Publication Rates of Abstracts Presented at Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America Meetings Between 2013 and 2016.

BACKGROUND: Academic conferences such as the annual Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) meeting provide opportunities to present up-to-date scientific work that can influence clinical decision making. This study reviewed 4 years of abstracts presented at POSNA to assess trends in poster and podium presentation publication rates and associated metrics and the impact of academic presentations on the pediatric orthopaedic literature. METHODS: All abstracts presented at POSNA annual meetings from 2013 to 2016 were analyzed for presentation type, subspeciality, level of evidence, study design, peer-reviewed publication within 4 years of presentation, 1-year publication rates, journal impact factors, number of authors, and citations of the final publication. χ2, analysis of variance, and t tests were conducted to measure independence of variables. Statistical significance was indicated at P<0.05. RESULTS: A total of 1135 abstracts were included with 676 published in peer-reviewed journals by August 2020 and 38 excluded because of publication before presentation. The number of accepted abstracts increased yearly. Total of 58.2% of POSNA abstracts were published and 42.5% had the same first author on the final manuscript. Average journal impact factor was 2.60±1.30 with a mean 14.3±16.0 citations. Podium presentations were significantly more likely to be published than poster presentations (63.1% vs. 51.2%, P<0.001) and in higher-impact factor journals. Level I evidence abstracts were published in journals with an average 1.663 higher impact factor than level V evidence abstracts, with no significant difference between overall publication rate and study type (P=0.69) or level of evidence (P=0.95) for podium presentations. The Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics accepted the most abstracts, 38.4% overall, with 64.1% of acceptances resulting from podium presentations and no difference in time to publication based on subspecialty. CONCLUSIONS: The overall publication rate for POSNA abstracts has increased 8.7% from prior analysis. Podium presentations are more likely than poster presentations to be published, overall and in higher-impact journals, and are cited more frequently. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-descriptive retrospective epidemiological study.

Oxidative stress during early pregnancy and birth outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Routine high-dose Fe supplementation in non-anaemic pregnant women may induce oxidative stress and eventually affect birth outcomes. The aim of the present study was to measure oxidative stress markers in pregnant women with low/normal and high Hb values in trimester 1 (Hb1) and to relate these to birth weight. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study where selected oxidative stress markers were analysed in both maternal (trimester 1; T1) and cord blood samples and correlated with birth weight. SETTING: A tertiary hospital in urban South India. SUBJECTS: One hundred women were chosen based on their Hb1 values (forty women with low/normal Hb1 (<110 g/l) and sixty women with high Hb1 (≥120 g/l)). RESULTS: In T1, women with high Hb1 values were found to have lower paraoxonase-1 (PON-1) activity (424·7 (sd 163·7) v. 532·9 (sd 144·7) pmol p-nitrophenol formed/min per ml plasma, P=0·002) and higher lipid peroxides compared with women with low/normal Hb1. Routine supplementation of Fe to these women resulted in persistent lower PON-1 activity in cord blood (P=0·02) and directionally lower (P=0·142) birth weights. Furthermore, women with high Hb1 who delivered low-birth-weight babies were observed to have lowest PON-1 activity in T1. No changes were observed in other markers (myeloperoxidase activity and total antioxidant levels). CONCLUSIONS: Routine Fe supplementation in pregnant women with high Hb1 associated with increased oxidative stress, as reflected by low PON-1 activity in T1, could potentially lead to deleterious effects on birth weight.

Complication Rates Following Cerebral and Coronary Angiography: Nationwide Analysis 2008-2014.

Catheter-based angiography is an essential procedure for the diagnosis and treatment of vascular complications in patients. Since cerebral and coronary angiography are similar techniques that utilize the same access sites and general principles, the associated risks overlap and should be identified to help direct patient care. The purpose of this study was to determine complication rates in a combined cohort of cerebral and coronary angiography patients, as well as conduct a comparative analysis of coronary and cerebral angiography complications. The National Inpatient Sample was queried from 2008 to 2014 to identify patients who underwent coronary or cerebral angiography. After assessment of baseline characteristics, complication rates, and disposition in the combined cohort, propensity matching was utilized to create sub-cohorts of coronary and cerebral angiography patients based on demographics and comorbidities. Comparative analysis of procedural complications and disposition was then performed. A total of 3,763,651 hospitalizations were included in our study cohort (3,505,715 coronary angiographies and 257,936 cerebral angiographies). The median age was 62.9 years, with females being 46.42%. The most prevalent comorbidities in the overall cohort were hypertension (69.92%), coronary artery disease (69.48%), smoking (35.64%), and diabetes mellitus (35.13%). Propensity matching demonstrated that the cerebral angiography cohort had lower rates of acute and unspecified renal failure (5.4% vs 9.2%, OR 0.57, 95% CI, 0.53-0.61, P < 0.001), hemorrhage/hematoma formation (0.8% vs 1.3%, OR 0.63, 95% CI, 0.54-0.73, P < 0.001), and equivalent rates of retroperitoneum hematoma formation (0.03% vs 0.04%, OR 1.49, 95% CI, 0.76-2.90, P = 0.247) and arterial embolism/ thrombus formation (0.3% vs 0.3%, OR 1.01, 95% CI, 0.81-1.27, P = 0.900). Our study showed both cerebral and coronary angiography have generally low rates of procedural complications. Matched cohort analysis demonstrated that cerebral angiography patients are at no greater risk for complications than coronary angiography patients.

Obstructive sleep apnea confers lower mortality risk in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy: National Inpatient Sample analysis 2010-2018.

BackgroundObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) portends increased morbidity and mortality following acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Evaluation of OSA in the setting of AIS treated with endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has not yet been evaluated in the literature. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample from 2010 to 2018 was utilized to identify adult AIS patients treated with MT. Those with and without OSA were compared for clinical characteristics, complications, and discharge disposition. Multivariable logistic regression analysis and propensity score adjustment (PA) were employed to evaluate independent associations between OSA and clinical outcome. RESULTS: Among 101 093 AIS patients treated with MT, 6412 (6%) had OSA. Those without OSA were older (68.5 vs 65.6 years old, p<0.001), female (50.5% vs 33.5%, p<0.001), and non-caucasian (29.7% vs 23.7%, p<0.001). The OSA group had significantly higher rates of obesity (41.4% vs 10.5%, p<0.001), atrial fibrillation (47.1% vs 42.2%, p=0.001), hypertension (87.4% vs 78.5%, p<0.001), and diabetes mellitus (41.2% vs 26.9%, p<0.001). OSA patients treated with MT demonstrated lower rates of intracranial hemorrhage (19.1% vs 21.8%, p=0.017), treatment of hydrocephalus (0.3% vs 1.1%, p=0.009), and in-hospital mortality (9.7% vs 13.5%, p<0.001). OSA was independently associated with lower rate of in-hospital mortality (aOR 0.76, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.83; p<0.001), intracranial hemorrhage (aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.95; p<0.001), and hydrocephalus (aOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.71; p<0.001). Results were confirmed by PA. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that MT is a viable and safe treatment option for AIS patients with OSA.

Importance of Pharmacy Partnerships in Effective COVID-19 Vaccine Distribution.

The goal of vaccinating the majority of Americans against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a timely manner requires a robust federal vaccine distribution plan involving pharmacy partnerships. Previously, the 2009 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) H1N1 Vaccine Pharmacy Initiative resulted in approximately 10% of adults who received a vaccine during the 2009 pandemic reporting they were vaccinated at a pharmacy. This proportion has already largely increased for COVID-19 vaccinations, with the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) using similar channels for vaccination as existing partnerships with national pharmacy and grocery retail chains for the COVID-19 Community-Based Testing Program. It continues to prove crucial that the Biden administration's national COVID-19 vaccine distribution plan, including the Federal Retail Pharmacy Program, focus on ensuring equitable vaccine distribution and access in medically underserved areas and to vulnerable populations, enabling maximum uptake of COVID-19 vaccines.