Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 96
Filtrar
Más filtros

País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Surg ; 279(1): 125-131, 2024 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37325926

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Early-Onset (EO) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PanNET) is a rare disease, but whether it is clinically different from late-onset (LO) PanNET is unknown. Our study aimed to evaluate clinical differences and disease outcomes between EO-PanNET and LO-PanNET and to compare sporadic EO-PanNET with those with a hereditary syndrome. METHODS: Patients with localized PanNET who underwent pancreatectomy at Memorial Sloan Kettering between 2000 and 2017 were identified. Those with metastatic disease and poorly differentiated tumors were excluded. EO-PanNET was defined as <50 and LO-PanNET >50 years of age at the time of diagnosis. Family history and clinical and pathology characteristics were recorded. RESULTS: Overall 383 patients were included, 107 (27.9%) with EO-PanNET. Compared with LO-PanNET, EO-PanNET were more likely to have a hereditary syndrome (2.2% vs. 16%, P <0.001) but had similar pathology features such as tumor grade ( P =0.6), size (2.2 Vs. 2.3 cm, P =0.5) and stageof disease ( P =0.8). Among patients with EO-PanNET, those with hereditary syndrome had more frequently a multifocal disease (65% vs. 3.3%, P <0.001). With a median follow-up of 70 months (range 0-238), the 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence after curative surgery was 19% (95% CI 12%-28%) and 17% (95% CI 13%-23%), in EO-PanNET and LO-PanNET ( P =0.3). Five-year disease-specific survival was 99% (95% CI 98%-100%) with no difference with respect to PanNET onset time ( P =0.26). CONCLUSIONS: In this surgical cohort, we found that EO-PanNET is associated with hereditary syndromes but has pathologic characteristics and oncological outcomes similar to LO-PanNET. These findings suggest that patients with EO-PanNET can be managed similarly to those with LO-PanNET.


Asunto(s)
Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pancreatectomía , Incidencia
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(4): 2337-2348, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38036927

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The benefit of primary tumor resection in distant metastatic small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNETs) is controversial, with treatment-based morbidity not well-defined. We aimed to determine the impact of primary tumor resection on development of disease-specific complications in patients with metastatic well-differentiated SBNETs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients diagnosed with metastatic well-differentiated jejunal/ileal SBNETs at a single tertiary care cancer center from 1980 to 2016. Outcomes were compared on the basis of treatment selected at diagnosis between patients who underwent initial medical treatment or primary tumor resection. RESULTS: Among 180 patients, 71 underwent medical management and 109 primary tumor resection. Median follow-up was 116 months. Median event-free survival did not differ between treatment approaches (log-rank p = 0.2). In patients medically managed first, 16/71 (23%) required surgery due to obstruction, perforation, or bleeding. These same complications led to resection at presentation in 31/109 (28%) surgically treated patients. Development of an obstruction from the primary tumor was not associated with disease progression/recurrence (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.75-1.75) with all patients recovering postoperatively. Ongoing tumor progression requiring secondary laparotomy was associated with worse mortality (HR 7.51, 95% CI 3.3-16.9; p < 0.001) and occurred in 20/109 (18%) primary tumor resection and 7/16 (44%) initially medically treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of event-free survival among patients with metastatic SBNETs do not differ on the basis of primary tumor management. The development of an obstruction from the primary tumor was not associated with worse outcomes with all patients salvaged. Regardless of initial treatment selected, patients with metastatic SBNET should be closely followed for early signs of primary tumor complications.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Intestinales , Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/cirugía , Neoplasias Intestinales/cirugía
3.
Br J Cancer ; 129(2): 291-300, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37208512

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To date, single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy has proven to be ineffective against biomarker-unselected extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (EP-PDNECs). The efficacy of CPI in combination with chemotherapy remains under investigation. METHODS: Patients with advanced, progressive EP-PDNECs were enrolled in a two-part study of pembrolizumab-based therapy. In Part A, patients received pembrolizumab alone. In Part B, patients received pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints: safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Tumours were profiled for programmed death-ligand 1 expression, microsatellite-high/mismatch repair deficient status, mutational burden (TMB), genomic correlates. Tumour growth rate was evaluated. RESULTS: Part A (N = 14): ORR (pembrolizumab alone) 7% (95% CI, 0.2-33.9%), median PFS 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.7-21.4), median OS 7.8 months (95% CI, 3.1-not reached); 14% of patients (N = 2) had grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Part B (N = 22): ORR (pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy) 5% (95% CI, 0-22.8%), median PFS 2.0 months (95% CI, 1.9-3.4), median OS 4.8 months (95% CI, 4.1-8.2); 45% of patients (N = 10) had grade 3/4 TRAEs. The two patients with objective response had high-TMB tumours. DISCUSSION: Treatment with pembrolizumab alone and pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was ineffective in advanced, progressive EP-PDNECs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03136055.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Neuroendocrino , Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Humanos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/genética , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Supervivencia sin Progresión
4.
Ann Surg ; 278(5): e1063-e1067, 2023 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37796750

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the pattern of recurrence, treatments received, as well the oncological outcomes, of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) following curative surgery. BACKGROUND: PanNETs recur in 10% to 15% of cases following surgery. Information on the natural history and management of recurring disease is lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with PanNET that underwent curative surgery at 4 institutions between 2000 and 2019 were identified. Patients with poorly differentiated tumors, unknown tumor grade and differentiation, hereditary syndromes, unknown margin or R2 status, metastatic, and those that had neoadjuvant treatment or perioperative mortality were excluded. Clinical variables were assessed including first site of recurrence, treatment received, and survival outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1402 patients were included: 957 (74%) had grade 1, 322 (25%) had grade 2, and 13 (1%) had grade 3 tumors. Median follow-up was 4.8 years (interquartile range: 2-8.2 years). Cumulative incidence of recurrence at 5 years was 13% (95% CI: 11%-15.2%) for distant disease, 1.4% (95% CI: 0.8%-2.3%) for locoregional recurrence, and 0.8% (95% CI: 0.4%-1.5%) for abdominal nodal recurrence. Patients who recurred had 2.89 increased risk of death (95% CI: 2-4.1) as compared with patients who did not recur. Therapy postrecurrence included: somatostatin analogs in 111 (61.0%), targeted therapies in 48 (26.4%), liver-directed therapies in 61 (33.5%), peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in 30 (16.5%), and surgery in 46 (25.3%) patients. Multiple treatments were used in 103 (57%) cases. After the first recurrence, 5-year overall survival was 74.6% (95% CI: 67.4%-82.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence following surgery is infrequent but reduces survival. Most recurrences are distant and managed with multiple therapies. Prospective studies are needed to establish strategies for surveillance and the sequence of treatment to control the disease and prolong survival.


Asunto(s)
Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/cirugía , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Somatostatina/uso terapéutico , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
Eur Radiol ; 33(12): 9254-9261, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37368111

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several barriers hamper recruitment of diverse patient populations in multicenter clinical trials which determine efficacy of new systemic cancer therapies. PURPOSE: We assessed if quantitative analysis of computed tomography (CT) scans of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients using imaging features that predict overall survival (OS) can unravel the association between ethnicity and efficacy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed CT images from 1584 mCRC patients in two phase III trials evaluating FOLFOX ± panitumumab (n = 331, 350) and FOLFIRI ± aflibercept (n = 437, 466) collected from August 2006 to March 2013. Primary and secondary endpoints compared RECIST1.1 response at month-2 and delta tumor volume at month-2, respectively. An ancillary study compared imaging phenotype using a peer-reviewed radiomics-signature combining 3 imaging features to predict OS landmarked from month-2. Analysis was stratified by ethnicity. RESULTS: In total, 1584 patients were included (mean age, 60.25 ± 10.57 years; 969 men). Ethnicity was as follows: African (n = 50, 3.2%), Asian (n = 66, 4.2%), Caucasian (n = 1413, 89.2%), Latino (n = 27, 1.7%), Other (n = 28, 1.8%). Overall baseline tumor volume demonstrated Africans and Caucasians had more advanced disease (p < 0.001). Ethnicity was associated with treatment response. Response per RECIST1.1 at month-2 was distinct between ethnicities (p = 0.048) with higher response rate (55.6%) in Latinos. Overall delta tumor volume at month-2 demonstrated that Latino patients more likely experienced response to treatment (p = 0.021). Radiomics phenotype was also distinct in terms of tumor radiomics heterogeneity (p = 0.023). CONCLUSION: This study highlights how clinical trials that inadequately represent minority groups may impact associated translational work. In appropriately powered studies, radiomics features may allow us to unravel associations between ethnicity and treatment efficacy, better elucidate mechanisms of resistance, and promote diversity in trials through predictive enrichment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Radiomics could promote clinical trial diversity through predictive enrichment, hence benefit to historically underrepresented racial/ethnic groups that may respond variably to treatment due to socioeconomic factors and built environment, collectively referred to as social determinants of health. KEY POINTS: •Findings indicate ethnicity was associated with treatment response across all 3 endpoints. First, response per RECIST1.1 at month-2 was distinct between ethnicities (p = 0.048) with higher response rate (55.6%) in Latinos. •Second, the overall delta tumor volume at month-2 demonstrated that Latino patients were more likely to experience response to treatment (p = 0.021). Radiomics phenotype was also distinct in terms of tumor radiomics heterogeneity (p = 0.023).


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Etnicidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Neuroendocrinology ; 112(12): 1177-1186, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35609558

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Lutetium-177 (177Lu)-DOTATATE received FDA approval in 2018 to treat somatostatin receptor-positive gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Little data are available on response and outcomes for well-differentiated (WD) high-grade (HG) NETs treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with WD HG NETs treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE at MSK from 2018 to 2020 were identified. Demographics, response (RECIST 1.1), and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed in the archival tumor. RESULTS: Nineteen patients, all with progressive, heavily treated disease, were identified. Sites of tumor origin were: pancreas (74%), small bowel (11%), rectum (11%), and lung (5%); median Ki-67 was 32% (range 22-56). Thirteen patients (68%) completed all four 177Lu-DOTATATE cycles. Best response (N = 18 evaluable) was: 5/18 (28%) partial response, 8/18 (44%) stable disease, and 5/18 (28%) disease progression. Median PFS was 13.1 months (95% CI: 8.7-20.9). Most common treatment-related toxicities were thrombocytopenia (9 patients, 47%; G3/4, 1 patient, 5%), anemia (7 patients, 37%; G3/4, 2 patients, 11%), leukopenia (6 patients, 32%; G3/4, 0 patients), and liver function test elevation (4 patients, 21%; G3/4, 0 patients). NGS results were available from 13/19 tumors (68%). The most observed alterations were in MEN1 (6/13, 46%) and DAXX (4/13, 31%). No RB1 alterations identified. CONCLUSION: We observed a meaningful disease control rate of 72% during treatment of WD HG NETs with 177Lu-DOTATATE. In this heavily pre-treated population, more than half of patients received all four treatment cycles with toxicities largely bone marrow-related. As would be expected in WD NETs, the vast majority had alterations in chromatin remodeling genes and no RB1 alterations.


Asunto(s)
Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Compuestos Organometálicos , Humanos , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Octreótido/uso terapéutico , Lutecio/efectos adversos , Radioisótopos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Organometálicos/efectos adversos , Radiofármacos
7.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(9): e3013-e3018, 2021 11 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33090210

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: New York City (NYC) experienced a surge of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases in March and April 2020. Since then, universal polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based surveillance testing and personal protective equipment (PPE) measures are in wide use in procedural settings. There is limited published experience on the utility and sustainability of PCR-based surveillance testing in areas with receding and consistently low community COVID-19 rates. METHODS: The study was conducted at a tertiary care cancer center in NYC from 22 March to 22 August 2020. Asymptomatic patients underwent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing before surgeries, interventional radiology procedures, and endoscopy. Contact tracing in procedural areas was done if a patient with an initial negative screen retested positive within 48 hours of the procedure. RESULTS: From March 22 until August 22, 2020, 11 540 unique patients underwent 14 233 tests before surgeries or procedures at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Overall, 65 patients were positive, with a peak rate of 4.3% that fell below 0.3% after April 2020. Among the 65 positive cases, 3 were presymptomatic and 38 were asymptomatic. Among asymptomatic test-positive patients, 76% had PCR cycle threshold >30 at first detection. Five patients tested newly positive in the immediate postoperative period, exposing 82 employees with 1 case of probable transmission (1.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection identified on preprocedural surveillance was low in our study, which was conducted in an area with limited community spread at the later stage of the study. Universal PPE is protective in procedural settings. Optimal and flexible diagnostic strategies are needed to accomplish and sustain the goals of comprehensive preprocedure surveillance testing.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Equipo de Protección Personal , Políticas
8.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 19(2): 130-133, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33545685

RESUMEN

Lynch syndrome is a heritable cancer syndrome caused by a heterozygous germline mutation in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. MMR-deficient (dMMR) tumors are particularly sensitive to immune checkpoint inhibitors, an effect attributed to the higher mutation rate in these cancers. However, approximately 15% to 30% of patients with dMMR cancers do not respond to immunotherapy. This report describes 3 patients with Lynch syndrome who each had 2 primary malignancies: 1 with dMMR and a high tumor mutational burden (TMB), and 1 with dMMR but, unexpectedly, a low TMB. Two of these patients received immunotherapy for their TMB-low tumors but experienced no response. We have found that not all Lynch-associated dMMR tumors have a high TMB and propose that tumors with dMMR and TMB discordance may be resistant to immunotherapy. The possibility of dMMR/TMB discordance should be considered, particularly in less-typical Lynch cancers, in which TMB evaluation could guide the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Neoplasias Colorrectales Hereditarias sin Poliposis , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Inmunoterapia , Síndromes Neoplásicos Hereditarios , Neoplasias Colorrectales Hereditarias sin Poliposis/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales Hereditarias sin Poliposis/terapia , Reparación de la Incompatibilidad de ADN , Humanos , Inestabilidad de Microsatélites
9.
Cancer ; 126(16): 3689-3697, 2020 08 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32525561

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antiangiogenic-targeting agents have low response rates in patients with nonpancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Nintedanib is an oral antiangiogenic agent that has inhibitory effects on the fibroblast growth factor receptor, which is highly expressed in NETs. The authors hypothesized that nintedanib would be active in patients with nonpancreatic NETs. METHODS: Patients with advanced, grade 1 or 2, nonpancreatic NETs who were receiving a stable dose of somatostatin analogue were enrolled. Nintedanib was administered at a dose of 200 mg twice daily in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 16 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were enrolled, and 30 were evaluable for the primary outcome. Most had radiographic disease progression within 12 months before enrollment. The 16-week PFS rate was 83%, and the median PFS and overall survival were 11.0 months and 32.7 months, respectively. Nintedanib was well tolerated and delayed deterioration in quality of life. The baseline serotonin level had a strong, positive correlation with activated but exhausted T cells. CONCLUSIONS: Nintedanib is active in nonpancreatic NETs. The immunosuppressive effect of serotonin should be targeted in future clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Indoles/administración & dosificación , Neovascularización Patológica/tratamiento farmacológico , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Indoles/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neovascularización Patológica/patología , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Somatostatina/administración & dosificación , Somatostatina/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
J Surg Oncol ; 122(8): 1821-1826, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32914407

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18 F-FDG-PET/CT) parameters may help distinguish malignant from benign adrenal tumors, but few have been externally validated or determined based on definitive pathological confirmation. We determined and validated a threshold for 18 F-FDG-PET/CT maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) in patients who underwent adrenalectomy for a nonfunctional tumor. METHODS: Database review identified patients with 18 F-FDG-PET/CT images available (training cohort), or only SUVmax values (validation cohort). Discriminative accuracy was assessed by area under the curve (AUC), and the optimal cutoff value estimated by maximally selected Wilcoxon rank statistics. RESULTS: Of identified patients (n = 171), 86 had adrenal metastases, 20 adrenal cortical carcinoma, and 27 adrenal cortical adenoma. In the training cohort (n = 96), SUVmax was significantly higher in malignant versus benign tumors (median 8.3 vs. 3.0, p < .001), with an AUC of 0.857. Tumor size did not differ. The optimal cutoff SUVmax was 4.6 (p < .01). In the validation cohort (n = 75), this cutoff had a sensitivity of 75% and specificity 55%. CONCLUSIONS: 18 F-FDG-PET/CT SUVmax was associated with malignancy. Validation indicated that SUVmax ≥ 4.6 was suggestive of malignancy, while lower values did not reliably predict benign tumor.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/clasificación , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/diagnóstico , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18/metabolismo , Imagen Multimodal/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/metabolismo , Anciano , Área Bajo la Curva , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiofármacos/metabolismo
11.
Palliat Support Care ; 18(5): 602-608, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32036806

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Symptoms of depression and anxiety are common in neuroendocrine tumor (NET), yet controversy exists over whether serotonin-mediated antidepressants (SAs) are safe in this population. We sought to address this knowledge gap. METHOD: Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review to identify NET patients who were prescribed SA. RESULTS: We identified 15 articles, reporting on 161 unique patients, 72 with carcinoid syndrome (CS) and 89 without. There was substantial agreement between reviewers at the full-text stage (κ = 0.69). Three of the articles, all with low risk of bias, accounted for most of the cases (149/161; 93%). Among the 72 NET patients with CS prior to antidepressant usage, CS was exacerbated in 6 cases (8%), only 3 (4%) of whom chose to discontinue the antidepressant. The remaining 89 patients had no prior CS symptoms, and none developed CS following antidepressant usage. Overall, no instances of carcinoid crisis or death were reported. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence for serious adverse outcomes related to SA usage in NET patients. Previous authors have recommended avoiding antidepressants in NET, but our findings do not support those recommendations. Oncologists should nonetheless monitor for symptom exacerbation when prescribing SA to patients with NET.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/efectos adversos , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/fisiopatología , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/complicaciones , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/etiología , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/fisiopatología , Humanos
12.
Invest New Drugs ; 37(4): 755-762, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31172443

RESUMEN

Background Adrenal cortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare cancer with treatment options of limited efficacy, and poor prognosis if metastatic. AT-101 is a more potent inhibitor of B cell lymphoma 2 family apoptosis-related proteins than its racemic form, gossypol, which showed preliminary clinical activity in ACC. We thus evaluated the efficacy of AT-101 in patients with advanced ACC. Methods Patients with histologically confirmed metastatic, recurrent, or primarily unresectable ACC were treated with AT-101 (20 mg/day orally, 21 days out of 28-day cycles) until disease progression and/or prohibitive toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate, wherein a Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) partial response rate of 25% would be considered promising and 10% not, with a Type I error of 10% and 90% power. In a 2-stage design, 2 responses were required of the first 21 assessable subjects to warrant complete accrual of 44 patients. Secondary endpoints included safety, progression-free survival and overall survival. Results This study accrued 29 patients between 2009 and 2011; median number of cycles was 2. Seven percent experienced grade 4 toxicity including cardiac troponin elevations and hypokalemia. None of the first 21 patients attained RECIST partial response; accordingly, study therapy was deemed ineffective and the trial was permanently closed. Conclusions AT-101 had no meaningful clinical activity in this study in patients with advanced ACC, but demonstrated feasibility of prospective therapeutic clinical trials in this rare cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Corteza Suprarrenal/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Corticosuprarrenal/tratamiento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/uso terapéutico , Gosipol/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Gosipol/efectos adversos , Gosipol/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-bcl-2 , Criterios de Evaluación de Respuesta en Tumores Sólidos
13.
Curr Treat Options Oncol ; 20(12): 87, 2019 11 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31776785

RESUMEN

OPINION STATEMENT: Over the years, there have been significant advances in systemic treatments for metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs). Despite these advancements, uncertainty remains regarding how to best sequence available therapies. For well-differentiated and metastatic panNETs that are somatostatin receptor (SSTR) avid on functional imaging, first-line therapy typically consists of somatostatin analogs (SSAs), given their favorable toxicity profile and overall low burden for patients. When progression of disease is observed on an SSA, multiple treatment options are available, including the targeted agents everolimus and sunitinib, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), as well as chemotherapy, with the latter often preferred for those panNETs of heavy tumor burden, higher grade, and/or more aggressive behavior clinically and/or radiographically. Here, we review panNET classification, currently available systemic treatments, therapy sequencing, and areas of active investigation to further our treatments for the disease.


Asunto(s)
Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/terapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/etiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/etiología , Somatostatina/análogos & derivados , Somatostatina/farmacología , Somatostatina/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
HPB (Oxford) ; 21(5): 612-618, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30366884

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Serum Chromogranin A (CgA) is widely used as a biomarker for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs). The aim of this study was to investigate the value of CgA as a diagnostic and prognostic marker for well-differentiated PanNETs. METHODS: Patients with well-differentiated PanNET and a baseline CgA measurement, between 2011 and 2016 were reviewed. The diagnostic value was determined by comparing CgA values from patients with PanNETs to those with other pancreatic neoplasms and healthy controls. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to investigate the CgA prognostic significance. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients met inclusion criteria. As a diagnostic marker, CgA had a sensitivity of 66%, specificity of 95%, and overall accuracy of 71%. The use of PPIs was associated with a higher CgA level (p = 0.015). When excluding patients on PPIs, CgA accuracy in distinguishing PanNETs from other pancreatic neoplasms was 66%, the sensitivity and specificity were 60% and 75% respectively. Elevated CgA (p = 0.004), Ki67% (p < 0.001), tumor grade (p < 0.001) and stage of disease (p = 0.036) were associated with disease-specific survival. CONCLUSION: CgA has a limited role as a diagnostic biomarker for well-differentiated PanNETs. An elevated CgA level may have prognostic value but its role should be further investigated with respect to other known pathological factors.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Cromogranina A/sangre , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/sangre , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/sangre , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
15.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 29(11): 1519-1526, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30342802

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To identify common gene mutations in patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases (NLM) undergoing transarterial embolization (TAE) and establish relationship between these mutations and response to TAE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 51; mean age 61 y; 29 men, 22 women) with NLMs who underwent TAE and had available mutation analysis were identified. Mutation status and clinical variables were recorded and evaluated in relation to hepatic progression-free survival (HPFS) (Cox proportional hazards) and time to hepatic progression (TTHP) (competing risk proportional hazards). Subgroup analysis of patients with pancreatic NLM was performed using Fisher exact test to identify correlation between mutation and event (hepatic progression or death) by 6 months. Changes in mutation status over time and across specimens in a subset of patients were recorded. RESULTS: Technical success of TAE was 100%. Common mutations identified were MEN1 (16/51; 31%) and DAXX (13/51; 25%). Median overall survival was 48.7 months. DAXX mutation status (hazard ratio = 6.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.67-14.48; P < .001) and tumor grade (hazard ratio = 3.05; 95% CI, 1.80-5.17; P < .001) were associated with shorter HPFS and TTHP on univariate and multivariate analysis. Median HPFS was 3.6 months (95% CI, 1.7-5.3) for patients with DAXX mutation compared with 8.9 months (95% CI, 6.6-11.4) for patients with DAXX wild-type status. In patients with pancreatic NLMs, DAXX mutation status was associated with hepatic progression or death by 6 months (P = .024). DAXX mutation status was concordant between primary and metastatic sites. CONCLUSIONS: DAXX mutation is common in patients with pancreatic NLMs. DAXX mutation status is associated with shorter HPFS and TTHP after TAE.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas Adaptadoras Transductoras de Señales/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/genética , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Mutación , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/genética , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/terapia , Proteínas Nucleares/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Proteínas Co-Represoras , Análisis Mutacional de ADN , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Embolización Terapéutica/mortalidad , Femenino , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Chaperonas Moleculares , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/mortalidad , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/secundario , Fenotipo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Oncologist ; 22(9): 1102-1106, 2017 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28559412

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Based largely on reports that predate modern reporting standards, mitotane has been considered a systemic treatment option for both hormone control and antitumor control of metastatic adrenocortical cancer (ACC), although the therapeutic window is narrow. METHODS: We searched electronic medical records to identify patients with metastatic ACC treated and prescribed single-agent mitotane at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from March 15, 1989-September 18, 2015. Reference radiologists reviewed all imaging and determined efficacy according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. Patient demographics, toxicities, and treatment outcomes were reviewed. Next-generation sequencing was performed in selected cases. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were identified. The mean age was 54 and 50% had functional tumors. Grade 3 or greater toxicities were documented in 16 out of 36 patients (44%) and 17% had documented long term adrenal insufficiency. Progression of the disease as the best response occurred in 30 out of 36 patients (83%) and one patient (3%) experienced clinical progression. Three patients achieved a complete response (CR) (8%), one patient achieved a partial response (3%), and one patient (3%) had stable disease after slow disease progression prior to initiation of therapy (durable for 6 months). All responders had nonfunctional tumors. Next-generation sequencing in two of the three CR patients was performed and failed to identify any novel alterations. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective series, mitotane had a low response rate and low tumor control rate; however, a disproportionately high complete response rate suggested it should be used in selected individuals. Adrenal insufficiency is common with mitotane use and aggressive treatment with steroid supplementation should be considered when appropriate to avoid excess toxicities. Biomarkers are desperately needed to further define this disease. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This is the first objective report of single-agent mitotane using modern objective criteria. Although the vast majority of patients did not respond (and toxicity was high), we identified a remarkable 8% complete response rate (i.e. cure) in biopsy proven stage IV adrenocortical cancer patients. Biomarkers are desperately needed for this rare disease.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Corteza Suprarrenal/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Corticosuprarrenal/tratamiento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Mitotano/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Corteza Suprarrenal/patología , Insuficiencia Suprarrenal/inducido químicamente , Insuficiencia Suprarrenal/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Suprarrenal/tratamiento farmacológico , Insuficiencia Suprarrenal/epidemiología , Carcinoma Corticosuprarrenal/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/análisis , Biopsia , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Inducción de Remisión/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
17.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 23(4): 1361-70, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26597365

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the natural history of small asymptomatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNET) and to present a matched comparison between groups who underwent either initial observation or resection. Management approach for small PanNET is uncertain. METHODS: Incidentally discovered, sporadic, small (<3 cm), stage I-II PanNET were analyzed retrospectively between 1993 and 2013. Diagnosis was determined either by pathology or imaging characteristics. Intention-to-treat analysis was applied. RESULTS: A total of 464 patients were reviewed. Observation was recommended for 104 patients (observation group), and these patients were matched to 77 patients in the resection group based on tumor size at initial imaging. The observation group was significantly older (median 63 vs. 59 years, p = 0.04) and tended towards shorter follow-up (44 vs. 57 months, p = 0.06). Within the observation group, 26 of the 104 patients (25 %) underwent subsequent tumor resection after a median observation interval of 30 months (range 7-135). At the time of last follow-up of the observation group, the median tumor size had not changed (1.2 cm, p = 0.7), and no patient had developed evidence of metastases. Within the resection group, low-grade (G1) pathology was recorded in 72 (95 %) tumors and 5 (6 %) developed a recurrence, which occurred after a median of 5.1 (range 2.9-8.1) years. No patient in either group died from disease. Death from other causes occurred in 11 of 181 (6 %) patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, no patient who was initially observed developed metastases or died from disease after a median follow-up of 44 months. Observation for stable, small, incidentally discovered PanNET is reasonable in selected patients.


Asunto(s)
Tumores Neuroendocrinos/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Selección de Paciente , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Espera Vigilante
18.
J Surg Oncol ; 114(6): 655-663, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27566258

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) liver metastases (LM) refractory to oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and fluorouracil-based treatments. METHODS: A search identified patients with mCRC treated after tumor progression on at least three standard systemic therapies. RESULTS: One hundred and ten patients met criteria for inclusion (i.e., progression on at least three standard agents). Fifty seven patients had LM-only and 53 patients had LM and low volume extrahepatic metastases (LME). Patients with LM-only and LME had a response rate (RR) of 33% and 36%, median survival of 20 months and 11.4 months, respectively. Patients with LM-only had progression free survival of 6 months and hepatic progression free survival of 7.56 months. In a secondary analysis, 46 patients were RECIST-refractory to all standard therapies: LM-only (n = 24) and LME (n = 22). LM-only and LME had a RR of 29% and 36%, and median survival 17.2 months and 9.1 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with refractory mCRC LM can achieve a response to HAI resulting in antitumor activity and improvement in survival. Responses are rarely seen in such heavily treated patients with systemic therapy alone, suggesting a regional directed approach is useful. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:655-663. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Infusiones Intraarteriales , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Floxuridina/administración & dosificación , Floxuridina/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
19.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 13(2): 139-44, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25691605

RESUMEN

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs) are a type of neuroendocrine tumor with 5-year overall survival rates of approximately 50% when metastasis is present at diagnosis. Tumor grade, as defined by Ki-67 proliferation index, influences overall survival, with low-grade tumors portending a better outcome than intermediate- and high-grade tumors. This case report follows the clinical course and management of a patient with an insulin-secreting metastatic panNET who died 10 years after diagnosis after a treatment course with regional therapy and multiple forms of cytotoxic and molecularly targeted agents. This report presents the various treatment options available for patients with insulin-secreting metastatic panNETs.


Asunto(s)
Insulinoma/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Resultado Fatal , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Insulina/metabolismo , Secreción de Insulina , Insulinoma/diagnóstico , Insulinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol ; 13(5 Suppl 5): 1-18; quiz 1 p following 18, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26430956

RESUMEN

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are rare, generally indolent neoplasms that can arise throughout the gastrointestinal system. Some GEP-NETs, known as functional, secrete hormones that can lead to a complex of symptoms. Classical carcinoid syndrome is associated with flushing, diarrhea, bronchospasm, and symptoms of valvular heart disease. GEP-NETs are classified according to the primary tumor site, functionality of the disease, and histology. Treatment is guided by the resectability of the tumor, the location and extent of metastases, and the presence of clinical symptoms. Typically, first-line treatment of patients with unresectable disease includes the use of somatostatin analogs, such as octreotide LAR depot or lanreotide depot/autogel, which was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of GEP-NETs. Somatostatin analogs can improve the severe diarrhea/flushing episodes that may be associated with metastatic carcinoid tumors. For patients with pancreatic NETs, additional approved treatment options include the targeted agents everolimus and sunitinib, which have demonstrated antitumor activity. Chemotherapy may also have a selective role, particularly in pancreatic NETs. Localized approaches, including cytoreductive surgery, hepatic arterial embolization, and ablative therapies, may be used for palliative treatment in patients with liver metastases.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Intestinales/patología , Neoplasias Intestinales/terapia , Intestinos/patología , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/terapia , Páncreas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Estómago/patología , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Everolimus/uso terapéutico , Hormonas/química , Hormonas/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Intestinales/cirugía , Intestinos/efectos de los fármacos , Intestinos/cirugía , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/cirugía , Octreótido/uso terapéutico , Páncreas/efectos de los fármacos , Páncreas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Somatostatina/análogos & derivados , Somatostatina/uso terapéutico , Estómago/efectos de los fármacos , Estómago/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Sunitinib
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA