Real-world experience with mavacamten in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Observations from a tertiary care center.

BACKGROUND: In symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) patients, mavacamten is commercially approved to help improve left ventricular (LV) outflow tract (LVOT) gradients, symptoms, and reduce eligibility for septal reduction therapy (SRT) under the risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) program. We sought to prospectively report the initial real-world clinical experience with the use of commercially available mavacamten in a multi-hospital tertiary healthcare system. METHODS: We studied the first 150 consecutive oHCM patients (mean age 65 years, 53% women, 83% on betablockers and 61% in New York Heart Association [NYHA] class III) who were initiated on 5 mg of mavacamten with dose titrations using symptom assessment and echocardiographic measurements of LVOT gradient and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) measurements. We measured changes in NYHA class, LVEF, LVOT gradients (resting and Valsalva) at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: At 261 ± 143 days (range of 31-571 days), 69 (46%) patients had ≥1 NYHA class, and 27 (18%) additional patients had ≥2 NYHA class improvement. The mean Valsalva LVOT gradient decreased from 72 ± 43 mmHg at baseline to 29 ± 31 mmHg at 4 weeks, 29 ± 28 mmHg at 8 weeks and 30 ± 29 mmHg at 12 weeks (p < 0.001). At baseline, 100% patients had Valsalva LVOT gradients ≥30 mmHg, which reduced to 29% at 4 weeks, 28% at 8 weeks and 30% at 12 weeks. In 40 patients who reported no symptomatic improvement, the mean Valsalva LVOT gradient decreased from 73 ± 39 mmHg at baseline to 34 ± 27 mmHg at 4 weeks, 35 ± 28 mmHg at 8 weeks and 30 ± 24 mmHg at 12 weeks (P < 0.001). The mean LVEF at baseline was 66 ± 6% and changed to 64 ± 5% at 4 weeks, 63 ± 5% at 8 weeks and 62 ± 7% at 12 weeks (p < 0.0001). No patient underwent SRT, developed LVEF ≤30% or developed heart failure requiring admission. Three (2%) patients needed temporary interruption of mavacamten due to LVEF<50%. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world study in symptomatic oHCM patients at a multi-hospital tertiary care referral center, we demonstrate the efficacy and safety, along with the logistic feasibility of prescribing mavacamten under the REMS program.

Novel Cardiac Myosin Inhibitor Therapy for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Adults: A Contemporary Review.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) affects as many as 1 in 200 people in the adult population globally. Patients may present with exertional dyspnea, presyncope or syncope, atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, heart failure, and even sudden cardiac death. Current guideline-based therapy involves medical therapy for treatment of symptoms in milder forms of the disease and surgical or catheter-based septal reduction therapies in obstructive HCM. Until recently, there has existed a gap between these two approaches that is now being filled by a new class of drugs, cardiac myosin inhibitors, which directly target the underlying disease process in HCM. Current investigations examine the effects of two cardiac myosin inhibitors on reported symptoms, echocardiographic evidence of disease, and the associated need for septal reduction. This paper reviews the contemporary evidence for the use of cardiac myosin inhibitors in HCM in adults and highlights future directions for this exciting field of cardiovascular medicine.

Carotid Duplex Ultrasonography to Assess Severity of Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic valve stenosis constitute a substantial subset of all severe aortic stenosis patients. However, assessment of true severity of these patients can be challenging. In this analysis, we study the utility of the common carotid artery waveforms to distinguish true from pseudo-severe low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis. METHODS: This is an observational analysis that included patients who underwent a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) and duplex carotid ultrasonography (DCUS) and had low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on the index TTE (LVEF <50%, calculated aortic valve area [AVA] of ≤1.0 cm2, mean and peak gradient of <40 and <64 mm Hg, respectively, and stroke volume index <35 mL/m2). Patients were classified as pseudo-severe and true-severe aortic stenosis based on additional subsequent testing. Differences in various TTE and DCUS waveform parameters across the aortic valve and the common carotid artery were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The study included 30 patients (60 carotid arteries). Fifteen patients were categorized as pseudo-severe and 15 as true severe aortic stenosis. There were no significant differences in calculated AVA, LVEF, stroke volume/stroke volume index, and Doppler Velocity Index in the 2 groups. Mean and peak gradient were higher in patients with true-severe aortic stenosis. Carotid acceleration time (cAT) was significantly prolonged in patients with true-severe compared with pseudo-severe aortic stenosis. A cAT ≥80 ms was 83.3% sensitive and 83.3% specific for true-severe aortic stenosis. CONCLUSION: cAT acceleration time may be used to distinguish true from pseudo-severe low-flow, low-gradient aortic valve stenosis.

Longitudinal Assessment of Left Atrial Remodeling in Patients With Chronic Severe Aortic Regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: There are significant sex and age differences in left ventricular (LV) remodeling that may lead to disparity in outcomes when used to inform the timing of aortic regurgitation (AR) intervention. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine whether left atrial (LA) parameters might represent better criteria than LV parameters to inform the timing of AR intervention. METHODS: Using data on patients with moderate to severe or severe AR with serial echocardiography (2010-2016), the longitudinal trends in left atrial volume index (LAVI) and left atrial reservoir strain (LAr) were evaluated by sex and age. The incremental utility of these parameters in predicting adverse events over LV parameters was also determined. RESULTS: In 525 patients (25.7% women) with 1,687 echocardiograms over a median follow-up period of 2.0 years (Q1-Q3: 1.0-3.6 years), there was significant increase in LAVI (1.0 mL/m2 per year [95% CI: 0.76-1.2 mL/m2 per year]) and decrease in LAr (-1.3% per year [95% CI: -1.6% to -0.92%]), without a significant interaction by sex or age category (P for interaction ≥ 0.17). In addition, both LAVI and LAr were significant predictors of adverse events independent of LV parameters. The optimal discriminatory thresholds were 37 mL/m2 for LAVI and 35% for LAr. These thresholds were similar across categories of sex and age. Within the relatively short-term follow-up, surgery was associated with survival benefit among patients with LAVI ≥37 mL/m2 (HR: 0.33 [95% CI: 0.15-0.72]; P = 0.006) but was not statistically significant among patients with LAVI <37 mL/m2 (HR: 0.46 [95% CI: 0.18-1.17]; P = 0.09). Similarly, surgery was associated with survival for the subgroup with LAr ≤35% but not among those with LAr >35%. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike LV remodeling, LA remodeling demonstrates a similar rate of progression between categories of sex and age among patients with AR. In addition, LA parameters provide incremental prognostic value over LV parameters.