Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 132
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 20(2): e182-e195, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33346140

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Treatment of malignant biliary strictures with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) guided stent placement is highly effective. Our objective was to compare the efficacy and adverse outcomes between plastic stents (PS) and self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS). METHODS: A cohort study was performed of all consecutive patients who underwent ERCP with stent placement for the management of malignant biliary stricture. Comparisons on clinical success, patency duration, stent dysfunction, unplanned reintervention and adverse outcomes were performed. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify factors associated with clinical success, need for reintervention, and stent dysfunction. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2019, 1139 patients underwent ERCP with PS placement while 1008 patients received SEMS for the management of malignant biliary stricture. In distal strictures, SEMS reported a significantly higher rate of clinical success compared with PS (94.1% vs 87.4%, P < 0.001) and a lower rate of unplanned reintervention (17.1% vs 27.4%, P < 0.001). In hilar strictures, the rates of clinical success and unplanned intervention were comparable. The patency duration and time to unplanned reintervention were significantly longer with SEMS than PS, irrespective of stricture location. In distal stricture, PS was associated with a significantly higher rate of cholangitis than SEMS (6.9% vs 2.4%; P < .001) but a lower rate of pancreatitis (3.6% vs 6%; P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: Given superior efficacy, durability and lower rates of cholangitis, SEMS should be offered as the first line endoscopic treatment option for malignant distal biliary stricture. For malignant hilar stricture, SEMS is an attractive alternative to PS in some cases by offering a comparable efficacy with a superior durability.


Asunto(s)
Colestasis , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Colestasis/etiología , Colestasis/cirugía , Estudios de Cohortes , Constricción Patológica/etiología , Humanos , Plásticos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles/efectos adversos , Stents , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 93(5): 997-1005, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33712228

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Multidrug-resistant infectious outbreaks associated with duodenoscopes have been documented internationally. Single-use duodenoscopes, disposable distal ends, or distal end cap sealants could eliminate or reduce exogenous patient-to-patient infection associated with ERCP. METHODS: This document reviews technologies that have been developed to help reduce or eliminate exogenous infections because of duodenoscopes. RESULTS: Four duodenoscopes with disposable end caps, 1 end sheath, and 2 disposable duodenoscopes are reviewed in this document. The evidence regarding their efficacy in procedural success rates, reduction of duodenoscope bacterial contamination, clinical outcomes associated with these devices, safety, and the financial considerations are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Several technologies discussed in this document are anticipated to eliminate or reduce exogenous infections during endoscopy requiring a duodenoscope. Although disposable duodenoscopes can eliminate exogenous ERCP-related risk of infection, data regarding effectiveness are needed outside of expert centers. Additionally, with more widespread adoption of these new technologies, more data regarding functionality, medical economics, and environmental impact will accrue. Disposable distal end caps facilitate duodenoscope reprocessing; postmarketing surveillance culture studies and real-life patient infection analyses are important areas of future research.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria , Duodenoscopios , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efectos adversos , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Brotes de Enfermedades , Desinfección , Contaminación de Equipos/prevención & control , Humanos
3.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 94(4): 671-684, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34344541

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic management of acute cholecystitis has expanded in patients who are considered nonoperative candidates. Traditionally managed with percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC), improvement in techniques and devices has led to increased use of endoscopic methods for gallbladder drainage. This document reviews technical aspects of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ET-GBD) and EUS-guided GBD (EUS-GBD) as well as their respective technical/clinical success and adverse event rates. Available comparative data are also reviewed among nonsurgical gallbladder drainage techniques (PC, ET-GBD, and EUS-GBD). METHODS: The MEDLINE database was searched through March 2021 for relevant articles by using keywords including "acute cholecystitis," "interventional EUS," "percutaneous cholecystostomy," "transpapillary gallbladder drainage," "EUS-guided gallbladder drainage," "lumen-apposing metal stent," "gallbladder stenting," and "endoscopic gallbladder drainage." The manuscript was drafted by 2 authors and reviewed by members of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Technology Committee and subsequently by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Governing Board. RESULTS: Multiple studies have demonstrated acceptable outcomes comparing PC and both endoscopic gallbladder drainage techniques, ET-GBD and EUS-GBD. Published data suggest that endoscopic gallbladder drainage techniques may be associated with lower rates of adverse events and improved quality of life. However, there are important clinical considerations for choosing among these treatment options, requiring a multidisciplinary and collaborative approach to therapeutic decision-making in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of EUS-GBD and ET-GBD in high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis may result in favorable outcomes when compared with PC. Further improvements in techniques and training should lead to more widespread acceptance and dissemination of these treatment options.


Asunto(s)
Colecistitis Aguda , Colecistostomía , Colecistitis Aguda/cirugía , Drenaje , Endosonografía , Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Humanos , Calidad de Vida
4.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 94(3): 457-470, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34311975

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) are a novel class of devices that have expanded the spectrum of endoscopic GI interventions. LAMSs with their dumbbell configuration, short saddle length, and large inner luminal diameter provide favorable stent characteristics to facilitate anastomosis formation between the gut lumen and adjacent structures. METHODS: The MEDLINE database was searched through April 2021 for articles related to LAMSs by using additional relevant keywords such as "walled-off pancreatic necrosis," "pseudocysts," "pancreatic fluid collection," "cholecystitis," "gastroenterostomy," in addition to "endoscopic treatment" and "endoscopic management," among others. RESULTS: This technology review describes the full spectrum of LAMS designs and delivery systems, techniques for deployment, procedural outcomes, safety, training issues, and financial considerations. CONCLUSIONS: Although LAMSs were initially introduced for drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts and walled-off necrosis, the versatility of these devices has led to a variety of off-label uses including gallbladder drainage, enteric bypass with the creation of gastroenterostomies, and treatment of luminal GI strictures.


Asunto(s)
Seudoquiste Pancreático , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante , Drenaje , Endosonografía , Vesícula Biliar , Humanos , Stents , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 93(2): 323-333, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33129492

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: EUS remains a primary diagnostic tool for the evaluation of pancreaticobiliary disease. Although EUS combined with FNA or biopsy sampling is highly sensitive for the diagnosis of neoplasia within the pancreaticobiliary tract, limitations exist in specific clinical settings such as chronic pancreatitis. Enhanced EUS imaging technologies aim to aid in the detection and diagnosis of lesions that are commonly evaluated with EUS. METHODS: We reviewed technologies and methods for enhanced imaging during EUS and applications of these methods. Available data regarding efficacy, safety, and financial considerations are summarized. RESULTS: Enhanced EUS imaging methods include elastography and contrast-enhanced EUS (CE-EUS). Both technologies have been best studied in the setting of pancreatic mass lesions. Robust data indicate that neither technology has adequate specificity to serve as a stand-alone test for pancreatic malignancy. However, there may be a role for improving the targeting of sampling and in the evaluation of peritumoral lymph nodes, inflammatory pancreatic masses, and masses with nondiagnostic FNA or fine-needle biopsy sampling. Further, novel applications of these technologies have been reported in the evaluation of liver fibrosis, pancreatic cysts, and angiogenesis within neoplastic lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Elastography and CE-EUS may improve the real-time evaluation of intra- and extraluminal lesions as an adjunct to standard B-mode and Doppler imaging. They are not a replacement for EUS-guided tissue sampling but provide adjunctive diagnostic information in specific clinical situations. The optimal clinical use of these technologies continues to be a focus of ongoing research.


Asunto(s)
Quiste Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Pancreatitis Crónica , Biopsia con Aguja Fina , Endosonografía , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Pancreatitis Crónica/diagnóstico por imagen
6.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 91(2): 385-393.e1, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31541625

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Indeterminate biliary stricture remains a significant diagnostic challenge. The current method of ERCP with bile duct brush cytology has substantial room for improvement. We aimed to determine the efficacy of a digital single-operator cholangioscopy (DSOC) in evaluation of indeterminate biliary stricture. METHODS: An observational cohort study was conducted among the patients who underwent DSOC for the indication of indeterminate biliary stricture at a tertiary academic medical center. The outcomes of interests were the accuracy of DSOC in visual interpretation and bile duct sample and identification of any factor(s) that could influence its effectiveness. RESULTS: One hundred five patients were included. The overall accuracy of DSOC in visual interpretation was 89.5%, whereas the accuracy of bile duct sample was 83.2%. The sensitivities of visual impression and bile duct sample were 89.1% and 69.8% and their specificities were 90% and 97.9%, respectively. The degree of endoscopists' experience with fewer than 25 cases and the severity of hyperbilirubinemia negatively impacted the accuracy of DSOC. Among 55 patients with definitive diagnosis of malignant stricture, the sensitivity of combined intraductal forceps biopsy sampling and brush cytology was 80.6%, whereas the sensitivity of brush cytology alone was 47.1%. CONCLUSIONS: DSOC augments ERCP in evaluating indeterminate biliary stricture. The acquisition of intraductal forceps biopsy samples should be a requisite in evaluation of indeterminate biliary stricture with DSOC. Discovery of modifiable factors such as the degree of endoscopists' expertise and the severity of hyperbilirubinemia, which can influence the accuracy of DSOC, warrants further studies on patient preprocedure optimization and an endoscopic training program that will cultivate procedural competency.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/diagnóstico , Colestasis/patología , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Anciano , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/complicaciones , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/patología , Biopsia/métodos , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Colangitis/epidemiología , Colestasis/etiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Constricción Patológica , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pancreatitis/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Stents
7.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 92(3): 483-491, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32684298

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gastroparesis is a symptomatic chronic disorder of the stomach characterized by delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Several endoscopic treatment modalities have been described that aim to improve gastric emptying and/or symptoms associated with gastroparesis refractory to dietary and pharmacologic management. METHODS: In this report we review devices and techniques for endoscopic treatment of gastroparesis, the evidence regarding their efficacy and safety, and the financial considerations for their use. RESULTS: Endoscopic modalities for treatment of gastroparesis can be broadly categorized into pyloric, nonpyloric, and nutritional therapies. Pyloric therapies such as botulinum toxin injection, stent placement, pyloroplasty, and pyloromyotomy specifically focus on pylorospasm as a therapeutic target. These interventions aim to reduce the pressure gradient across the pyloric sphincter, with a resultant improvement in gastric emptying. Nonpyloric therapies, such as venting gastrostomy and gastric electrical stimulation, are intended to improve symptoms. Nutritional therapies, such as feeding tube placement, aim to provide nutritional support. CONCLUSIONS: Several endoscopic interventions have shown utility in improving the quality of life and symptoms of select patients with refractory gastroparesis. Methods to identify which patients are best suited for a specific treatment are not well established. Endoscopic pyloromyotomy is a relatively recent development that may prove to be the preferred pyloric-directed intervention, although additional and longer-term outcomes are needed.


Asunto(s)
Gastroparesia , Vaciamiento Gástrico , Gastroparesia/cirugía , Humanos , Piloromiotomia , Píloro/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 92(3): 492-507, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32800313

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: As the prevalence of obesity continues to rise, increasing numbers of patients undergo bariatric surgery. Management of adverse events of bariatric surgery may be challenging and often requires a multidisciplinary approach. Endoscopic intervention is often the first line of therapy for management of these adverse events. This document reviews technologies and techniques used for endoscopic management of adverse events of bariatric surgery, organized by surgery type. METHODS: The MEDLINE database was searched through May 2018 for articles related to endoscopic management of adverse events of bariatric interventions by using relevant keywords such as adverse events related to "gastric bypass," "sleeve gastrectomy," "laparoscopic adjustable banding," and "vertical banded sleeve gastroplasty," in addition to "endoscopic treatment" and "endoscopic management," among others. Available data regarding efficacy, safety, and financial considerations are summarized. RESULTS: Common adverse events of bariatric surgery include anastomotic ulcers, luminal stenoses, fistulae/leaks, and inadequate initial weight loss or weight regain. Devices used for endoscopic management of bariatric surgical adverse events include balloon dilators (hydrostatic, pneumatic), mechanical closure devices (clips, endoscopic suturing system, endoscopic plication platform), luminal stents (covered esophageal stents, lumen-apposing metal stents, plastic stents), and thermal therapy (argon plasma coagulation, needle-knives), among others. Available data, composed mainly of case series and retrospective cohort studies, support the primary role of endoscopic management. Multiple procedures and techniques are often required to achieve clinical success, and existing management algorithms are evolving. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopy is a less invasive alternative for management of adverse events of bariatric surgery and for revisional procedures. Endoscopic procedures are frequently performed in the context of multidisciplinary management with bariatric surgeons and interventional radiologists. Treatment algorithms and standards of practice for endoscopic management will continue to be refined as new dedicated technology and data emerge.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica/efectos adversos , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Derivación Gástrica , Gastroplastia/efectos adversos , Humanos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 92(3): 474-482, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32641215

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Residual neoplasia after macroscopically complete EMR of large colon polyps has been reported in 10% to 32% of resections. Often, residual polyps at the site of prior polypectomy are fibrotic and nonlifting, making additional resection challenging. METHODS: This document reviews devices and methods for the endoscopic treatment of fibrotic and/or residual polyps. In addition, techniques reported to reduce the incidence of residual neoplasia after endoscopic resection are discussed. RESULTS: Descriptions of technologies and available outcomes data are summarized for argon plasma coagulation ablation, snare-tip coagulation, avulsion techniques, grasp-and-snare technique, EndoRotor endoscopic resection system, endoscopic full-thickness resection device, and salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection. CONCLUSIONS: Several technologies and techniques discussed in this document may aid in the prevention and/or resection of fibrotic and nonlifting polyps.


Asunto(s)
Pólipos del Colon , Pólipos del Colon/patología , Pólipos del Colon/cirugía , Colonoscopía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa , Humanos , Mucosa Intestinal/patología , Neoplasia Residual/patología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto
10.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 90(1): 1-12, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31122746

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Simulation refers to educational tools that allow for repetitive instruction in a nonpatient care environment that is risk-free. In GI endoscopy, simulators include ex vivo animal tissue models, live animal models, mechanical models, and virtual reality (VR) computer simulators. METHODS: After a structured search of the peer-reviewed medical literature, this document reviews commercially available GI endoscopy simulation systems and clinical outcomes of simulation in endoscopy. RESULTS: Mechanical simulators and VR simulators are frequently used early in training, whereas ex vivo and in vivo animal models are more commonly used for advanced endoscopy training. Multiple studies and systematic reviews show that simulation-based training appears to provide novice endoscopists with some advantage over untrained peers with regard to endpoints such as independent procedure completion and performance time, among others. Data also suggest that simulation training may accelerate the acquisition of specific technical skills in colonoscopy and upper endoscopy early in training. However, the available literature suggests that the benefits of simulator training appear to attenuate and cease after a finite period. Further studies are needed to determine if meeting competency metrics using simulation will predict actual clinical competency. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation training is a promising modality that may aid in endoscopic education. However, for widespread incorporation of simulators into gastroenterology training programs to occur, simulators must show a sustained advantage over traditional mentored teaching in a cost-effective manner. Because most studies evaluating simulation have focused on novice learners, the role of simulation training in helping practicing endoscopists gain proficiency using new techniques and devices should be further explored.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/educación , Gastroenterología/educación , Entrenamiento Simulado/métodos , Humanos , Modelos Anatómicos , Realidad Virtual
11.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 90(3): 325-334, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31113535

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Most patients diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma do not carry a known diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus (BE), suggesting that an improved approach to screening may potentially be of benefit. The use of dysplasia as a biomarker and random biopsy protocols for its detection has limitations. In addition, detecting and appropriately classifying dysplasia in patients with known BE can be difficult. METHODS: This document reviews several technologies with a recently established or potential role in the diagnosis and/or surveillance of BE as well as risk stratification for progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: Two technologies were reviewed for imaging or tissue sampling: (1) wide-area transepithelial sampling and (2) volumetric laser endomicroscopy. Four technologies were reviewed for molecular and biomarker technologies for diagnosis and risk stratification: (1) Cytosponge, (2) mutational load, (3) fluorescence in situ hybridization, and (4) immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSION: Several technologies discussed in this document may improve dysplasia detection in BE in a wide-field manner. Moreover, the addition of different biomarkers may aid in enhanced risk stratification to optimize approaches to surveillance or treatment for patients with BE.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Esófago de Barrett/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiología , Esófago de Barrett/metabolismo , Esófago de Barrett/patología , Biopsia/métodos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional , Inmunohistoquímica , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Microscopía Confocal/métodos , Medición de Riesgo , Espera Vigilante
14.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 15(11): 1776-1781, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28624651

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Anastomotic bile duct stricture (ABS) remains as one of the most common complications in liver transplant patients. Current practice of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with insertion of plastic stent often requires multiple procedures before achieving stricture resolution. To date, studies using covered self-expandable metallic stent (cSEMS) in ABS management reported varying degrees of efficacy. The aim of this study was to analyze long-term efficacy of cSEMS in patients with ABS and identify factor(s) influencing the probability of stricture resolution. METHODS: Liver transplant patients with ABS who received cSEMS were identified by query of our endoscopic database. The rate of stricture resolution, duration of stricture-free interval, factors associated with stricture resolution, and adverse outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 44 liver transplant patients with refractory ABS who underwent ERCP-cSEMS, stricture resolution was observed in 33 patients (75%). Longer duration of cSEMS insertion was the only variable associated with increasing probability of stricture resolution. There was 20% increase in odds of stricture resolution for every additional week cSEMS was in place. Among 33 patients with initial stricture resolution, 26 patients (78.8%) maintained bile duct patency throughout the follow-up period. The most common adverse outcome was internal migration of cSEMS, which occurred in 11 patients (25%). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of ABS resolution observed with cSEMS placement in a single ERCP session appears to be comparable with that of multiple ERCPs with plastic stent placement reported previously. Longer stent insertion period is associated with higher likelihood of ABS resolution.


Asunto(s)
Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Constricción Patológica/cirugía , Endoscopía/métodos , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Stents , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
15.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 15(3): 446-453, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27765727

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Biliary self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) are widely used to treat malignant and benign conditions of bile duct. Despite their lower rate of occlusion and longer patency than plastic stents, SEMSs still have significant rates of occlusion. We aimed to identify factors associated with occlusion of biliary SEMS. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with biliary SEMS placement at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation from March 2011 to April 2016. We collected clinical, endoscopic, radiographic, and surgical data from medical records and performed multivariable analysis to identify factors associated with SEMS patency. Subjects that received minimal daily dose of 81 mg at the time of stent placement until the end of follow-up were assigned to the aspirin exposure group (n = 157) and compared with subjects with no aspirin exposure (n = 436). Patients were followed for a median 81 days. The primary outcome was hazard ratio for SEMS occlusion requiring an interventional maneuver for biliary drainage. RESULTS: We analyzed data from patients receiving a total of 593 biliary SEMS for treatment of malignant and benign conditions of bile duct. Stent occlusion was observed in 126 cases. Multivariable analysis showed that daily use of aspirin (81 mg or more) was associated with 51% lower risk of stent occlusion than in patients without daily use of aspirin (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.75). Furthermore, SEMSs had a longer duration of stent patency in patients in the aspirin exposure group (434.4 days) versus the no aspirin exposure group (339.9 days) (P < .001). Stricture location limited to distal bile duct (in comparison with strictures involving proximal extrahepatic duct) was associated with lower risk of stent occlusion (hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.22-0.71). CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of a large cohort of subjects with metallic biliary stent placement for malignant and benign conditions of bile duct, we associated daily use of aspirin (81 mg or more) with lower risk of SEMS occlusion and longer stent patency duration.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Biliar/efectos adversos , Colestasis/prevención & control , Stents/efectos adversos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ohio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo
17.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 84(4): 649-55, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26995690

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Digital cholangioscopes provide higher-resolution imaging of the pancreatobiliary tract compared with fiberoptic instruments. The role of a new, digital, single-operator cholangiopancreatoscopy (SOC) system for diagnosis and treatment of pancreatobiliary disorders in clinical practice is not known. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, observational study of 105 consecutive patients with suspected pancreatobiliary disorders. The main outcome measures were (1) sensitivity and specificity of SOC visual appearance and biopsies in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures and (2) achieving complete duct clearance in patients with biliary or pancreatic duct stones. RESULTS: A total of 98 cholangioscopy and 7 pancreatoscopy procedures were performed in 105 patients. Superior views of the ductal lumen and mucosa were obtained in all 44 patients with indeterminate biliary strictures. Among the 44 patients who underwent SOC-guided biopsies, the specimen was adequate for histologic evaluation in 43 patients (97.7%). The sensitivity and specificity of SOC visual impression for diagnosis of malignancy was 90% (95% confidence interval [CI], 69.9%-97.2%) and 95.8% (95% CI, 79.8%-99.3%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of SOC-guided biopsies for diagnosis of malignancy was 85% (95% CI, 64.0%-94.8%) and 100% (95% CI, 86.2%-100%). In patients with biliary or pancreatic duct stones (N = 36), complete duct clearance with stone removal in 1 session was accomplished in 86.1% of patients (31/36). Three patients (2.9%) experienced SOC-related adverse events that included cholangitis in 2 patients and postprocedure pancreatitis in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: SOC has become an integral part of the ERCP armamentarium and has high accuracy in the evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures. Complete stone clearance was achieved in all but 1 patient with challenging biliary or pancreatic duct stones. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01815619.).


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/diagnóstico , Colangiocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Colelitiasis/diagnóstico , Colestasis/diagnóstico , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/complicaciones , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Anciano , Enfermedades de los Conductos Biliares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de los Conductos Biliares/patología , Enfermedades de los Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/complicaciones , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/patología , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Biliar , Biopsia , Colangiocarcinoma/complicaciones , Colangiocarcinoma/patología , Colangiocarcinoma/cirugía , Colangitis/epidemiología , Colelitiasis/complicaciones , Colelitiasis/patología , Colelitiasis/cirugía , Colestasis/etiología , Colestasis/patología , Colestasis/cirugía , Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Pancreáticas/patología , Enfermedades Pancreáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pancreatitis/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
18.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 84(4): 597-603, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26646671

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A noninvasive screening test that can detect esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) at an earlier stage could improve the prognosis associated with EAC. The role of plasma volatile organic compounds (VOCs) for the diagnosis of EAC has not been previously studied. METHODS: Plasma samples were collected from subjects with EAC and GERD before endoscopy. Twenty-two preselected VOCs were analyzed with selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry. RESULTS: The headspaces from 39 plasma samples (20 EAC, 19 GERD) were analyzed. The levels of 9 VOCs (acetonitrile, acrylonitrile, carbon disulfide, isoprene, 1-heptene, 3-methylhexane, [E]-2-nonene, hydrogen sulfide, and triethylamine) were significantly altered in EAC patients compared with GERD patients. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to build a model for the prediction of EAC. The model identified patients with EAC with an area under the curve of 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Plasma VOCs may be useful in diagnosing EAC. Larger studies are needed to confirm our pilot study observations.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/sangre , Neoplasias Esofágicas/sangre , Compuestos Orgánicos Volátiles/sangre , Acetonitrilos/sangre , Acrilonitrilo/sangre , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Área Bajo la Curva , Butadienos/sangre , Disulfuro de Carbono/sangre , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Transversales , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Etilaminas/sangre , Femenino , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/sangre , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Hemiterpenos/sangre , Hexanos/sangre , Humanos , Sulfuro de Hidrógeno/sangre , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Pentanos/sangre , Proyectos Piloto
19.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 83(4): 684-98.e7, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26874597

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic real-time imaging of Barrett's esophagus (BE) with advanced imaging technologies enables targeted biopsies and may eliminate the need for random biopsies to detect dysplasia during endoscopic surveillance of BE. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Technology Committee to specifically assess whether acceptable performance thresholds outlined by the ASGE Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations (PIVI) document for clinical adoption of these technologies have been met. METHODS: We conducted meta-analyses calculating the pooled sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), and specificity for chromoendoscopy by using acetic acid and methylene blue, electronic chromoendoscopy by using narrow-band imaging, and confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) for the detection of dysplasia. Random effects meta-analysis models were used. Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated by means of I(2) statistics. RESULTS: The pooled sensitivity, NPV, and specificity for acetic acid chromoendoscopy were 96.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 95-98), 98.3% (95% CI, 94.8-99.4), and 84.6% (95% CI, 68.5-93.2), respectively. The pooled sensitivity, NPV, and specificity for electronic chromoendoscopy by using narrow-band imaging were 94.2% (95% CI, 82.6-98.2), 97.5% (95% CI, 95.1-98.7), and 94.4% (95% CI, 80.5-98.6), respectively. The pooled sensitivity, NPV, and specificity for endoscope-based CLE were 90.4% (95% CI, 71.9-97.2), 98.3% (95% CI, 94.2-99.5), and 92.7% (95% CI, 87-96), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis indicates that targeted biopsies with acetic acid chromoendoscopy, electronic chromoendoscopy by using narrow-band imaging, and endoscope-based CLE meet the thresholds set by the ASGE PIVI, at least when performed by endoscopists with expertise in advanced imaging techniques. The ASGE Technology Committee therefore endorses using these advanced imaging modalities to guide targeted biopsies for the detection of dysplasia during surveillance of patients with previously nondysplastic BE, thereby replacing the currently used random biopsy protocols.


Asunto(s)
Esófago de Barrett/diagnóstico por imagen , Esófago de Barrett/patología , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Esófago/patología , Ácido Acético , Biopsia/métodos , Colorantes , Esofagoscopía/normas , Humanos , Microscopía Intravital/normas , Azul de Metileno , Microscopía Confocal/normas , Imagen de Banda Estrecha/normas , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Espera Vigilante
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA