Deficient processing and activity of type I insulin-like growth factor receptor in the furin-deficient LoVo-C5 cells.

To investigate endoproteolytic processing of the type I insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-IR), we have examined its structure and activity in the furin-deficient LoVo-C5 cell line. Immunoprecipitation experiments using the monoclonal anti-IGF-IR antibody (alpha-IR3) showed that LoVo-C5 cells expressed a major high molecular mass receptor (200 kDa) corresponding to the unprocessed alpha/beta pro-receptor. A small amount of successfully cleaved alpha/beta heterodimers was also produced, indicating a residual endoproteolytic cleavage activity in these cells. In vitro, a soluble form of recombinant furin was able to cleave the pro-IGF-IR (200 kDa) into alpha-subunit (130 kDa) and beta-subunit (97 kDa). Measurement of IGF binding parameters in LoVo-C5 cells indicated a low number of typical type I IGF-binding sites (binding capacity, 5 x 10(3) sites/cell; Kd, 1.9 nM for IGF-I and 7.0 nM for IGF-II). These findings in LoVo-C5 contrast with those in HT29-D4 cells, which have active furin, and where IGF-IR (2.8 x 10(4) sites/cell) was fully processed. Moreover, the 200-kDa pro-IGF-IR of LoVo-C5 was unable to induce intracellular signaling, such as beta-subunit tyrosine autophosphorylation and insulin-related substrate-1 tyrosine phosphorylation. Flow immunocytometry analysis using alpha-IR3 antibody indicated that LoVo-C5 cells expressed 40% more receptors than HT29-D4 cells, suggesting that in LoVo-C5 cells only the small amount of mature type I IGF-IR binds IGFs with high affinity. To provide evidence for this idea, we showed that mild trypsin treatment of living LoVo-C5 cells partially restored alpha/beta cleavage of IGF-IR, and greatly enhanced (6-fold) the IGF-I binding capacity of LoVo-C5 cells, but did not restore IGF-IR signaling activity. Moreover, LoVo-C5 cells were totally unresponsive to IGF-I in terms of cell migration, in contrast to fully processed IGF-IR-HT29-D4 cells. Our data indicate that furin is involved in the endoproteolytic processing of the IGF-IR and suggest that this posttranslational event might be crucial for its ligand binding and signaling activities. However, our data do not exclude that other proprotein convertases could participate to IGF-IR maturation.

Integrins and E-cadherin cooperate with IGF-I to induce migration of epithelial colonic cells.

Although the detailed mechanisms of cell migration remain largely unknown, it is now clear that growth factors and cell adhesion molecules are crucial for this process. We have shown that type I insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I) promotes migration of human colonic tumour cells. Since morphological analysis suggested an involvement of adhesion molecules, we have now examined the role of integrins (cell-matrix adhesion molecules) and E-cadherin/catenins complex (cell-cell adhesion molecules) in the IGF-I-induced migration. Using a monolayer wounding assay, we have determined that, except for alpha2beta1, all of the integrins expressed in HT29-D4 cells are involved in the induced cell migration. Immunofluorescence studies revealed that upon IGF-I stimulation the integrins reorganized at the leading edge of migrating cells. We also demonstrate that E-cadherin is involved in cell migration. A rapid tyrosine phosphorylation of E-cadherin and beta-catenin was detected upon IGF-I stimulation. Tyrosine phosphorylation was associated with reduced membranous expression of E-cadherin and promotion of cell motility, suggesting a regulation of the E-cadherin/catenins complex. This effect can be reversed by incubating cells with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Taken together, our results suggest that IGF-I promotes colonic cell migration through reorganization of integrin receptors and through modulation of E-cadherin/catenins complex function.

Endoproteolytic processing of integrin pro-alpha subunits involves the redundant function of furin and proprotein convertase (PC) 5A, but not paired basic amino acid converting enzyme (PACE) 4, PC5B or PC7.

Several integrin alpha subunits undergo post-translational endoproteolytic processing at pairs of basic amino acids that is mediated by the proprotein convertase furin. Here we ask whether other convertase family members can participate in these processing events. We therefore examined the endoproteolysis rate of the integrin subunits pro-alpha5, alpha6 and alphav by recombinant furin, proprotein convertase (PC)5A, paired basic amino acid converting enzyme (PACE)4, PC1, PC2 and PC7 in vitro and/or ex vivo after overexpression in LoVo cells that were deficient in furin activity. We found that 60-fold more PC1 than furin was needed to produce 50% cleavage of pro-alpha subunit substrates in vitro; the defective pro-alpha chain endoproteolysis in LoVo cells was not rescued by overexpression of PC1 or PC2. No endoproteolysis occurred with PC7 either in vitro or ex vivo, although similar primary sequences of the cleavage site are found in integrins and in proteins efficiently processed by PC7, which suggests that a particular conformation of the cleavage site is required for optimal convertase-substrate interactions. In vitro, 50% cleavage of pro-alpha subunits was obtained with one-third of the amount of PC5A and PACE4 than of furin. In LoVo cells, PC5A remained more active than furin, PACE4 activity was quite low, and PC5B, which differs from PC5A by a C-terminal extension containing a transmembrane domain, was very inefficient in processing integrin alpha-subunit precursors. In conclusion, these results indicate that integrin alpha-subunit endoproteolytic processing involves the redundant function of furin and PC5A and to a smaller extent PACE4, but not of PC1, PC2, PC5B or PC7.