RESUMEN
Since the first description of Brugada syndrome (BrS), several studies were carried out aimed at diagnosis, arrhythmic risk stratification, and available strategies for sudden death prevention. In high-risk patients, the use of an implantable cardiac defibrillator was an evident option since the first description of the syndrome. Nevertheless, this strategy, while proven, as expected, to be effective in sudden death prevention, does not prevent arrhythmias and may not be an adequate or accepted solution for all patients. The need of a non-pharmacological therapy as a potential solution based on the electrophysiological mechanisms underlying the syndrome, led to search for substrate as target for catheter ablation. Advances in the tools, technology, and technical approach enabled to launch studies aimed at mapping the epicardium of patients with BrS in order to identify and ablate the substrate. As described in previous work and in our experience, an anatomically identifiable electrical substrate, which correspond to the typical ECG, is the ablation target. Complete substrate is better identified in a larger area with sodium-channel-blockers. Ablation of all abnormal electrical potentials is able to normalize the ECG and prevent arrhythmias induction. Encouraging preliminary data, if confirmed by longer follow-up and by multicentre randomized study, could change the whole therapeutic management in BrS patients.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the main cause of cardioembolic stroke. In high-bleeding-risk patients, long-life anticoagulation therapy is not permitted, and left atrial appendage (LAA) closure may be considered. LAA is also a critical substrate for AF. Epicardial LAA occlusion has several advantages: LAA ligation results in a favorable electrical and structural atrial remodeling, which decreases AF recurrence. Endocardial ablation alone is not efficient for all patients, and new evidence shows better outcomes in patients affected by persistent AF after a combined hybrid endo-epicardial ablation. Considering the synergic potential of these techniques, in this case series, they were both combined in a single procedure. Methods and results: We describe the treatment of 5 patients referred for refractory AF ablation and LAA closure. All patients had high thrombotic and previous major hemorrhage, with relative contraindication to life-long therapy with anticoagulation. A combined procedure of LAA ligation and endo-epicardial ablation was scheduled with short-term anticoagulation. LAA closure was performed with an epicardial approach using the LARIAT system. Then, LA mapping and ablation were performed, endocardially and then epicardially.All procedures were concluded without complications.At follow-up, in all patients, transesophageal echocardiography showed the complete occlusion of the LAA; therefore, anticoagulation therapy was interrupted. All patients were asymptomatic, and in the sinus rhythm, no hemorrhage or ischemic events occurred. Conclusion: The combination of percutaneous LAA ligation and endo-epicardial ablation was revealed to be feasible and safe and might represent a new approach for the treatment of refractory AF in patients with indication of LAA occlusion.