Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
BMC Cancer ; 23(1): 966, 2023 Oct 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37828434

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In case of locally advanced and/or non-metastatic unresectable esophageal cancer, definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) delivering 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions in combination with platinum-based regimen remains the standard of care resulting in a 2-year disease-free survival of 25% which deserves to be associated with new systemic strategies. In recent years, several immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD1/anti-PD-L1, anti-Program-Death 1/anti-Program-Death ligand 1) have been approved for the treatment of various solid malignancies including metastatic esophageal cancer. As such, we hypothesized that the addition of an anti-PD-L1 to CRT would provide clinical benefit for patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer. To assess the efficacy of the anti-PD-L1 durvalumab in combination with CRT and then as maintenance therapy we designed the randomized phase II ARION (Association of Radiochemotherapy with Immunotherapy in unresectable Oesophageal carciNoma- UCGI 33/PRODIGE 67). METHODS: ARION is a multicenter, open-label, randomized, comparative phase II trial. Patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio in each arm with a stratification according to tumor stage, histology and centre. Experimental arm relies on CRT with 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions in combination with FOLFOX regimen administrated during and after radiotherapy every two weeks for a total of 6 cycles and durvalumab starting with CRT for a total of 12 infusions. Standard arm is CRT alone. Use of Intensity Modulated radiotherapy is mandatory. The primary endpoint is to increase progression-free survival at 12 months from 50 to 68% (HR = 0.55) (power 90%; one-sided alpha-risk, 10%). Progression will be defined with central external review of imaging. ANCILLARY STUDIES ARE PLANNED: PD-L1 Combined Positivity Score on carcinoma cells and stromal immune cells of diagnostic biopsy specimen will be correlated to disease free survival. The study of gut microbiota will aim to determine if baseline intestinal bacteria correlates with tumor response. Proteomic analysis on blood samples will compare long-term responder after CRT with durvalumab to non-responder to identify biomarkers. CONCLUSION: Results of the present study will be of great importance to evaluate the impact of immunotherapy in combination with CRT and decipher immune response in this unmet need clinical situation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT: 03777813.Trial registration date: 5th December 2018.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Humanos , Proteómica , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioradioterapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Inmunoterapia , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto
2.
BMC Cancer ; 20(1): 74, 2020 Jan 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32000724

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Approximately 40% of colorectal cancer patients will develop colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The most effective approach to increase long-term survival is CRLM complete resection. Unfortunately, only 10-15% of CRLM are initially considered resectable. The objective response rates (ORR) after current first-line systemic chemotherapy (sys-CT) regimens range from 40 to 80% and complete resection rates (CRR) range from 25 to 50% in patients with initially unresectable CRLM. When CRLM patients are not amenable to complete resection after induction of sys-CT, ORRs obtained with second-line sys-CT are much lower (between 10 and 30%) and consequently CRRs are also low (< 10%). Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) oxaliplatin may represent a salvage therapy in patients with CRLM unresectable after one or more sys-CT regimens with ORRs and CRRs up to 60 and 30%, respectively. This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy of an intensification strategy based on HAI oxaliplatin combined with sys-CT as a salvage treatment in patients with CRLM unresectable after at least 2 months of first-line induction sys-CT. OBJECTIVES AND ENDPOINTS OF THE PHASE II STUDY: Our main objective is to investigate the efficacy, in term of CRR (R0-R1), of treatment intensification in patients with liver-only CRLM not amenable to curative-intent resection (and/or ablation) after at least 2 months of induction sys-CT. Patients will receive either HAI oxaliplatin plus systemic FOLFIRI plus targeted therapy (i.e. anti-EGFR antibody or bevacizumab) or conventional sys-CT plus targeted therapy (i.e. anti-EGFR or antiangiogenic antibody). Secondary objectives are to compare: progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate, depth of response, feasibility of delivering HAI oxaliplatin including HAI catheter-related complications, and toxicity (NCI-CTCAE v4.0). METHODS: This study is a multicenter, randomized, comparative phase II trial (power, 80%; two-sided alpha-risk, 5%). Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive HAI oxaliplatin combined with systemic FOLFIRI plus targeted therapy (experimental arm) or the best sys-CT plus targeted therapy on the basis of their first-line prior sys-CT history and current guidelines (control arm). One hundred forty patients are required to account for non-evaluable patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, (NCT03164655). Trial registration date: 11th May 2017.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos Clínicos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Femenino , Arteria Hepática , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Inducción , Infusiones Intraarteriales , Masculino
3.
Transpl Int ; 27(9): 931-8, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24853579

RESUMEN

Renal insufficiency (RI) is a frequent complication in heart transplant (HT) patients. The main objectives of the Cardiac trAnsplantation and Renal INsufficiency (CARIN) study were to follow the evolution of renal function after heart transplantation (HTx), to identify the factors associated with the decline of renal function, to describe the impact of RI on mortality during 3 years after the HT, and to observe the renal profile of the prescriptions. CARIN was a French retrospective, multicentric, study. Data were collected for patients who received a HT between 2000 and 2005. Data collection was performed at five time points: before HTx (T0), 1(T1), 6(T6), 12 (T12), and 36 (T36) months after HTx. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated with aMDRD formula. RI was defined as GFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m². Four hundred and forty-one patients from five HT centers were included. The prevalences of RI were 28.8% (T0), 54.0% (T1), 50.4% (T6), 51.6% (T12), and 59.6% (T36). Age and cyclosporine were independently linked to the decline of renal function. Hypertension and GFR < 60 at T0 were independent risk factors of mortality. 48.7-64.7% of the nonimmunosuppressive prescriptions were drugs that required dosage adjustment in RI patients or for which no data were available concerning administration in RI patients. RI is highly frequent after HTx. Because RI is a risk factor of mortality, any sparing renal strategies have to be undertaken.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Corazón , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Insuficiencia Renal/etiología , Adulto , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Francia/epidemiología , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Trasplante de Corazón/mortalidad , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/farmacología , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Riñón/efectos de los fármacos , Riñón/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Farmacocinética , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Insuficiencia Renal/metabolismo , Insuficiencia Renal/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Renal/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
4.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(9): e2124483, 2021 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34495337

RESUMEN

Importance: The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with substantial reduction in screening, case identification, and hospital referrals among patients with cancer. However, no study has quantitatively examined the implications of this correlation for cancer patient management. Objective: To evaluate the association of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown with the tumor burden of patients who were diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) before vs after lockdown. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study analyzed participants in the screening procedure of the PANIRINOX (Phase II Randomized Study Comparing FOLFIRINOX + Panitumumab vs FOLFOX + Panitumumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Stratified by RAS Status from Circulating DNA Analysis) phase 2 randomized clinical trial. These newly diagnosed patients received care at 1 of 18 different clinical centers in France and were recruited before or after the lockdown was enacted in France in the spring of 2020. Patients underwent a blood-sampling screening procedure to identify their RAS and BRAF tumor status. Exposures: mCRC. Main Outcomes and Measures: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis was used to identify RAS and BRAF status. Tumor burden was evaluated by the total plasma ctDNA concentration. The median ctDNA concentration was compared in patients who underwent screening before (November 11, 2019, to March 9, 2020) vs after (May 14 to September 3, 2020) lockdown and in patients who were included from the start of the PANIRINOX study. Results: A total of 80 patients were included, of whom 40 underwent screening before and 40 others underwent screening after the first COVID-19 lockdown in France. These patients included 48 men (60.0%) and 32 women (40.0%) and had a median (range) age of 62 (37-77) years. The median ctDNA concentration was statistically higher in patients who were newly diagnosed after lockdown compared with those who were diagnosed before lockdown (119.2 ng/mL vs 17.3 ng/mL; P < .001). Patients with mCRC and high ctDNA concentration had lower median survival compared with those with lower concentration (14.7 [95% CI, 8.8-18.0] months vs 20.0 [95% CI, 14.1-32.0] months). This finding points to the potential adverse consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic and related lockdown. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that tumor burden differed between patients who received an mCRC diagnosis before vs after the first COVID-19 lockdown in France. The findings of this study suggest that CRC is a major area for intervention to minimize pandemic-associated delays in screening, diagnosis, and treatment.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/organización & administración , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Carga Tumoral , Adulto , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , COVID-19/epidemiología , ADN Tumoral Circulante/sangre , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Estudios Controlados Antes y Después , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , SARS-CoV-2
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA