Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 23
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 38(7): 821-834, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37191831

RESUMEN

Pediatric patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) often undergo low dose ionizing radiation (LDIR) from cardiac catheterization (CC) for the diagnosis and/or treatment of their disease. Although radiation doses from a single CC are usually low, less is known about the long-term radiation associated cancer risks. We aimed to assess the risk of lympho-hematopoietic malignancies in pediatric CHD patients diagnosed or treated with CC. A French cohort of 17,104 children free of cancer who had undergone a first CC from 01/01/2000 to 31/12/2013, before the age of 16 was set up. The follow-up started at the date of the first recorded CC until the exit date, i.e., the date of death, the date of first cancer diagnosis, the date of the 18th birthday, or the 31/12/2015, whichever occurred first. Poisson regression was used to estimate the LDIR associated cancer risk. The median follow-up was 5.9 years, with 110,335 person-years. There were 22,227 CC procedures, yielding an individual active bone marrow (ABM) mean cumulative dose of 3.0 milligray (mGy). Thirty-eight incident lympho-hematopoietic malignancies were observed. When adjusting for attained age, gender and predisposing factors to cancer status, no increased risk was observed for lympho-hematopoietic malignancies RR/mGy = 1.00 (95% CI: 0.88; 1.10). In summary, the risk of lympho-hematopoietic malignancies and lymphoma was not associated to LDIR in pediatric patients with CHD who undergo CC. Further epidemiological studies with greater statistical power are needed to improve the assessment of the dose-risk relationship.


Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías Congénitas , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación , Humanos , Niño , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/epidemiología , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Radiación Ionizante , Neoplasias Hematológicas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Dosis de Radiación
2.
Occup Environ Med ; 80(7): 385-391, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37164624

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Radon is a ubiquitous occupational and environmental lung carcinogen. We aim to quantify the association between radon progeny and lung cancer mortality in the largest and most up-to-date pooled study of uranium miners. METHODS: The pooled uranium miners analysis combines 7 cohorts of male uranium miners with 7754 lung cancer deaths and 4.3 million person-years of follow-up. Vital status and lung cancer deaths were ascertained between 1946 and 2014. The association between cumulative radon exposure in working level months (WLM) and lung cancer was modelled as the excess relative rate (ERR) per 100 WLM using Poisson regression; variation in the association by temporal and exposure factors was examined. We also examined analyses restricted to miners first hired before 1960 and with <100 WLM cumulative exposure. RESULTS: In a model that allows for variation by attained age, time since exposure and annual exposure rate, the ERR/100 WLM was 4.68 (95% CI 2.88 to 6.96) among miners who were less than 55 years of age and were exposed in the prior 5 to <15 years at annual exposure rates of <0.5 WL. This association decreased with older attained age, longer time since exposure and higher annual exposure rate. In analyses restricted to men first hired before 1960, we observed similar patterns of association but a slightly lower estimate of the ERR/100 WLM. CONCLUSIONS: This new large, pooled study confirms and supports a linear exposure-response relationship between cumulative radon exposure and lung cancer mortality which is jointly modified by temporal and exposure factors.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación , Enfermedades Profesionales , Exposición Profesional , Radón , Uranio , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radón/efectos adversos , Uranio/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/epidemiología , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Proteínas Reguladoras de la Apoptosis , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología
3.
Pediatr Radiol ; 51(1): 45-56, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32910229

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ionizing radiation use for medical diagnostic purposes has substantially increased over the last three decades. Moderate to high doses of radiation are well established causes of cancer, especially for exposure at young ages. However, cancer risk from low-dose medical imaging is debated. OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on cancer risks associated with prenatal and postnatal medical diagnostic ionizing radiation exposure among children and to assess this risk through a meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search of five electronic databases supplemented by a hand search was performed to retrieve relevant epidemiological studies published from 2000 to 2019, including patients younger than 22 years of age exposed to medical imaging ionizing radiation. Pooled odds ratio (ORpooled) and pooled excess relative risk (ERRpooled) representing the excess of risk per unit of organ dose were estimated with a random effect model. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were included. For prenatal exposure (radiographs or CT), no significant increased risk was reported for all cancers, leukemia and brain tumors. For postnatal exposure, increased risk was observed only for CT, mostly for leukemia (ERRpooled=26.9 Gy-1; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.7-57.1) and brain tumors (ERRpooled=9.1 Gy-1; 95% CI: 5.2-13.1). CONCLUSION: CT exposure in childhood appears to be associated with increased risk of cancer while no significant association was observed with diagnostic radiographs.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación , Exposición a la Radiación , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/epidemiología , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Embarazo , Dosis de Radiación , Exposición a la Radiación/efectos adversos , Radiación Ionizante , Radiografía
4.
Occup Environ Med ; 77(3): 194-200, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32005674

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Epidemiological studies of underground miners have provided clear evidence that inhalation of radon decay products causes lung cancer. Moreover, these studies have served as a quantitative basis for estimation of radon-associated excess lung cancer risk. However, questions remain regarding the effects of exposure to the low levels of radon decay products typically encountered in contemporary occupational and environmental settings on the risk of lung cancer and other diseases, and on the modifiers of these associations. These issues are of central importance for estimation of risks associated with residential and occupational radon exposures. METHODS: The Pooled Uranium Miner Analysis (PUMA) assembles information on cohorts of uranium miners in North America and Europe. Data available include individual annual estimates of exposure to radon decay products, demographic and employment history information on each worker and information on vital status, date of death and cause of death. Some, but not all, cohorts also have individual information on cigarette smoking, external gamma radiation exposure and non-radiological occupational exposures. RESULTS: The PUMA study represents the largest study of uranium miners conducted to date, encompassing 124 507 miners, 4.51 million person-years at risk and 54 462 deaths, including 7825 deaths due to lung cancer. Planned research topics include analyses of associations between radon exposure and mortality due to lung cancer, cancers other than lung, non-malignant disease, modifiers of these associations and characterisation of overall relative mortality excesses and lifetime risks. CONCLUSION: PUMA provides opportunities to evaluate new research questions and to conduct analyses to assess potential health risks associated with uranium mining that have greater statistical power than can be achieved with any single cohort.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Mineros , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/mortalidad , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Radón/efectos adversos , Uranio , Fumar Cigarrillos/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Masculino , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/epidemiología , América del Norte/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo
5.
Radiat Environ Biophys ; 59(4): 631-641, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32700049

RESUMEN

A meta-analytic summary effect estimate often is calculated as an inverse-variance-weighted average of study-specific estimates of association. The variances of published estimates of association often are derived from their associated confidence intervals under assumptions typical of Wald-type statistics, such as normality of the parameter. However, in some research areas, such as radiation epidemiology, epidemiological results typically are obtained by fitting linear relative risk models, and associated likelihood-based confidence intervals are often asymmetric; consequently, reasonable estimates of variances associated with study-specific estimates of association may be difficult to infer from the standard approach based on the assumption of a Wald-type interval. Here, a novel method is described for meta-analysis of published results from linear relative risk models that uses a parametric transformation of published results to improve on the normal approximation used to assess confidence intervals. Using simulations, it is illustrated that the meta-analytic summary obtained using the proposed approach yields less biased summary estimates, with better confidence interval coverage, than the summary obtained using the more classical approach to meta-analysis. The proposed approach is illustrated using a previously published example of meta-analysis of epidemiological findings regarding circulatory disease following exposure to low-level ionizing radiation.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Modelos Lineales , Radiación Ionizante , Riesgo , Humanos , Exposición a la Radiación/efectos adversos
6.
J Radiol Prot ; 40(4)2020 Sep 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32668420

RESUMEN

The HARMONIC project (Health Effects of Cardiac Fluoroscopy and Modern Radiotherapy in Paediatrics) is a European study aiming to improve our understanding of the long-term health risks from radiation exposures in childhood and early adulthood. Here, we present the study design for the cardiac fluoroscopy component of HARMONIC. A pooled cohort of approximately 100 000 patients who underwent cardiac fluoroscopy procedures in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Norway, Spain or the UK, while aged under 22 years, will be established from hospital records and/or insurance claims data. Doses to individual organs will be estimated from dose indicators recorded at the time of examination, using a lookup-table-based dosimetry system produced using Monte Carlo radiation transport simulations and anatomically realistic computational phantom models. Information on beam geometry and x-ray energy spectra will be obtained from a representative sample of radiation dose structured reports. Uncertainties in dose estimates will be modelled using 2D Monte Carlo methods. The cohort will be followed up using national registries and insurance records to determine vital status and cancer incidence. Information on organ transplantation (a major risk factor for cancer development in this patient group) and/or other conditions predisposing to cancer will be obtained from national or local registries and health insurance data, depending on country. The relationship between estimated radiation dose and cancer risk will be investigated using regression modelling. Results will improve information for patients and parents and aid clinicians in managing and implementing changes to reduce radiation risks without compromising medical benefits.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Radiometría , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Fluoroscopía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Método de Montecarlo , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Fantasmas de Imagen , Dosis de Radiación , Radiometría/métodos , Factores de Riesgo
7.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health ; 92(5): 747-762, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30737558

RESUMEN

It is well established that high radon exposures increase the risk of lung cancer mortality. The effects of low occupational exposures and the factors that confound and modify this risk are not clear and are needed to inform current radiation protection of miners. The risk of lung cancer mortality at low radon exposures (< 100 working-level months) was assessed in the joint cohort analysis of Czech, French, and Canadian uranium miners, employed in 1953 or later. Statistical analysis was based on linear Poisson regression modeling with grouped cohort survival data. Two sensitivity analyses were used to assess potential confounding from tobacco smoking. A statistically significant linear relationship between radon exposure and lung cancer mortality was found. The excess relative risk per working-level month was 0.022 (95% confidence intervals: 0.013-0.034), based on 408 lung cancer deaths and 394,236 person-years of risk. Time since exposure was a statistically significant modifier; risk decreased with increasing time since exposure. A tendency for a decrease in risk with increasing attained age was observed, but this was not statistically significant. Exposure rate was not found to be a modifier of the excess relative risk. The potential confounding effect of tobacco smoking was estimated to be small and did not substantially change the radon-lung cancer mortality risk estimates. This joint cohort analysis provides strong evidence for an increased risk of lung cancer mortality from low occupational radon exposures. The results suggest that radiation protection measures continue to be important among current uranium miners.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Mineros , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/mortalidad , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Radón/efectos adversos , Uranio , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Canadá/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , República Checa/epidemiología , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Fumar Tabaco
8.
J Radiol Prot ; 38(1): 92-108, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28925920

RESUMEN

After the extension of the French cohort of uranium miners with the inclusion of workers employed in the Jouac mines, this article seeks to describe the new Jouac cohort and to estimate mortality risks, as well as to quantify their relation to radon exposure in this extended cohort. The Jouac cohort includes 458 miners hired by the Société des Mines de Jouac between 1957 and 2001. There is no measurement of radon exposure before 1978 and so no data were available. Consequently, only the post-1977 Jouac cohort (n = 314) has been included in the French cohort, creating an extended cohort of 5400 French uranium miners followed up from 1946 to 2007. Mortality analyses computed the standardised mortality ratios (SMRs). Excess relative risks (ERRs) were assessed using Poisson regression models. No evidence of a significant excess risk of overall mortality (n = 66, SMR = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.72-1.19) or any specific mortality was observed in the Jouac cohort. In the extended cohort, overall mortality did not increase, but a significant excess of deaths was observed for all cancers (SMR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.03-1.19), lung cancer (SMR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.14-1.51), and kidney cancer (SMR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.01-2.35). Cumulative exposure to radon was 3.9 working level month (WLM) and 35.1 WLM in the post-1977 Jouac and extended cohorts, respectively. Cumulative radon exposure was significantly associated with an excess risk of death from lung cancer (ERR/100 WLM = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.32-1.33) and from cerebrovascular diseases (ERR/100 WLM = 0.42 95% CI = 0.04-1.04). In conclusion, the Jouac cohort is still a young cohort and its inclusion leads to slight modifications compared to previous analyses of the French cohort. The already known relation between radon exposure and lung cancer death as well as the excess risk of death from cerebrovascular diseases persisted in the extended cohort.


Asunto(s)
Mineros , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Radón/efectos adversos , Uranio/efectos adversos , Adulto , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/etiología , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mineros/estadística & datos numéricos
10.
J Radiol Prot ; 36(2): 319-45, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27183135

RESUMEN

The potential health impacts of chronic exposures to uranium, as they occur in occupational settings, are not well characterized. Most epidemiological studies have been limited by small sample sizes, and a lack of harmonization of methods used to quantify radiation doses resulting from uranium exposure. Experimental studies have shown that uranium has biological effects, but their implications for human health are not clear. New studies that would combine the strengths of large, well-designed epidemiological datasets with those of state-of-the-art biological methods would help improve the characterization of the biological and health effects of occupational uranium exposure. The aim of the European Commission concerted action CURE (Concerted Uranium Research in Europe) was to develop protocols for such a future collaborative research project, in which dosimetry, epidemiology and biology would be integrated to better characterize the effects of occupational uranium exposure. These protocols were developed from existing European cohorts of workers exposed to uranium together with expertise in epidemiology, biology and dosimetry of CURE partner institutions. The preparatory work of CURE should allow a large scale collaborative project to be launched, in order to better characterize the effects of uranium exposure and more generally of alpha particles and low doses of ionizing radiation.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Traumatismos por Radiación/epidemiología , Radiobiología/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Uranio/toxicidad , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Humanos , Dosis de Radiación , Radiometría/métodos , Factores de Riesgo
11.
Occup Environ Med ; 71(9): 611-8, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25017574

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Medical surveillance of uranium miners can include periodic chest X-ray examinations. This study aimed to assess the X-ray exposure due to occupational health monitoring in the French cohort of uranium miners, and to test whether consideration of this additional radiation exposure impacts the excess risk of lung cancer death associated with radon exposure. METHOD: X-ray exposure due to occupational health monitoring was estimated retrospectively based on review of a sample of miners' medical records and bibliographic data. Four exposure scenarios were designed, differing in their assumptions about the type of procedures performed, their frequency, and the lung dose delivered. Radon exposure and lung doses from exposure to α-particle emitters and external γ rays have previously been individually assessed. Exposure-risk and dose-risk relations were estimated by Poisson regression with a linear excess relative risk (ERR) model. RESULTS: The cohort included 5086 miners with a mean follow-up duration of 30.1 years. The mean number of chest X-ray examinations ranged from 15.1 in the lowest to 34 in the highest-exposure scenario, and produced a mean cumulative lung dose ranging from 4.6 to 34.2 mGy. The role of occupation-related imaging screening X-ray procedures in total equivalent lung dose appeared insignificant compared to α-emitter exposure. X-ray exposure was not associated with lung cancer mortality risk. The ERR associated with radon remained significantly positive when X-ray exposure was included in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: X-ray exposure did not confound the exposure-risk relation between radon and lung cancer.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Radiactivos del Aire/toxicidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Minería , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía Torácica/efectos adversos , Radón/toxicidad , Compuestos de Uranio , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Pulmón/efectos de la radiación , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/mortalidad , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Dosis de Radiación , Rayos X/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven
12.
Radiat Environ Biophys ; 53(3): 505-13, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24858911

RESUMEN

The investigation of potential adverse health effects of occupational exposures to ionizing radiation, on uranium miners, is an important area of research. Radon is a well-known carcinogen for lung, but the link between radiation exposure and other diseases remains controversial, particularly for kidney cancer. The aims of this study were therefore to perform external kidney cancer mortality analyses and to assess the relationship between occupational radiation exposure and kidney cancer mortality, using competing risks methodology, from two uranium miners cohorts. The French (n = 3,377) and German (n = 58,986) cohorts of uranium miners included 11 and 174 deaths from kidney cancer. For each cohort, the excess of kidney cancer mortality has been assessed by standardized mortality ratio (SMR) corrected for the probability of known causes of death. The associations between cumulative occupational radiation exposures (radon, external gamma radiation and long-lived radionuclides) or kidney equivalent doses and both the cause-specific hazard and the probability of occurrence of kidney cancer death have been estimated with Cox and Fine and Gray models adjusted to date of birth and considering the attained age as the timescale. No significant excess of kidney cancer mortality has been observed neither in the French cohort (SMR = 1.49, 95 % confidence interval [0.73; 2.67]) nor in the German cohort (SMR = 0.91 [0.77; 1.06]). Moreover, no significant association between kidney cancer mortality and any type of occupational radiation exposure or kidney equivalent dose has been observed. Future analyses based on further follow-up updates and/or large pooled cohorts should allow us to confirm or not the absence of association.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales/etiología , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Minería , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/mortalidad , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Uranio , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Francia/epidemiología , Rayos gamma/efectos adversos , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Distribución de Poisson , Radón/efectos adversos , Análisis de Regresión , Riesgo , Adulto Joven
13.
Stat Med ; 31(30): 4428-43, 2012 Dec 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22996087

RESUMEN

A broad variety of methods for measurement error (ME) correction have been developed, but these methods have rarely been applied possibly because their ability to correct ME is poorly understood. We carried out a simulation study to assess the performance of three error-correction methods: two variants of regression calibration (the substitution method and the estimation calibration method) and the simulation extrapolation (SIMEX) method. Features of the simulated cohorts were borrowed from the French Uranium Miners' Cohort in which exposure to radon had been documented from 1946 to 1999. In the absence of ME correction, we observed a severe attenuation of the true effect of radon exposure, with a negative relative bias of the order of 60% on the excess relative risk of lung cancer death. In the main scenario considered, that is, when ME characteristics previously determined as most plausible from the French Uranium Miners' Cohort were used both to generate exposure data and to correct for ME at the analysis stage, all three error-correction methods showed a noticeable but partial reduction of the attenuation bias, with a slight advantage for the SIMEX method. However, the performance of the three correction methods highly depended on the accurate determination of the characteristics of ME. In particular, we encountered severe overestimation in some scenarios with the SIMEX method, and we observed lack of correction with the three methods in some other scenarios. For illustration, we also applied and compared the proposed methods on the real data set from the French Uranium Miners' Cohort study.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Minería/estadística & datos numéricos , Radón/envenenamiento , Uranio/envenenamiento , Sesgo , Estudios de Cohortes , Simulación por Computador , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inducido químicamente , Distribución Normal , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Distribución de Poisson , Monitoreo de Radiación/métodos , Monitoreo de Radiación/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Regresión , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos
14.
Environ Health Perspect ; 130(5): 57010, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35604341

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite reductions in exposure for workers and the general public, radon remains a leading cause of lung cancer. Prior studies of underground miners depended heavily upon information on deaths among miners employed in the early years of mine operations when exposures were high and tended to be poorly estimated. OBJECTIVES: To strengthen the basis for radiation protection, we report on the follow-up of workers employed in the later periods of mine operations for whom we have more accurate exposure information and for whom exposures tended to be accrued at intensities that are more comparable to contemporary settings. METHODS: We conducted a pooled analysis of cohort studies of lung cancer mortality among 57,873 male uranium miners in Canada, Czech Republic, France, Germany, and the United States, who were first employed in 1960 or later (thereby excluding miners employed during the periods of highest exposure and focusing on miners who tend to have higher quality assessments of radon progeny exposures). We derived estimates of excess relative rate per 100 working level months (ERR/100 WLM) for mortality from lung cancer. RESULTS: The analysis included 1.9 million person-years of observation and 1,217 deaths due to lung cancer. The relative rate of lung cancer increased in a linear fashion with cumulative exposure to radon progeny (ERR/100 WLM=1.33; 95% CI: 0.89, 1.88). The association was modified by attained age, age at exposure, and annual exposure rate; for attained ages <55 y, the ERR/100 WLM was 8.38 (95% CI: 3.30, 18.99) among miners who were exposed at ≥35 years of age and at annual exposure rates of <0.5 working levels. This association decreased with older attained ages, younger ages at exposure, and higher exposure rates. DISCUSSION: Estimates of association between radon progeny exposure and lung cancer mortality among relatively contemporary miners are coherent with estimates used to inform current protection guidelines. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP10669.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Mineros , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación , Enfermedades Profesionales , Exposición Profesional , Radón , Uranio , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/epidemiología , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Hijas del Radón
15.
BMJ Open ; 11(8): e048576, 2021 08 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34344681

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The COCCINELLE study is a nationwide retrospective French cohort set up to evaluate the risk of cancer in patients who undergone cardiac catheterisation (CC) procedures for diagnosis or treatment of congenital heart disease during childhood. PARTICIPANTS: Children who undergone CC procedures from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2013, before the age of 16 in one of the 15 paediatric cardiology departments which perform paediatric CC in mainland France were included. The follow-up started at the date of the first recorded CC procedure until the exit date, that is, the date of death, the date of first cancer diagnosis, the date of the 18th birthday or the 31 December 2015, whichever occurred first. The cohort was linked to the National Childhood Cancer Registry to identify patients diagnosed with cancer and with the French National Directory for the Identification of Natural Persons to retrieve the patients' vital status. FINDINGS TO DATE: A total of 17 104 children were included in the cohort and followed for 110 335 person-years, with 22 227 CC procedures collected. Among the patients, 81.6% received only one procedure. Fifty-nine cancer cases were observed in the cohort. Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) were increased for all-cancer (SIR=3.8, 95% CI: 2.9 to 4.9), leukaemia (SIR=3.3, 95% CI: 2.0 to 5.4), lymphoma (SIR=14.9, 95% CI: 9.9 to 22.5) and solid cancers excluding central nervous system (CNS) tumours (SIR=3.3, 95% CI: 2.0 to 5.5) compared with the general population. FUTURE PLANS: Dose reconstruction is currently underway to estimate individual cumulative doses absorbed to relevant organs, including red bone marrow and brain for respectively haematologic disorders and CNS tumours risk estimation. A dose-response analysis will be conducted with consideration to confounding factors such as age at exposure, gender, predisposing factors to cancer and other sources of medical diagnostic low-dose ionising radiation.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Niño , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/etiología , Radiación Ionizante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
16.
PLoS One ; 13(2): e0190792, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29408862

RESUMEN

Exposure measurement error represents one of the most important sources of uncertainty in epidemiology. When exposure uncertainty is not or only poorly accounted for, it can lead to biased risk estimates and a distortion of the shape of the exposure-response relationship. In occupational cohort studies, the time-dependent nature of exposure and changes in the method of exposure assessment may create complex error structures. When a method of group-level exposure assessment is used, individual worker practices and the imprecision of the instrument used to measure the average exposure for a group of workers may give rise to errors that are shared between workers, within workers or both. In contrast to unshared measurement error, the effects of shared errors remain largely unknown. Moreover, exposure uncertainty and magnitude of exposure are typically highest for the earliest years of exposure. We conduct a simulation study based on exposure data of the French cohort of uranium miners to compare the effects of shared and unshared exposure uncertainty on risk estimation and on the shape of the exposure-response curve in proportional hazards models. Our results indicate that uncertainty components shared within workers cause more bias in risk estimation and a more severe attenuation of the exposure-response relationship than unshared exposure uncertainty or exposure uncertainty shared between individuals. These findings underline the importance of careful characterisation and modeling of exposure uncertainty in observational studies.


Asunto(s)
Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos
17.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; 11(11): e006765, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30571202

RESUMEN

Background Children treated with cardiac catheterization procedures have now a long life expectancy and consequently potential long-term radiation-induced risks. We projected lifetime attributable risks (LARs) of cancer incidence from the most frequent procedures in pediatrics: atrial septal defect closure, patent ductus arteriosus occlusion, or pulmonary valvuloplasty. Methods and Results Organ equivalent doses were estimated for 1251 procedures performed in children aged ≤15 years at 2 reference catheterization centers in France from 2009 to 2013. Sex-specific LARs were projected in lifelong nonsmokers using extended Committee on Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII risk models and considering various sources of risk projection uncertainties and dose variability (Radiation Risk Assessment Tool software). Median LARs ranged between 0.3 and 1.4 (atrial septal defect closure), 0.6 and 5.0 (patent ductus arteriosus occlusion), and 1.0 and 12.0 (pulmonary valvuloplasty) per 1000 procedures, depending on patient sex and age at treatment. These radiation-related risks would represent 0.4% to 6.0% of children's total lifetime cancer risk. For the 10% of procedures (all types combined) with highest exposures, LARs reached 4.2 per 1000 (95% uncertainty interval, 0.8-13.1) in boys and 22.2 per 1000 (95% uncertainty interval, 7.4-45.6) in girls. In boys, lung cancer accounted for 70% to 80% of the projected LARs, whereas in girls it accounted for 20% to 60% and breast cancer for 30% to 80% of the excess risks, depending on the type of procedure and patient age. Conclusions Radiation exposure may lead to substantial radiation doses and increased cancer risks in some cases. This suggests the need for dose reporting to support recommendations for long-term surveillance and prevention strategies when it is necessary.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Cardiopatías Congénitas/diagnóstico por imagen , Cardiopatías Congénitas/terapia , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/epidemiología , Exposición a la Radiación/efectos adversos , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Edad de Inicio , Femenino , Fluoroscopía/efectos adversos , Francia/epidemiología , Cardiopatías Congénitas/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/diagnóstico , Dosis de Radiación , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Oncology ; 72(1-2): 105-10, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18025804

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of cetuximab in the palliative treatment of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (CCA) unresponsive to first-line gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (GEMOX) pretreatment. METHODS: Nine patients (mean age: 54 years) with recurrent or unresectable CCA (6 peripheral and 3 hilar CCA, histologically proven) resistant to GEMOX received cetuximab 400 mg/m2 on day 1 then 250 mg/m2 weekly combined with gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on day 1 and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 2, every 3 weeks. Immunohistochemical detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and erbB-2, as well as EGFR gene copy number were assessed. Tumor response was measured using RECIST. RESULTS: A total of 43 cycles were given (3-8 per patient). After 6 months, CT scans revealed 1 complete response, 1 partial response, 1 stable disease and 6 patients with disease progression. Median time to tumor progression and overall survival were 4 and 7 months, respectively. All patients relapsed (mean follow-up: 17 months). In 6 patients, death was not related to treatment. Toxicity included grade 3 neutropenia (n = 1) and acne-like rash (n = 7). In 7 of the 9 patients, EGFR was highly expressed in all tumor cells without gene amplification. No expression of erbB-2 was noted. CONCLUSION: Even in the absence of EGFR gene amplification, cetuximab + GEMOX is a well-tolerated palliative treatment in patients with advanced CCA. Adding cetuximab circumvents tumor resistance to GEMOX.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Colangiocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Cetuximab , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos Organoplatinos/administración & dosificación , Cuidados Paliativos
20.
Radiat Res ; 187(2): 196-209, 2017 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28118116

RESUMEN

Many occupational cohort studies on underground miners have demonstrated that radon exposure is associated with an increased risk of lung cancer mortality. However, despite the deleterious consequences of exposure measurement error on statistical inference, these analyses traditionally do not account for exposure uncertainty. This might be due to the challenging nature of measurement error resulting from imperfect surrogate measures of radon exposure. Indeed, we are typically faced with exposure uncertainty in a time-varying exposure variable where both the type and the magnitude of error may depend on period of exposure. To address the challenge of accounting for multiplicative and heteroscedastic measurement error that may be of Berkson or classical nature, depending on the year of exposure, we opted for a Bayesian structural approach, which is arguably the most flexible method to account for uncertainty in exposure assessment. We assessed the association between occupational radon exposure and lung cancer mortality in the French cohort of uranium miners and found the impact of uncorrelated multiplicative measurement error to be of marginal importance. However, our findings indicate that the retrospective nature of exposure assessment that occurred in the earliest years of mining of this cohort as well as many other cohorts of underground miners might lead to an attenuation of the exposure-risk relationship. More research is needed to address further uncertainties in the calculation of lung dose, since this step will likely introduce important sources of shared uncertainty.


Asunto(s)
Minería , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Radón/efectos adversos , Proyectos de Investigación , Uranio , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Teorema de Bayes , Estudios de Cohortes , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Francia , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Estadísticos , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Incertidumbre , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA