RESUMEN
The RNA-binding protein PURA has been implicated in the rare, monogenetic, neurodevelopmental disorder PURA Syndrome. PURA binds both DNA and RNA and has been associated with various cellular functions. Only little is known about its main cellular roles and the molecular pathways affected upon PURA depletion. Here, we show that PURA is predominantly located in the cytoplasm, where it binds to thousands of mRNAs. Many of these transcripts change abundance in response to PURA depletion. The encoded proteins suggest a role for PURA in immune responses, mitochondrial function, autophagy and processing (P)-body activity. Intriguingly, reduced PURA levels decrease the expression of the integral P-body components LSM14A and DDX6 and strongly affect P-body formation in human cells. Furthermore, PURA knockdown results in stabilization of P-body-enriched transcripts, whereas other mRNAs are not affected. Hence, reduced PURA levels, as reported in patients with PURA Syndrome, influence the formation and composition of this phase-separated RNA processing machinery. Our study proposes PURA Syndrome as a new model to study the tight connection between P-body-associated RNA regulation and neurodevelopmental disorders.
Asunto(s)
Proteínas de Unión al ARN , Factores de Transcripción , Humanos , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/genética , Epilepsia , Cuerpos de Procesamiento , ARN Mensajero/metabolismo , Factores de Transcripción/metabolismoRESUMEN
Mutations in the human PURA gene cause the neurodevelopmental PURA syndrome. In contrast to several other monogenetic disorders, almost all reported mutations in this nucleic acid-binding protein result in the full disease penetrance. In this study, we observed that patient mutations across PURA impair its previously reported co-localization with processing bodies. These mutations either destroyed the folding integrity, RNA binding, or dimerization of PURA. We also solved the crystal structures of the N- and C-terminal PUR domains of human PURA and combined them with molecular dynamics simulations and nuclear magnetic resonance measurements. The observed unusually high dynamics and structural promiscuity of PURA indicated that this protein is particularly susceptible to mutations impairing its structural integrity. It offers an explanation why even conservative mutations across PURA result in the full penetrance of symptoms in patients with PURA syndrome.
PURA syndrome is a neurodevelopmental disorder that affects about 650 patients worldwide, resulting in a range of symptoms including neurodevelopmental delays, intellectual disability, muscle weakness, seizures, and eating difficulties. The condition is caused by a mutated gene that codes for a protein called PURA. PURA binds RNA the molecule that carries genetic information so it can be translated into proteins and has roles in regulating the production of new proteins. Contrary to other conditions that result from mutations in a single gene, PURA syndrome patients show 'high penetrance', meaning almost every reported mutation in the gene leads to symptoms. Proske, Janowski et al. wanted to understand the molecular basis for this high penetrance. To find out more, the researchers first examined how patient mutations affected the location of the PURA in the cell, using human cells grown in the laboratory. Normally, PURA travels to P-bodies, which are groupings of RNA and proteins involved in regulating which genes get translated into proteins. The researchers found that in cells carrying PURA syndrome mutations, PURA failed to move adequately to P-bodies. To find out how this 'mislocalization' might happen, Proske, Janowski et al. tested how different mutations affected the three-dimensional folding of PURA. These analyses showed that the mutations impair the protein's folding and thereby disrupt PURA's ability to bind RNA, which may explain why mutant PURA cannot localize correctly. Proske, Janowski et al. describe the molecular abnormalities of PURA underlying this disorder and show how molecular analysis of patient mutations can reveal the mechanisms of a disease at the cell level. The results show that the impact of mutations on the structural integrity of the protein, which affects its ability to bind RNA, are likely key to the symptoms of the syndrome. Additionally, their approach used establishes a way to predict and test mutations that will cause PURA syndrome. This may help to develop diagnostic tools for this condition.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo , Cuerpos de Procesamiento , Humanos , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo/metabolismo , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo/patología , Cuerpos de Procesamiento/metabolismo , Cuerpos de Procesamiento/patología , Gránulos de Estrés/metabolismo , Cristalografía por Rayos X , Dimerización , Dominios Proteicos , Dicroismo Circular , Proteínas Recombinantes , Pliegue de Proteína , Penetrancia , Sustitución de Aminoácidos , Mutación Puntual , Células HeLaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Treg cells modulate immune responses and can suppress the development of autoimmune diseases. Tumor necrosis factor receptor II (TNFRII) has been recognized as a key receptor on these cells that facilitates expansion and stabilization of CD4+ Treg cells. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the therapeutic activity of a novel TNFRII agonist in experimental arthritis as well as the role of different Treg cell subsets. METHODS: A novel mouse TNFRII-selective fusion protein (EHD2-sc-mTNFR2 ) was generated by genetic engineering. Mouse T cells were incubated together with interleukin-2 and/or EHD2-sc-mTNFR2 , and the effects on Treg cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Mice with collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) were treated with EHD2-sc-mTNFR2 or saline, and the therapeutic effects were monitored and characterized. RESULTS: Selective activation of TNFRII was found to expand both CD4+ and CD8+ Treg cells. Moreover, TNFRII activation elevated the number of CD4+CD25+ and CD8+CD25+ Treg cells and increased the number of FoxP3-expressing cells in CD8+, but not CD4+, Treg cells, indicating different mechanisms of TNFRII-induced expansion of diverse T cell subsets with suppressive activity. In the CIA model, we demonstrated that administration of the TNFRII agonist EHD2-sc-mTNFR2 led to the expansion of both CD4+ and CD8+ Treg cells in vivo and induced antiinflammatory responses that alleviated arthritis. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the use of TNFRII-selective therapeutics as an effective approach to the treatment of arthritic disease and possibly other inflammatory and autoimmune diseases.