Silencing of PCK1 mitigates the proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells and vascular intimal hyperplasia by suppressing STAT3/DRP1-mediated mitochondrial fission.

The pathological proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) are key processes during vascular neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) and restenosis. Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxy kinase 1 (PCK1) is closely related to a variety of malignant proliferative diseases. However, the role of PCK1 in VSMCs has rarely been investigated. This study aims to examine the role of PCK1 in the proliferation and migration of VSMCs and vascular NIH after injury. In vivo, extensive NIH and increased expression of PCK1 within the neointima are observed in injured arteries. Interestingly, the administration of adeno-associated virus-9 (AAV-9) carrying Pck1 short hairpin RNA (sh Pck1) significantly attenuates NIH and stenosis of the vascular lumen. In vitro, Pck1 small interfering RNA (si Pck1)-induced PCK1 silencing inhibits VSMC proliferation and migration. Additionally, silencing of PCK1 leads to reduced expression of dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1) and attenuated mitochondrial fission. Lentivirus-mediated DRP1 overexpression markedly reverses the inhibitory effects of PCK1 silencing on VSMC proliferation, migration, and mitochondrial fission. Finally, PCK1 inhibition attenuates the phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3). Activation of STAT3 abolishes the suppressive effects of PCK1 silencing on DRP1 expression, mitochondrial fission, proliferation, and migration in VSMCs. In conclusion, PCK1 inhibition attenuates the mitochondrial fission, proliferation, and migration of VSMCs by inhibiting the STAT3/DRP1 axis, thereby suppressing vascular NIH and restenosis.

Role of Nuclear Receptor Subfamily 1 Group D Member 1 in the Proliferation, Migration of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell, and Vascular Intimal Hyperplasia.

ABSTRACT: Excessive proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) cause neointimal hyperplasia after percutaneous vascular interventions. Nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group D member 1 (NR1D1), a crucial member of circadian clock, is involved in the regulation of atherosclerosis and cellular proliferation. However, whether NR1D1 affects vascular neointimal hyperplasia remains unclear. In this study, we found that activating NR1D1 reduced injury-induced vascular neointimal hyperplasia. Overexpression of NR1D1 reduced the number of Ki-67-positive VSMCs and migrated VSMCs after platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-BB treatment. Mechanistically, NR1D1 suppressed the phosphorylation of AKT and 2 main effectors of the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), S6, and 4EBP1 in PDGF-BB-challenged VSMCs. Re-activation of mTORC1 by Tuberous sclerosis 1 siRNA (si Tsc1 ) and re-activation of AKT by SC-79 abolished NR1D1-mediated inhibitory effects on proliferation and migration of VSMCs. Moreover, decreased mTORC1 activity induced by NR1D1 was also reversed by SC-79. Simultaneously, Tsc1 knockdown abolished the vascular protective effects of NR1D1 in vivo. In conclusion, NR1D1 reduces vascular neointimal hyperplasia by suppressing proliferation and migration of VSMCs in an AKT/mTORC1-dependent manner.

Entecavir plus adefovir rescue therapy for chronic hepatitis B patients after multiple treatment failures in real-life practice.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Entecavir (ETV) plus adefovir (ADV) for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients after multiple nucleos(t)ide analogue (NAs) failure treatment. METHODS: Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients who had a suboptimal response or developed resistance to two or more previous NAs treatments were included, and all subjects were treated with ETV in combination with ADV for ≥ 24 months. Complete virologic response (CVR) was defined as an undetectability of serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level during treatment. Safety assessment was based on the increasing of serum creatinine and creatine kinase levels. RESULTS: A total of 45 eligible patients were included. Twenty-five patients had been treated with lamivudine (LAM) or telbivudine (LdT) and developed genotypic resistance. Resistance to ADV was present in 18 patients and 4 patients had a suboptimal response to ETV. Two patients had a resistance to both LAM and ADV. The cumulative probabilities of CVR at 12 and 24 months of ETV + ADV treatment were 88.9% (40/45) and 97.8% (44/45), respectively. Although one patient failed to achieve CVR, its serum HBV DNA level decreased by 3.3 log copies/mL after 24 months of combination therapy. The cumulative probability of HBeAg seroconversion was 15.6% (7/45) and 26.7% (12/45) at 12 and 24 months of treatment, respectively. History of prior exposure to specific NAs did not make a difference to ETV + ADV treatment outcome. There were no significant adverse events related to ETV + ADV therapy observed in the study subjects. CONCLUSION: ETV + ADV can be used as an effective and safe rescue therapy in patients after multiple NA therapy failures, especially in the areas where tenofovir is not yet available.