Author Correction: γδ T cells producing interleukin-17A regulate adipose regulatory T cell homeostasis and thermogenesis.

In the version of this article initially published, three authors (Hui-Fern Kuoy, Adam P. Uldrich and Dale. I. Godfrey) and their affiliations, acknowledgments and contributions were not included. The correct information is as follows:Ayano C. Kohlgruber1,2, Shani T. Gal-Oz3, Nelson M. LaMarche1,2, Moto Shimazaki1, Danielle Duquette4, Hui-Fern Koay5,6, Hung N. Nguyen1, Amir I. Mina4, Tyler Paras1, Ali Tavakkoli7, Ulrich von Andrian2,8, Adam P. Uldrich5,6, Dale I. Godfrey5,6, Alexander S. Banks4, Tal Shay3, Michael B. Brenner1,10* and Lydia Lynch1,4,9,10*1Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 2Division of Medical Sciences, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 3Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel. 4Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 5Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia. 6ARC Centre of Excellence in Advanced Molecular Imaging, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia. 7Department of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 8Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 9School of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland. 10These authors jointly supervised this work: Michael B. Brenner, Lydia Lynch. *e-mail: mbrenner@research.bwh.harvard.edu; llynch@bwh.harvard.eduAcknowledgementsWe thank A.T. Chicoine, flow cytometry core manager at the Human Immunology Center at BWH, for flow cytometry sorting. We thank D. Sant'Angelo (Rutgers Cancer Institute) for providing Zbtb16-/- mice and R. O'Brien (National Jewish Health) for providing Vg4/6-/- mice. Supported by NIH grant R01 AI11304603 (to M.B.B.), ERC Starting Grant 679173 (to L.L.), the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (1013667), an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT140100278 for A.P.U.) and a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Senior Principal Research Fellowship (1117766 for D.I.G.).Author contributionsA.C.K., L.L., and M.B.B. conceived and designed the experiments, and wrote the manuscript. A.C.K., N.M.L., L.L., H.N.N., M.S., T.P., and D.D. performed the experiments. S.T.G.-O. and T.S. performed the RNA-seq analysis. A.S.B. and A.I.M. provided advice and performed the CLAMS experiments. A.T. provided human bariatric patient samples. Parabiosis experiments were performed in the laboratory of U.v.A. H.-F.K., A.P.U. and D.I.G provided critical insight into the TCR chain usage of PLZF+ γδ T cells. M.B.B., N.M.L., and L.L. critically reviewed the manuscript.The errors have been corrected in the HTML and PDF version of the article.Correction to: Nature Immunology doi:10.1038/s41590-018-0094-2 (2018), published online 18 April 2018.

γδ T cells producing interleukin-17A regulate adipose regulatory T cell homeostasis and thermogenesis.

γδ T cells are situated at barrier sites and guard the body from infection and damage. However, little is known about their roles outside of host defense in nonbarrier tissues. Here, we characterize a highly enriched tissue-resident population of γδ T cells in adipose tissue that regulate age-dependent regulatory T cell (Treg) expansion and control core body temperature in response to environmental fluctuations. Mechanistically, innate PLZF+ γδ T cells produced tumor necrosis factor and interleukin (IL) 17 A and determined PDGFRα+ and Pdpn+ stromal-cell production of IL-33 in adipose tissue. Mice lacking γδ T cells or IL-17A exhibited decreases in both ST2+ Treg cells and IL-33 abundance in visceral adipose tissue. Remarkably, these mice also lacked the ability to regulate core body temperature at thermoneutrality and after cold challenge. Together, these findings uncover important physiological roles for resident γδ T cells in adipose tissue immune homeostasis and body-temperature control.

Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Adolescent Patients May Result in Acceptable Graft Failure Rate in Nonpivoting Sports Athletes.

BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated that pediatric patients have an increased risk of failure with allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR); however, there is no study investigating whether allograft ACLR may be safe in older adolescent patients who are not returning to competitive pivoting sports (ie, low risk). The purpose of this study was to assess outcomes for low-risk older adolescents selected for allograft ACLR. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients younger than 18 years who received a bone-patellar-tendon-bone allograft or autograft ACLR by a single orthopaedic surgeon from 2012 to 2020. Patients were offered allograft ACLR if they did not intend to return to pivoting sports for 1 year. The autograft cohort was matched 1:1 based on age, sex, and follow-up. Patients were excluded for skeletal immaturity, multiligamentous injury, prior ipsilateral ACLR, or concomitant realignment procedure. Patients were contacted to obtain patient-reported outcomes at ≥2 years follow-up, including single assessment numerical evaluation, surgery satisfaction, pain scores, Tegner Activity Scale, and the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale. Parametric and nonparametric tests were used as appropriate. RESULTS: Of the 68 allografts, 40 (59%) met inclusion and 28 (70%) were contacted. Among the 456 autografts, 40 (8.7%) were matched and 26 (65%) were contacted. Two allograft patients (2/40; 5%) failed at a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 36 (12, 60) months. There were 0/40 failures in the autograft cohort and 13/456 (2.9%) among the overall autografts; neither were significantly different from the allograft failure rate (both P > 0.05). Two (5.0%) patients in the autograft cohort required manipulation under anesthesia and arthroscopic lysis of adhesions. There were no significant differences between cohorts for single assessment numerical evaluation, Lysholm, Tegner, pain, and satisfaction scores (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although ACL allograft failure rates remain nearly two times higher than autograft failure rates in older adolescents, our study suggests that careful patient selection can potentially bring this failure rate down to an acceptable level. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; retrospective matched cohort study.

Clinical outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for elective indications versus acute 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has continued to increase in clinical utility and popularity as an effective treatment for cuff tear arthropathy (CTA), irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCTs), osteoarthritis, and acute 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures. Performing RTSA for acute proximal humeral fractures presents the unique challenges of tuberosity management, bone loss, and instability compared with elective indications such as CTA or irreparable RCTs. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes, active range of motion (ROM), radiographic outcomes, and complications between patients undergoing elective RTSA (RTSA-E) and those undergoing RTSA for fracture (RTSA-F). METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We queried 3 electronic databases (Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed) using the search term "reverse" AND "shoulder" AND "arthroplasty." Studies investigating the clinical outcomes of RTSA for traumatic and/or elective indications were included. Studies were excluded if they included RTSA performed for fracture sequelae, inflammatory arthritis, post-traumatic osteoarthritis, or avascular necrosis. Data collected included patient demographic characteristics, subjective outcome measurements, ROM, and complications. The pooled means and proportions along with their 95% confidence intervals were generated by a random-effects model that incorporated the between-study variations in weighting. RESULTS: A total of 134 studies (11,651 shoulders) investigating the clinical outcomes of RTSA-E patients and 66 studies (3117 shoulders) investigating RTSA-F patients were included in this systematic review. Analysis of patient-reported outcomes demonstrated that RTSA-F patients experienced significantly lower Constant scores than RTSA-E patients; however, relative Constant scores, Simple Shoulder Test scores, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, and visual analog scale pain scores were similar. RTSA-F patients also had significantly lower forward elevation, abduction, and external rotation. RTSA-F patients experienced tuberosity complications at a significantly higher rate than RTSA-E patients (25.9% vs. 4.1%). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of other complications such as heterotopic ossification, radiographic loosening, revision, nerve injury, postoperative stiffness, infection, dislocation, and component loosening. DISCUSSION: RTSA performed for acute 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures yields overall worse clinical outcomes and active ROM compared with RTSA performed for elective indications including CTA, massive irreparable RCTs, and osteoarthritis with deformity. Tuberosity healing may be a major contributing factor to the difference in clinical outcomes. In the setting of RTSA-F, patient and surgeon expectations may need to be tempered and appropriate measures undertaken to optimize tuberosity healing.

Decreased Posterior Tibial Slope and Its Association With Pediatric Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

BACKGROUND: Recent adult studies have demonstrated that decreased posterior tibial slope angle (PTSA) may be a risk factor for posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury. However, there is no study investigating this phenomenon in a pediatric population. Understanding risk factors for PCL injuries among a pediatric population is important given the recent rise in athletic competition/specialization and sports-related injuries. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare PTSA between pediatric patients sustaining a primary PCL tear compared with age- and sex-matched controls. It was hypothesized that pediatric patients sustaining a PCL tear would have a decreased PTSA compared with controls, with decreased PTSA being associated with higher odds of PCL injury. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The records of all patients sustaining a PCL injury between 2006 and 2021 at a level 1 pediatric trauma center were reviewed. Patients aged ≤18 years with magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed PCL tear were included. Excluded were patients with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament tears, previous PCL reconstruction, or previous coronal plane realignment. A control cohort, with their ligament shown as intact on magnetic resonance imaging scans, was matched based on age and sex. PTSA was measured on lateral radiographs of the injured knee or tibia. The mean PTSA was compared between cohorts, and odds ratios were calculated based on the normal slope range (7°-10°) described in the literature, an upper range (>10°), and a lower range (<7°). Inter- and intrarater reliability were determined via calculation of an intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Of the 98 patients who sustained a PCL injury in this study period, 59 (60%) met inclusion criteria, and 59 healthy knee controls were matched. There were no differences between the cohorts for age (P = .90), sex (P > .99), or body mass index (P = .74). The PCL cohort had a lower mean ± SD PTSA compared with the control group (5.9°± 2.7° vs 7.3°± 4.3°; P = .03). PTSA <7° was associated with a 2.8 (95% CI, 1.3-6.0; P = .01) times risk of PCL tear. Conversely, PTSA >10° was associated with a 0.27 (95% CI, 0.09-0.81; P = .02) times risk of PCL tear. These PTSA measurements demonstrated acceptable intrarater and interrater reliability. CONCLUSION: PTSA <7° was associated with an increased odds of PCL injury, whereas a slope >10° was associated with a decreased odds of PCL injury in a pediatric population. These findings corroborate similar outcomes in adult studies; however, further studies are needed to elucidate PTSA as a risk factor for PCL injury.

Trends in Level of Evidence of Systematic Reviews in Sports Medicine, 2010-2020 : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: Popularization of systematic reviews has been met with controversy because of concerns that the primary literature for certain topics may not be suited for systematic review and meta-analysis. Purpose: To assess the rate of publication of systematic reviews based on their level of evidence (LOE) in influential orthopaedic sports medicine journals and commonly studied topics in sports medicine. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: An electronic search was performed using the PubMed database of studies published from January 2010 to December 2020. The advanced search function was used to identify systematic reviews from the Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (JSES), American Journal of Sports Medicine (AJSM), Arthroscopy, British Journal of Sports Medicine (BJSM), Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume (JBJS), and Sports Medicine (SM Auckland), as well as reviews of the most common areas of sports medicine research, including rotator cuff repair (RCR), shoulder instability (SI), anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), and meniscal repair. The LOE was assigned to each included study according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Studies were grouped as LOE 1-2, LOE 3-5, and nonclinical systematic reviews. A negative binomial regression was used to determine the changes in publication rate over time. Results: A total of 2162 systematic reviews were included in this study. From 2010 to 2020, the rate of publication of LOE 3-5 systematic reviews increased significantly among most of the surveyed journals (AJSM, P < .0001; Arthroscopy, P = .01; BJSM, P < .0001; JSES, P < .0001; SM Auckland, P < .0001), with the exception of JBJS (P = .57). The rate of publication of LOE 1-2 systematic reviews increased in AJSM (P < .0001), Arthroscopy (P = .02), BJSM (P < .0001), and SM Auckland (P < .0001); however, no significant changes were seen in JBJS (P = .08) or JSES (P = .15). The publication rate of LOE 3-5 systematic reviews increased for all sports medicine topics surveyed (meniscal repair, P < .0001; RCR, P < .0001; SI, P < .0001; ACLR, P < .0001). However, the publication rate of LOE 1-2 studies only increased for RCR (P = .0003) and ACLR (P < .0001). Conclusion: The rate of publication of LOE 3-5 systematic reviews exponentially increased in orthopaedic sports medicine journals over the past decade, outpacing the publication rate of LOE 1-2 systematic reviews.