Efficacy of two telemonitoring systems to improve glycaemic control during basal insulin initiation in patients with type 2 diabetes: The TeleDiab-2 randomized controlled trial.

TeleDiab-2 was a 13-month randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of two telemonitoring systems to optimize basal insulin (BI) initiation in subjects with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (HbA1c, 7.5%-10%). A total of 191 participants (mean age 58.7 years, mean HbA1c 8.9%) were randomized into three groups: group 1(G1, standard care, n = 63), group 2 (G2, interactive voice response system, n = 64) and group 3 (G3, Diabeo-BI app software, n = 64). The two telemonitoring systems proposed daily adjustments of BI doses, in order to facilitate the achievement of fasting blood glucose (FBG) values targeted at ~100 mg/dL. At 4 months follow-up, HbA1c reduction was significantly higher in the telemonitoring groups (G2: -1.44% and G3: -1.48% vs. G1: -0.92%; P < 0.002). Moreover, target FBG was reached by twice as many patients in the telemonitoring groups as in the control group, and insulin doses were also titrated to higher levels. No severe hypoglycaemia was observed in the telemonitoring groups and mild hypoglycaemia frequency was similar in all groups. In conclusion, both telemonitoring systems improved glycaemic control to a similar extent, without increasing hypoglycaemic episodes.

Télépied Study: A Single-Centre Trial in Diabetic Subjects Comparing Total Duration of Hospitalization Over a 1-Year Period Required for Complete Healing of a Foot Ulcer Using Telemedicine Management and a Referral Nurse Versus the Standard Care Pathway.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to demonstrate that the total number of days in hospital required for healing of a de novo diabetes-related foot ulcer (DFU) is lower in patients followed up using a telemedicine platform (Télépied Follow-Up group [Group 2]) than in patients followed up using standard care (Standard Follow-Up control group [Group 1]). Patients are assigned to either Group 1 or Group 2 depending on whether their first inclusion visit is during an even or odd week. Patients included in Group 1 are to be followed at spaced intervals during day hospital visits by the investigator assisted by a specialized referral nurse as part of the regular follow-up procedure (dressing changes + ulcer monitoring). Between visits, an independent nurse (IN) provides local care on a daily basis. Patients included in Group 2 have their DFU treated by a referral nurse trained at the diabetic foot unit of the investigating centre, and they are also followed up by an IN under the supervision of a referral nurse. In Group 2, monitoring of lesions is performed weekly by the referral nurse using photos of the DFU with planimetry taken by the IN and sent to the referral nurse via telemedicine software. The referral nurse can, in turn, provide guidance to the IN on the care to be provided and/or decide that a further hospital visit is needed. Both treatment groups are to be followed for 12 months or until complete healing of the ulcer. RESULTS: Recruitment for the study began in March 2017 and ended in May 2019, with the final study visit scheduled for May 2020. CONCLUSION: The aim of the Télépied study is to assess the impact of ambulatory foot ulcer management in diabetics over a 1-year period by a non-specialized IN working under the supervision of a referral nurse via telemedicine follow-up versus standard follow-up by an IN alone. The primary endpoint is the total duration of hospitalization required until full healing of the ulcer.