A systematic review of extraneural meningioma metastasis: timing, evolution and outlook.

PURPOSE: Extraneural meningioma metastasis is a rare occurrence and may pose a clinical challenge due to its unclear prognosis. In this systematic review, we analyze patient demographics, clinical characteristics, management strategies, and outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to February 23, 2024 for cases of metastatic meningioma according to PRISMA guidelines. Descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher's exact tests, Kaplan-Meier curves, and log-rank tests were used for selected analyses. RESULTS: A total of 288 patients (52% male) were included with an average age of 49 years at meningioma diagnosis. Tumors were distributed across WHO grade 1 (38%), 2 (36%), and 3 (26%). Most patients experienced intracranial recurrence (79%) and mean time to first metastasis was approximately 8 years. No change in WHO grade between primary and metastasis was observed for most cases (65%). Treatment of the initial metastasis was most often with surgery (43%), chemotherapy (20%), or no treatment (14%). Half of the patients were alive (50%) with an average follow-up of 3 years following metastasis. Overall median survival was 36 months for the entire cohort. This differed significantly between WHO grade 1 versus 2/3 meningioma primaries (168 vs. 15 months, p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Metastatic meningioma appears to be associated with more positive prognosis than other brain tumor types with extra-neural metastasis or metastasis in general. This is particularly true for cases arising from a WHO grade 1 meningioma.

Diffuse Midline H3K27-Altered Gliomas in the Spinal Cord: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To systematically review the clinical features, management, and outcomes of diffuse midline H3K27-altered gliomas of the spinal cord (DMG-SCs). METHODS: PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from database inception to 23 September 2023 for histologically confirmed cases of DMG-SC. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, management information, and survival outcomes were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 279 patients from 39 studies were collected. Patients were mostly male (61%), with an average age of 32 years. Patients were treated with surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy combined (31%) or surgery only (24%), and extent of resection was most often subtotal (38%). Temozolomide was the most common chemotherapeutic agent (81%). Radiation therapy was delivered with mean dose of 47 Gy in 23 fractions. At mean follow-up time of 21 months, 13% of patients were alive. Average median overall survival was 24 months (range of 13 to 40 months) with a median progression-free survival of 14 months. Historical WHO grades of 2 or 3 appeared to exhibit a longer average median overall survival time than that of grade 4 DMG-SCs (32 vs. 23 months, p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes for DMG-SCs are poor overall but appear to be favorable compared to intracranial DMGs. Despite the recent WHO 2021 grade 4 classification for all DMGs, given the differences in overall survival reported based on historical grading systems, future studies on DMG-SCs are needed to further define if DMG-SCs may represent a heterogeneous group of tumors with different prognoses.

Current status of artificial intelligence technologies in pituitary adenoma surgery: a scoping review.

PURPOSE: Pituitary adenoma surgery is a complex procedure due to critical adjacent neurovascular structures, variations in size and extensions of the lesions, and potential hormonal imbalances. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has demonstrated considerable potential in assisting neurosurgeons in decision-making, optimizing surgical outcomes, and providing real-time feedback. This scoping review comprehensively summarizes the current status of AI/ML technologies in pituitary adenoma surgery, highlighting their strengths and limitations. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Studies discussing the use of AI/ML in pituitary adenoma surgery were included. Eligible studies were grouped to analyze the different outcomes of interest of current AI/ML technologies. RESULTS: Among the 2438 identified articles, 44 studies met the inclusion criteria, with a total of seventeen different algorithms utilized across all studies. Studies were divided into two groups based on their input type: clinicopathological and imaging input. The four main outcome variables evaluated in the studies included: outcome (remission, recurrence or progression, gross-total resection, vision improvement, and hormonal recovery), complications (CSF leak, readmission, hyponatremia, and hypopituitarism), cost, and adenoma-related factors (aggressiveness, consistency, and Ki-67 labeling) prediction. Three studies focusing on workflow analysis and real-time navigation were discussed separately. CONCLUSION: AI/ML modeling holds promise for improving pituitary adenoma surgery by enhancing preoperative planning and optimizing surgical strategies. However, addressing challenges such as algorithm selection, performance evaluation, data heterogeneity, and ethics is essential to establish robust and reliable ML models that can revolutionize neurosurgical practice and benefit patients.

Calcified spinal meningiomas: a systematic review of clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Calcified meningiomas involving the spine are rare but can pose significant surgical challenges. We systematically reviewed the literature on calcified spinal meningiomas. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web-of-Science, and Scopus databases were searched to include studies reporting clinical data of patients with calcified spinal meningioma. Included articles were analyzed for symptoms, imaging, spine level of the tumor, tumor location relative to the spinal cord, calcification status, treatment regimen, recurrence, progression-free survival, and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 35 articles encompassing 94 patients were included. Most patients were female (90.4%), presenting with lower extremity weakness (44%) and/or lower extremity paresthesia (38.1%). Most calcified spinal meningiomas occurred in the thoracic spine (82%) and on the dorsal (33.3%) or ventral (27.2%) side relative to the spinal cord. Most tumors were intradural (87.2%). Histologically, most calcified spinal meningiomas were WHO grade I (97.4%) and psammomatous (50.7%). Most tumors demonstrated macroscopic calcification (48.9%). Most patients underwent gross total resection (91.5%) through a posterior approach (100%). Two patients (2.1%) received adjunctive radiotherapy. The most common treatment related complication was CSF leakage. Post-operatively, most patients demonstrated symptomatic improvement (75.5%) and 2 (2.1%) had local tumor recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Calcified spinal meningiomas are uncommon but benign entities. These neoplasms tend to adhere to surrounding tissues and nerves and, thus, can be surgically challenging to remove. In most patients, safe gross total resection remains the standard of care, but accurate surgical planning is necessary to reduce the risks of postoperative complications.

Single session versus multisession stereotactic radiosurgery for the management of intracranial meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy, outcomes, and complications of single session (SS-SRS) and multisession (MS-SRS) stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of intracranial meningiomas. METHODS: Relevant articles were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane. A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment protocols and outcomes were conducted. After the selection process, 20 articles describing 1483 cases were included. RESULTS: A total of 1303 patients who underwent SS-SRS and 180 patients who underwent MS-SRS for the management of their intracranial meningioma were reported in the included studies. SS-SRS and MS-SRS had comparable one-year (SS-SRS: 98% vs. MS-SRS: 100%, p > 0.99) and five-year (SS-SRS: 94% vs. MS-SRS: 93%, p = 0.71) tumor control rates. The groups also had comparable tumor volume reduction/tumor regression rates (SS-SRS: 44% vs. MS-SRS: 25%, p = 0.25), tumor volume stability rates (SS-SRS: 51% vs. MS-SRS: 75%, p = 0.12), and tumor progression rates (SS-SRS: 4% vs. MS-SRS: 4%, p = 0.89). SS-SRS and MS-SRS yielded similar complication rates (10.4% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.68) and comparable functional improvement rates (MS-SRS: 44% vs. SS-SRS: 36%, p = 0.57). However, MS-SRS was used for significantly larger tumor volumes (MS-SRS: 23.8 cm3 vs. SS-SRS: 6.1 cm3, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: SS-SRS and MS-SRS resulted in comparable tumor control, tumor volumetric change, and functional outcomes despite significant biases in selecting patients for SS- or MS-SRS.

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and/or stenting for the treatment of basilar artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Basilar artery stenosis (BAS) carries high morbidity and mortality, with variable outcomes after endovascular treatments. We systematically reviewed the literature on percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and/or stenting (PTAS) for BAS. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web-of-Science, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched upon the PRISMA guidelines to include prospective/retrospective cohort studies describing PTAS for BAS. Pooled rates of intervention-related complications and outcomes were analyzed with random-effect model meta-analyses. RESULTS: We included 25 retrospective cohort studies comprising 1016 patients. All patients were symptomatic, presenting with transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke. BAS frequently involved the middle basilar artery (51.4%), mostly classified as Mori-B (57.4%). PTAS for BAS was indicated in severe (≥ 50-70%), symptomatic BAS refractory to dual antiplatelet therapy. Patients underwent angioplasty (95.5%) and/or stenting (92.2%), preferably using Wingspan or Apollo stents. Median baseline BAS was 81% (range, 53-99%), while median post-intervention BAS was 13% (0-75%). Actuarial rates of successful intervention and "good" final outcome were 100% (95% CI: 100-100%) and 89% (95% CI: 85-93%). Intervention-related recurrent ischemic stroke occurred in 85 patients (8.3%) with actuarial rates of 5% (95% CI: 4-7%), differentiated into perforator (5.4%), in-stent (2.6%), and embolic (0.4%). Actuarial rates of intervention-related dissection, restenosis, and death were 0% (95% CI: 0-0%), 1% (95% CI: 0-1%), and 0% (95% CI: 0-2%). CONCLUSION: Elective PTAS appears to be safe and effective in selected patients with medically refractory, severe, symptomatic, and non-acute BAS. Different stent types and angioplasty-assisted procedures should be considered based on specific clinico-radiological characteristics of the lesions. Future randomized controlled trials are required to corroborate these findings.

An updated overview of recent and ongoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) trials in patients with dementia: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Dementia affects more than 55 million people worldwide. Several technologies have been developed to slow cognitive decline: deep brain stimulation (DBS) of network targets in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) have been recently investigated. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to review the characteristics of the populations, protocols, and outcomes of patients with dementia enrolled in clinical trials investigating the feasibility and efficacy of DBS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search of all registered RCTs was performed on Clinicaltrials.gov and EudraCT, while a systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and APA PsycInfo to identify published trials. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 2122 records, and the clinical trial search 15 records. Overall, 17 studies were included. Two of 17 studies were open-label studies reporting no NCT/EUCT code and were analysed separately. Of 12 studies investigating the role of DBS in AD, we included 5 published RCTs, 2 unregistered open-label (OL) studies, 3 recruiting studies, and 2 unpublished trials with no evidence of completion. The overall risk of bias was assessed as moderate-high. Our review showed significant heterogeneity in the recruited populations regarding age, disease severity, informed consent availability, inclusion, and exclusion criteria. Notably, the standard mean of overall severe adverse events was moderately high (SAEs: 9.10 ± 7.10%). CONCLUSION: The population investigated is small and heterogeneous, published results from clinical trials are under-represented, severe adverse events not negligible, and cognitive outcomes uncertain. Overall, the validity of these studies requires confirmation based on forthcoming higher-quality clinical trials.

Bilateral basal ganglia hemorrhage: a systematic review of etiologies, management strategies, and clinical outcomes.

Bilateral basal ganglia hemorrhages (BBGHs) represent rare accidents, with no clear standard of care currently defined. We reviewed the literature on BBGHs and analyzed the available conservative and surgical strategies. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched following the PRISMA guidelines to include studies reporting patients with BBGHs. Clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes were analyzed. We included 64 studies comprising 75 patients, 25 (33%) traumatic and 50 (67%) non-traumatic. Traumatic cases affected younger patients (mean age 35 vs. 46 years, p=0.014) and males (84% vs. 71%, p=0.27) and were characterized by higher proportion of normal blood pressures at admission (66% vs. 13%, p=0.0016) compared to non-traumatic cases. Most patients were comatose at admission (56%), with a mean Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 7 and a higher proportion of comatose patients in the traumatic than in the non-traumatic group (64% vs. 52%, p=0.28). Among the traumatic group, motor vehicle accidents and falls accounted for 79% of cases. In the non-traumatic group, hemorrhage was most associated with hypertensive or ischemic (54%) and chemical (28%) etiologies. Management was predominantly conservative (83%). Outcomes were poor in 56% of patients with mean follow-up of 8 months. Good recovery was significantly higher in the traumatic than in the non-traumatic group (48% vs. 17%, p=0.019). BBGHs are rare occurrences with dismal prognoses. Standard management follows that of current intracerebral hemorrhage guidelines with supportive care and early blood pressure management. Minimally invasive surgery is promising, though substantial evidence is required to outweigh the potentially increased risks of bilateral hematoma evacuation.

Awake craniotomy during pregnancy: A systematic review of the published literature.

Neurosurgical pathologies in pregnancy pose significant complications for the patient and fetus, and physiological stressors during anesthesia and surgery may lead to maternal and fetal complications. Awake craniotomy (AC) can preserve neurological functions while reducing exposure to anesthetic medications. We reviewed the literature investigating AC during pregnancy. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from the inception to February 7th, 2023, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Studies in English investigating AC in pregnant patients were included in the final analysis. Nine studies composed of nine pregnant patients and ten fetuses (one twin-gestating patient) were included. Glioma was the most common pathology reported in six (66.7%) patients. The frontal lobe was the most involved region (4 cases, 44.4%), followed by the frontoparietal region (2 cases, 22.2%). The awake-awake-awake approach was the most common protocol in seven (77.8%) studies. The shortest operation time was two hours, whereas the longest one was eight hours and 29 min. The mean gestational age at diagnosis was 13.6 ± 6.5 (2-22) and 19.6 ± 6.9 (9-30) weeks at craniotomy. Seven (77.8%) studies employed intraoperative fetal heart rate monitoring. None of the AC procedures was converted to general anesthesia. Ten healthy babies were delivered from patients who underwent AC. In experienced hands, AC for resection of cranial lesions of eloquent areas in pregnant patients is safe and feasible and does not alter the pregnancy outcome.

Anterior occipital condyle screw placement through the endonasal corridor: proof of concept study with cadaveric analysis.

PURPOSE: Odontoidectomy for ventral compressive pathology may result in O-C1 and/or C1-2 instability. Same-stage endonasal C1-2 spinal fusion has been advocated to eliminate risks associated with separate-stage posterior approaches. While endonasal methods for C1 instrumentation and C1-2 trans-articular stabilization exist, no hypothetical construct for endonasal occipital instrumentation has been validated. We provide an anatomic description of anterior occipital condyle (AOC) screw endonasal placement as proof-of-concept for endonasal craniocervical stabilization. METHODS: Eight adult, injected cadaveric heads were studied for placing 16 AOC screws endonasally. Thin-cut CT was used for registration. After turning a standard inferior U-shaped nasopharyngeal flap endonasally, 4 mm × 22 mm AOC screws were placed with a 0° driver using neuronavigation. Post-placement CT scans were obtained to determine: site-of-entry, measured from the endonasal projection of the medial O-C1 joint; screw angulation in sagittal and axial planes, proximity to critical structures. RESULTS: Average site-of-entry was 6.88 mm lateral and 9.74 mm rostral to the medial O-C1 joint. Average angulation in the sagittal plane was 0.16° inferior to the palatal line. Average angulation in the axial plane was 23.97° lateral to midline. Average minimum screw distances from the jugular bulb and hypoglossal canal were 4.80 mm and 1.55 mm. CONCLUSION: Endonasal placement of AOC screws is feasible using a 0° driver. Our measurements provide useful parameters to guide optimal placement. Given proximity of hypoglossal canal and jugular bulb, neuronavigation is recommended. Biomechanical studies will ultimately be necessary to evaluate the strength of AOC screws with plate-screw constructs utilizing endonasal C1 lateral mass or C1-2 trans-articular screws as inferior fixation points.

Dolichoectatic vertebrobasilar aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of management strategies and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the efficacy, clinical outcomes, and complications of open cerebrovascular surgery, endovascular surgery, and conservative management of dolichoectatic vertebrobasilar aneurysms (DVBAs). METHODS: Relevant articles were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases according to PRISMA guidelines. A meta-analysis was conducted for clinical presentation, treatment protocols, and clinical outcomes-good (improved or stable clinical status) or poor (deteriorated clinical status or death)-and mortality rates. RESULTS: The 9 identified articles described 41 cases (27.5%) of open cerebrovascular surgery, 61 endovascular procedures (40.9%), and 47 cases (31.5%) of conservative management for DVBAs. The total cohort had a good outcome rate of 51.9% (95% CI 28.3%-74.6%), a poor outcome rate of 45.5% (95% CI 23.0%-70.1%), and a mortality rate of 22.3% (95% CI 11.8%-38.0%). The treatment groups had comparable good clinical outcome rates (open cerebrovascular surgery group: 24.7% [95% CI 2.9%-78.2%]; endovascular surgery group: 69.0% [95% CI 28.7%-92.5%]; conservative management group: 57.7% [95% CI 13.0%-92.5%]; p = 0.19) and poor outcome rates (open vascular surgery group: 75.3% [95% CI 21.8%-97.1%]; endovascular surgery group: 27.2% [95% CI 5.6%-0.70.2%]; conservative management group: 39.9% [95% CI 9.1%-81.6%]; p = 0.15). The treatment groups also had comparable mortality rates (open vascular surgery group: 39.5% [95% CI 11.4%-76.8%]; endovascular surgery group: 15.8% [95% CI 4.4%-43.0%]; conservative management group: 19.2% [95% CI 6.8%-43.5%]; p = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS: The current study of DVBAs illustrated poor outcomes and high mortality rates regardless of the treatment modality. The subgroup analysis showed heterogeneity among the subgroups and advice for personalized management.

The role of cesium-131 brachytherapy in brain tumors: a scoping review of the literature and ongoing clinical trials.

PURPOSE: Cesium-131 radioactive isotope has favored the resurgence of intracavitary brachytherapy in neuro-oncology, minimizing radiation-induced complications and maximizing logistical and clinical outcomes. We reviewed the literature on cesium-131 brachytherapy for brain tumors. METHODS: PubMed, Web-of-Science, Scopus, Clinicaltrial.gov, and Cochrane were searched following the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews to include published studies and ongoing trials reporting cesium-131 brachytherapy for brain tumors. RESULTS: We included 27 published studies comprising 279 patients with 293 lesions, and 3 ongoing trials. Most patients had brain metastases (63.1%), followed by high-grade gliomas (23.3%), of WHO Grade III (15.2%) and Grade IV (84.8%), and meningiomas (13.6%), mostly of WHO Grade II (62.8%) and Grade III (27.9%). Most brain metastases were newly diagnosed (72.3%), while most gliomas and meningiomas were recurrent (95.4% and 88.4%). Patients underwent gross-total (91.1%) or subtotal (8.9%) resection, with median postoperative cavity size of 3.5 cm (range 1-5.8 cm). A median of 20, 28, and 16 seeds were implanted in gliomas, meningiomas, and brain metastases, with median seed activity of 3.8 mCi (range 2.4-5 mCi). Median follow-up was 16.2 months (range 0.6-72 months). 1-year freedom from progression rates were local 94% (range 57-100%), regional 85.1% (range 55.6-93.8%), and distant 53.5% (range 26.3-67.4%). Post-treatment radiation necrosis, seizure, and surgical wound infection occurred in 3.4%, 4.7%, and 4.3% patients. CONCLUSION: Initial data suggest that cesium-131 brachytherapy is safe and effective in primary or metastatic malignant brain tumors. Ongoing trials are evaluating long-term locoregional tumor control and future studies should analyze its role in multimodal systemic tumor management.

Intrathecal therapy for the management of leptomeningeal metastatic disease: a scoping review of the current literature and ongoing clinical trials.

PURPOSE: Leptomeningeal metastatic disease (LMD) from advanced malignancies has poor prognoses and limited treatments. Intrathecal therapy (ITT) protocols are available, showing variable outcomes. We reviewed the therapeutic and toxicity profiles of ITT in LMD. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web-of-Science, and Scopus were searched following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines to include studies reporting ITT for LMD. CLINICALTRIAL: gov and Cochrane were searched to identify ongoing clinical trials. RESULTS: We included 27 published studies encompassing 2161 patients and 4 ongoing trials. LMD originated from brain metastases (85.5%), lymphomas (5.4%), high-grade gliomas (4.6%), medulloblastomas (2.3%), and leukemias (2.1%). LMD was mostly diagnosed with the co-presence of neurological-related symptoms and positive imaging and/or cerebrospinal fluid cytology (60.8%). The most common ITT agents were methotrexate (35.9%), cytarabine (21.9%), and thiotepa (8.2%), standalone or combined. Patients received a median of 6.5 ITT cycles (range, 1.0-71.0) via intraventricular (58.8%) or lumbar intrathecal (41.2%) routes. The Ommaya reservoir was implanted in 38.5% cases. Concurrent systemic chemotherapy (45.2%) and/or radiotherapy (30.6%) were used. After 1-3 cycles, 44.7% patients had improved clinical status and 29.9% converted into negative cerebrospinal fluid cytology. The most common ITT-related severe adverse events were neutropenia (6.5%), meningitis (5.2%) and encephalopathy (4.5%). Median freedom from progression was 2.4 months (range, 0.1-59.5) and median overall survival 5.5 months (range, 0.1-148.0). CONCLUSION: Current ITT protocols are variable but effective and well-tolerated in LMD. Ongoing trials are investigating dose-limiting toxicity profiles and long-term overall survival. Future studies should analyze the therapeutic and safety profiles of ITT compared to newer systemic therapies.

Stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of petroclival meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment outcomes of primary and adjuvant radiosurgery.

PURPOSE: To summarize the clinical features and outcomes of petroclival meningioma patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as either a primary or an adjuvant modality. METHODS: Relevant articles were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane. A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment outcomes comparing primary and adjuvant SRS was conducted. RESULTS: Seven articles comprising 722 cases were included. The mean tumor marginal dose was 13.5 Gy. After SRS, symptoms improved in 28.7%, remained unchanged in 61.3%, and worsened in 10.0% of the cohort. Tumor control was achieved in 94.8% of patients. The mean tumor volume change was -6.4 cm3. The 5-year and 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 91-100% and 69.6-89.9%, respectively. Overall, 61.9% of patients underwent primary radiosurgery, and 38.1% had adjuvant radiosurgery. Patients who had primary SRS reported higher rates of tumor control (94.3% vs. 88.2%) and fewer SRS-related complications (3.7% vs. 10.3%) than those who received adjuvant SRS (not accounting for microsurgical complications). The functional status of patients who had primary SRS was more likely to improve or remain unchanged, with an effect size of 1.12 (95% CI 1.1-1.25; I2 = 0). Neither group displayed superiority in worsening functional outcomes or tumor control rate. CONCLUSION: SRS of petroclival meningiomas was associated with excellent long-term PFS and local tumor control rates. Primary SRS was highly effective for patients with smaller volume lesions without clinically symptomatic mass effect. In patients who warrant initial resection, adjuvant radiosurgery remains an important modality to prevent regrowth while maintaining postresection function.

Is intraoperative MRI use in malignant brain tumor surgery a health care burden? A matched analysis of MarketScan Database.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) is a useful adjunct for resection of primary malignant brain tumors (MBTs). The aim of our study is to investigate the impact of iMRI on health care utilization in patients who underwent craniotomy for resection of MBTs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MarketScan database were queried using the ICD-9/10 and CPT 4th edition, from 2008 to 2020. We included patients ≥ 18 years of age who underwent a craniotomy with at-least one year follow-up. Outcomes were length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, hospital/emergency room (ER) re-admissions, outpatient services, medication refills and corresponding payments. RESULTS: Of 6,640 patients who underwent craniotomy for MBTs, 465 patients (7%) had iMRI used during the procedure with 0.7% per year increase in iMRI use during the study period. Patients without iMRI use had higher complications at index hospitalization compared to those with iMRI use (19% vs. 14%, p = 0.04). There was no difference in the ER admission rates among the patients who underwent surgery with and without iMRI use at 6-months and 1-year after the index procedure. In terms of post-discharge payments, no significant differences were noted among the patients without and with iMRI use at 6-months ($81,107 vs. $ 81,458, p = 0.26) and 1-year ($132,657 vs. $ 118,113, p = 0.12). CONCLUSION: iMRI use during craniotomy for MBT gradually increased during the study period. iMRI did not result in higher payments at index hospitalization, 6-months, and 1-year after the index procedure.

Endocrine disorders after primary gamma knife radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is feasible for pituitary adenomas, but post-surgery GKRS may cause severe hormone deficits. We reviewed the literature on primary GKRS for pituitary adenoma focusing on radiation-induced hormone deficiencies. METHODS: PubMed, Web-of-Science, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched upon the PRISMA guidelines to include studies describing primary GKRS for pituitary adenomas. Pooled-rates of GKRS-induced hormone deficiencies and clinical-radiological responses were analyzed with a random-effect model meta-analysis. RESULTS: We included 24 studies comprising 1381 patients. Prolactinomas were the most common (34.2%), and 289 patients had non-functioning adenomas (20.9%). Median tumor volume was 1.6cm3 (range, 0.01-31.3), with suprasellar extension and cavernous sinus invasion detected in 26% and 31.1% cases. GKRS was delivered with median marginal dose 22.6 Gy (range, 6-49), maximum dose 50 Gy (range, 25-90), and isodose line 50% (range, 9-100%). Median maximum point doses were 9 Gy (range, 0.5-25) to the pituitary stalk, 7 Gy (range, 1-38) to the optic apparatus, and 5 Gy (range, 0.4-12.3) to the optic chiasm. Pooled 5 year rates of endocrine normalization and local tumor control were 48% (95%CI 45-51%) and 97% (95%CI 95-98%). 158 patients (11.4%) experienced endocrinopathies at a median of 45 months (range, 4-187.3) after GKRS, with pooled 5-year rates of 8% (95%CI 6-9%). GKRS-induced hormone deficiencies comprised secondary hypothyroidism (42.4%) and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (33.5%), with panhypopituitarism reported in 31 cases (19.6%). CONCLUSION: Primary GKRS for pituitary adenoma may correlate with lower rates of radiation-induced hypopituitarism (11.4%) than post-surgery GKRS (18-32%). Minimal doses to normal pituitary structures and long-term endocrine follow-up are of primary importance.

Coccygectomy for refractory coccygodynia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: We sought to systematically assess and summarize the available literature on outcomes following coccygectomy for refractory coccygodynia. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data concerning patient demographics, validated patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for pain relief, disability outcomes, complications, and reoperation rates were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies (18 retrospective and 3 prospective) were included in the quantitative analysis. A total of 826 patients (females = 75%) received coccygectomy (720 total and 106 partial) for refractory coccygodynia. Trauma was reported as the most common etiology of coccygodynia (56%; n = 375), followed by idiopathic causes (33%; n = 221). The pooled mean difference (MD) in pain scores from baseline on a 0-10 scale was 5.03 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.35 to 6.86) at a 6-12 month follow-up (FU); 5.02 (95% CI: 3.47 to 6.57) at > 12-36 months FU; and 5.41 (95% CI: 4.33 to 6.48) at > 36 months FU. The MCID threshold for pain relief was surpassed at each follow-up. Oswestry Disability Index scores significantly improved postoperatively, with a pooled MD from baseline of - 23.49 (95% CI: - 31.51 to - 15.46), surpassing the MCID threshold. The pooled incidence of complications following coccygectomy was 8% (95% CI: 5% to 12%), the most frequent of which were surgical site infections and wound dehiscence. The pooled incidence of reoperations was 3% (95% CI: 1% to 5%). CONCLUSION: Coccygectomy represents a viable treatment option in patients with refractory coccygodynia.

Penetrating spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical features and treatment outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature on penetrating spinal cord injury (PSCI) and evaluate current management strategies, their impact on patient functional outcomes, and treatment complications. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic-Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to include studies on penetrating spinal cord injury (PSCI). RESULTS: We included 10 articles comprising 1754 cases of PSCI. Mean age was 19.2 years (range, 16-70), and most patients were male (89.9%). Missile spinal cord injury (MSCI) was the most common type, affecting 1623 patients (92.6%), while non-missile spinal cord injury (NMSCI) accounted for only 131 cases (7.4%). Gunshots were the most common cause of MSCI, representing 87.2%, while knife stabs were the most common cause of NMSCI, representing 72.5%. A total of 425 patients (28.0%) underwent surgical intervention, and 1094 (72.0%) underwent conservative management. The conservative group had a higher rate of complete spine cord injury compared with the surgical group (61.5% vs. 49.2; p < 0.001). Although surgery yielded a higher score improvement rate compared with the conservative management (41.5% vs. 20.5%, p < 0.001), neither treatment strategy displayed superiority in improving neurological outcomes for neither complete SCIs (OR:0.7, 95% CI, 0.3-1.64; I2 = 44%, p = 0.13) nor for incomplete SCIs (OR:1.15, 95% CI, 0.64-2,06; I2 = 40%, p = 0.12). CONCLUSION: Surgical and conservative management strategies proved to be equally effective on PSCI, irrespective of injury severity. Therefore, tailored treatment strategies for each patient and careful surgical selection is advised.

The role of radiation therapy in the treatment of spine metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Spine hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) metastases severely worsen quality of life and prognosis, with the role of radiotherapy being controversial. The authors systematically reviewed the literature on radiotherapy for spine metastatic HCCs. METHODS: The PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched according to the PRISMA guidelines to include studies of radiotherapy for spine metastatic HCCs. Outcomes, complications, and local control were analyzed with indirect random-effect meta-analyses. RESULTS: The authors included 12 studies comprising 713 patients. The median time interval from diagnosis of HCC to spine metastases was 12 months (range 0-105 months). Most lesions were thoracic (35.9%) or lumbar (24.7%). Radiotherapy was delivered with conventional external-beam (67.3%) or stereotactic (31.7%) techniques. The median dose was 30.3 Gy (range 12.5-52 Gy) in a median of 5 fractions (range 1-20 fractions). The median biologically effective dose was 44.8 Gy10 (range 14.4-112.5 Gy10). Actuarial rates of postradiotherapy pain relief and radiological response were 87% (95% CI 84%-90%) and 70% (95% CI 65%-75%), respectively. Radiation-related adverse events and vertebral fractures had actuarial rates of 8% (95% CI 5%-11%) and 16% (95% CI 10%-23%), respectively, with fracture rates significantly higher after stereotactic radiotherapy (p = 0.033). Fifty-eight patients (27.6%) had local recurrences after a median of 6.8 months (range 0.1-59 months), with pooled local control rates of 61.6% at 6 months and 40.8% at 12 months, and there were no significant differences based on radiotherapy type (p = 0.068). The median survival was 6 months (range 0.1-62 months), with pooled rates of 52.5% at 6 months and 23.4% at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy in spine metastatic HCCs shows favorable rates of pain relief, radiological responses, and local control. Rates of postradiotherapy vertebral fractures are higher after high-dose stereotactic radiotherapy.

Adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery with or without postoperative fractionated radiation therapy in adults with skull base chordomas: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this retrospective study was to compare the survival of patients with biopsy-proven skull base chordoma who had undergone stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with versus without prior fractionated radiation therapy (RT). METHODS: Relevant articles from database inception to September 2021 were retrieved from the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases for a systematic review of treatment protocols. Studies were included if they 1) involved adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with histologically and radiologically confirmed chordomas located within the clival skull base region and treated with SRS; 2) reported data on clinical features, SRS protocols, and outcomes; and 3) were written in the English language. Studies were excluded if they 1) were literature reviews, case reports, technical notes, abstracts, or autopsy reports; 2) did not clearly differentiate the data of patients with chordomas from the data of patients with different tumors or the data of patients with chordomas in locations other than the skull base; or 3) lacked histological confirmation or treatment and outcome data. Extracted data included the following: study author and publication year, patient age and sex, symptoms, cranial nerve involvement, invaded structures, lesion size, treatment modality, surgical details, histopathological type, RT modality, SRS parameters, complications, postradiosurgery outcomes, complications, and survival outcomes. RESULTS: After the selection process, 15 articles describing 130 patients met the study eligibility criteria, including 94 patients who had undergone postresection SRS (NoRT group) and 36 who had undergone postresection fractionated RT and subsequent SRS (RT group). The NoRT and RT groups were comparable in age (51.3 vs 47.4 years, respectively), sex (57.1% vs 58.3% male), tumor volume (9.5 vs 11.2 cm3), SRS treatment parameters (maximum dose: 35.4 vs 42.2 Gy, marginal dose: 19.6 vs 20.6 Gy, treatment isodose line: 60.2% vs 65.2%), and SRS adverse effects (10.9% vs 17.6%). For the entire cohort, the 3-, 5-, and 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 23%, 9%, and 3%, respectively, and the overall survival (OS) rates were 94%, 82%, and 76%, respectively. In the NoRT group, SRS was adjuvant treatment after resection in 38 patients (40.4%), salvage treatment for recurrent tumor treated with resection alone in 10 (10.6%), and not specified in 46 (48.9%). In the RT group, SRS was boost treatment in 9 patients (25.0%), salvage treatment after recurrence in 22 (61.1%), and not specified in 5 (13.9%). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of median PFS (24.0 months [Q1 34.0, Q3 15.0] vs 23.8 months [34.0, 18.0], respectively; p = 0.8) or median OS (293.0 months [not reached, 137.4] vs not reached [not reached, 48.0], respectively; p = 0.36). The adverse radiation effect rates were comparable between the groups (10.9% vs 17.6%, respectively; p = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: The role of SRS in the management of skull base chordomas is still evolving. This systematic literature review of biopsy-proven chordoma revealed that tumor control and survival rates for SRS alone after chordoma surgery were not inferior to those encountered after SRS plus fractionated RT.