Transplantation Outcomes with Donor Hearts after Circulatory Death.

BACKGROUND: Data showing the efficacy and safety of the transplantation of hearts obtained from donors after circulatory death as compared with hearts obtained from donors after brain death are limited. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, noninferiority trial in which adult candidates for heart transplantation were assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive a heart after the circulatory death of the donor or a heart from a donor after brain death if that heart was available first (circulatory-death group) or to receive only a heart that had been preserved with the use of traditional cold storage after the brain death of the donor (brain-death group). The primary end point was the risk-adjusted survival at 6 months in the as-treated circulatory-death group as compared with the brain-death group. The primary safety end point was serious adverse events associated with the heart graft at 30 days after transplantation. RESULTS: A total of 180 patients underwent transplantation; 90 (assigned to the circulatory-death group) received a heart donated after circulatory death and 90 (regardless of group assignment) received a heart donated after brain death. A total of 166 transplant recipients were included in the as-treated primary analysis (80 who received a heart from a circulatory-death donor and 86 who received a heart from a brain-death donor). The risk-adjusted 6-month survival in the as-treated population was 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88 to 99) among recipients of a heart from a circulatory-death donor, as compared with 90% (95% CI, 84 to 97) among recipients of a heart from a brain-death donor (least-squares mean difference, -3 percentage points; 90% CI, -10 to 3; P<0.001 for noninferiority [margin, 20 percentage points]). There were no substantial between-group differences in the mean per-patient number of serious adverse events associated with the heart graft at 30 days after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, risk-adjusted survival at 6 months after transplantation with a donor heart that had been reanimated and assessed with the use of extracorporeal nonischemic perfusion after circulatory death was not inferior to that after standard-care transplantation with a donor heart that had been preserved with the use of cold storage after brain death. (Funded by TransMedics; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03831048.).

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant recipients from hepatitis C viremic donors.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest the transplantation of Hepatitis C (HCV) hearts from viremic donors is associated with comparable 1 year survival to nonviremic donors. Though HCV viremia is a known risk factor for accelerated atherosclerosis, data on cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) outcomes are limited. We compared the incidence of CAV in heart transplant recipients from HCV viremic donors (nucleic acid amplification test positive; NAT+) compared to non-HCV infected donors (NAT-). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed annual coronary angiograms with intravascular ultrasound from April 2017 to August 2020 at two large cardiac transplant centers. CAV was graded according to ISHLT guidelines. Maximal intimal thickness (MIT) ≥ 0.5 mm was considered significant for subclinical disease. RESULTS: Among 270 heart transplant recipients (mean age 54; 77% male), 62 patients were transplanted from NAT+ donors. CAV ≥ grade 1 was present in 8.8% of the NAT+ versus 16.8% of the NAT- group at 1 year, 20% versus 28.8% at 2 years, and 33.3% versus 41.5% at 3 years. After adjusting for donor age, donor smoking history, recipient BMI, recipient, hypertension, and recipient diabetes, NAT+ status did not confer increased risk of CAV (HR.80; 95% CI.45-1.40, p = 0.43) or subclinical IVUS disease (HR.87; 95% CI.58-1.30, p = 0.49). Additionally, there was no difference in the presence of rapidly progressive lesions on IVUS. CONCLUSION: Our data show that NAT+ donors conferred no increased risk for early CAV or subclinical IVUS disease following transplantation in a cohort of heart transplant patients who were treated for HCV, suggesting the short-term safety of this strategy to maximize the pool of available donor hearts.

Heart transplantation from donation after circulatory death: Impact on waitlist time and transplant rate.

The effect of using donation after circulatory death (DCD) hearts on waitlist outcomes has not been substantiated. We retrospectively analyzed 184 heart transplant (HT) candidates at our institution from 2019 to 2021. Patients were stratified into 2 observation periods centered on September 12, 2020, when the adult DCD HT program officially began. The primary outcome was a comparison of transplant rate between period 1 (pre-DCD) and period 2 (post-DCD). Secondary outcomes included waitlist time-to-transplant, waitlist mortality rate, independent predictors of incidence of HT, and posttransplant outcomes. A total of 165 HTs (n = 92 in period 1 and n = 73 in period 2) were performed. The median waitlist time-to-transplant decreased from 47.5 to 19 days in periods 1 and 2, respectively (P = .004). The transplant rate increased from 181 per 100 patient-years in period 1 to 579 per 100 patient-years in period 2 (incidence rate ratio, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.04-3.38; P = .038). There were no statistical differences in waitlist mortality rate (P = .566) and 1-year survival (P = .699) between the 2 periods. DCD HTs (n = 36) contributed to 49.3% of overall HT activity in period 2. We concluded that utilization of DCD hearts significantly reduced waitlist time and increased transplant rate. Short-term posttransplant outcomes were comparable between the pre-DCD and post-DCD periods.

Heart-liver-kidney transplantation for AL amyloidosis using normothermic recovery and storage from a donor following circulatory death: Short-term outcome in a first-in-world experience.

AL amyloidosis is a rare condition characterized by the overproduction of an unstable free light chain, protein misfolding and aggregation, and extracellular deposition that can progress to multiorgan involvement and failure. To our knowledge, this is the first worldwide report to describe triple organ transplantation for AL amyloidosis and triple organ transplantation using thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion recovery with a donation from a circulatory death (DCD) donor. The recipient was a 40-year-old man with multiorgan AL amyloidosis with a terminal prognosis without multiorgan transplantation. An appropriate DCD donor was selected for sequential heart, liver, and kidney transplants via our center's thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion pathway. The liver was additionally placed on an ex vivo normothermic machine perfusion, and the kidney was maintained on hypothermic machine perfusion while awaiting implantation. The heart transplant was completed first (cold ischemic time [CIT]: 131 minutes), followed by the liver transplant (CIT: 87 minutes, normothermic machine perfusion: 301 minutes). Kidney transplantation was performed the following day (CIT: 1833 minutes). He is 8 months posttransplant without evidence of heart, liver, or kidney graft dysfunction or rejection. This case highlights the feasibility of normothermic recovery and storage modalities for DCD donors, which can expand transplant opportunities for allografts previously not considered for multiorgan transplantations.

Multidisciplinary Approach to Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Role of Radiologists.

Management of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) should be determined by a multidisciplinary team, ideally at a specialized CTEPH referral center. Radiologists contribute to this multidisciplinary process by helping to confirm the diagnosis of CTEPH and delineating the extent of disease, both of which help determine a treatment decision. Preoperative assessment of CTEPH usually employs multiple imaging modalities, including ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scanning, echocardiography, CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA), and right heart catheterization with pulmonary angiography. Accurate diagnosis or exclusion of CTEPH at imaging is imperative, as this remains the only form of pulmonary hypertension that is curative with surgery. Unfortunately, CTEPH is often misdiagnosed at CTPA, which can be due to technical factors, patient-related factors, radiologist-related factors, as well as a host of disease mimics including acute pulmonary embolism, in situ thrombus, vasculitis, pulmonary artery sarcoma, and fibrosing mediastinitis. Although V/Q scanning is thought to be substantially more sensitive for CTEPH compared with CTPA, this is likely due to lack of recognition of CTEPH findings rather than a modality limitation. Preoperative evaluation for pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) includes assessment of technical operability and surgical risk stratification. While the definitive therapy for CTEPH is PTE, other minimally invasive or noninvasive therapies also lead to clinical improvements including greater survival. Complications of PTE that can be identified at postoperative imaging include infection, reperfusion edema or injury, pulmonary hemorrhage, pericardial effusion or hemopericardium, and rethrombosis. ©RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Increased Peripheral Blood Neutrophil Activation Phenotypes and Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation in Critically Ill Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Patients: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Increased inflammation has been well defined in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), while definitive pathways driving severe forms of this disease remain uncertain. Neutrophils are known to contribute to immunopathology in infections, inflammatory diseases, and acute respiratory distress syndrome, a primary cause of morbidity and mortality in COVID-19. Changes in neutrophil function in COVID-19 may give insight into disease pathogenesis and identify therapeutic targets. METHODS: Blood was obtained serially from critically ill COVID-19 patients for 11 days. Neutrophil extracellular trap formation (NETosis), oxidative burst, phagocytosis, and cytokine levels were assessed. Lung tissue was obtained immediately postmortem for immunostaining. PubMed searches for neutrophils, lung, and COVID-19 yielded 10 peer-reviewed research articles in English. RESULTS: Elevations in neutrophil-associated cytokines interleukin 8 (IL-8) and interleukin 6, and general inflammatory cytokines IFN-inducible protien-19, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interleukin 1ß, interleukin 10, and tumor necrosis factor, were identified both at first measurement and across hospitalization (P < .0001). COVID-19 neutrophils had exaggerated oxidative burst (P < .0001), NETosis (P < .0001), and phagocytosis (P < .0001) relative to controls. Increased NETosis correlated with leukocytosis and neutrophilia, and neutrophils and NETs were identified within airways and alveoli in lung parenchyma of 40% of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-infected lungs available for examination (2 of 5). While elevations in IL-8 and absolute neutrophil count correlated with disease severity, plasma IL-8 levels alone correlated with death. CONCLUSIONS: Literature to date demonstrates compelling evidence of increased neutrophils in the circulation and lungs of COVID-19 patients. Importantly, neutrophil quantity and activation correlates with severity of disease. Similarly, our data show that circulating neutrophils in COVID-19 exhibit an activated phenotype with enhanced NETosis and oxidative burst.

Cost-effectiveness of using hepatitis C viremic hearts for transplantation into HCV-negative recipients.

Outcomes following hepatitis C virus (HCV)-viremic heart transplantation into HCV-negative recipients with HCV treatment are good. We assessed cost-effectiveness between cohorts of transplant recipients willing and unwilling to receive HCV-viremic hearts. Markov model simulated long-term outcomes among HCV-negative patients on the transplant waitlist. We compared costs (2018 USD) and health outcomes (quality-adjusted life-years, QALYs) between cohorts willing to accept any heart and those willing to accept only HCV-negative hearts. We assumed 4.9% HCV-viremic donor prevalence. Patients receiving HCV-viremic hearts were treated, assuming $39 600/treatment with 95% cure. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were compared to a $100 000/QALY gained willingness-to-pay threshold. Sensitivity analyses included stratification by blood type or region and potential negative consequences of receipt of HCV-viremic hearts. Compared to accepting only HCV-negative hearts, accepting any heart gained 0.14 life-years and 0.11 QALYs, while increasing costs by $9418/patient. Accepting any heart was cost effective (ICER $85 602/QALY gained). Results were robust to all transplant regions and blood types, except type AB. Accepting any heart remained cost effective provided posttransplant mortality and costs among those receiving HCV-viremic hearts were not >7% higher compared to HCV-negative hearts. Willingness to accept HCV-viremic hearts for transplantation into HCV-negative recipients is cost effective and improves clinical outcomes.

Clinical significance of incidentally detected lead perforations by computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) has an established role in detecting perforation of implanted pacemaker and defibrillator leads. The clinical significance of incidental finding of delayed lead perforation remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of lead perforation as detected by CT in a cohort of patients undergoing transvenous laser lead extraction and characterize the association between finding of incidental lead perforation with periprocedural outcomes. METHODS: Consecutive patients that underwent chest CT and lead extraction were retrospectively assessed for presence of lead perforation. A total of 143 patients and 348 leads were assessed. The finding of lead perforation was correlated with findings from peri-procedural transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and outcomes of the lead extraction procedure. RESULTS: Lead perforations (including perforations <5 mm and ≥5 mm) were detected in 66 (46%) patients and 73 (21%) leads. Lead perforation ≥5 mm were less common and detected in 13 (9%) of patients and 14 (4%) of leads. There was no significant difference in the rates of peri-procedural death, cardiac avulsion, cardiac tamponade or post-extraction pericardial effusion in patients with and without lead perforation. CONCLUSIONS: Incidental delayed lead perforations detected by CT are common and do not correlate with significant TEE findings or adverse peri-procedural outcomes in patients undergoing lead extraction. Larger studies are needed to further characterize the frequency and safety of these findings.

Local and regional variability in utilization and allocation of hepatitis C virus-infected hearts for transplantation.

With the advent of direct-acting antiviral agents, there has been a rapid rise in hepatitis C virus-infected (HCV+) heart transplantation. We aimed to understand local and regional differences in utilization and allocation of HCV+ hearts. Using United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) de-identified data from January 1, 2016 to September 30, 2019 we compared trends in the utilization rates (hearts transplanted/donors recovered) of HCV-uninfected (HCV-) to those of HCV+ nonviremic (HCV-NV) and viremic (HCV-V) hearts nationally and by UNOS region. We also evaluated allocation rates (hearts successfully allocated/donors recovered) by organ procurement organization (OPO). We found that (1) in 2019, national utilization rates for HCV-NV and HCV-V hearts were the same as HCV- hearts (27.6% for HCV-NV, 30.9 for HCV-V, and 31.7% for HCV-, P = .277); (2) utilization rates of HCV-NV hearts were low in regions 3 and 4 and of HCV-V hearts in regions 3, 4, and 8 even in the contemporary period since 2018; and (3) there was marked variability in allocation of HCV+ hearts at the OPO level even within the same UNOS region. We conclude that despite national strides in the utilization of HCV+ hearts for transplantation, more aggressive allocation of HCV+ hearts at the OPO level may still significantly affect the organ shortage.

Post-transplant survey to assess patient experiences with donor-derived HCV infection.

BACKGROUND: Despite increased utilization of hepatitis C virus-infected (HCV+) organs for transplantation into HCV-uninfected recipients, there is lack of standardization in HCV-related patient education/consent and limited data on financial and social impact on patients. METHODS: We conducted a survey on patients with donor-derived HCV infection at our center transplanted between 4/1/2017 and 11/1/2019 to assess: why patients chose to accept HCV+ organ(s), the adequacy of their pre-transplant HCV education and informed consent process, financial issues related to copays after discharge, and social challenges they faced. RESULTS: Among 49 patients surveyed, transplanted organs included heart (n = 19), lung (n = 9), kidney (n = 11), liver (n = 4), heart/kidney (n = 4), and liver/kidney (n = 2). Many recipients accepted an HCV-viremic (HCV-V) organ due to perceived reduction in waitlist time (n = 33) and/or trust in their physician's recommendation (n = 29). Almost all (n = 47) felt that pre-transplant education and consent was appropriate. Thirty patients had no copay for direct-acting antivirals (DAA) for HCV, including 21 with household income <$20 000; seven had copays of <$100 and one had a copay >$1000. Two patients reported feeling isolated due to HCV infection and eight reported higher than anticipated medication costs. Patients' biggest concern was potential HCV transmission to partners (n = 18) and family/friends (n = 15). Overall almost all (n = 47) patients reported a positive experience with HCV-V organ transplantation. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that real-world patient experiences surrounding HCV-V organ transplantation have been favorable. Almost all patients report comprehensive HCV-related pre-transplant consent and education. Additionally, medication costs and social isolation/exclusion were not barriers to the use of these organs.

Ramelteon for Prevention of Postoperative Delirium: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Patients Undergoing Elective Pulmonary Thromboendarterectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of ramelteon in preventing delirium, an acute neuropsychiatric condition associated with increased morbidity and mortality, in the perioperative, ICU setting. DESIGN: Parallel-arm, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Academic medical center in La Jolla, California. PATIENTS: Patients greater than or equal to 18 years undergoing elective pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. INTERVENTIONS: Ramelteon 8 mg or matching placebo starting the night prior to surgery and for a maximum of six nights while in the ICU. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Incident delirium was measured twice daily using the Confusion Assessment Method-ICU. The safety outcome was coma-free days assessed by the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale. One-hundred twenty participants were enrolled and analysis completed in 117. Delirium occurred in 22 of 58 patients allocated to placebo versus 19 of 59 allocated to ramelteon (relative risk, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.5-1.4; p = 0.516). Delirium duration, as assessed by the number of delirium-free days was also similar in both groups (placebo median 2 d [interquartile range, 2-3 d] vs ramelteon 3 d [2-5 d]; p = 0.181). Coma-free days was also similar between groups (placebo median 2 d [interquartile range, 1-3 d] vs ramelteon 3 d [2-4 d]; p = 0.210). We found no difference in ICU length of stay (median 4 d [interquartile range, 3-5 d] vs 4 d [3-6 d]; p = 0.349), or in-hospital mortality (four vs three deaths; relative risk ratio, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.2-3.2; p = 0.717), all placebo versus ramelteon, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ramelteon 8 mg did not prevent postoperative delirium in patients admitted for elective cardiac surgery.

Lead extraction for reduction of chronic pain related to cardiovascular implantable electronic device.

AIMS: Chronic pain at the cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) generator or lead insertion site that is not otherwise manageable carries a IIA indication for extraction. However, limited data exist evaluating causes of pain and outcomes of extraction in eliminating pain. A multi-centre retrospective observational study was conducted to evaluate outcomes of patients undergoing device extraction for treatment of chronic device pain. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-seven out of 2188 lead extraction candidates (1.3%) met the chronic pain IIA indication for extraction [50 ± 16 years; 14 (51%) women]. Onset, severity, triggers, and pain management were measured before and after extraction. Device type, procedure done (with/without reimplantation), and positive tissue cultures were noted. Pain was reported as constant (n = 14; 50%), intermittent (n = 13; 46%), and movement-triggered (n = 14; 50%). Average severity of pain was seven out of 10 (10 being the worst). Post-extraction, 18 (66%) received freedom from pain, including all patients with poorly formed pockets (n = 2) and subclinical infections (n = 2). Of the 18, 11 underwent reimplantation (61%) without recurrent pain. Nine still had pain (44 ± 17 years; seven women) after extraction. Eight of the nine underwent reimplantation, three on the contralateral chest wall and five ipsilaterally. Pain severity decreased (n = 5), increased (n = 1), or was unchanged (n = 3). CONCLUSION: Chronic pain at the CIED generator site can present as chronic or movement-triggered pain, and can be due to subclinical infection or a poorly formed device pocket. Extraction relieved constant and intermittent pain in two-thirds of patients. Extraction appears less successful in eliminating pain in women who undergo subsequent reimplantation.

Successful heart-kidney transplantation from a Hepatitis C viremic donor to negative recipient: One year of follow-up.

Every year the number of patients waiting for a heart transplant increases faster than the number of available donor organs. Some potential donor organs are from donors with active communicable diseases, including hepatitis C virus (HCV), potentially making donation prohibitive. The advent of direct-acting antiviral agents for HCV has drastically changed the treatment of HCV. Recently, these agents have been used to treat HCV in organ donor recipients who acquired the disease from the donor organ. We report a case of heart-kidney transplantation from an HCV viremic donor to HCV negative recipient with successful treatment and sustained virologic response.

The Use of Cangrelor and Heparin for Anticoagulation in a Patient Requiring Pulmonary Thromboendarterectomy Surgery with Suspected Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia.

The management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in the perioperative period for patients undergoing cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) can be a challenging clinical scenario. Once a diagnosis of HIT has been established, heparin products typically are avoided and alternative therapies for anticoagulation are started. Alternative anticoagulation strategies for CPB are limited and often have various pharmacokinetic profiles that may lead to increased perioperative bleeding. Historically the use of a GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor, such as tirofiban, followed by unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the typical alternative for surgeries requiring DHCA in patients with HIT at the authors' institution. This article presents a case in which cangrelor followed by UFH was used in a 20-year-old patient with suspected HIT and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension undergoing pulmonary thromboendarterectomy surgery requiring CPB and DHCA. Due to the frequency of significant postoperative bleeding encountered when using tirofiban and UFH, it was decided to attempt to block platelet aggregation with significantly shorter-acting cangrelor. The authors hypothesized that cangrelor would reduce the risk of significant bleeding compared with tirofiban because of its favorable pharmacokinetics. Specifically, cangrelor has a short elimination half-life of 3 to 6 minutes, and its elimination is not altered by renal and hepatic impairment. This case report discusses the pathophysiology of HIT, the alternative anticoagulants used for HIT type II in pulmonary thromboendarterectomy, and the potential of cangrelor in conjunction with UFH to be a favorable option for patients in similar clinical scenarios.

Atrial arrhythmias after pulmonary thromboendarterectomy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Atrial arrhythmias (AAs) are common after cardiac surgeries including pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE). This study was done to identify patients at highest risk of developing post-PTE AA and their length of stay (LOS). METHODS: We reviewed 521 consecutive patients referred to University of California San Diego (UCSD) for PTE and examined their demographics as well as their baseline pulmonary hemodynamics to determine risk factors for AA. RESULTS: Overall, 24.2% of patients developed an AA after PTE. Patients who developed AA had a significantly longer Intensive Care Unit (ICU) LOS (median: 5 vs 3 days, P < 0.001) and postoperative LOS (median: 14 vs 9 days; P < 0.001). Patients who developed AA were more frequently male (63.2% male, P = 0.003), older (mean age 60.8 vs 50.7 years, P < 0.001), had a prior history of atrial fibrillation (80.2% of those who developed AA) and were more likely to have undergone concomitant Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (12.7% vs 6.6%, P = 0.028). Compared to those who did not develop AA, the cardiopulmonary bypass time was longer among those who developed AA (261.6 vs 253.8 minutes, P = 0.027). In a multivariate logistic regression model, the preoperative variables that predicted AA were age (odds ratio [OR], 1.058 per year, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.038-1.078), male sex (OR, 1.68, 95% CI: 1.06-2.64), prior AA (OR, 2.52, 95% CI: 1.23-5.15) and baseline right atrial pressure (OR, 1.039 per mm Hg, 95% CI: 1.000-1.079). While mortality rates were similar, patients who developed AA had more bleeding complications and more postoperative delirium. CONCLUSIONS: AA is common after PTE surgery. The strongest risk factors for AA after PTE included the previous history of AA, age and male sex. Development of AA was associated with longer lengths of stay and more postoperative complications.

Outcomes of repeated transvenous lead extraction.

INTRODUCTION: The outcomes of repeated cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extraction have not been well studied. We sought to determine the indications, outcomes, and safety of repeated lead extraction procedures. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted using data from two medical centers, including 38 patients who had undergone two or more lead extraction procedures compared to 439 patients who had a single procedure. The electronic medical records and procedural databases were reviewed to determine the indications, procedural characteristics, and outcomes. The outcomes of the first procedure were compared to the outcomes of subsequent procedures. RESULTS: The 5-year cumulative probability of a repeated extraction procedure was 11% (95% confidence interval, 7%-15%). In 439 patients who underwent single lead extractions, 72% had device and lead related infections as the procedure indication compared to 39% for 38 patients who underwent repeated extraction (P < 0.001). The mean duration from device reimplant to repeated extraction procedures was 63 ± 48 months. Ninety-eight percent of the leads were removed completely in repeated procedures, similar to the 95% success rate of the first procedure (P = 0.51). There was no significant difference in major complication rate in the first or repeated extractions (2.6% vs 5.2%, P = 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: Repeated transvenous lead extraction is not uncommon. It had a high success rate comparable to that of the initial procedure and was not associated with an increased incidence of adverse events.

Outcomes of lead extraction without subsequent device reimplantation.

AIMS: Outcomes among patients who do not receive device reimplantation after cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) extraction have not been well studied. The present study aims to investigate the outcomes of patients without device reimplantation after lead extraction and device removal. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively searched for consecutive patients who underwent CIED extraction at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN and University of California San Diego Medical Center from 2001 through 2012. Among the patients identified, we compared characteristics of those who did and did not have device reimplantation. The Kaplan-Meier survival was analysed. Among 678 patients, 97 patients had their device extracted without reimplantation during 1-year follow-up ('no-reimplant group'). Median age was younger in the no-reimplant group (60.7 vs. 70.6 years; P < 0.001). The reasons for no reimplantation were as follows: no longer meeting criteria for CIED (48%), inappropriate device indication at initial implantation (23%), patient preference (17%), and unresolved device complications (12%). Three major arrhythmias were reported in the no-reimplant group. Overall survival in the no-reimplant group was significantly lower than in the reimplant group (60 vs. 93%; P < 0.001). Ongoing device-related complications [hazard ratio (HR), 3.91; 95% CI, 1.74-8.81; P = 0.001], infection (HR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.24-7.52; P = 0.02), and concurrent dialysis (HR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.12-6.71; P = 0.03) were associated with increased mortality. Of 31 deaths in the no-reimplant group, 1 was secondary to cardiac arrhythmia. CONCLUSION: Fourteen per cent of patients who had device extraction did not undergo reimplantation mainly because they no longer met CIED indications. The high mortality in these patients is related to device complications and comorbid conditions, whereas mortality associated with arrhythmia is rare.