Outcomes in Hematopoietic Cell Transplant and Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy Recipients with Pre-Cellular Therapy SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

BACKGROUND: Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) or chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy recipients have high morbidity from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. There are limited data on outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection shortly before cellular therapy and uncertainty whether to delay therapy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection within 90 days prior to HCT or CAR-T therapy between January 2020 and November 2022. We characterized the kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 detection, clinical outcomes following cellular therapy, and impact on delays in cellular therapy. RESULTS: We identified 37 patients (n=15 allogeneic HCT, n=11 autologous HCT, n=11 CAR-T therapy) with SARS-CoV-2 infections within 90 days of cellular therapy. Most infections (73%) occurred between March and November 2022, when Omicron strains were prevalent. Most patients had asymptomatic (27%) or mild (68%) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). SARS-CoV-2 positivity lasted a median of 20.0 days [IQR, 12.5-26.25]. The median time from first positive SARS-CoV-2 test to cellular therapy was 45 days [IQR, 37.75-70]; one patient tested positive on the day of infusion. After cellular therapy, no patients had recrudescent SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19-related complications. Cellular therapy delays related to SARS-CoV-2 infection occurred in 70% of patients for a median of 37 days. Delays were more common after allogeneic (73%) and autologous (91%) HCT compared to CAR-T cell therapy (45%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 may not require prolonged delays in cellular therapy in the context of contemporary circulating variants and availability of antiviral therapies.

Differential Association between Blood Glucose Levels and Nonrelapse Mortality after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Based on Presence or Absence of Preexisting Diabetes.

Malglycemia, defined as hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, or increased glycemic variability, has been associated with increased mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Among critically ill non-HCT recipients with diabetes and poor glycemic control, compared to those without diabetes, stringent blood glucose control has been associated with increased mortality. This study investigated whether a pre-HCT diagnosis of diabetes and the type of pre-HCT diabetes treatment modulate the previously reported negative impact of malglycemia on post-HCT nonrelapse mortality (NRM). We performed a single-institution retrospective analysis of mortality outcomes after allogeneic HCT as a function of post-HCT blood glucose levels, pre-HCT diagnosis of diabetes, and type of pre-HCT diabetes treatment (insulin, no insulin). A total of 1062 patients who underwent allogeneic HCT between 2015 and 2020 were included in this study. Among these patients, 84 (8%) had a pre-HCT diagnosis of diabetes, of whom 38 (4%) used insulin and 46 (4%) used a noninsulin antiglycemic agent. Post-HCT blood glucose values measured within 100 days from HCT, modeled as a continuous nonlinear time-varying covariate, were associated with day-200 NRM, with both lower and higher glycemic values associated with higher NRM compared to normoglycemic values (adjusted P < .0001). The association between post-HCT blood glucose and NRM varied, however, depending on the presence or absence of a pre-HCT diagnosis of diabetes; that is, there was evidence of a statistical interaction between blood glucose levels and diabetes (adjusted P = .008). In particular, the detrimental impact of hyperglycemic values was more pronounced in patients without a pre-HCT diagnosis of diabetes compared to those with a pre-HCT diagnosis of diabetes. As reported previously, higher and lower blood glucose levels measured within 100 days after allogeneic HCT were associated with an increased risk of NRM; however, this association was more pronounced among patients without a pre-HCT diagnosis of diabetes compared to those with a pre-HCT diagnosis of diabetes, suggesting that patients with diabetes are relatively protected from the downstream effects of hyperglycemia. These data support the notion that patients with pre-HCT diabetes may need a different approach to blood glucose management after transplantation compared to those without diabetes. © 2024 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Financial Toxicity, Time Toxicity, and Quality of Life in Multiple Myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) may be on therapy for years, which can lead to financial toxicity (FinTox) or time toxicity (TimeTox). The prevalence, predictors, and quality of life (QOL) impacts of FinTox and TimeTox during different phases of MM treatment have not been characterized. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center cross-sectional survey of patients with MM who had undergone transplantation. FinTox+ was defined as a COST-FACIT score <23, TimeTox+ as MM-related interactions (including phone calls) ≥1x weekly or ≥1x monthly in-person among far-residing patients, QOL using PROMIS Global Health, and functional status using patient-reported Karnofsky performance status (KPS). RESULTS: Of 252 patients, 22% and 40% met FinTox+ and TimeTox+ criteria respectively. Respective FinTox+ and TimeTox+ proportions were 22%/37% for patients on maintenance, 22%/82% with active therapy, and 20%/14% with observation. FinTox+ predictors included annual income (P < .01) and out-of-pocket costs (P < .01). TimeTox+ predictors included disease status (P < .001), caregiver status (P = .01), far-residing status (P < .001), and out-of-pocket costs (P = .03). FinTox+ was associated with a clinically meaningful decrease in mental QOL, while TimeTox+ patients were more likely to have KPS ≤ 80. CONCLUSIONS: In our large study, monetary status but not disease status predicted FinTox. Over a third of patients on maintenance reported TimeTox. FinTox+ was associated with decreased mental health, while TimeTox+ was associated with worse performance status. These two toxicities may negatively impact patient wellbeing, and studies of strategies to mitigate their impact are in development.

Returning to Work Following Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: The Survivor's Perspective.

While curing a patient's underlying disease is the primary goal of physicians performing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), the ultimate objective is to provide patients with optimal post-HCT quality of life. For many survivors, this includes returning to work (RTW). We conducted a survey of 1- to 5-yr post-HCT survivors at our center to evaluate their perspective on facilitators and barriers to RTW as well as to gauge interest in potentially useful RTW support interventions. Survivors aged 18 to 65 yrs (n = 994) were sent an annual survey that included 36 supplementary questions about post-HCT RTW. Survey questions were selected from published national cancer survivor surveys and then modified specifically for HCT survivors. Three hundred forty-four (35%) survivors with a mean age of 53 yrs completed the survey, of whom 272 (79%) had worked prior to their diagnosis. Of those 272 patients, 145 (53%) were working currently and another 22 (8%) had attempted to go back to work following HCT but were not presently working. We found that having had an allogeneic versus autologous HCT (P = .006) was associated with a decreased likelihood of currently working, whereas frequent employer communication (>once a month) (P = .070) and having a more supportive employer (P = .036) were associated with a greater chance of currently working. Of survivors currently working, 45% reported that they had made one or more changes to their work schedule (e.g., flexible schedule or part-time work) or environment (e.g., work from home) upon RTW. Ninety-five percent of responders reported that they could have benefited from RTW support provided by the transplant center, but only 13% indicated that they had received it. Education on RTW challenges, information on disability benefits, and access to physical therapy were among the most requested support interventions. To improve post-HCT quality of life for survivors open to assistance, providers should address work status and goals, recognize barriers to successful return, and offer RTW support including working directly with employers. Allogeneic HCT survivors are particularly vulnerable to failing attempts to RTW and should be the target of retention interventions. A previously published manuscript on RTW guidance for providers of stem cell transplant patients endorsed by the American Society of Transplant and Cellular Therapy is available in Open Access and can be used as a tool to counsel and support these patients.

Late Effects of Severe Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease on Quality of Life, Medical Comorbidities, and Survival.

Grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is associated with high short-term morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The long-term effects after recovery from grade III-IV aGVHD are unknown. This study aimed to analyze late medical comorbidities, quality of life, nonrelapse mortality, and survival in patients treated for grade III-IV aGVHD. Chart review identified late effects, and patients were asked to complete annual surveys to collect patient-reported outcomes. Outcomes were compared between patients with grade 0-I aGVHD and grade III-IV aGVHD who underwent HCT between 2001 and 2019 and survived for at least 1 year post-transplantation. Patients with a history of grade III-IV aGVHD (n = 192) had significantly higher rates of late medical comorbidities (P < .001) and worse physical (P = .01) and mental (P = .04) functioning compared with patients with grade 0-I aGVHD (n = 615). Patients who survived for >1 year post-transplantation and had prior grade III-IV aGVHD also had worse 5-year overall survival (77.5% versus 83.6%; P = .006) and higher nonrelapse mortality (19.2% versus 10.6%; P < .001) compared with those with a history of grade 0-I aGVHD. No between-group difference was found in cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD. Patients who recover from severe aGVHD remain vulnerable to developing late comorbidities. These patients would likely benefit from continued monitoring and supportive care in an attempt to prevent late effects and improve survival.

Neuropathy and Muscle Cramps in Autologous and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Survivors.

Although autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation are used to treat hematologic diseases, they are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The goal of this cross-sectional study was to describe the incidence, characteristics, severity and clinical correlates of neuropathy and muscle cramps, as self-reported by hematopoietic cell transplantation survivors. We included all respondents to a survey conducted July 1, 2020, to June 30, 2021. Surveys were completed online or on-paper according to participants' preferences; they received one reminder if no survey was received 1 month after distribution. Statistics are primarily descriptive comparing subgroups of patients. Of 4641 potentially eligible patients, 1745 responded and are included in the analysis. Participants (615 [35%] autologous, 1130 [65%] allogeneic) were a median age of 64.1 years (interquartile range [IQR] 55.2-70.8) and surveyed at a median of 11 years (IQR 4-21) after their most recent transplantation. Neuropathy symptoms were reported by 65% of autologous recipients, 66% of allogeneic transplant recipients with current chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD), and 45% of allogeneic recipients who never developed chronic GVHD. Muscle cramps were reported by 56% of autologous recipients, and 52% of allogeneic recipients and were rated as "very painful" by nearly half of patients who experienced them. These results suggest that neuropathy symptoms and muscle cramps are much more prevalent among survivors after hematopoietic cell transplantation than previously recognized. Better approaches for prevention and treatment of these bothersome complications are needed.

Outcomes after hematopoietic cell transplantation among non-English- compared to English-speaking recipients.

Multiple studies have documented that racial/ethnic minority patients are less likely to undergo hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in the United States (US), and if they do, they often have worse outcomes. No studies to our knowledge have compared the outcomes of English-speakers to non-English speakers undergoing HCT in the US. To test our hypothesis that non-English speakers have worse outcomes than English speakers after HCT, all transplants performed between 2015 and 2019 at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, WA, USA were analyzed. Cox proportional hazards models were used to test our hypothesis, adjusting for significant clinical covariates. Out of 2051 patients, 106 (5%) were documented to be non-English speakers. Mortality for non-English speakers was not different than English speakers (adjusted HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.63-1.63, p = 0.95). When the analysis was limited to the allogeneic population, the results were similar to the total population (adjusted HR 1.10, 0.64-1.88, p = 0.73). The risk of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was higher in the non-English speaking subset: adjusted OR 2.01, 95% CI, 1.02-3.98, p = 0.04. These data suggest that non-English speakers have similar survival compared to English speakers following HCT although they have more acute GVHD.