Value of a secretomic approach for distinguishing patients with COVID-19 viral pneumonia among patients with respiratory distress admitted to intensive care unit.

In intensive care units, COVID-19 viral pneumonia patients (VPP) present symptoms similar to those of other patients with Nonviral infection (NV-ICU). To better manage VPP, it is therefore interesting to better understand the molecular pathophysiology of viral pneumonia and to search for biomarkers that may clarify the diagnosis. The secretome being a set of proteins secreted by cells in response to stimuli represents an opportunity to discover new biomarkers. The objective of this study is to identify the secretomic signatures of VPP with those of NV-ICU. Plasma samples and clinical data from NV-ICU (n = 104), VPP (n = 30) or healthy donors (HD, n = 20) were collected at Nantes Hospital (France) upon admission. Samples were enriched for the low-abundant proteins and analyzed using nontarget mass spectrometry. Specifically deregulated proteins (DEP) in VPP versus NV-ICU were selected. Combinations of 2 to 4 DEPs were established. The differences in secretome profiles of the VPP and NV-ICU groups were highlighted. Forty-one DEPs were specifically identified in VPP compared to NV-ICU. We describe five of the best combinations of 3 proteins (complement component C9, Ficolin-3, Galectin-3-binding protein, Fibrinogen alpha, gamma and beta chain, Proteoglycan 4, Coagulation factor IX and Cdc42 effector protein 4) that show a characteristic receptor function curve with an area under the curve of 95.0%. This study identifies five combinations of candidate biomarkers in VPP compared to NV-ICU that may help distinguish the underlying causal molecular alterations.

Fundamental technical skills of EndoVascular Surgery: A preliminary study on its impact on skills and stress during procedures.

OBJECTIVES: Our objective is twofold: determining if simulation allows residents to reach proficient surgeons' performance concerning Fundamental technical skills of EndoVascular Surgery (FEVS) and to while investigating the effects of the program on surgeon's stress. MATERIAL & METHODS: Using a FEVS training simulator, 8 endovascular FEVS were performed by vascular surgery residents (simulator-naive (SNR) or simulator-experienced (SER)) and seniors. Total time needed to complete the 8 tasks, called Total Completion Time (TCT), was the main evaluation criterion. Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI), was monitored during simulation. Likert scale questionnaire was filled after each simulation. RESULTS: For each task, TCT was significantly lower for SER and seniors than SNR (p=0.0163). After only 5 simulations, SER were able to reach and even exceed the seniors' level in terms of TCT, with a median time of 10.8 minutes for SER and 11.9 minutes for seniors, and wire's movements with a median distance during cannulation of 4.44 m for SER and 4.17m for seniors. Seniors remained better than SER in terms of precise wire manipulation (wire movement after cannulation), 4.17m against 4.44m (3.72-5.96) respectively. Based on the Likert scale, stress analysis, seniors felt less stressed than both residents' groups (p=0.0618). Seniors' initial ANI and mean ANI over the session was were significantly lower than those of the residents, p=0.0358 and p=0.0250 respectively. CONCLUSION: We showed that 5 simulation sessions allowed residents to reach experienced surgeons' capacities on FEVS concerning TCT. Subjectively, seniors felt less stressed than residents, contrary to the results of our objective measures of stress.

NButGT Reinforces the Beneficial Effects of Epinephrine on Cardiac Mitochondrial Respiration, Lactatemia and Cardiac Output in Experimental Anaphylactic Shock.

Anaphylactic shock (AS) is the most severe form of acute systemic hypersensitivity reaction. Although epinephrine can restore patients' hemodynamics, it might also be harmful, supporting the need for adjuvant treatment. We therefore investigated whether NButGT, enhancing O-GlcNAcylation and showing beneficial effects in acute heart failure might improve AS therapy. Ovalbumin-sensitized rats were randomly allocated to six groups: control (CON), shock (AS), shock treated with NButGT alone before (AS+pre-Nbut) or after (AS+post-Nbut) AS onset, shock treated with epinephrine alone (AS+EPI) and shock group treated with combination of epinephrine and NButGT (AS+EPI+preNBut). Induction of shock was performed with an intravenous (IV) ovalbumin. Cardiac protein and cycling enzymes O-GlcNAcylation levels, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, cardiac output (CO), left ventricle shortening fraction (LVSF), mitochondrial respiration, and lactatemia were evaluated using Western blotting experiments, invasive arterial monitoring, echocardiography, mitochondrial oximetry and arterial blood samples. AS decreased MAP (-77%, p < 0.001), CO (-90%, p < 0.001) and LVSF (-30%, p < 0.05). Epinephrine improved these parameters and, in particular, rats did not die in 15 min. But, cardiac mitochondrial respiration remained impaired (complexes I + II -29%, p < 0.05 and II -40%, p < 0.001) with hyperlactatemia. NButGT pretreatment (AS+pre-Nbut) efficiently increased cardiac O-GlcNAcylation level as compared to the AS+post-Nbut group. Compared to epinephrine alone, the adjunction of NButGT significantly improved CO, LVSF and mitochondrial respiration. MAP was not significantly increased but lactatemia decreased more markedly. Pretreatment with NButGT increases O-GlcNAcylation of cardiac proteins and has an additive effect on epinephrine, improving cardiac output and mitochondrial respiration and decreasing blood lactate levels. This new therapy might be useful when the risk of AS cannot be avoided.

Impact of COVID-19 and lockdown regarding blood transfusion.

BACKGROUND: The outbreak of a SARS-CoV-2 resulted in a massive afflux of patients in hospital and intensive care units with many challenges. Blood transfusion was one of them regarding both blood banks (safety, collection, and stocks) and consumption (usual care and unknown specific demand of COVID-19 patients). The risk of mismatch was sufficient to plan blood transfusion restrictions if stocks became limited. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Analyses of blood transfusion in a tertiary hospital and blood collection in the referring blood bank between February 24 and May 31, 2020. RESULTS: Withdrawal of elective surgery and non-urgent care and admission of 2291 COVID-19 patients reduced global activity by 33% but transfusion by 17% only. Only 237 (10.3) % of COVID-19 patients required blood transfusion, including 45 (2.0%) with acute bleeding. Lockdown and cancellation of mobile collection resulted in an 11% reduction in blood donation compared to 2019. The ratio of reduction in blood transfusion to blood donation remained positive and stocks were slightly enhanced. DISCUSSION: Reduction of admissions due to SARS-CoV-2 pandemic results only in a moderate decrease of blood transfusion. Incompressible blood transfusions concern urgent surgery, acute bleeding (including some patients with COVID-19, especially under high anticoagulation), or are supportive for chemotherapy-induced aplasia or chronic anemia. Lockdown results in a decrease of blood donation by cancellation of mobile donation but with little impact on a short period by mobilization of usual donors. No mismatch between demand and donation was evidenced and no planned restriction to blood transfusion was necessary.

Treatment with a platelet-activating factor receptor antagonist improves hemodynamics and reduces epinephrine requirements, in a lethal rodent model of anaphylactic shock.

BACKGROUND: In some cases, anaphylactic shock (AS) is still lethal, despite rapid use of epinephrine. High doses of epinephrine are associated with severe complications. Platelet-activating factor (PAF) is secreted in massive amounts during AS, and a high plasma level is correlated with increased AS severity. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of ABT-491, a PAF-receptor antagonist and possible adjunct treatment, alone or in combination with epinephrine during AS. METHODS: AS was induced by intravenous injection of 1 mg ovalbumin into ovalbumin-sensitized rats. Rats were then randomly assigned to 5 groups (n = 10 per group): SHAM (vehicle only), SHOCK (no treatment), ABT (ABT-491 1 mg/kg), EPI (epinephrine 5 µg as a bolus then 10 µg kg-1  min-1 by continuous infusion, followed by a reducing protocol) and EPI-ABT (both treatments). RESULTS: Ovalbumin injection resulted in a severe decrease in mean arterial pressure, left ventricular inotropy (max dP/dt) and left ventricular shortening fraction (LVSF). All rats from the ABT group survived until the end of the experiment. ABT-491 prevented the LVSF decrease observed in the SHOCK group (at T15: ABT 50% ± 11% vs SHOCK 36% ± 9%, P = .01), significantly reduced the dose of epinephrine needed to treat anaphylactic shock (EPI-ABT 314 ± 67 µg/kg vs EPI 475 ± 69 µg/kg, P < .001) and reduced the time to restore basal MAP (ABT 23 ± 7 minutes vs EPI-ABT 13 ± 5 minutes, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: AS was characterized by early cardiac dysfunction in our model. Treatment with ABT-491 allowed survival until the end of the experiment and reduced cardiac dysfunction. Use of the PAF-R antagonist had a synergistic effect with epinephrine and allowed a significant reduction in epinephrine consumption. Use of PAF-R antagonists during AS could reduce epinephrine-related complications and improve the treatment of epinephrine refractory cases.

Decompressive hemicraniectomy for acute ischemic stroke in a patient implanted with a left ventricular assist device: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Thromboembolic ischemic stroke (IS) is one of the most feared complications of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement and represents a challenge to surgical management because of concomitant anticoagulant therapy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 39-year-old man presented with cardiogenic shock following an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. After a period of stabilization, the patient was referred for LVAD placement. Upon recovery from anesthesia, he presented with acute neurological deficits suggestive of IS. A brain computed tomography confirmed the diagnosis, and an emergency decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) was performed. Anticoagulation was managed empirically. The patient's neurological status progressively improved and he was referred for heart transplantation at five months from DHC. One month later, cranioplasty was performed. CONCLUSIONS: This report suggests an anticoagulation management approach in combination with decompressive craniectomy after IS in a patient with LVAD placement was successful. An optimized anticoagulation management and collaborative team-based practice may contribute to successful outcomes in complex cases.

Epinephrine, compared with arginine vasopressin, is associated with similar haemodynamic effects but significantly improved brain oxygenation in the early phase of anaphylactic shock in rats: An experimental study.

BACKGROUND: In contrast to other types of shock, anaphylactic shock decreases cerebral blood flow more than would be expected from severe arterial hypotension, thus potentially affecting survival through brain ischaemia/hypoxia. We hypothesised that epinephrine (EPI) used as a first-line treatment of anaphylactic shock and arginine vasopressin (AVP) proposed in case of EPI refractoriness may have different effects on brain oxygenation. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of EPI and AVP on brain oxygenation under similar macro-haemodynamic target values in an anaphylactic shock model. DESIGN: Prospective laboratory study. SETTING: University laboratory. ANIMALS: Male brown Norway rats (n = 27). INTERVENTIONS: Twenty-seven rats were sensitised with ovalbumin (OVA). Twenty rats had anaphylactic shock induced with OVA and were resuscitated with either 0.9% saline (OVA group), EPI (EPI group) or AVP (AVP group). Sensitised control rats received only 0.9% saline and no OVA (CON group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean arterial pressure (MAP), carotid artery blood flow (CaBF), cerebral cortical blood flow (CBF) and hippocampal oxygen partial pressure (PtiO2) were recorded. RESULTS: All rats in the OVA group died within 15 min. EPI and AVP restored comparable levels of MAP, carotid artery blood flow and CBF, and extended survival time. EPI was associated with biologically relevant and significantly (P < 0.05) higher PtiO2 values (nadir values at 20 min: 25.0 ± 2.2 mmHg) compared with the AVP group (14.9 ± 2.0 mmHg). The slopes of the correlations of MAP vs. PtiO2 and CBF were significantly steeper with AVP (more pressure dependence) compared with EPI. By the end of the experiment, hippocampal PtiO2 values between the EPI (24.1 ± 2.1 mmHg) and the AVP (20.8 ± 2.0 mmHg) groups were similar. CONCLUSION: At early, but not at late time points, resuscitation of anaphylactic shock with EPI or AVP to similar MAP and CBF endpoints resulted in hippocampal PtiO2 being significantly higher after EPI. In addition, the PtiO2 after EPI always remained above the threshold for brain hypoxia, whereas PtiO2 after AVP was below the hypoxic threshold most of the time. Because of this early brain hypoxia, AVP may not be the drug of first choice for resuscitation of anaphylactic shock.

Early chest tube removal on the 1st postoperative day protocol of an enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery programme is safe.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the safety of early chest tube removal (CTR) protocol on the 1st postoperative day (POD1) of our Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme by comparing the risk of postoperative pneumothorax, pleural and pericardial effusion requiring intervention and hospital mortality. METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing elective coronary revascularization and/or valve surgery between 2015 and 2021 were assessed in terms of their perioperative management pathways: conventional standard of care (control group) versus standardized systematic perioperative ERAS programme including an early CTR on POD1 (ERAS group). A propensity score matching was applied. The primary end-point was a composite of postoperative pneumothorax, pleural and pericardial effusion requiring intervention and hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 3153 patients were included. Propensity score analysis resulted in 2 groups well-matched pairs of 1026 patients. CTR on POD1 was significantly increased from 29.5% in the control group to 70.3% in the ERAS group (P < 0.001). The incidence of the primary end-point was 6.4% in the control group and 6.9% in the ERAS group (P = 0.658). Patients in the ERAS group, as compared with control group, had significant lower incidence of bronchopneumonia (9.0% vs 13.5%; P = 0.001) and higher incidence of mechanical ventilation ≤6 h (84.6% vs 65.2%; P < 0.001), length of intensive care unit ≤1 day (61.2% vs 50.8%; P < 0.001) and hospital ≤6 days (67.3% vs.43.2%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CTR on POD1 protocol can be safely incorporated into a standardized systematic ERAS programme, enabling early mobilization, and contributing to the improvement of postoperative outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Ethics committee of the French Society of Thoracic and Cardio-Vascular Surgery (CERC-SFCTCV-2022-09-13_23140).

Using the nociception level index to compare the intraoperative antinociceptive effect of propofol and sevoflurane during clinical and experimental noxious stimulus in patients under general anesthesia.

STUDY: Propofol and sevoflurane are two anesthetic agents widely used to induce and maintain general anesthesia (GA). Their intrinsic antinociceptive properties remain unclear and are still debated. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether propofol presents stronger antinociceptive properties than sevoflurane using intraoperative clinical and experimental noxious stimulations and evaluating postoperative pain outcomes. DESIGN: A prospective randomized monocentric trial. SETTING: Perioperative care. PATIENTS: 60 adult patients with ASA status I to III who underwent elective abdominal laparoscopic surgery under GA were randomized either in propofol or sevoflurane group to induce and maintain GA. INTERVENTIONS: We used clinical and experimental noxious stimulations (intubation, tetanic stimulation) to assess the antinociceptive properties of propofol and sevoflurane in patients under GA and monitored using the NOL index, BIS index, heart rate, and mean arterial blood pressure. MEASUREMENTS: We measured the difference in the NOL index alterations after intubation and tetanic stimulation during either intravenous anesthesia (propofol) or inhaled anesthesia (sevoflurane). We also intraoperatively measured the NOL index and remifentanil consumption and recorded postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption in the post-anesthesia care unit. Intraoperative management was standardized by targeting similar values of depth of anesthesia (BIS index), hemodynamic (HR and MAP), NOL index values (below the threshold of 20), same multimodal analgesia and type of surgery. MAIN RESULTS: We found the antinociceptive properties of propofol and sevoflurane similar. The only minor difference was after tetanic stimulation: the delta NOL was higher in the sevoflurane group (39 ± 13 for the propofol group versus 47 ± 15 for sevoflurane; P = 0.04). Intraoperative and postoperative pain outcomes and opioid consumption were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a precise intraoperative experimental and clinical protocol using the NOL index, propofol does not provide a higher level of antinociception during anesthesia or analgesia after surgery when compared to sevoflurane. Anesthesiologists may prefer propofol over sevoflurane to reduce PONV or anesthesia-related pollution, but not for superior antinociceptive properties.

COVID-19 promotes endothelial dysfunction and thrombogenicity: role of proinflammatory cytokines/SGLT2 prooxidant pathway.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular complications. Although cytokines have a predominant role in endothelium damage, the precise molecular mechanisms are far from being elucidated. OBJECTIVES: The present study hypothesized that inflammation in patients with COVID-19 contributes to endothelial dysfunction through redox-sensitive SGLT2 overexpression and investigated the protective effect of SGLT2 inhibition by empagliflozin. METHODS: Human plasma samples were collected from patients with acute, subacute, and long COVID-19 (n = 100), patients with non-COVID-19 and cardiovascular risk factors (n = 50), and healthy volunteers (n = 25). Porcine coronary artery endothelial cells (ECs) were incubated with plasma (10%). Protein expression levels were determined using Western blot analyses and immunofluorescence staining, mRNA expression by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and the level of oxidative stress by dihydroethidium staining. Platelet adhesion, aggregation, and thrombin generation were determined. RESULTS: Increased plasma levels of interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 were observed in patients with COVID-19. Exposure of ECs to COVID-19 plasma with high cytokines levels induced redox-sensitive upregulation of SGLT2 expression via proinflammatory cytokines IL-1ß, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α which, in turn, fueled endothelial dysfunction, senescence, NF-κB activation, inflammation, platelet adhesion and aggregation, von Willebrand factor secretion, and thrombin generation. The stimulatory effect of COVID-19 plasma was blunted by neutralizing antibodies against proinflammatory cytokines and empagliflozin. CONCLUSION: In patients with COVID-19, proinflammatory cytokines induced a redox-sensitive upregulation of SGLT2 expression in ECs, which in turn promoted endothelial injury, senescence, platelet adhesion, aggregation, and thrombin generation. SGLT2 inhibition with empagliflozin appeared as an attractive strategy to restore vascular homeostasis in COVID-19.

Enhanced recovery after surgery program for patients undergoing isolated elective coronary artery bypass surgery improves postoperative outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a perioperative systematic standardized enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program for patients undergoing isolated elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in terms of mortality, hospital morbidities, and length of stay. METHODS: From January 2015 to September 2020, 1101 patients underwent isolated elective CABG. Our standardized systematic ERAS program was implemented in November 2018. Propensity score matching resulted in well-matched pairs of 362 patients receiving standard perioperative care (control group) and 362 patients on the ERAS program (ERAS group). There were no significant intergroup differences in preoperative and operative data except for the normothermia rate, which was significantly greater in the ERAS group (P < .001). The primary outcome was 3-year mortality. The secondary outcomes were hospital morbidities and length of stay. RESULTS: In-hospital and 3-year mortality did not differ between the 2 groups. The ERAS program was associated with a significant relative risk decrease in mechanical ventilation duration (-53.1%, P = .003), length of intensive care unit stay (-28.0%, P = .015), length of hospital stay (-10.5%, P = .046), bronchopneumonia (-51.5%, P < .001), acute respiratory distress syndrome (-50.8%, P = .050), postoperative delirium (-65.4%, P = .011), moderate-to-severe acute kidney injury (-72.0%, P = .009), 24-hour chest tube output (-26.4%, P < .001), and overall red blood cell transfusion rate (-32.4%, P = .005) compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: A systematic standardized ERAS program for low-risk patients undergoing isolated elective CABG was associated with a significant improvement in postoperative outcomes, reduction in red blood cell transfusion, shorter lengths of intensive care unit and hospital stays, and comparable long-term mortality.

Influence of socio-economic status on functional recovery after ARDS caused by SARS-CoV-2: the multicentre, observational RECOVIDS study.

PURPOSE: Survivors after acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are at high risk of developing respiratory sequelae and functional impairment. The healthcare crisis caused by the pandemic hit socially disadvantaged populations. We aimed to evaluate the influence of socio-economic status on respiratory sequelae after COVID-19 ARDS. METHODS: We carried out a prospective multicenter study in 30 French intensive care units (ICUs), where ARDS survivors were pre-enrolled if they fulfilled the Berlin ARDS criteria. For patients receiving high flow oxygen therapy, a flow ≥ 50 l/min and an FiO2 ≥ 50% were required for enrollment. Socio-economic deprivation was defined by an EPICES (Evaluation de la Précarité et des Inégalités de santé dans les Centres d'Examens de Santé - Evaluation of Deprivation and Inequalities in Health Examination Centres) score ≥ 30.17 and patients were included if they performed the 6-month evaluation. The primary outcome was respiratory sequelae 6 months after ICU discharge, defined by at least one of the following criteria: forced vital capacity < 80% of theoretical value, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide < 80% of theoretical value, oxygen desaturation during a 6-min walk test and fibrotic-like findings on chest computed tomography. RESULTS: Among 401 analyzable patients, 160 (40%) were socio-economically deprived and 241 (60%) non-deprived; 319 (80%) patients had respiratory sequelae 6 months after ICU discharge (81% vs 78%, deprived vs non-deprived, respectively). No significant effect of socio-economic status was identified on lung sequelae (odds ratio (OR), 1.19 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72-1.97]), even after adjustment for age, sex, most invasive respiratory support, obesity, most severe P/F ratio (adjusted OR, 1.02 [95% CI 0.57-1.83]). CONCLUSIONS: In COVID-19 ARDS survivors, socio-economic status had no significant influence on respiratory sequelae 6 months after ICU discharge.

Impaired Myocardial Mitochondrial Function in an Experimental Model of Anaphylactic Shock.

Anaphylactic shock (AS) is associated with a profound vasodilation and cardiac dysfunction. The cellular mechanisms underlying AS-related cardiac dysfunction are unknown. We hypothesized that myocardial mitochondrial dysfunction may be associated with AS cardiac dysfunction. In controls and sensitized Brown Norway rats, shock was induced by ovalbumin i.v bolus, and abdominal aortic blood flow (ABF), systemic mean arterial pressure (MAP), and lactatemia were measured for 15 min. Myocardial mitochondrial function was assessed with the evaluation of mitochondrial respiration, oxidative stress production by reactive oxygen species (ROS), reactive nitrogen species (RNS), and the measurement of superoxide dismutases (SODs) activity. Oxidative damage was assessed by lipid peroxidation. The mitochondrial ultrastructure was assessed using transmission electronic microscopy. AS was associated with a dramatic drop in ABF and MAP combined with a severe hyperlactatemia 15 min after shock induction. CI-linked substrate state (197 ± 21 vs. 144 ± 21 pmol/s/mg, p < 0.05), OXPHOS activity by complexes I and II (411 ± 47 vs. 246 ± 33 pmol/s/mg, p < 0.05), and OXPHOS activity through complex II (316 ± 40 vs. 203 ± 28 pmol/s/mg, p < 0.05) were significantly impaired. ROS and RNS production was not significantly increased, but SODs activity was significantly higher in the AS group (11.15 ± 1.02 vs. 15.50 ± 1.40 U/mL/mg protein, p = 0.02). Finally, cardiac lipid peroxidation was significantly increased in the AS group (8.50 ± 0.67 vs. 12.17 ± 1.44 µM/mg protein, p < 0.05). No obvious changes were observed in the mitochondrial ultrastructure between CON and AS groups. Our experimental model of AS results in rapid and deleterious hemodynamic effects and was associated with a myocardial mitochondrial dysfunction with oxidative damage and without mitochondrial ultrastructural injury.

Long Term Follow-Up of Sarcopenia and Malnutrition after Hospitalization for COVID-19 in Conventional or Intensive Care Units.

BACKGROUND: The post-COVID-19 condition, defined as COVID-19-related signs and symptoms lasting at least 2 months and persisting more than 3 months after infection, appears now as a public health issue in terms of frequency and quality of life alterations. Nevertheless, few data are available concerning long term evolution of malnutrition and sarcopenia, which deserve further attention. METHOD: Sarcopenia was investigated prospectively, together with weight evolution, at admission and at 3 and 6 months after hospital discharge in 139 COVID-19 patients, using the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2) criteria, associating both decreased muscle strength and muscle mass, assessed, respectively, with hand dynamometer and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: Of the 139 patients, 22 presented with sarcopenia at 3 months; intensive care units (ICU) length of stay was the sole factor associated with sarcopenia after multivariate analysis. Although the entire group did not demonstrate significant weight change, weight decreased significantly in the sarcopenia group (Five and eight patients, showing, respectively, >5 or >10% weight decrease). Interestingly, at 6 months, 16 of the 22 patients recovered from sarcopenia and their weight returned toward baseline values. CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenia and malnutrition are frequently observed in patients hospitalized for COVID-19, even 3 months after infection occurrence, but can largely be reversed at 6 months after discharge. Enhanced patient care is needed in sarcopenic patients, particularly during long stays in an ICU.

Serum lactate and acute mesenteric ischaemia: An observational, controlled multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis and prompt management of acute mesenteric ischaemia (AMI) are key to survival but remain extremely difficult, due to vague and non-specific symptoms. Serum lactate (SL) is commonly presented as a useful biomarker for the diagnosis or prognosis of AMI. The aim of our study was test SL (1) as a diagnostic marker and (2) as a prognostic marker for AMI. STUDY DESIGN: This was an ancillary multicentre case-control study. Patients with AMI at intensive care unit (ICU) admission were included (AMI group) and matched to ICU patients without AMI (control group). SL was measured and compared on day 0 (D0) and day 1 (D1). Diagnosis and prognosis accuracy were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and their area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Each group consisted of 137 matched ICU patients. There was no significant difference of SL between the two groups at D0 or at D1 (p = 0.26 and p = 0.29 respectively). SL was a poor marker of AMI: at D0 and D1, AUC were respectively 0.57 [0.51; 0.63] and 0.60 [0.53; 0.67]. SL at D0 and D1 correctly predicted ICU mortality, independently of AMI (AUC D0: 0.69 [0.59; 0.79] vs. 0.74 [0.65; 0.82]; p = 0.51 and D1: 0.74 [0.64; 0.84] vs. 0.76 [0.66; 0.87]; p = 0.77, respectively, for control and AMI groups]. CONCLUSIONS: SL has no specific link with AMI, both for diagnosis and prognosis. SL should not be used for the diagnosis of AMI but, despite its lack of specificity, it may help to assess severity.

Evolution of Neuroimaging Findings in Severe COVID-19 Patients with Initial Neurological Impairment: An Observational Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cerebral complications related to the COVID-19 were documented by brain MRIs during the acute phase. The purpose of the present study was to describe the evolution of these neuroimaging findings (MRI and FDG-PET/CT) and describe the neurocognitive outcomes of these patients. METHODS: During the first wave of the COVID-19 outbreak between 1 March and 31 May 2020, 112 consecutive COVID-19 patients with neurologic manifestations underwent a brain MRI at Strasbourg University hospitals. After recovery, during follow-up, of these 112 patients, 31 (initially hospitalized in intensive care units) underwent additional imaging studies (at least one brain MRI). RESULTS: Twenty-three men (74%) and eight women (26%) with a mean age of 61 years (range: 18-79) were included. Leptomeningeal enhancement, diffuse brain microhemorrhages, acute ischemic strokes, suspicion of cerebral vasculitis, and acute inflammatory demyelinating lesions were described on the initial brain MRIs. During follow-up, the evolution of the leptomeningeal enhancement was discordant, and the cerebral microhemorrhages were stable. We observed normalization of the vessel walls in all patients suspected of cerebral vasculitis. Four patients (13%) demonstrated new complications during follow-up (ischemic strokes, hypoglossal neuritis, marked increase in the white matter FLAIR hyperintensities with presumed vascular origin, and one suspected case of cerebral vasculitis). Concerning the grey matter volumetry, we observed a loss of volume of 3.2% during an average period of approximately five months. During follow-up, the more frequent FDG-PET/CT findings were hypometabolism in temporal and insular regions. CONCLUSION: A minority of initially severe COVID-19 patients demonstrated new complications on their brain MRIs during follow-up after recovery.

Influence of socioeconomic status on functional recovery after ARDS caused by SARS-CoV-2: a multicentre, observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Prognosis of patients with COVID-19 depends on the severity of the pulmonary affection. The most severe cases may progress to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which is associated with a risk of long-term repercussions on respiratory function and neuromuscular outcomes. The functional repercussions of severe forms of COVID-19 may have a major impact on quality of life, and impair the ability to return to work or exercise. Social inequalities in healthcare may influence prognosis, with socially vulnerable individuals more likely to develop severe forms of disease. We describe here the protocol for a prospective, multicentre study that aims to investigate the influence of social vulnerability on functional recovery in patients who were hospitalised in intensive care for ARDS caused by COVID-19. This study will also include an embedded qualitative study that aims to describe facilitators and barriers to compliance with rehabilitation, describe patients' health practices and identify social representations of health, disease and care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The "Functional Recovery From Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Due to COVID-19: Influence of Socio-Economic Status" (RECOVIDS) study is a mixed-methods, observational, multicentre cohort study performed during the routine follow-up of post-intensive care unit (ICU) functional recovery after ARDS. All patients admitted to a participating ICU for PCR-proven SARS-CoV-2 infection and who underwent chest CT scan at the initial phase AND who received respiratory support (mechanical or not) or high-flow nasal oxygen, AND had ARDS diagnosed by the Berlin criteria will be eligible. The primary outcome is the presence of lung sequelae at 6 months after ICU discharge, defined either by alterations on pulmonary function tests, oxygen desaturation during a standardised 6 min walk test or fibrosis-like pulmonary findings on chest CT. Patients will be considered to be socially disadvantaged if they have an "Evaluation de la Précarité et des Inégalités de santé dans les Centres d'Examen de Santé" (EPICES) score ≥30.17 at inclusion. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol and the informed consent form were approved by an independent ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud Méditerranée II) on 10 July 2020 (2020-A02014-35). All patients will provide informed consent before participation. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international congresses. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04556513.

Hemodynamic Management During Kidney Transplantation: A French Survey.

BACKGROUND: Hypovolemia or excess fluid load during kidney transplantation may have detrimental effects on the recipient and graft. The aim of our survey was to examine hemodynamic monitoring during kidney transplantation (KT) in French KT centers. BASIC PROCEDURES: The online survey covered the organization of anesthesia, the type of hemodynamic monitoring available in each center, the frequency of use of each hemodynamic parameter, and the hemodynamic algorithm used to manage fluid administration. MAIN FINDINGS: Twenty-four centers answered the survey (70% of all the 34 French KT centers) and reported performing 2029 KTs in 2016. Anesthesia for KT was performed either by a general team (n = 12, 48%) or less often, by a specific team during open hours (n = 7, 28%), a specific 24-hour/24-hour team (n = 5, 20%), or an emergency team (n = 1, 4%). The centers reported that up to 8 different hemodynamic monitoring techniques were available for KT. Central venous pressure (CVP) is the most frequently used hemodynamic parameter (1278 KT, 63%). Among the 17 centers using CVP monitoring, 9 had no specific algorithm and the other 8 centers used a different algorithm to manage fluids with CVP. The total fluids administered during KT varied from 1000 mL to 3500 mL. CONCLUSIONS: CVP was still the main hemodynamic parameter used in France during KT in 2016. Our results suggest that a large randomized controlled trial should be performed to specifically address the question of hemodynamic management during KT.