Sampling of tar from sewage sludge gasification using solid phase adsorption.

Sewage sludge is a residue from wastewater treatment plants which is considered to be harmful to the environment and all living organisms. Gasification technology is a potential source of renewable energy that converts the sewage sludge into gases that can be used to generate energy or as raw material in chemical synthesis processes. But tar produced during gasification is one of the problems for the implementation of the gasification technology. Tar can condense on pipes and filters and may cause blockage and corrosion in the engines and turbines. Consequently, to minimize tar content in syngas, the ability to quantify tar levels in process streams is essential. The aim of this work was to develop an accurate tar sampling and analysis methodology using solid phase adsorption (SPA) in order to apply it to tar sampling from sewage sludge gasification gases. Four types of commercial SPA cartridges have been tested to determine the most suitable one for the sampling of individual tar compounds in such streams. Afterwards, the capacity, breakthrough volume and sample stability of the Supelclean™ ENVI-Carb/NH(2), which is identified as the most suitable, have been determined. Basically, no significant influences from water, H(2)S or NH(3) were detected. The cartridge was used in sampling real samples, and comparable results were obtained with the present and traditional methods.

Quality indicators and specifications for key analytical-extranalytical processes in the clinical laboratory. Five years' experience using the Six Sigma concept.

BACKGROUND: The results of 5 years of experience (2004-2008) with process-based quality management using quality indicators for key laboratory processes (analytic and extra-analytic) in a group of clinical laboratories affiliated with the Catalan Health Institute are presented. Our purpose was to analyze the evolution of the indicators, identify processes that require corrective measures, and obtain specifications that are more robust than the preliminary ones proposed in a previous study by the same group. METHODS: The yearly average was recorded for each indicator in each laboratory, the yearly interlaboratory median was calculated, and the changes occurring were studied to determine their continuity in the 5-year period. For each indicator, the average of the yearly medians was calculated and the results transformed to the Six Sigma scale to estimate the degree of control over the related process. It was suggested to establish the yearly interlaboratory median as the desirable specification for each indicator. RESULTS: The medians for most indicators were stable during the period studied. Thus, the specifications proposed in the first study were considered robust in these cases. The Six Sigma statistic provided added value in this study because it enabled detection of processes that should be improved, in which case the specifications proposed were considered provisional despite their stability. After identifying processes that have the greatest impact on patient safety, the group set a specification of 0%, regardless of the actual specification obtained, although the members are conscious of the difficulty in attaining this level of quality. Certain processes that are in a period of change obtained specifications that are considered in a phase of consolidation. CONCLUSIONS: The results for indicators related with sample collection indicate that the process is stable and well controlled. However, based on the results for Hemolyzed serum sample, the group saw the need for installing centrifuges in all phlebotomy centers and established a recommendation to unify the system for measuring hemolysis. The indicator External control exceeds acceptance limit clearly highlighted the need to rigorously monitor the analytic phase of the clinical laboratory. The values obtained for the indicator Reports from referred tests exceed delivery time show that there is considerable deviation regarding the expected report delivery time, whereas for in-house laboratory reports, delivery time is satisfactory.

Indicators and quality specifications for strategic and support processes related to the clinical laboratory: four years' experience.

BACKGROUND: Quality specifications for indicators of the key analytic processes have been defined by international consensus. However, only preliminary specifications for laboratory-related strategic and support processes have been developed. The present study attempts to increase the robustness of the preliminary proposed specifications. METHODS: Recovering records and incidences occurred over a 4-year follow-up period, for 12 indicators, used in all laboratories from this group regarding strategic and support processes. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained indicate that it is better to establish an interval rather than a fixed value for the majority of indicators. Longer studies are needed to properly assess some quality specifications, and data recording system must be standardized in others. Additional, multicenter studies are needed to establish more robust specifications and determine the state of the art of laboratories in other settings.

Exploring petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater by double solid phase extraction coupled to gas chromatography-flame ionization detector.

This work proposes an analytical procedure for measuring aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons fractions present in groundwater. In this method, hydrocarbons are solid phase extracted (SPE) twice from the groundwater and the resulting fractions are analyzed by gas chromatography with flame ionization detection. The first SPE disposes the hydrocarbons present in groundwater in organic solvents and the second SPE divides them into aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons. The validation study is carried out and its uncertainties are discussed. Identifying the main sources of uncertainty is evaluated through applying the bottom-up approach. Limits of detection for hydrocarbons ranges are below 5 µg L(-1), precision is not above of 30%, and acceptable recoveries are reached for aliphatic and aromatic fractions studied. The uncertainty due to volume of the sample, factor of calibration and recovery are the highest contributions. The expanded uncertainty range from 13% to 26% for the aliphatic hydrocarbons ranges and from 14% to 23% for the aromatic hydrocarbons ranges. As application, the proposed method is satisfactorily applied to a set of groundwater samples collected in a polluted area where there is evidence to present a high degree of hydrocarbons. The results have shown the range of aliphatic hydrocarbons >C21-C35 is the most abundant, with values ranging from 215 µg L(-1) to 354 µg L(-1), which it is associated to a contamination due to diesel.

Estimation of measurement uncertainty of pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls and polyaromatic hydrocarbons in sediments by using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

The evaluation of the uncertainty associated to analytical methods is essential in order to demonstrate quality of a result. However, there is often lack of information about uncertainty of methods to estimate persistent organic pollutants concentration in complex matrix. Current work has thoroughly evaluated uncertainty associated to quantification of several organochloride pesticides, PCBs and PAHs in sediments. A discussion of the main contributions to the overall uncertainty is reported, allowing authors to establish the accuracy of results and plan future improvements. Combined uncertainties ranged between 5-9% (pesticides), 4-7% (PCBs) and 5-10% (PAHs), being uncertainty derived of calibration the main contribution. Also, the analytical procedure was validated analysing a standard reference material (IAEA-408).

Quality indicators and specifications for strategic and support processes in laboratory medicine.

BACKGROUND: This work is the second part of a study regarding indicators and quality specifications for the non-analytical processes in laboratory medicine. Five primary care and five hospital laboratories agreed on the indicators for two strategic processes (quality planning and project development) and various support processes (client relationships, instrument and infrastructure maintenance, safety and risk prevention, purchases and storage, personnel training). METHODS: In the majority of cases, the median values recorded over 1 year is considered to be the state-of-the-art in our setting and proposed as the quality specification for the indicators stated. Values have been stratified according to primary care and hospital laboratory for referred tests and group of personnel for training. In some cases, the specifications have been set equal to zero events, such as serious incidents in the infrastructure maintenance process and number of work accidents in the safety and risk prevention process. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: In light of this study, an effort is needed to optimize decisions regarding corrective actions and to move from a subjective individual criterion to systematic and comparative management. This preliminary study provides a comprehensive vision of a subject that could motivate further research and advances in the quality of laboratory services.