RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the learning curve associated with the adoption of US guided PCNL and demonstrate that it can be carried out safely with results comparable to those obtained using standard PCNL. METHODS: Prospective study with 65 patients who underwent PCNL between 2019 and 2020. all procedures were performed in supine position and an initial attempt to gain access to the kidney using US was made. RESULTS: Mean procedure duration was 69.5 ± 27.8 min. Fluoroscopy was used with a mean dose of 276.68 ± 560.71 (cGycm3) and mean fluoroscopy time 40.25 ± 77.69 (s). Throughout the study there was a steady decrease in the use of fluoroscopy and amount of radiation to gain access to the kidney to only 25% at the study end. 76.5% of the patients were stone free at follow-up. Complication rate was 9.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroless US guided PCNL is safe, feasible and reproducible procedure.
RESUMEN
It has been suggested that up to 40 cases of RALP are required to reach the operative results equal to open surgery. We have hypothesized that previous experience in open and laparoscopic surgeries might shorten the learning curve of robotic surgery. We have retrospectively evaluated the data of all children who underwent pyeloplasty in our institute by a single surgeon since 2003. The children were divided into three groups: open pyeloplasty (OP) of 72 children, laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LAP) of 22, and RALP of 33 patients subsequently. The data included: demographics, duration of surgery, length of stay, success of surgery, and complication rate according to the Clavien-Dindo score. The groups were ordered chronologically by the operation date and each group was divided into two different phases: early and late. A comparison was made between the data of the early and the late phase. There was no difference in the demographic data between the groups; however, the patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery were significantly older compared with the patients from the other groups. The median duration of surgery in the RALP group was significantly shorter than the OP group (65 min vs 72.5 min P < 0.01), while the first RALP case was already shorter than the median duration of surgery in OP group. There was no significant decrease in the duration of surgery of the RALP group over the study period, though there was a significant trend of decreasing operative time in the OP and LAP groups. There was no difference in the length of stay in the early vs late phases in the RALP group. There was no difference in the complication and success rate between the RALP and OP group, as well as the early and late phases of the RALP group. Our data show that previous experience in OP and LAP surgery may contribute to a shorter learning curve of robotic surgery required for the surgeon to achieve a similar outcome to that of OP.