How Much Delay Matters? How Time to Treatment Impacts Overall Survival in Early Stage Lung Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify drivers of time from diagnosis to treatment (TTT) of surgically resected early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and determine the effect of TTT on post-resection survival. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Large database studies that lack relevant comorbidity data have identified longer TTT asa driver of worse overall survival. METHODS: From January 1, 2014 to April 1, 2018, 599 patients underwent lung resection for clinical stage I and II NSCLC. Random forest classification, regression, and survival were used to estimate likelihood of TTT = 0 (tissue diagnosis obtained at surgery), >0 (diagnosis obtained pre-resection), and effect of TTT on all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Patients with TTT > 0 (n = 413) had median TTT of 42 days (25-75 th percentile: 27-59 days). Patients with TTT = 0 (n = 186) had smaller tumors and higher percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 %). Patients with history of stroke, oncology consultation, invasive mediastinal staging, low and high extremes of FEV 1 % had longer TTT. Higher clinical stage, lack of preoperative stress test, anemia, older age, lower FEV1% and diffusion lung capacity, larger tumor size, and longer TTT were the most important predictors of all-cause mortality. One- and 5-year overall survival decreased when TTT was >50 days. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative physiologic workup and multidisciplinary evaluation were the predominant drivers of longer TTT. Patients with TTT = 0have more favorable presentation and should be considered in TTT analyses for early stage lung cancer populations. The time needed to clinically stage and optimize patients for resection is not deleterious to overall survival until resection is performed after 50 days from diagnosis.

Adjuvant Therapy After Neoadjuvant Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: Who Needs It?

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that, on average, patients do not benefit from additional adjuvant therapy after neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer, although subsets of patients might. Therefore, we sought to identify profiles of patients predicted to receive the most survival benefit or greatest detriment from adding adjuvant therapy. BACKGROUND: Although neoadjuvant therapy has become the treatment of choice for locally advanced esophageal cancer, the value of adding adjuvant therapy is unknown. METHODS: From 1970 to 2014, 22,123 patients were treated for esophageal cancer at 33 centers on 6 continents (Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration), of whom 7731 with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma received neoadjuvant therapy; 1348 received additional adjuvant therapy. Random forests for survival and virtual-twin analyses were performed for all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Patients received a small survival benefit from adjuvant therapy (3.2±10 months over the subsequent 10 years for adenocarcinoma, 1.8±11 for squamous cell carcinoma). Consistent benefit occurred in ypT3-4 patients without nodal involvement and those with ypN2-3 disease. The small subset of patients receiving most benefit had high nodal burden, ypT4, and positive margins. Patients with ypT1-2N0 cancers had either no benefit or a detriment in survival. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant therapy after neoadjuvant therapy has value primarily for patients with more advanced esophageal cancer. Because the benefit is often small, patients considering adjuvant therapy should be counseled on benefits versus morbidity. In addition, given that the overall benefit was meaningful in a small number of patients, emerging modalities such as immunotherapy may hold more promise in the adjuvant setting.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection with versus without traction for pathologically staged T1B esophageal cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Positive vertical margins (VMs) are common after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of T1b esophageal cancer (EC) and are associated with an increased risk of recurrence. Traction during ESD provides better exposure of the submucosa and may allow deeper dissection, potentially reducing the risk of positive VMs. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study to compare the proportion of resections with positive VMs in ESD performed with versus without traction in pathologically staged T1b EC. METHODS: Patients who underwent ESD revealing T1b EC (squamous or adenocarcinoma) at 10 academic tertiary referral centers in the United States (n = 9) and Brazil (n = 1) were included. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted. ESD using either traction techniques (tunneling, pocket) or traction devices (clip line, traction wire) were classified as ESD with traction (Tr-ESD) and those without were classified as conventional ESD without traction. The primary outcome was a negative VM. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess associations with negative VMs. RESULTS: A total of 166 patients with pathologically staged T1b EC underwent Tr-ESD (n = 63; 38%) or conventional ESD without traction (n = 103; 62%). Baseline factors were comparable between both groups. On multivariable analysis, Tr-ESD was found to be independently associated with negative VMs (odds ratio, 2.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-4.91; P = .037) and R0 resection (odds ratio, 2.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-6.23; P = .008). CONCLUSION: Tr-ESD seems to be associated with higher odds of negative VMs than ESD without traction for pathologically staged T1b EC, and future well-conducted prospective studies are warranted to establish the findings of the current study.

Quantifying the subjective: length-to-height ratio characterizes achalasia esophageal tortuosity.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal morphology in achalasia is thought to affect outcomes, with "end-stage" sigmoidal morphology faring poorly; however, evaluation of morphology's role in outcomes has been limited by lack of objective characterization. Hence, the goals of this study were twofold: characterize the variability of timed barium esophagram (TBE) interpretation and evaluate an objective classification of TBE tortuosity: length-to-height ratio (LHR). We hypothesized that the esophagus must elongate to become sigmoidal such that sigmoidal morphology would demonstrate a larger LHR. METHODS: Ninety pre-operative TBEs were selected from an institutional database. Esophageal morphology was categorized as straight, intermediate, or sigmoidal. Esophageal length was measured by a mid-lumen line from the aortic knob to the esophagogastric junction on TBE; height was measured vertically from the aortic knob to the level of the esophagogastric junction. The length divided by the height generated the LHR. Descriptive statistics and frequency of expert agreement were calculated. Median LHR was compared between consensus morphologies. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) determined the optimal LHR for sigmoidal vs non-sigmoidal characterization. RESULTS: From a total of 90 pre-operative TBEs, expert consensus morphology was reached in 56 (62.2%) cases. Pairs of experts agreed on morphology in 62-74% of TBEs, with all three experts agreeing on 46.7-48.9% of cases. Median LHR between expert consensus morphologies was 1.03, 1.09, and 1.24 for straight, intermediate, and sigmoidal morphologies, respectively (p < 0.001). ROC demonstrated that an LHR cutoff of 1.13 was 100% sensitive and 95% specific (AUC 0.99) for ruling out sigmoidal morphology. CONCLUSION: These findings confirm our anecdotal experience that subjective morphology interpretation is variable, even between experts at a high-volume center. LHR provides an objective method for classification, allowing us to overcome the limitations of inter-observer variability, thus paving the way for future study of the role of morphology in achalasia outcomes.

Clinical Risk Prediction Model for Neoadjuvant Therapy in Resectable Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

GOALS AND BACKGROUND: Clinical staging with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and positron emission tomography (PET) is used to identify esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) patients with locally advanced disease and therefore, benefit from neoadjuvant therapy. However, EUS is operator dependent and subject to interobserver variability. Therefore, we aimed to identify clinical predictors of locally advanced EAC and build a predictive model that can be used as an adjunct to current staging methods. STUDY: This was a cross-sectional study of patients with EAC who underwent preoperative staging with EUS and PET scan followed by definitive therapy at our institution from January 2011 to December 2017. Demographic data, symptoms, endoscopic findings, EUS, and PET scan findings were obtained. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-six patients met the study criteria, of which 86 (20.2%) patients had limited stage EAC and 340 (79.8%) had locally advanced disease. The mean age was 65.4±10.3 years of which 356 (83.6%) were men and 393 (92.3%) were White. On multivariable analysis, age (above 75 or below 65 y), dysphagia [odds ratio (OR): 2.84], weight loss (OR: 2.06), protruding tumor (OR: 2.99), and tumor size >2 cm (OR: 3.3) were predictive of locally advanced disease, while gastrointestinal bleeding (OR: 0.36) and presence of visible Barrett's esophagus (OR: 0.4) were more likely to be associated with limited stage. A nomogram for predicting the risk of locally advanced EAC was constructed and internally validated. CONCLUSIONS: We constructed a nomogram to facilitate an individualized prediction of the risk of locally advanced EAC. This model can aid in decision making for neoadjuvant therapy in EAC.

Value of Lymphadenectomy in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Therapy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effect on survival of extent of lymphadenectomy during esophagectomy for patients undergoing multimodality (neoadjuvant) therapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction using Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration data. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Previous worldwide data demonstrated that optimum lymphadenectomy during esophagectomy alone for esophageal cancer provides accurate staging and maximum survival. However, for patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced adenocarcinoma, its value is unclear, leading to wide practice variability. METHODS: A total of 3859 patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction received neoadjuvant therapy. The endpoint was all-cause mortality, reported as gain or loss of lifetime within 10 years. Lifetime predicted for each regional lymph node resected used quantile survival random forest methodology. RESULTS: Across all post-neoadjuvant ypTNM cancer categories, some degree of lymphadenectomy was associated with longer lifetime, but in a nonlinear fashion. For patients with ypN0 cancers, there was a modest gain in lifetime up to 25 lymph nodes resected and an incremental loss in lifetime as >25 were resected. For patients with ypN+ cancers, there was a robust gain in lifetime up to 30 lymph nodes resected and then an incremental loss in lifetime. CONCLUSIONS: Worldwide data for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction demonstrate that lymphadenectomy during esophagectomy is a valuable component of neoadjuvant therapy. Survival is maximized when an optimum range of nodes is resected.

Repair, Reconstruct, or Divert: Fate of the Perforated Esophagus.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine differences in esophageal perforation populations undergoing different advanced interventions for perforated esophagus and identify predictors of treatment outcomes. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Contained esophageal perforation can often be managed expectantly, but uncontained perforation is uniformly fatal without invasive intervention. Treatment options for the latter range from simple endoscopic control through advanced intervention. Clinical presentation varies greatly and directs which intervention is most appropriate. METHODS: From 1996 to 2017, 335 patients were treated for esophageal perforation, and 166 for advanced interventions: 74 primary repair with tissue flap (repair), 26 esophagectomy and gastric pull-up (resection), and 66 esophagectomy and immediate diversion with planned delayed reconstruction (resection-diversion). Patient characteristics, clinical presentation, operative outcomes, and survival were abstracted. Pittsburgh Severity Scores (PSS) were retrospectively calculated. Random survival forest analysis was performed for 90-day mortality and competing risks for reconstruction after resection-diversion. RESULTS: Repair and resection patients had lower PSS than resection-diversion patients (3 vs 3 vs 6, respectively). Ninety-day mortality for repair, resection, and resection-diversion was 11% vs 7.7% vs 23%, and 5-year survival was 71% vs 63% vs 47%. Risk of death after resection-diversion was highest within 1 year, but 52% of patients had reconstruction of the upper alimentary tract within 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Several advanced interventions exist for critically ill patients with uncontained esophageal perforation. Repair and organ preservation are always preferred; however, patients at extremes of illness might best be treated with resection-diversion, with the understanding that the competing risk of death may preclude eventual reconstruction.

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Is Safe and Highly Effective Treatment for Advanced Achalasia With Sigmoid Esophagus.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In advanced achalasia patients with sigmoid esophagus, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) might be technically challenging and its outcomes are not well known in western population. Hence, our study aims were to assess and compare the safety and efficacy of POEM in achalasia patients with and without sigmoid esophagus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of achalasia patients who had POEM at our institution between April 2014 and December 2019 were reviewed. Patients who underwent work-up comprising timed barium esophagram (TBE) and high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) before POEM along with 2-month post-POEM esophageal pH study, TBE and HREM were included in the final analysis. Patients were categorized as either sigmoid or no sigmoid esophagus based on the morphology of esophagus on TBE as per Japan Esophageal Society guidelines. Treatment success was defined as reduction of post-POEM Eckardt score to ≤3. RESULTS: A total of 168 patients (sigmoid esophagus=20; no sigmoid esophagus=148) were included. Esophageal width on TBE at 1 minute was significantly higher in sigmoid esophagus group compared with no sigmoid esophagus group (4.9 vs. 3.0 cm, P<0.001). Procedural outcomes and complications were similar in both groups. At 2-month follow-up, both groups had significant improvement in Eckardt scores, TBE, and HREM parameters. Treatment success was high and similar in both sigmoid and no sigmoid groups (94.4% vs. 93.2%, P=0.84). The rates of gastroesophageal reflux disease were also similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study findings suggest that POEM is safe and highly effective treatment for achalasia patients with sigmoid esophagus similar to those without sigmoid esophagus in western population. POEM should be considered as the treatment of choice in advanced achalasia with sigmoid esophagus.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy is highly effective for achalasia patients with recurrent symptoms after pneumatic dilatation.

BACKGROUND: Previous interventions in achalasia such as pneumatic dilation (PD) might lead to difficulties with peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) along with sub-optimal outcomes. There are limited data in the literature on outcomes of POEM after PD, especially from the western hemisphere. Hence, we aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of POEM for recurrent symptoms after PD compared to treatment naïve achalasia patients. METHODS: Medical records of achalasia patients who underwent POEM at our institution between April 2014 and October 2019 were reviewed. Patients who had POEM for recurrent symptoms after prior PD were matched at 1:2 ratio with treatment naïve achalasia patients using propensity score matching. Patients who had prior Heller myotomy were excluded. Patient demographics, Eckardt scores, timed barium swallow (TBE), high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM), and pH study findings were compared between the two groups, pre- and 2 months post-POEM. Treatment success was defined as reduction of Eckardt score to ≤ 3. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients (prior PD = 13; treatment naïve = 26) were included. Patient demographics, procedural, and peri-procedural outcomes were similar in both groups. Treatment success was similar in both groups, 100.0% in prior PD vs 91.7% in treatment naïve group (p = 0.53). On adjusted analysis, there was no significant difference in the pre-post-POEM improvement in Eckardt scores, TBE, and HREM parameters in the two groups. Gastroesophageal reflux disease rates were also similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In achalasia with recurrent symptoms after PD, POEM is a safe and highly effective treatment modality. Prior PD does not seem to influence the outcomes or efficacy of POEM.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy is equally safe and highly effective treatment option in achalasia patients with both lower and higher ASA classification status.

INTRODUCTION: The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system was developed as a simple categorization of patients' physiological status that predicts the operative risk. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a less invasive alternative to surgical myotomy in achalasia. As such, POEM seems to be an appealing option for high-risk patients with achalasia. However, there are no studies which systematically analyzed the outcomes of POEM among patients with different ASA classes. Hence, we aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of POEM in patients with lower and higher ASA classes. METHODS: Medical records of all achalasia patients who underwent POEM at our institution between April 2014 and May 2019 were reviewed. Patients were categorized arbitrarily into two groups, lower ASA class (ASA I and II combined) and higher ASA class (ASA class III and IV combined). Demographic and procedural details, timed barium swallow (TBE), high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM), pH study findings and Eckardt scores were compared between the two groups. Baseline characteristics were compared using Chi-square test and two-sample t-test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients met our study criteria (lower ASA class, n = 44; and higher ASA class, n = 100). Patients in higher ASA class were significantly more obese and older. More patients in lower ASA class had prior Heller myotomy and more patients in higher ASA Class had prior botulinum toxin injections. Procedural parameters were similar in both groups. Procedural complications were infrequent and were also similar in the two groups. The length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, reflux symptoms and esophageal pH study findings were also comparable between the two groups. Treatment success was similar in both groups, 97.7% in lower ASA class versus 92% in higher ASA class (p = 0.19). At 2-month follow-up, both groups had significant improvement in HREM and TBE parameters. CONCLUSION: POEM is a very safe and highly effective treatment option for achalasia patients with advanced ASA class similar to lower ASA class patients. POEM may be considered as the preferred choice for myotomy in these high-risk achalasia patients due to its low morbidity and high efficacy.

Changes in esophageal physiology after paraesophageal hernia repair and Collis gastroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The surgical approach and technique for paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair is much debated. The changes in the esophageal physiology after PEH repair with a concomitant Collis gastroplasty (PEH-CG) are not clearly known. The aim of this study was to determine the changes in high resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) and esophageal pH testing after PEH-CG. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent PEH-CG at our institution between 2006 and 2013 was performed. Patients had esophageal pH testing, HREM, barium swallow and an upper endoscopy before and after PEH-CG. RESULTS: A total of 182 patients underwent PEH-CG during the study period. Majority of patients had Nissen fundoplication (176, 96.7%) with Toupet in 6 (3.3%). Basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) was lower after fundoplication (20.3 mmHg ± 11.3 vs. 25.8 mmHg ± 15.6, p < 0.001), whereas residual LESP was noted to be higher after fundoplication (7.7 mmHg ± 4.9 vs. 6.1 mmHg ± 6.7, p < 0.009). There were no significant changes in the esophageal motility patterns. There was an improvement in total pH and upright pH but not supine pH post PEH-CG. Normalization of total acid exposure after fundoplication was noted in 31 (59.6%) of the 52 patients who had abnormal total acid exposure prior to fundoplication. CONCLUSIONS: Objective clinical assessment in patients undergoing PEH-CG demonstrates an effective operation for this complex problem. There was an increase in residual LESP but interestingly, decrease in basal LESP. Additionally, there was an improvement in esophageal acid exposure afterwards. These findings will facilitate future management of PEH.

Manometric Esophageal Length to Height (MELH) Ratio Predicts Hiatal Hernia Recurrence.

INTRODUCTION: The shortened esophagus is poorly defined and is determined intraoperatively, as there exists no objective test to identify a shortened esophagus before surgical hiatal hernia repair. We devised a unique manometric esophageal length to height (MELH) ratio to define the presence of a shortened esophagus and examined the role of esophageal length in hiatal hernia recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review identified 254 patients with hiatal hernia who underwent preoperative esophageal manometry and either an open hernia repair with Collis gastroplasty and fundoplication (with Collis) or laparoscopic repair and fundoplication without Collis gastroplasty (without Collis) from 2005-2016. The MELH ratio was calculated by measuring the upper to lower esophageal sphincter distance divided by the patient's height. RESULTS: Of 245 patients, 157 underwent repair with Collis, while 97 underwent repair without Collis. The Collis group had a shorter manometric esophageal length (20.2 vs. 22.4 cm, P<0.001) and lower MELH (0.12 vs. 0.13, P<0.001). The Collis group had fewer hernia recurrences (18% vs. 55%, log-rank P<0.001) and fewer reoperations for recurrence (0% vs. 10%, log-rank P<0.001) at 5 years. A 33% decrease in risk of hernia recurrence was seen for every 0.01 U increment in MELH ratio (hazard ratio: 0.67; 95% confidence interval: 0.55-0.83, P<0.001) while repair without Collis (hazard ratio: 6.1; 95% confidence interval: 3.2-11.7, P<0.001) was associated with increased risk of hernia recurrence. CONCLUSION: MELH ratio is an objective predictor of a shortened esophagus preoperatively. Lower MELH is associated with increased risk of recurrence and the risk associated with shortened esophagus can be mitigated with an esophageal lengthening procedure such as Collis gastroplasty.

Obesity Does Not Impact Outcomes or Rates of Gastroesophageal Reflux After Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Achalasia.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of laparoscopic Heller myotomy in obese patients with achalasia are suboptimal along with the increased risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The impact of obesity on treatment success and GERD after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) are not well known. Hence, our study aims were to compare the clinical outcomes and rates of GERD after POEM in nonobese versus obese patients with achalasia. METHODS: Chart review of all achalasia patients who underwent POEM at our institution between April 2014 and June 2018. Patients with timed barium esophagram (TBE) and high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) before POEM along with post-POEM TBE, HREM, and esophageal pH study were included. Patients were categorized into 2 groups, nonobese (body mass index <30 kg/m) and obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m). Patient demographics, TBE, HREM, pH study findings, and Eckardt scores were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: A total of 89 patients (46 nonobese; 43 obese) met the study criteria. There were no significant differences in age, gender, achalasia subtype, operative time, length of stay and complication rates between the 2 groups. Treatment success (Eckardt score ≤3) was similar in both groups (97.7% nonobese vs. 92.7% obese, P=0.35). Abnormal DeMeester scores on pH study (>14.72) were similar in nonobese and obese patients (58.7% vs. 46.5%, P=0.25). Symptomatic GERD was also similar in both groups (17.8% in nonobese vs. 20% in obese, P=0.79). CONCLUSIONS: POEM is an equally safe and effective treatment option for both nonobese and obese patients with achalasia in the short-term. Interestingly, POEM does not lead to higher rates of GERD in obese compared with nonobese patients.

Esophageal dysmotility and other preoperative factors associated with acid suppressive therapy after fundoplication.

Background and aims: Acid suppressive therapy (AST) is frequently used after fundoplication. Prior studies show that most patients requiring AST after fundoplication have normal esophageal acid exposure and therefore do not need AST. Our aim was to determine the indications for AST use following fundoplication and the associated factors.Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent fundoplication at our institution between 2006 and 2013 with pre and postoperative esophageal physiologic studies was performed. Demographic data, symptoms, and findings on high resolution manometry, esophageal pH monitoring and upper endoscopy were collected.Results: Three hundred and thirty-nine patients were included with a median follow up time of 12.8[2.6, 47.7] months. Mean age was 59.6 ± 13.3 years and 71.4% were women. Of those, 39.5% went on AST following fundoplication with a median time to AST use of 15.7[2.8, 36.1] months. The most common reason for AST use was heartburn. Only 29% of patients had objective evidence of acid reflux. Preoperative factors associated with AST use following fundoplication were male gender (HR1.6, p = 0.019), esophageal dysmotility (HR1.7, p = 0.004), proton pump inhibitor use (HR2.3, p < 0.001) and prior history of fundoplication (HR1.8, p = 0.006). In those with paraesophageal hernia repair with Collis gastroplasty (N = 182), esophageal dysmotility (HR1.7, p = 0.047) and NSAID use (HR1.9, p = 0.023) were associated with AST use postoperatively.Discussion: AST use is common after fundoplication. Male gender, preoperative esophageal dysmotility, proton pump inhibitor use and redo fundoplication were associated with AST use following fundoplication. In those undergoing combined Collis gastroplasty, preoperative NSAID use and esophageal dysmotility predicted AST use.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy is a safe and effective treatment modality for geriatric patients with achalasia.

BACKGROUND: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an appealing treatment for older patients, as it is minimally invasive but highly efficacious similar to surgical myotomy. However, there is a lack of systematic studies analyzing POEM outcomes in young (< 65 years) versus geriatric patients (≥ 65 years). Hence, we aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of POEM in young versus geriatric patients. METHODS: Records of all achalasia patients who underwent POEM at our institution between April 2014 and May 2019 were reviewed. Patients were categorized into two groups: young (< 65 years) and old (≥ 65 years). Demographic and procedural details, timed barium esophagram (TBE), high-resolution manometry (HREM), pH study findings and Eckardt scores were compared between the two groups. Post-POEM Eckhardt score of ≤ 3 was defined as treatment success. RESULTS: A total of 148 patients met the study criteria (young = 93; old = 55). Younger patients were more likely to have lower TBE height at 1 min but wider TBE width at 5 min. The rest of the pre-operative parameters and Eckardt scores were similar in the two groups. Young patients were more likely to have undergone prior Heller myotomy, while Botox injections were common in the older group. The operative details and outcomes were similar in the two groups. Treatment success rates were similar in both groups (94.9% young vs. 94.7% in old patients, p = 1.00). At 2-month follow-up, both groups showed significant improvements in Eckhardt scores and HREM parameters; however, older patients showed greater improvement in TBE height at 1 and 5 min. The rates of symptomatic GERD and abnormal esophageal pH study findings were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: POEM was safe and highly effective treatment for geriatric patients with achalasia. These findings suggest that POEM might emerge as the preferred approach for myotomy in this patient population.

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Is Effective for Patients With Achalasia and Normal Lower-Esophageal Sphincter Relaxation Pressures.

Increased lower esophageal sphincter integrated relaxation pressure (LES-IRP) is a cardinal feature of achalasia. However, some patients with characteristic features of achalasia have normal LES-IRP.1,2 The efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in achalasia patients with normal LES-IRP is not well known. Hence, we aimed to compare POEM outcomes in achalasia patients with normal (<15 mm Hg) and increased (≥15 mm Hg) LES-IRP.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy leads to higher rates of abnormal esophageal acid exposure than laparoscopic Heller myotomy in achalasia.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) may be associated with higher rates of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) than laparoscopic Heller's myotomy with fundoplication (LHM), since POEM is not combined with a fundoplication. However, peri-esophageal anti-reflux barriers are preserved in POEM, which might prevent GERD. Hence, we sought to compare the objective esophageal pH study findings in achalasia patients after POEM and LHM. METHODS: Achalasia patients undergoing POEM from 2014 to 2015 at our institution were matched 1:3 with LHM patients using propensity score matching. Demographics, prior interventions, pre-treatment and 2-month post-treatment timed barium esophagram (TBE), high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) and 24-h esophageal pH study findings were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients in the POEM group and 88 patients in the LHM group were included. Larger proportion of POEM patients had prior interventions for achalasia as compared to LHM patients (overall: 71% vs. 44.3%; p = 0.012). Esophageal acid exposure was significantly higher in POEM as compared to LHM patients (abnormal total acid exposure: 48.4% vs. 13.6%; p < 0.001, abnormal DeMeester score 54.8% vs. 17.4%; p = 0.005 respectively). In sub-group analysis, similar results were noted on 24-h pH study after exclusion of the POEM patients with prior LHM and corresponding matches. There was no significant difference in the rate of GERD symptoms between POEM and LHM. There was no significant correlation between the post-treatment basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure and integrated relaxation pressure with abnormal acid exposure in either POEM or LHM. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with achalasia, POEM leads to significantly higher rates of abnormal esophageal acid exposure, without an increase in the rate of GERD symptoms, when compared to LHM with fundoplication. Interestingly, prior LHM has no impact on post-POEM pH study findings. Potential of increased esophageal acid exposure and possible consequences should be discussed with all patients prior to POEM. Further studies are needed to determine the long-term effects of increased acid exposure after POEM.

Correction to: Largely Unchanged Annual Incidence and Overall Survival of Pleural Mesothelioma in the USA.

The following disclaimer is missing from the original article.

Largely Unchanged Annual Incidence and Overall Survival of Pleural Mesothelioma in the USA.

BACKGROUND: Projections based on regulations curtailing asbestos use in the USA suggest that peak incidence of pleural mesothelioma would occur between 2000 and 2005 and then decline. We analyzed the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to assess current trends in disease incidence, patient demographics, cancer treatment, and survival. METHODS: The NCDB was queried to identify patients diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma from 2004 through 2014. Clinical and pathologic characteristics, treatments, and survival were analyzed. Risk factors for death were identified by multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 20,988 patients with pleural mesothelioma were reported to the NCDB. The number of cases per year increased from 1783 to 1961, accounting for roughly 0.3% of all reported cancers each year. The proportion of elderly patients increased from 75 to 80%, but distribution by sex remained constant (20% female). The proportion of patients undergoing treatment increased from 34 to 54%. One-year survival increased from 37 to 47% and 3-year survival from 9 to 15% (p < 0.001). Factors associated with improved survival included younger age, female sex, epithelioid histology, treatment in an academic center, health insurance, higher income, and multimodality therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The annual incidence of mesothelioma has not declined this century and remains stable. Reporting of histologic and clinical staging has improved. National trends suggest that survival is slowly increasing despite an aging cohort. Multimodal therapy and treatment at academic centers are modifiable risk factors associated with improved survival.

Erratum: Use of a Novel Submucosal Tunneling and Endoscopic Resection (STER) Technique for the Removal of an Esophageal Leiomyoma.

This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2017.168.