Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 210(2): 396-403, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29231760

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate the quality and reproducibility of semiautomatic measurements of the ankle in low-dose kinematic CT studies using a full model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Kinematic CT was performed in five cadaveric ankles at three acquisition dose levels: standard dose (1020 mGy × cm), low dose (10% of the standard dose), and ultra-low-dose (1.5% of the standard dose). All images were reconstructed using a full MBIR algorithm. Two semiautomatic measurements (one distance and one angle) were performed by two readers. Registration error was evaluated. The bone aspect on CT and presence of metallic implants were considered in the analysis. The influence of dose on the measurements obtained, reproducibility, and image quality was assessed. RESULTS: With the standard- and low-dose protocols, registration quality was good (registration error, 0.65-4.72%), measurements were similar (p = 0.9), and reproducibility was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.881). With the ultra-low-dose protocol, the registration quality was poor, yielding measurements significantly different from the other protocols (p < 0.001) and poor reproducibility (ICC = 0.39). In a specimen with normal bone and no metal implant, the registration error was low (0.61-1.01%), measurements were similar (p > 0.5), and reproducibility was excellent (ICC, 0.885-0.996) for the three dose levels tested. CONCLUSION: Full MBIR allows reliable and reproducible measurements in ankle kinematic CT with a low-dose protocol, but an ultra-low-dose protocol may lead to unreliable results.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Articulación del Tobillo/diagnóstico por imagen , Dosis de Radiación , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cadáver , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
2.
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol ; 19(5): 456-62, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26696084

RESUMEN

Kinematic computed tomography (CT) allows identification of fine positional anomalies of bones during motion and under stress and has a potential role in the evaluation of dynamic joint diseases. The increasing width of CT detector systems has made kinematic CT clinically available. Information on acquisition protocol, patient preparation, and the influence of motion on image quality is scarce in the literature despite the obvious importance for the clinical application of this technique. In this article we review the current knowledge on the relation between motion and artifacts, recommendations for the acquisition protocol, as well as current indications for kinematic CT.


Asunto(s)
Artefactos , Artropatías/diagnóstico por imagen , Movimiento/fisiología , Sistema Musculoesquelético/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Algoritmos , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Humanos , Artropatías/fisiopatología
3.
Skeletal Radiol ; 43(9): 1237-46, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24910125

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the image quality of CT with iterative reconstruction alone and in association with projection-based single-energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) for the visualization of specific periarticular soft tissue structures in patients with hip prostheses. METHODS: CT studies from 48 consecutive patients with a hip prosthesis (24 unilateral and 24 bilateral) were retrospectively reconstructed using two different methods: iterative reconstruction (IR) alone and IR associated with SEMAR. The influence of metallic artifacts on the identification of various periarticular structures was evaluated subjectively by two readers. The image quality was compared in patients with unilateral and bilateral prostheses. RESULTS: Visualization of periprosthetic soft tissue was significantly improved by the SEMAR algorithm (p < 0.0001). When SEMAR was associated with IR, the gluteus minimus and medius tendons, obturator internus muscle, prostate/uterus and bladder could be seen with medium or high confidence. There were no significant differences in image quality between patients with unilateral or bilateral prosthesis when SEMAR was used (p > 0.2). This algorithm increased the detection of periarticular masses by 30%. CONCLUSION: SEMAR significantly improves the image quality of periarticular soft-tissue structures in patients with hip prostheses.


Asunto(s)
Artefactos , Articulación de la Cadera/diagnóstico por imagen , Prótesis de Cadera , Metales , Músculo Esquelético/diagnóstico por imagen , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Algoritmos , Femenino , Articulación de la Cadera/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tendones/diagnóstico por imagen
4.
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr ; 12(2): 158-165, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29233633

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Vasculo-nervous structures serving the upper limbs may be compressed as they pass through three areas: the inter-scalene triangle (IST), the costo-clavicular space (CCS) and the retropectoralis minor space (RMS). The diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is essentially clinical, but requires imaging to specify the site of compression, its grade and the existence of predisposing anatomical factors, in order to guide the treatment and eliminate the main differential diagnoses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Images from 141 patients who underwent dynamic CT angiography of the thoracic outlets from June 2008 to January 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients had unilateral or bilateral vascular, neurological, mixed or atypical symptoms. We studied the degree of stenosis of the subclavian artery with the following grading system: 1 (0-<25%), 2 (25-<50%), 3 (50-<75%), 4 (75-100%). The site of stenosis and the presence of underlying anatomical predisposing factors were also taken in account. RESULTS: A total of 221 thoracic outlets were analyzed. Symptoms were neurological, mixed, vascular and atypical in 30%, 28%, 13% and 12%, respectively. Among patients with bilateral acquisitions, 38 outlets were asymptomatic; 40% of symptomatic outlets and only 5% of asymptomatic ones had grade 3 or 4 stenosis. 63% of the stenosis were in the CCS and 37% in the IST; 21% had a predisposing anatomical factor most often a costo-clavicular anomaly, associated with significant stenosis in 50% of cases. CONCLUSION: Vascular stenosis of more than 50% on dynamic CT angiography is strongly associated with TOS. Predisposing factors were present in 21% of cases, causing significant vascular stenosis in half, underscoring the need for functional evaluation.


Asunto(s)
Arteriopatías Oclusivas/diagnóstico por imagen , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada Multidetector , Arteria Subclavia/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/etiología , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Constricción Patológica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Arteria Subclavia/fisiopatología , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/etiología , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/fisiopatología , Adulto Joven
5.
Eur J Radiol ; 84(5): 892-900, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25656096

RESUMEN

A progressive increase in the detector width in CT scanners has meant that advanced techniques such as dynamic, perfusion and dual-energy CT are now at the radiologist's disposal. Although these techniques may be important for the diagnosis of various musculoskeletal diseases, data acquisition and interpretation can be challenging. This article offers a practical guide for the use of these tools including acquisition protocol, post-processing options and data interpretation based on 7 years of clinical experience in a tertiary university hospital.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen de Perfusión , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Humanos , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/patología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Investigación , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA