Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil ; 27(2): 173-9, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24361822

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The Biering-Sorensen Test (BST) is a useful and well validated assessment tool in patients with chronic lumbar pain. However there is sometimes concern that it may lead to an unwarranted increase in pain. This study compared pain levels before and after the BST against a currently accepted functional assessment tool- the modified 20-metre shuttle test (MST)- in military patients with chronic low back pain. METHODS: 56 patients with non-specific lumbar pain of more than three months duration were tested on admission and discharge from a three week in-patient rehabilitation programme using the BST and the MST. A questionnaire was used to assess pain levels before and after both tests on admission and discharge from the group. The BST was carried out before the MST, with a time delay of 30-60 minutes. RESULTS: There were significant increases in pain immediately after both the MST and the BST (range of mean increase: 2.2 to 3.2 points, p< 0.001). The mean absolute levels of pain after the BST on admission and discharge were 0.26 and 0.80 more than the levels after the MST. The mean increases were 0.36 and 1.16 more after the BST compared to that after the MST. Pain levels returned to normal within 60 minutes of the BST being completed. CONCLUSION: Using either comparison method, although the initial increases after the BST were slightly more, the amounts were comparable and much less that the minimal clinically important difference in pain which is 1.5.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/rehabilitación , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/diagnóstico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/rehabilitación , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Examen Físico/métodos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Personal Militar , Admisión del Paciente , Alta del Paciente , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Mil Med ; 178(6): 683-9, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23756077

RESUMEN

This study was undertaken to determine whether the incidence of lower limb overuse injuries (LLOIs) sustained during Royal Marine training could be reduced by issuing the recruits with shock-absorbing insoles (SAIs) to wear in their military boots. This was a retrospective longitudinal trial conducted in two phases. Injury data from 1,416 recruits issued with standard Saran insoles and 1,338 recruits issued with SAI were compared. The recruits in the two groups were of similar height, body mass, and aerobic fitness and followed the same training course. The incidence of LLOI sustained by the recruits was lower (p < 0.05) in the SAI Group (19.0%) compared to the Saran Insole Group (31.7%). The incidences of lower limb stress fractures, tibial periostitis, tenosynovitis of foot, achilles tendonopathy, other tendonopathy and anterior knee pain were lower (p < 0.05) in the SAI Group. Tibial stress fracture incidence was lower (p < 0.05) in the SAI Group but metatarsal and femoral stress fracture incidences were the same for the two insole groups. Thus, issuing SAIs to military recruits undertaking a sustained, arduous physical training program with a high incidence of LLOI would provide a beneficial reduction in the incidence of LLOI.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Traumas Acumulados/prevención & control , Ortesis del Pié/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismos de la Pierna/prevención & control , Personal Militar , Trastornos de Traumas Acumulados/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Estudios Longitudinales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Zapatos , Reino Unido
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA