Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) compared to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease (MVCAD). BACKGROUND: HCR involves a combination of surgical and percutaneous techniques, which in selected patients may present an alternative to conventional CABG. METHODS: Databases were searched through June 30, 2016, and studies comparing HCR with CABG for treatment of MVCAD were selected. We calculated summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs with the random-effects model. The primary outcome of interest was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as a composite of all cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke. RESULTS: The analysis included 2,245 patients from 8 studies (1 randomized controlled trial and 7 observational studies). The risk of MACCE with HCR and CABG were 3.6% and 5.4%, respectively (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.24-1.16). Compared to CABG group, patients in HCR group had similar risk of all cause mortality (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.38-1.88), myocardial infarction (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.31-1.64), stroke (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.23-1.20), and repeat revascularization (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.58-2.83). The need for postoperative blood transfusions (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.14-0.59) and hospital stay (weighted mean difference -1.20 days; 95% CI -1.52 to -0.88 days) was significantly lower in the HCR group. CONCLUSION: HCR appears to be safe, and has similar outcomes when compared with conventional CABG. HCR can be a suitable alternative to conventional CABG in select patients with MVCAD. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

SYNTAX Score and Outcomes of Coronary Revascularization in Diabetic Patients.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review describes the dynamic relationship between diabetes mellitus (DM) and coronary artery disease (CAD) with respect to different revascularization strategies and how angiographic tools such as the Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score can supplement clinical decision-making. RECENT FINDINGS: The SYNTAX score characterizes the anatomical extent of CAD in terms of the number of lesions, functional importance, and complexity. Studies not limited to patients with DM suggest that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a reasonable alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with low-medium SYNTAX scores, while patients with high SYNTAX scores should be revascularized with CABG if operable. Similar findings were also observed for diabetes patients with multivessel disease in retrospective pooled analysis. The SYNTAX II score combines anatomical and clinical risk to improve upon the decision regarding the optimal revascularization strategy. The SYNTAX II score can be applied to patients with DM. The SYNTAX scores provide guidance to clinicians faced with determining the optimal revascularization strategy in patients with DM and advanced CAD. Using a heart team approach, the information can be considered along with other factors that influence PCI or CABG risk.

Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: Evidence from a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in comparison to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in intermediate-risk patients. BACKGROUND: TAVR is an established treatment option in high-risk patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS). There are fewer data regarding efficacy of TAVR in intermediate-risk patients. METHODS: Databases were searched through April 30, 2016 for studies that compared TAVR with SAVR for the treatment of intermediate-risk patients with severe AS. We calculated summary risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with the random-effects model. RESULTS: The analysis included 4,601 patients from 7 studies (2 randomized and 5 observational). There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between the two groups after mean follow-up of 1.15 years [14.7% with TAVR vs 15.4% with SAVR; RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.77-1.12]. TAVR resulted in lower rates of acute kidney injury [number needed to treat (NNT) = 26], major bleeding (NNT = 4), and atrial-fibrillation (NNT = 6), but higher rates of major vascular complications [number needed to harm (NNH)= 18], and moderate/severe aortic regurgitation (NNH = 13). The rate of permanent-pacemaker implantation was significantly higher with TAVR in observational studies (RR 2.31; 95% CI 1.22-2.81), but not in RCTs (RR 1.21; 95% CI 0.93-1.56). No significant difference in the rate of stroke or myocardial infarction was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of mid-term results showed that TAVR has similar clinical efficacy to SAVR in intermediate-risk patients with severe AS, and can be a suitable alternative to surgical valve replacement. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The effect of interhospital transfers, emergency medical services, and distance on ischemic time in a rural ST-elevation myocardial infarction system of care.

BACKGROUND: Regional myocardial infarction systems of care have been shown to improve timely access to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, there is a relatively sparse research on rural "frontier" regions. Arrival mode, high rates of interhospital transfers, long transport times, low population density, and mostly volunteer emergency medical services (EMS) distinguish this region from metropolitan systems of care. We sought to assess the effect of interhospital transfers, distance, and arrival mode on total ischemic times for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarctions undergoing primary PCI. METHODS: We assessed patient data from our observational cohort of 395 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction with PCI as their primary treatment strategy. Data came from the 10 PCI hospitals participating in the Wyoming Mission: Lifeline program from January 2013 to September 2014. We performed both regression and tests of differences. RESULTS: Median total ischemic time was nearly 2.7 times greater in transferred patients than those presenting directly (379 vs 140 minutes). Distance in miles traveled between patient's home and PCI facility was 2.5 times larger in transfer patients (51 vs 20 miles). Emergency medical services arrival was associated with 23% shorter total ischemic times than self-arrival. CONCLUSIONS: Transfer patients from referral hospitals had significantly greater total ischemic time, and use of EMS was associated with significantly lower times. Transport distance was mixed in its effect. These findings suggest a continued focus on improving transitions between referral and receiving centers and enhancing coordination in rural systems of care to reduce the multiplier effect of transfers on total ischemic time.

Contemporary use of adjunctive thrombectomy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine the contemporary use of thrombectomy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the United States. BACKGROUND: Adjunctive thrombectomy during primary PCI for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has demonstrated mixed results. While earlier studies showed either unfavorable or neutral effects with rheolytic thrombectomy, recent clinical trials have shown benefits with manual or rheolytic thrombectomy when compared to PCI alone. METHODS: We analyzed data from 122,449 patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI from 1,181 centers reported to the CathPCI Registry® between July 2009 and December 2010. We used logistic regression analysis to examine factors associated with the use of manual and rheolytic thrombectomy. RESULTS: Thrombectomy was performed in 23,195 patients (18.9%): 22,404 (18.3%) had manual thrombectomy and 791 (0.6%) had rheolytic thrombectomy. The use of manual thrombectomy increased over time (P < 0.05). The use of rheolytic thrombectomy did not change. There was significant variation in the use of thrombectomy across hospitals. The strongest predictors of manual versus no thrombectomy included TIMI 0/1 flow (odds ratio 1.69), younger age (OR 0.90 per 10 year increase), saphenous vein graft (OR 2.22), glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (OR 1.34), single-vessel disease (OR 1.13), and year of admission (OR 1.20 per year; all P < 0.001). The strongest predictor of manual versus rheolytic thrombectomy was year of admission (OR 1.23, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that thrombectomy is performed infrequently in the US during primary PCI for STEMI. There is significant variation in the use of thrombectomy across US hospitals.

Retrograde left-ventricular hemodynamic assessment of mechanical aortic and mitral valve gradients using a high-fidelity pressure wire: a case series.

Noninvasive assessment of mechanical heart valve function with echocardiography is challenging. There are important safety issues when considering placing a standard catheter across a mechanical valve with for invasive hemodynamic measurements. The feasibility of using a high-fidelity micromanometer coronary pressure guide wire to assess hemodynamics across mechanical valves has been reported. Although this method appears feasible, safe, and free of major complication, its application and utility remains obscure and underappreciated. We report a series of two patients with mitral and aortic (St. Jude and Björk-Shiley) mechanical valves in which we successfully used this pressure wire technique to assess valvular function in patients evaluated for repeat surgical valve replacement. We include the first report of this guide wire technique to assess hemodynamics across a Björk-Shiley single-tilting disk valve.

Advanced glycation end products accumulate in vascular smooth muscle and modify vascular but not ventricular properties in elderly hypertensive canines.

BACKGROUND: Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are believed to increase left ventricular (LV) and vascular stiffness, in part via cross-linking proteins. We determined whether and where AGEs were increased in elderly hypertensive nondiabetic dogs and whether an AGE cross-link breaker (ALT-711) improved vascular or ventricular function. METHODS AND RESULTS: Elderly dogs with experimental hypertension (old hypertensives [OH]) were randomized to receive ALT-711 (OH+ALT group; n=11; 1 mg/kg PO) or not (OH group; n=11) for 8 weeks. Conscious blood pressure measurements (weekly), echocardiography (week 8), and anesthetized study (week 8) with LV pressure-volume analysis and aortic pressure-dimension and pressure-flow assessment over a range of preloads and afterloads were performed. In LV and aorta from OH, OH+ALT, and young normal dogs, AGE content (immunohistochemistry and Western analysis for N(epsilon)-(carboxymethyl)lysine [CML]) was assessed. Aortic CML content was markedly increased in OH and OH+ALT dogs compared with young normal dogs. CML was localized to aortic and aortic vasa vasorum smooth muscle but not to collagen or elastin. CML was essentially undetectable in young normal, OH, or OH+ALT myocardium but was visible in large vessels in the LV. ALT-711 therapy was associated with lower blood pressure and pulse pressure, decreased systemic vascular resistance, increased aortic distensibility and arterial compliance, and, notably, significant aortic dilatation. Neither LV systolic nor diastolic function was different in OH+ALT versus OH dogs. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly hypertensive canines, AGE accumulation and AGE cross-link breaker effects were confined to the vasculature without evidence of myocardial accumulation or effects. The lack of AGE accumulation in collagen-rich areas suggests that the striking vascular effects may be mediated by mechanisms other than collagen cross-linking.

Trends in prevalence and outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction may be changing as a result of changes in population demographics and in the prevalence and treatment of risk factors for heart failure. Changes in the prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction may contribute to changes in the natural history of heart failure. We performed a study to define secular trends in the prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction among patients at a single institution over a 15-year period. METHODS: We studied all consecutive patients hospitalized with decompensated heart failure at Mayo Clinic Hospitals in Olmsted County, Minnesota, from 1987 through 2001. We classified patients as having either preserved or reduced ejection fraction. The patients were also classified as community patients (Olmsted County residents) or referral patients. Secular trends in the type of heart failure, associated cardiovascular disease, and survival were defined. RESULTS: A total of 6076 patients with heart failure were discharged over the 15-year period; data on ejection fraction were available for 4596 of these patients (76 percent). Of these, 53 percent had a reduced ejection fraction and 47 percent had a preserved ejection fraction. The proportion of patients with the diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction increased over time and was significantly higher among community patients than among referral patients (55 percent vs. 45 percent). The prevalence rates of hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and diabetes among patients with heart failure increased significantly over time. Survival was slightly better among patients with preserved ejection fraction (adjusted hazard ratio for death, 0.96; P=0.01). Survival improved over time for those with reduced ejection fraction but not for those with preserved ejection fraction. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction increased over a 15-year period, while the rate of death from this disorder remained unchanged. These trends underscore the importance of this growing public health problem.

Exploratory study of relationship between hospitalized heart failure patients and chronic renal replacement therapy.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common in heart failure (HF) and is associated with poor outcomes. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) may be deferred over concerns regarding tolerability and outcomes in HF. Our objectives were to ascertain the incidence of RRT, changes in RRT incidence over time and the association between RRT and survival in hospitalized HF patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of consecutive hospitalized HF patients was performed at a single centre from 1987 to 2002 with RRT data from the United States Renal Data System. RESULTS: Of 6276 HF patients without RRT on admission, 304 commenced chronic (>or=3 months) RRT (280 dialysis only; 24 transplant) at a median of 475 days after dismissal. Overall incidence was 1.6% per year. Risk-adjusted incidence increased over time and was similar in those with preserved or reduced (<50%) ejection fraction. RRT patients were younger but had worse renal function and anaemia, and more diabetes, hypertension and coronary disease. Unadjusted survival was worse in the RRT group. However, risk-adjusted survival was similar in RRT and non-RRT groups (HR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.94-1.29, P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that although RRT is increasingly used in HF patients, the impact on risk-adjusted mortality remains to be established. Further studies should focus on defining the appropriate clinical settings in which RRT should be used in HF, the timing and type of RRT and whether RRT can improve specific outcomes.

Strong Relationship Between Vascular Function in the Coronary and Brachial Arteries.

Early detection of coronary artery dysfunction is of paramount cardiovascular clinical importance, but a noninvasive assessment is lacking. Indeed, the brachial artery flow-mediated dilation test only weakly correlated with acetylcholine-induced coronary artery function ( r=0.36). However, brachial artery flow-mediated dilation methodologies have, over time, substantially improved. This study sought to determine if updates to this technique have improved the relationship with coronary artery function and the noninvasive indication of coronary artery dysfunction. Coronary artery and brachial artery function were assessed in 28 patients referred for cardiac catheterization (61±11 years). Coronary artery function was determined by the change in artery diameter with a 1.82 µg/min intracoronary acetylcholine infusion. Based on the change in vessel diameter, patients were characterized as having dysfunctional coronary arteries (>5% vasoconstriction) or relatively functional coronary arteries (<5% vasoconstriction). Brachial artery function was determined by flow-mediated dilation, adhering to current guidelines. The acetylcholine-induced change in vessel diameter was smaller in patients with dysfunctional compared with relatively functional coronary arteries (-11.8±4.6% versus 5.8±9.8%, P<0.001). Consistent with this, brachial artery flow-mediated dilation was attenuated in patients with dysfunctional compared with relatively functional coronaries (2.9±1.9% versus 6.2±4.2%, P=0.007). Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation was strongly correlated with the acetylcholine-induced change in coronary artery diameter ( r=0.77, P<0.0001) and was a strong indicator of coronary artery dysfunction (receiver operator characteristic=78%). The current data support that updates to the brachial artery flow-mediated dilation technique have strengthened the relationship with coronary artery function, which may now provide a clinically meaningful indication of coronary artery dysfunction.

The effects of nesiritide on renal function and diuretic responsiveness in acutely decompensated heart failure patients with renal dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Strategies to preserve renal function and enhance diuretic responsiveness during therapy for heart failure (HF) are needed. We hypothesized that brain natriuretic peptide (nesiritide) added to standard HF therapy would preserve renal function and enhance diuretic responsiveness. METHODS: Patients with HF with underlying renal dysfunction who were admitted with volume overload were randomized to standard therapy with nesiritide (2 mug/kg bolus; 0.01 mug/kg/min for 48 hours) or without nesiritide. Patients requiring intravenous vasodilator or inotropic therapy for rapid symptom relief were ineligible. In all patients, diuretics were administered according to a standardized dosing algorithm. RESULTS: Patients (n = 72) had a mean creatinine level of 1.75 +/- 0.59 mg/dL. Patients receiving nesiritide had a lesser increase in creatinine (P = .048) and blood urea nitrogen (P = .02), but a greater reduction in blood pressure (P < .01). Nesiritide did not enhance diuretic responsiveness (P = .57) but increased 3'5' cyclic guanosine monophosphate and decreased endothelin more (P < .05 for both). There were no differences in the change in atrial natriuretic peptide, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, plasma renin activity, angiotensin II, and aldosterone between groups. CONCLUSION: When used as adjuvant "renal protective" therapy in patients with HF with renal dysfunction, the recommended dose of nesiritide reduced blood pressure, did not seem to worsen renal function, and suppressed endothelin but did not enhance diuretic responsiveness or prevent activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.

Ticagrelor Use in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Balancing Evidence-Based Medicine with Affordability.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Data from randomized controlled trials support a mortality benefit with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel among patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Many healthcare providers preferentially treat patients with AMI with ticagrelor. The goal of this study was to determine the association between out-of-pocket drug costs and ticagrelor continuation compared with switching to clopidogrel among patients hospitalized for AMI, following a pharmacist-led discussion on outpatient co-payment costs for ticagrelor. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A tertiary care academic medical center. PATIENTS: Patients hospitalized with AMI between February 15, 2015 and January 23, 2017, who were loaded with ticagrelor on presentation. MAIN RESULTS: Of 143 patients with AMI loaded with ticagrelor, 70 (49%) switched to clopidogrel after cost discussion. The median monthly ticagrelor co-payment was $268.29 (interquartile range [IQR] $45-$350) for switchers, versus $18 (IQR $6-$24) for non-switchers (p<0.001). Patients with co-payments of $100/month or more were 3.4 times more likely to switch to clopidogrel (relative risk 3.41, 95% confidence interval 2.12 to 5.47), compared with patients with co-payments of less than $100/month. CONCLUSIONS: Following a discussion of outpatient costs, half of patients with AMI switched from ticagrelor to clopidogrel when given the choice.

Managing Stenotic Septal Perforator Branches.

Coronary artery disease of the septal perforator branches can lead to clinical ischemia and conduction abnormalities. Performing interventional procedures in these vessels is frequently impossible because they are small, which makes it difficult to approach them and to select appropriate equipment. Larger septal perforator branches have been treated percutaneously in a few patients; however, the clinical effectiveness and long-term outcomes are not known. We present our experience in managing obstructive septal perforator branch stenosis in 4 patients.

Meta-Analysis of Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Narrowing.

Patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease are increasingly treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES); however, the benefits of DES compared with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in ULMCA remain controversial. This meta-analysis evaluated the effects of PCI with DES compared with CABG for the treatment of ULMCA stenosis. Databases were searched through November 30, 2016. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DES with PCI versus CABG for ULMCA stenosis were identified. We calculated summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs with the random-effects model. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as a composite of death from any cause, stroke, or myocardial infarction (MI). The analysis included 4,612 patients from 5 RCTs. Compared with CABG, patients assigned to PCI had a similar rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.43), all-cause mortality (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.35), cardiovascular death (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.45), stroke (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.76), and MI (OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.87 to 2.47). The risk of any repeat revascularization was significantly greater in the PCI group than that in the CABG group (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.53 to 2.24). In conclusion, our meta-analysis of RCTs suggest that PCI with DES results in comparable mortality, stroke, and MI compared with CABG for revascularization of ULMCA stenosis, with PCI associated with higher rates of repeat revascularization.

Culprit Vessel-Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Complicating ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Collaborative Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal revascularization strategy in patients with multivessel disease presenting with cardiogenic shock complicating ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction remains unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Databases were searched from 1999 to October 2016. Studies comparing immediate/single-stage multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MV-PCI) versus culprit vessel-only PCI (CO-PCI) in patients with multivessel disease, ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, and cardiogenic shock were included. Primary end point was short-term (in-hospital or 30 days) mortality. Secondary end points included long-term mortality, cardiovascular death, reinfarction, and repeat revascularization. Safety end points were in-hospital stroke, renal failure, and major bleeding. The meta-analysis included 11 nonrandomized studies and 5850 patients (1157 MV-PCI and 4693 CO-PCI). There was no significant difference in short-term mortality with MV-PCI versus CO-PCI (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-1.43; P=0.61). Similarly, there were no significant differences in long-term mortality (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.54-1.30; P=0.43), cardiovascular death (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.42-1.23; P=0.23), reinfarction (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 0.84-3.26; P=0.15), or repeat revascularization (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.76-1.69; P=0.54) between the 2 groups. There was a nonsignificant trend toward higher in-hospital stroke (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.98-2.72; P=0.06) and renal failure (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.98-1.72; P=0.06), with no difference in major bleeding (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.39-5.63; P=0.57) with MV-PCI when compared with CO-PCI. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of nonrandomized studies suggests that in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, there may be no significant benefit with single-stage MV-PCI compared with CO-PCI. Given the limitations of observational data, randomized trials are needed to determine the role of MV-PCI in this setting.

Secular trends in renal dysfunction and outcomes in hospitalized heart failure patients.

BACKGROUND: Renal dysfunction and worsening renal function (WRF) during heart failure (HF) therapy predict outcomes. We determined whether the severity of renal dysfunction, the incidence of WRF or outcomes have changed over time (secular trends) in patients hospitalized for HF therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 6440 consecutive unique patients admitted for HF to Mayo Clinic Hospitals Rochester, MN, January 1, 1987, to December 31, 2002, were identified and data extracted from electronic databases. Over the study period, age and admission creatinine increased, whereas estimated glomerular filtration rate and hemoglobin decreased (P < .0001 for all). The prevalence of hypertension and diabetes among HF patients also increased over time (P < .0001). The incidence of WRF was stable. Renal dysfunction and development of WRF were associated with mortality. When adjusted for the changes in baseline characteristics of HF patients, mortality declined over the study period. CONCLUSION: Hospitalized HF patients are increasingly elderly, have a greater prevalence of diseases that lead to renal dysfunction, and have more severe renal dysfunction and anemia on admission. However, adjusting for these secular trends in patient characteristics, mortality after HF admission is improving. These data enhance our understanding of the changing natural history of HF.

Minimizing the Risk of Bleeding with NOACs in the Elderly.

Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban have gained a lot of popularity as alternatives to warfarin for anticoagulation in various clinical settings. However, there is conflicting opinion regarding the absolute benefit of NOAC use in elderly patients. Low body mass, altered body composition of fat and muscle, renal impairment and concurrent presence of multiple comorbidities predispose elderly patients to many adverse effects with NOACs that are typically not seen in younger patients. There have been reports that NOAC use, in particular dabigatran, is associated with a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in the elderly. Diagnosis and management of NOAC-associated bleeding in the elderly is difficult due to the absence of commonly available drug-specific antidotes that can rapidly reverse the anticoagulant effects. Moreover, in elderly patients, a number of factors such as the presence of other comorbid medical conditions, renal insufficiency, drug interactions from polypharmacy, risk of falls and dementia need to be considered before prescribing anticoagulation therapy. Elderly patients frequently have compromised renal function, and therefore dose adjustments according to creatinine clearance for NOACs need to be made. As each NOAC comes with its own unique advantages and safety profile, an individualized case by case approach should be adopted to decide on the appropriate anticoagulation regimen for elderly patients after weighing the overall risks and benefits of therapy.

Transradial access mitigates bleeding benefit offered by bivalirudin over heparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies.

OBJECTIVE: Recent randomized control trials (RCTs) showed conflicting efficacy and safety between bivalirudin and heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to perform an updated meta-analysis, including real-world and trial data to examine the factors affecting their risk-benefit ratio. METHODS: We searched Medline, the Cochrane library, and meeting abstracts for studies comparing bivalirudin versus heparin during PCI. Random-effect meta-analyses for MACE (major adverse cardiovascular events), stent thrombosis (ST) and major bleeding were performed. p-Value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of 20 RCTs and 31 observation studies (n=165,835) showed that bivalirudin and heparin were similar in the risk of MACE in RCTs (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.97-1.13) and observational studies (OR 0.94, 95% 0.81-1.10). Major bleeding was lower with bivalirudin in both RCTs (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.51-0.70) and observational studies (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.47-0.68). However, in the metaregression analysis, every 10% increase of transradial access decreased the bleeding benefit of bivalirudin by 4.9% (p=0.046, adjusted for GPI and heparin loading dose). ST with bivalirudin was higher with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in RCTs (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.15-1.99) but not in observational studies (p=0.65). CONCLUSIONS: In this large meta-analysis, bivalirudin is associated with a lower risk of bleeding compared to heparin in both RCTs and observational studies, however, transradial PCI mitigated most of this bleeding benefit. Heparin should be the preferred agent in transradial PCI given its lower cost and comparable outcomes.

Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and Management in Prerenal Transplantation Candidates.

Cardiovascular (CV) assessment in prerenal transplant patients varies by center. Current guidelines recommend stress testing for candidates if ≥ 3 CV risk factors exist. We evaluated the CV assessment and management in 685 patients referred for kidney transplant over a 7-year period. All patients had CV risk factors, and the most common cause of end-stage renal disease was diabetes. Thirty-three percent (n = 229) underwent coronary angiography. The sensitivity of stress testing to detect obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) was poor (0.26). Patients who had no CAD, nonobstructive CAD, or CAD with intervention had significantly higher event-free survival compared with patients with obstructive CAD without intervention. There were no adverse clinical events (death, myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization, and graft failure) within 30 days post-transplant in patients who had preoperative angiography (n = 77). Of the transplanted patients who did not have an angiogram (n = 289), there were 8 clinical events (6 myocardial infarctions) in the first 30 days. In conclusion, our results indicate that stress testing and usual risk factors were poor predictors of obstructive CAD and that revascularization may prove beneficial in these patients.

Impact of a Rural Regional Myocardial Infarction System of Care in Wyoming.

BACKGROUND: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred reperfusion strategy for patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; however, to be effective, PCI must be performed in a timely manner. Rural regions are at a severe disadvantage, given the relatively sparse number of PCI hospitals and long transport times. METHODS AND RESULTS: We developed a standardized treatment and transfer protocol for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the rural state of Wyoming. The study design compared the time-to-treatment outcomes during the pre- and postintervention periods. Details of the program, changes in reperfusion strategies over time, and outcome improvements in treatment times were reported. From January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2014, 889 patients were treated in 11 PCI-capable hospitals (4 in Wyoming, 7 in adjoining states). Given the large geographic distance in the state (median of 47 miles between patient and PCI center), 52% of all patients were transfers, and 36% were administered fibrinolysis at the referral facility. Following the intervention, there was a significant shift toward greater use of primary PCI as the dominant reperfusion strategy (from 47% to 60%, P=0.002), and the median total ischemic time from symptom onset to arterial reperfusion was decreased by 92 minutes (P<0.001). There was a similar significant reduction in median time from receiving center door to balloon of 11 minutes less than the baseline time (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Rural systems of care for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction require increased levels of cooperation between emergency medical services agencies and hospitals. This study confirms that total ischemic times can be reduced through a coordinated rural statewide initiative.