Patient Selection and Outcomes of Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Performed with Monitored Anesthesia Care Versus General Anesthesia.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of monitored anesthesia care (MAC) versus general anesthesia (GA) for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF-TAVR) and to describe a selection process for the administration of MAC. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent TF-TAVR under MAC or GA. SETTING: Department of Cardiac Anesthesia, Albany Medical Center, a tertiary university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients selected for TF-TAVR. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were divided into those who underwent MAC and those who underwent GA. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The study comprised 104 consecutive patients (55% male, mean age 83 years) who underwent TF-TAVR under MAC (n = 60) or GA (n = 37) from 2014 to 2015. Seven patients were converted from MAC to GA and were omitted from analysis. There was no statistically significant difference between 30-day mortality and complications between the 2 groups. The MAC group had a significantly shorter median intensive care unit length of stay (48 h v 74 h, p = 0.0002). The MAC group also demonstrated reduced procedural time (45.5 min v 62 min, p = 0.003); operating room time (111 min v 153 min, p = <0.001); and fluoroscopy time (650 s v 690 s, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Patient selection for TF-TAVR with MAC can be formalized and implemented successfully. MAC allows for the minimizing of patient exposure to unnecessary interventions and improving resource utilization in suitable TAVR patients. Selection requires a multidisciplinary clinical decision-making process. MAC demonstrates good outcomes compared with GA, yet it is important to have a cardiac anesthesiologist present in the event of emergency conversion to GA.

Pheochromocytoma: the range of appearances on ultrasound, CT, MRI, and functional imaging.

OBJECTIVE: Pheochromocytomas are relatively rare neuroendocrine tumors of the adrenal medulla. Their variable clinical presentation and biologic behavior often make accurate diagnosis challenging. A variable spectrum of imaging appearances--some of which may also mimic other diseases--has been recognized. This article reviews the epidemiology; associations; and clinical, biochemical, pathologic, and multimodality imaging features of pheochromocytomas including diagnostic pearls and pitfalls. CONCLUSION: Pheochromocytomas are often considered the great mimicker of other adrenal tumors. Because of their varied clinical, imaging, and pathologic appearances, accurate diagnosis can be challenging. The various imaging appearances on ultrasound, CT, MRI, and functional imaging can be complementary and have features that are useful for differentiating pheochromocytoma from other lesions of the adrenal.

Multimodality imaging findings of pheochromocytoma with associated clinical and biochemical features in 53 patients with histologically confirmed tumors.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the spectrum of imaging appearances of pheochromocytoma and the associated clinical and biochemical features. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, a citywide pathology database (2000-2011) was searched to identify the records of patients with pheochromocytoma. The search yielded the cases of 53 patients (28 men, 25 women; mean age, 50 years). The institutional PACS and radiology information system records, hospital charts, and the provincial electronic health records of these patients were reviewed. Imaging appearances and clinical and biochemical features related to pheochromocytomas were recorded. RESULTS: One chart was not available for review. In the 52 cases analyzed, 40 of the patients had symptoms: 31 patients had hypertension; 10 had the triad of palpitations, diaphoresis, and headaches; and all had elevated urinary metanephrine concentrations. Seven patients had a familial syndrome, and five had bilateral pheochromocytomas. One patient had an extraadrenal pheochromocytoma, and five had malignant tumors. The mean size of pheochromocytomas was 4.0 cm. Most pheochromocytomas were heterogeneous (CT, 56%; MRI, 65%; ultrasound, 45%) and were MIBG positive (90%). Eleven of 34 (32%) pheochromocytomas had T2 signal intensity greater than that of the spleen. Most pheochromocytomas were less enhancing than the spleen (CT, 85%; MRI, 71%). Contrast-enhanced CT was performed on 33 tumors, of which 20 enhanced less than the spleen and 8 showed similar enhancement to the spleen; contrast-enhanced MRI was performed on 24 tumors, of which 12 enhanced less than the spleen and 5 showed similar enhancement to the spleen. Predominant cystic change was found in 4 of 20 (20%) ultrasound, 9 of 41 (22%) CT, and 11 of 34 (32%) MRI examinations. Eight of 34 (24%) pheochromocytomas were hemorrhagic, two (5%) had calcifications, and three of six were PET positive. Two cystic pheochromocytomas and one lipid-containing pheochromocytoma were misdiagnosed as adrenal adenomas. CONCLUSION: Most pheochromocytomas were heterogeneous at imaging, were MIBG positive, accompanied elevated urinary metanephrine concentrations, and were symptomatic. High T2 signal intensity was found in approximately one third of solid tumors. Atypical imaging features included homogeneity, cystic change, hemorrhage, intense enhancement, calcifications, intracellular lipid, bilaterality, and malignancy.

Post Operative Complications Of Open Partial Nephrectomy With Respect To Tumour Location.

BACKGROUND: Partial Nephrectomy has been the go-to approach for the treatment of small sized renal tumours for years now. Like any other surgical procedure, it is associated with post-operative complications. The study was aimed at determining the post-operative complications of open partial nephrectomy concerning tumour location. METHODS: This descriptive cross-sectional study was done on 45 patients as per inclusion criteria. The patients were managed as per department protocols and were observed for the development of immediate post-operative complications during hospital stays. RESULTS: Post-operative complications were observed in 4 (8.9%) patients and included haemorrhage (n=1; 2.2%) and urine leak (n=3; 6.7%). There was a statistically significant association between post-operative complications of partial nephrectomy and central tumour location (p=0.008, OR=14.52 and LR=5.70) and increased age (p=0.04, LR=5.40 and OR=8.90). Discussion: Increased age and tumour location may play a significant role in determining the likelihood of post-operative complications in patients who have undergone surgery for renal tumours.

Evaluation and Treatment of Foot Drop Using Nerve Transfer Techniques.

Foot drop represents a complex pathologic condition, requiring a multidisciplinary approach for appropriate evaluation and treatment. Multiple etiologic factors require recognition before considering invasive/operative intervention. When considering surgical management for the treatment of foot drop, it is first and foremost imperative to establish the cause of the condition. Not all causes resulting in clinical foot drop have surgical options. Establishing a cause allows the provider to more appropriately curtail a multidisciplinary approach to working-up, and ultimately, treating the patient. The authors offer an algorithm for evaluating and treating foot drop conditions associated with lumbar spine radiculopathy and peripheral nerve lesions.

Differences in treadmill exercise tolerance parameters between patients with partial and advanced interatrial depolarization abnormality.

Advanced interatrial block (aIAB) is considerably much less common than partial interatrial block (pIAB), occuring in <2% of the elderly hospitalized population. Less is, therefore, known of the true clinical burden of aIAB, particularly in relation to graded exercise. Therefore, 12 patients with aIAB and 30 patients with pIAB who performed a baseline exercise tolerance test and had a repeat test performed > or = 2 years later were included in the study. Exercise tolerance, echocardiographic findings, and major adverse cardiovascular events were compared. Left atrial size progressed at a significantly faster rate in those with aIAB. In addition, Duke Prognostic Treadmill scores were significantly lower on follow-up in those patients with aIAB. Overall, patients with aIAB had significantly greater left atrial size (48.3 +/- 9 vs 42.8 +/- 4 mm, p < 0.01) and significantly lower Duke Prognostic Treadmill scores than those with pIAB (-0.2 +/- 5 vs 4.1 +/- 4, p < 0.05). There were, however, no significant differences in the occurence of major adverse cardiovascular events. In conclusion, left atrial size progressed at a significantly faster rate but Duke Prognostic Treadmill scores were significantly lower in those with aIAB compared with patients with pIAB after > or = 2 years of follow-up. Further study is required to determine whether patients with aIAB require follow-up echocardiography and/or exercise tolerance tests for optimal risk stratification.