedingly rare. CONCLUSION: This case report illustrates a rare case of Sino-nasal metastases from a patient with glottic SCC, it highlights an alternative metastatic pathway which often proves fatal.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The presence of extranodal extension (ENE) is well documented as a predictor of non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) metastasis. The ACOSOG Z0011 trial (2011) concluded that patients who satisfy criteria including the absence of sentinel lymph node (SLN) ENE can forgo axillary clearance (AC). Currently there are no studies analysing the rate of ENE in NSLN metastasis in which the sentinel node was positive but had no ENE. Determining this incidence will help determine if current paradigms are resulting in residual ENE in NSLN metastasis by forgoing AC based on the Z0011 trial.. METHODS: This study determined incidence of ENE at NSLN metastasis in patients with a positive SLN biopsy without ENE in 162 symptomatic breast cancer patients who underwent AC between 2009 and 2014â¯at Cork University Hospital Breast Cancer Service, a teaching hospital of University College Cork. RESULTS: Of 965 sentinel node biopsies performed 251 were identified as SLN positive, 162 (64.5%) underwent further AC. Of the 162 patients, 56.8% (92/162) were positive for ENE at SLN, of these 57.6% (53/92) had NSLN metastasis versus 17.1% (12/70) in the ENE-negative group (χ2 test; Pâ¯<â¯0.001). On adjusted analysis, ENE at the SLN was a significant predictor of NSLN metastasis (odds ratio [OR] 8.63; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.26-22.86; Pâ¯<â¯0.001). The incidence of NSLN-ENE in patients without SLN-ENE was 1/70 (1.4%) compared with 33.7% (31/92) in patients who had ENE at the SLN (χ2 test; Pâ¯<â¯0.001). CONCLUSION: ENE at the SLN is an independent predictor of NSLN involvement; its absence significantly reduces the likelihood of ENE in NSLN metastasis..