The Effects of a Perindopril-Based Regimen in Relation to Statin Use on the Outcomes of Patients with Vascular Disease: a Combined Analysis of the ADVANCE, EUROPA, and PROGRESS Trials.

PURPOSE: To study the effects of a perindopril-based regimen on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with vascular disease in relation to background statin therapy. METHODS: A pooled analysis of the randomized ADVANCE, EUROPA, and PROGRESS trials was performed to evaluate CV outcomes in 29,463 patients with vascular disease treated with perindopril-based regimens versus placebo. The primary endpoint was a composite of CV mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stroke. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the effects of a perindopril-based regimen versus placebo in relation to statin use. RESULTS: At randomization, 39.5% of the overall combined study population used statins. After a mean follow-up of 4.0 years (SD 1.0), the cumulative event-free survival was highest in the statin/perindopril group and lowest in the no statin/placebo group (91.2% vs. 85.6%, respectively, log-rank p < 0.001). In statin users (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-0.98) and non-statin users (aHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.74-0.87), a perindopril-based regimen was associated with a significantly lower risk of the primary endpoint when compared to placebo. The additional treatment effect appeared numerically greater in non-statin users, but the observed difference was statistically nonsignificant. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the treatment benefits of a perindopril-based regimen in patients with vascular disease are independent of statin use.

The Treatment Effect of an ACE-Inhibitor Based Regimen with Perindopril in Relation to Beta-Blocker use in 29,463 Patients with Vascular Disease: a Combined Analysis of Individual Data of ADVANCE, EUROPA and PROGRESS Trials.

INTRODUCTION: In everyday practice, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers are cornerstone treatments in patients with (cardio-)vascular disease. Clear data that evaluate the effects of the combination of these agents on morbidity and mortality are lacking. METHODS: In this retrospective pooled analysis of three large perindopril outcome trials (ADVANCE, EUROPA, PROGRESS), clinical outcomes were evaluated in 29,463 patients with vascular disease. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed in patients randomized to a perindopril-based regimen or placebo (treatment effect), and data were stratified according to background beta-blocker treatment. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and stroke. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint over mean follow-up of 4.0 years (Sd 1.0) was significantly lower in the beta-blocker/perindopril group (9.6%; 545/5700 patients) as compared to beta-blocker/placebo (11.8%; 676/5718 patients) (p < 0.01). Adding perindopril to existing beta-blocker treatment reduced the relative risk of the primary endpoint by 20% (hazard ratio (HR) 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-0.90), non-fatal myocardial infarction by 23% (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.65-0.91), and all-cause mortality by 22% (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.68-0.88) as compared to placebo. Significant treatment benefit was not observed for stroke (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.75-1.15). Significance was maintained for the primary endpoint and cardiovascular endpoints when data were further stratified by baseline hypertension. However, the mortality benefit was only observed in patients with hypertension with background beta-blocker use. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the beneficial cardioprotective effects of perindopril treatment are additive to the background beta-blockers use.

The rationale and design of the PERindopril GENEtic association study (PERGENE): a pharmacogenetic analysis of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduce clinical symptoms and improve outcome in patients with hypertension, heart failure, and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and are among the most frequently used drugs in these patient groups. For hypertension, treatment is guided by the level of blood pressure. In the secondary prevention setting, there are no means of guiding therapy. Prior attempts to target ACE-inhibitors to those patients that are most likely to benefit have not been successful, mainly due to the consistency in the treatment effect in clinical subgroups. Still, for prolonged prophylactic treatment with ACE-inhibitors it would be best to target treatment to only those patients most likely to benefit, which would considerably lower the number needed to treat and increase cost-effectiveness. A new approach for such "tailored-therapy" may be to integrate information on the genetic variation between patients. Until now, pharmacogenetic research of the efficacy of ACE-inhibitor therapy in CAD patients is still in a preliminary stage. METHODS: The PERindopril GENEtic association study (PERGENE) is a substudy of the EUROPA trial, a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre clinical trial which demonstrated a beneficial effect of the ACE-inhibitor perindopril in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in 12.218 patients with stable coronary artery disease (mean follow-up 4.2 years). Blood tubes were received from patients at the beginning of the EUROPA trial and buffy coats were stored at -40 degrees C at the central core laboratory. Candidate genes were selected in the renin-angiotensin-system and bradykinin pathways. Polymorphisms were selected based on haplotype tagging principles using the HapMap genome project, Seattle and other up-to-date genetic database platforms to comprehensively cover all common genetic variation within the genes. Selection also took into consideration the functionality of SNP's, location within the gene (promoter) and existing relevant literature. The main outcome measure of PERGENE is the effect of genetic factors on the treatment benefit with ACE-inhibitors. The size of this pharmacogenetic substudy allows detection with a statistical power of 98% to detect a difference in hazard ratios (treatment effect) of 20% between genotypes with minor allele frequency of 0.20 (two-sided alpha 0.05). CONCLUSION: The PERGENE study is a large cardiovascular pharmacogenetic study aimed to assess the feasibility of pharmacogenetic profiling of the treatment effect of ACE-inhibitor use with the perspective to individualize treatment in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Drug-induced heart failure.

Heart failure is a clinical syndrome that is predominantly caused by cardiovascular disorders such as coronary heart disease and hypertension. However, several classes of drugs may induce heart failure in patients without concurrent cardiovascular disease or may precipitate the occurrence of heart failure in patients with preexisting left ventricular impairment. We reviewed the literature on drug-induced heart failure, using the MEDLINE database and lateral references. Successively, we discuss the potential role in the occurrence of heart failure of cytostatics, immunomodulating drugs, antidepressants, calcium channel blocking agents, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antiarrhythmics, beta-adrenoceptor blocking agents, anesthetics and some miscellaneous agents. Drug-induced heart failure may play a role in only a minority of the patients presenting with heart failure. Nevertheless, drug-induced heart failure should be regarded as a potentially preventable cause of heart failure, although sometimes other priorities do not offer therapeutic alternatives (e.g., anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy). The awareness of clinicians of potential adverse effects on cardiac performance by several classes of drugs, particularly in patients with preexisting ventricular dysfunction, may contribute to timely diagnosis and prevention of drug-induced heart failure.

Hemodynamic tolerability and anti-ischemic efficacy of high dose intravenous diltiazem in patients with normal versus impaired ventricular function.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to compare the acute systemic and coronary hemodynamic effects of high doses of intravenous diltiazem in patients with normal versus impaired left ventricular function, investigate the safety of this drug and compare its anti-ischemic potential in these two patient groups during pacing-induced stress. BACKGROUND: Because coronary hemodynamic effects and negative inotropic properties of diltiazem are dose related, high dose intravenous diltiazem may improve anti-ischemic efficacy but may not be tolerated in patients with impaired cardiac function. METHODS: High dose intravenous diltiazem, 0.4 mg/kg for 5 min followed by 0.4 mg/kg for 10 min, was administered to 23 normotensive patients with coronary artery disease, 11 (group A) with normal and 12 (group B) with impaired ventricular function (ejection fraction < 45%) during two identical arterial pacing stress tests performed 30 min before (pacing test I) and immediately after diltiazem (pacing test II). RESULTS: Diltiazem was well tolerated despite high peak plasma levels, 869 +/- 152 micrograms/liter (group A) and 926 +/- 169 micrograms/liter (group B). It resulted in immediate but similar reductions in systemic resistance from 1,321 +/- 136 (control value) to 963 +/- 113 dynes.s.cm-5 (group A) and from 1,267 +/- 106 to 865 +/- 58 dynes.s.cm-5 (group B) and in mean arterial pressure from 107 +/- 3 to 93 +/- 4 mm Hg (group A) and from 103 +/- 4 to 86 +/- 4 mm Hg (group B), at 5 min after diltiazem (all p < 0.05 vs. control value). Diltiazem improved stroke output from 36 +/- 3 (control value) to 46 +/- 4 ml/beat per m2 in group B and from 44 +/- 4 (control value) to 49 +/- 5 ml/beat per m2 in group A, an effect that was significantly greater and more prolonged in group B than in group A. Although neither heart rate nor contractility was affected in either group, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure increased in group A (9 +/- 2 mm Hg to 12 +/- 1 mm Hg, p < 0.05) but not in group B. Despite similar reductions in coronary resistance and improvements in coronary flow, diltiazem consistently reduced myocardial oxygen extraction, but only in group B. Also, the anti-ischemic effects of diltiazem were more pronounced in group B. During pacing test II, myocardial lactate extraction normalized in group B (7 +/- 5% vs. -6 +/- 12% [pacing test I]) but not in group A, contractility indexes improved more and the increase in left ventricular filling pressure was reduced to a greater extent in group B. Moreover, the ischemia-induced increase in arterial pressures, observed in both groups during pacing test I, was prevented in group B but recurred in group A during pacing test II. CONCLUSIONS: High dose intravenous diltiazem is well tolerated, augments coronary flow and improves left ventricular pump function, particularly in patients with preexisting ventricular dysfunction. As its anti-ischemic effects also appear more pronounced in the latter group, high dose diltiazem may be particularly useful when ventricular function is depressed, for example, during prolonged ischemia at rest.

Value of digoxin in heart failure and sinus rhythm: new features of an old drug?

Digoxin has been a controversial drug since its introduction >200 years ago. Although its efficacy in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation is clear, its value in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm has often been questioned. In the 1980s, reports of some large-scale trials indicated that digoxin, with or without vasodilators or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, reduced signs and symptoms of congestive heart failure and improved exercise tolerance. This beneficial influence was mainly found in patients with more advanced heart failure and dilated ventricles, whereas the effect in those with mild disease appeared to be less pronounced. In the last few years, new data have shown that digoxin may also have clinical value in mild heart failure, either when used in combination with other drugs or when administered alone. As neurohumoral activation has increasingly been recognized to be a contributing factor in the disease progression of chronic heart failure, the modulating effects of digoxin on neurohumoral and autonomic status have received more attention. Also, there is evidence that relatively low doses of digoxin may be at least as effective as higher doses and have a lower incidence of side effects. Further, the recognition that the use of digoxin too early after myocardial infarction may be harmful and the development of other drugs, in particular angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, have obviously changed the place of digoxin in the treatment of chronic heart failure. The large-scale survival trial by the Digitalis Investigators Group (DIG), whose preliminary results have recently been presented, has shown that although digoxin has a neutral effect on total mortality during long-term treatment, it reduces the number of hospital admissions and deaths due to worsening heart failure. The potentially new features of the old drug digoxin are discussed in this review.

Systemic and cardiac neuroendocrine activation and severity of myocardial ischemia in humans.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of different degrees of ischemia on circulating and cardiac neurohormones and vasotone. BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine activation and subsequent systemic vasoconstriction may complicate ischemia. Whether this relates to severity of ischemia and subsequent cardiac dysfunction, and whether neurohormonal balance in the ischemic area changes, is unknown. METHODS: Fifty-six normotensive patients with coronary artery disease were evaluated during incremental atrial pacing. On the basis of ST segment changes, patients were classified in a nonischemic (n = 11) or ischemic group (n = 45), the latter patients were subsequently classified as lactate (n = 28) or nonlactate (n = 17) producing, to identify neurohormonal changes in the effluent of the ischemic myocardium. RESULTS: Angina occurred in 55%, 82% and 82% of patients in the nonischemic, lactate- and nonlactate-producing groups, respectively. Baseline hemodynamic variables and neurohormones were comparable in all groups, as were heart rate, rate-pressure product and coronary hemodynamic variables during pacing. In lactate producers, contractility did not improve, relaxation deteriorated, left ventricular filling pressure increased and cardiac output decreased during pacing, indicating more severe ischemia compared with that in nonlactate producers. Neurohormones did not change in the nonischemic group. In contrast, arterial and coronary venous catecholamines increased significantly more in lactate producers than in nonlactate producers (arterial norepinephrine by 68% vs. 36%, respectively). Moreover, arterial angiotensin II increased in lactate producers from a baseline mean +/- SEM of 6.8 +/- 0.9 to 9.7 +/- 1.6 pmol/liter (p < 0.05), accompanied by a sustained 23% increase in systemic resistance and arterial pressures. In lactate producers, baseline net cardiac norepinephrine release changed to net uptake during pacing (-0.05 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.06 +/- 0.05 nmol/min, p < 0.05). Epinephrine uptake increased in all patients with ischemia, albeit more in lactate producers. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating catecholamines and renin-angiotensin levels are activated, and systemic vasotone is increased in relation to the degree of ischemia. Cardiac epinephrine uptake increases, whereas net baseline norepinephrine release from the ischemic myocardium changes to net uptake. Modulation of this neurohormonal activation may provide an alternative mode to limit ischemia.

Preservation of global and regional left ventricular function after early thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction.

The effect of early myocardial reperfusion (within 4 hours after onset of symptoms) on regional left ventricular function in patients with acute myocardial infarction has been quantitated by analysis of segmental wall motion. Of 533 patients randomized either to conventional coronary care unit therapy or to a reperfusion strategy, in 332 high quality angiograms were obtained 2 to 8 weeks after the onset of myocardial infarction. In those assigned to thrombolytic therapy, angiographic data were also available after acute reperfusion. Analysis on an "intention to treat" basis revealed significant preservation of left ventricular function after thrombolytic therapy (ejection fraction 53%) compared with conventional treatment (ejection fraction 47%). In addition, wall motion analysis showed significant improvement of regional function in the infarct zone in both inferior and anterior infarction. In addition, significant changes occurred in regional function of the remote "noninfarct zone" in the acute as well as the chronic stage. It is concluded that improved regional and global left ventricular function can be achieved with early reperfusion and that this is the likely explanation for the reduction of early and late mortality after thrombolysis observed in this study.

Hemodynamic and neurohumoral effects of continuous infusion of levosimendan in patients with congestive heart failure.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to define the therapeutic dose range of levosimendan in patients with New York Heart Association class II-IV heart failure of ischemic origin. BACKGROUND: Levosimendan is a calcium sensitizer for treatment of acute decompensated heart failure. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter, parallel-group study included 151 adult patients. Levosimendan was given as a 10-min intravenous bolus of 3, 6, 12, 24 or 36 microg/kg, followed by a 24-h infusion of 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4 or 0.6 microg/kg/min, respectively. Dobutamine, for comparative purposes, was given as an open-label infusion (6 microg/kg/min). The primary efficacy variable was the proportion of patients achieving in each treatment group at least one of the following: 1) a > or =15% increase in stroke volume (SV) at 23 h to 24 h; 2) a > or =25% decrease in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) (and > or =4 mm Hg) at 23 h to 24 h; 3) a > or =40% increase in cardiac output (CO) (with change in heart rate [HR] <20%); 4) a > or =50% decrease in PCWP during two consecutive measurements. RESULTS: The response rate to levosimendan ranged from 50% at the lowest dose to 88% at the highest dose (compared with placebo 14%, dobutamine 70%). A dose-response relationship was demonstrated for levosimendan on increases in CO and SV, and reductions in PCWP during the infusion (for all, p< or =0.001). Headache (9%), nausea (5%) and hypotension (5%) were the most frequently reported adverse events at higher dosages. CONCLUSIONS: Dosing of levosimendan with a 10-min bolus of 6 to 24 microg/kg followed by an infusion of 0.05 to 0.2 microg/kg/min is well tolerated and leads to favorable hemodynamic effects.

Early thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: limitation of infarct size and improved survival.

The effect of thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction on infarct size, left ventricular function, clinical course and patient survival was studied in a randomized trial comparing thrombolysis (269 patients) with conventional treatment (264 control patients). All 533 patients were admitted to the coronary care unit within 4 hours after the onset of symptoms related to the infarction. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Informed consent was requested only of patients allocated to thrombolysis; no angiography was performed in 35. The infarct-related artery was patent in 65 patients and occluded in 169. Recanalization was achieved in 133 patients. The median time to angiographic documentation of vessel patency was 200 minutes after the onset of symptoms. The clinical course in the coronary care unit was more favorable after thrombolysis. Infarct size, estimated from myocardial enzyme release, was 30% lower after thrombolysis. In patients admitted within 1 hour after the onset of symptoms the reduction of infarct size was 51%, in those admitted between 1 and 2 hours it was 31% and in those admitted later than 2 hours it was 13%. Left ventricular function measured by radionuclide angiography before hospital discharge was better after thrombolysis (ejection fraction 48 +/- 15%) than in control patients (44 +/- 15%). Similar improvement was observed in patients with a first infarct only (thrombolysis 50 +/- 14%, control subjects 46 +/- 15%), in patients with anterior infarction (thrombolysis 44 +/- 16%, control subjects 35 +/- 14%) and in those with inferior infarction (thrombolysis 52 +/- 12%, control subjects 49 +/- 12%). Similar results were obtained by contrast angiography. Mortality was lower after thrombolysis. After 28 days 16 patients allocated to thrombolysis and 31 control patients had died. One year survival rates were 91 and 84%, respectively. On the other hand, nonfatal reinfarction occurred more frequently after thrombolysis (36 patients) than in control subjects (16 patients). Early thrombolysis by intracoronary streptokinase leads to a smaller infarct size estimated by enzyme release, preserves left ventricular function at the second week and leads to improved 1 year survival.

Cardiovascular and antiarrhythmic effects of aprindine (AC1802) during partial occlusion of a coronary artery in the pig.

The effect of intravenously administered aprindine (AC1802) as a prophylactic agent against ventricular arrhythmias was studied in pigs. During the first 30 min of ischaemia 5 of the 22 untreated animals died because of ventricular fibrillation against 1 of the 23 animals pretreated with aprindine (P=0.09). Ventricular tachycardias were observed in 10 untreated animals and in none of the aprindine group (P=0.0002). The incidence of other arrhythmias was significantly less in the aprindine group compared with the untreated group (P less than 0.02).

Effects of intracoronary thrombolysis on global left ventricular function assessed by an automated edge detection technique.

Three hundred and two patients with acute myocardial infarction were enrolled in a randomized multicenter trial to compare conventional treatment with attempted recanalization by intracoronary streptokinase. In a subgroup of patients, the effects of thrombolysis on left ventricular function were evaluated within 48 hr, at 2 wk, and at 3 mo after admission. Global left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was obtained by radionuclide angiography and analyzed with an automatic detection program. Paired data were determined in 160 patients (control 78, thrombolysis 82) within 48 hr and at 2 wk, and in 143 patients (control 71, thrombolysis 72) at 48 hr, 2 wk, and 3 mo. It was shown that LVEF significantly improved in the thrombolysis group as compared with controls both at 2 wk (delta LVEF thrombolysis 3.9 +/- 7.9%, p less than 0.001 compared with delta LVEF control 0.6 +/- 9.7%, p = N.S.) and at 3 mo (delta LVEF thrombolysis 3.1 +/- 12.4%, p less than 0.05 compared with delta LVEF control 2.1 +/- 12.2%, p = N.S.). When patients were divided according to infarct site, however, significant improvement at 3 mo was only observed in the patients with anterior infarction (delta LVEF thrombolysis 5.5 +/- 13.1%, p less than 0.05 compared with delta LVEF control 3.3 +/- 10.4%, p = N.S.). It was shown that acute intervention with intracoronary streptokinase has a potentially favorable and lasting effect on left ventricular function in patients with anterior myocardial infarction. This improvement might be related to the rather rapid administration of thrombolytic therapy with a median time of approximately 4 hr after onset of symptoms.

Effects of L-propionylcarnitine on ischemia-induced myocardial dysfunction in men with angina pectoris.

To identify the effect of L-propionylcarnitine (LPC) on ischemia, 31 fasting, untreated male patients with left coronary artery disease were studied during 2 identical pacing stress tests 45 minutes before (atrial pacing test I [APST I]) and 15 minutes after (APST II) administration of 15 mg/kg of LPC or placebo. Hemodynamic, metabolic, and nuclear angiographic variables were studied before, during, and for 10 minutes after pacing. After LPC administration, arterial total carnitine levels increased from 47 +/- 1.7 mumol/liter (control) to 730 +/- 30 mumol/liter. Hemodynamic and metabolic variables were comparable in LPC and placebo during APSI I, and reproducible in placebo during both tests. Although LPC did not affect myocardial oxygen demand and supply, it diminished myocardial ischemia, indicated by a significant 12% and 50% reduction in ST-segment depression and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, respectively, during APST II. Moreover, during APST II, left ventricular ejection fraction increased by 18% (p < 0.05 vs APST I). Furthermore, LPC improved recovery of myocardial function after pacing, with a reduction in the time to peak filling and a 21% increase in both peak ejection and filling rates 10 minutes after pacing (all p < 0.05). Thus, LPC prevents ischemia-induced ventricular dysfunction, not by affecting the myocardial oxygen supply-demand ratio but as a result of its intrinsic metabolic actions, increasing pyruvate dehydrogenase activity and flux through the citric acid cycle. Because it is well tolerated, it may be a valuable alternative or addition to available antiischemic therapy.

Systemic neurohumoral activation and vasoconstriction during pacing-induced acute myocardial ischemia in patients with stable angina pectoris.

To identify the effect of myocardial ischemia on systemic neurohormones and vascular resistance, 32 untreated, normotensive patients with coronary artery disease underwent incremental atrial pacing until angina. Arterial and coronary venous lactate and arterial values of catecholamines and angiotensin II were determined at control, at maximal pacing rates, and at 1, 2, 5 and 30 minutes after pacing. Based on pacing-induced ST-segment depression (greater than or equal to 0.1 mV) or myocardial lactate production, or both, patients were selected as ischemic (n = 25) or nonischemic (n = 7). Baseline clinical and hemodynamic data were comparable. During pacing, chest pain was similar (20 ischemic vs 7 nonischemic patients). Also, hemodynamic measurements were comparable, except for contractility, which did not improve, and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, which significantly increased in ischemic patients. Moreover, during ischemia arterial pressures increased significantly (13%) and systemic resistance increased from 1,470 +/- 60 (control) to 1,632 +/- 76 dynes.s.cm-5 5 minutes after pacing (p less than 0.05) in ischemic but not in nonischemic patients. Pacing did not affect neurohormones in nonischemic patients. In contrast, norepinephrine in ischemic patients increased significantly from 1.7 +/- 0.2 (control) to 2.6 +/- 0.3 (maximal pacing) and to 3.0 +/- 0.4 nmol/liter (1 minute after pacing), whereas angiotensin II levels increased from 6.2 +/- 1.4 (control) to 9.3 +/- 2.1 pmol/liter (1 minute after pacing, p less than 0.05). Epinephrine only increased during maximal rates (0.9 +/- 0.1 vs 0.6 +/- 0.1 nmol/liter at control, p less than 0.05). Thus, myocardial ischemia activates circulating catecholamines and angiotensin II, accompanied by systemic vasoconstriction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acute hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects and safety of high-dose intravenous diltiazem in patients receiving metoprolol.

The anti-ischemic efficacy of diltiazem may improve with increments in dosage and with additional beta-blocking therapy. However, the combined administration could lead to adverse effects through amplification of negative inotropic and chronotropic properties. To evaluate hemodynamic tolerability and safety of high-dose intravenous diltiazem in patients with coronary artery disease receiving long-term metoprolol treatment, 9 such patients were studied for 30 minutes after onset of intravenous diltiazem administration (0.5 mg/kg for 5 minutes, followed by 15 mg/hour). Diltiazem plasma levels peaked at 5 minutes (641 +/- 74 micrograms/liter), decreasing to 177 micrograms/liter at 30 minutes. Average metoprolol levels (43 +/- 12 micrograms/liter) did not change. Diltiazem immediately decreased systemic vascular resistance, left ventricular systolic and mean aortic pressures (29, 21 and 20%, respectively, at 5 minutes), and they remained significantly reduced at 30 minutes. Heart rate initially increased by 11% during the bolus infusion (p < 0.05). Concomitantly, contractility indexes Vmax and Vce40, measured at fixed heart rates, also increased significantly by 11%. Both heart rate and contractility indexes returned to baseline levels thereafter. Cardiac output increased by 10% (p = not significant), stroke index remained unchanged, but stroke work decreased significantly by 20%. Also, the tension-time index was significantly reduced (23%). Diltiazem induced moderate negative lusitropic effects, the first derivative of negative left ventricular pressure decline decreased by 12% and Tau 2 lengthened by 13%. Concomitantly, left ventricular filling pressure increased from 19 +/- 2 to 23 +/- 3 mm Hg, but only at 5 and 15 minutes. PQ, QRS and QTc intervals were not affected.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of bisoprolol on heart rate variability in heart failure.

Analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) provides a non-invasive index of autonomic nervous system activity. HRV has been shown to be reduced in heart failure. Preliminary data indicate that beta blockers improve clinical status in patients with heart failure, but HRV improvement remains to be demonstrated. Fifty-four patients from the randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study were included in the HRV study. The bisoprolol daily dose was 5 mg once daily. We assessed HRV during 24-hour Holter recordings before randomization and after 2 months of treatment. HRV as measured in the time domain by root-mean-square successive differences (rMSSD), the percentage of adjacent RR differences >50 ms (pNN50), and the SD of RR intervals (SDNN), and in the frequency domain by high-frequency (0.16 to 0.40 Hz) and low-frequency (0.04 to 0.15 Hz) power. Most patients were in New York Heart Association functional class III. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 27 +/- 7%, and heart failure was idiopathic or ischemic. After 2 months, the patients receiving bisoprolol had a reduced mean heart rate compared with that in placebo patients (p=0.0004). Bisoprolol increased 24-hour rMSSD (p=0.04) and 24-hour pNN50 (p=0.04), daytime SDNN (p=0.05), and daytime high-frequency power (p=0.03) power. Bisoprolol induced a significant increase in HRV parameters related to parasympathetic activity in heart failure. Increased vagal tone may contribute to the protective effect of beta blockers and may have prognostic implications.

Reproducibility and relation to mean heart rate of heart rate variability in normal subjects and in patients with congestive heart failure secondary to coronary artery disease.

Before heart rate (HR) variability can be used for predictive purposes in the clinical setting, day-to-day variation and reproducibility need to be defined as do relations to mean HR. HR variability and mean HR were therefore determined in 2 successive 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiograms obtained from 33 normal subjects (age 34 +/- 7 years, group I), and 22 patients with coronary disease and stable congestive heart failure (CHF) (age 59 +/- 7 years, group II). Three measures were used: (1) SDANN (standard deviation of all mean 5-minute normal sinus RR intervals in successive 5-minute recording periods over 24 hours); (2) SD (the mean of the standard deviation of all normal sinus RR intervals in successive 5-minute recording periods over 24 hours); and (3) CV (coefficient of variation of the SD measure), a new measure that compensates for HR effects. Group mean HR was higher and HR variability lower in group II than in group I (80 +/- 10 vs 74 +/- 9 beats/min, p less than 0.04). Mean group values for HR and HR variability showed good correlations between days 1 and 2 (mean RR, r = 0.89, 0.97; SDANN, r = 0.87, 0.87; SD, r = 0.93, 0.97; CV, r = 0.95, 0.97 in groups I and II, respectively). In contrast, considerable individual day-to-day variation occurred (group I, 0 to 46%; group II, 0 to 51%). Low HR variability values were more consistent than high values. SDANN and SD correlated moderately with HR in both groups (r = 0.50 to 0.64). The CV measure minimizes HR effects on HR variability.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Temporal relation of changes in regional coronary flow and myocardial lactate and nucleoside metabolism during pacing-induced ischemia.

The temporal relation between myocardial lactate and hypoxanthine metabolism and regional changes in krypton-81m perfusion during pacing-induced ischemia was studied in 17 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). During incremental atrial pacing, lactate production and hypoxanthine release occurred early and simultaneously, accompanied by ST-segment changes, but before angina and only few minutes after a significant (17%) reduction in krypton-81m perfusion in areas with more than 90% luminal diameter reduction. During maximal pacing heart rates, krypton-81m distribution decreased to 68 +/- 7% of control in areas with more than 90% diameter reduction and to 80 +/- 4% in 70 to 90% reduction (both p less than 0.05 vs control). Maximal lactate production occurred 15 seconds after pacing (extraction -15 +/- 7% vs 16 +/- 2% during control, p less than 0.05) and peak hypoxanthine release 1 minute after pacing (delta arteriovenous -2.64 +/- 0.8 microM vs 0.08 +/- 0.21 microM during control, p less than 0.05). Krypton-81m perfusion decreased in 20 of the 21 CAD areas. Angina, ST-segment changes, hemodynamic alterations and lactate production occurred in 15, 14, 9 and 15 patients, respectively. In contrast, hypoxanthine release was found in all cases. After pacing, lactate production and all general indexes of ischemia persisted for only 2 to 3 minutes. In contrast, krypton-81m perfusion was still significantly reduced 5 minutes after pacing and was only accompanied by hypoxanthine release (delta arteriovenous -1.41 +/- 0.6 microM, p less than 0.05 vs control).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acute anti-ischemic effects of perindoprilat in men with coronary artery disease and their relation with left ventricular function.

Long-term angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition may reduce ischemic events in patients with coronary artery disease, but whether it protects against acute ischemia or the effects of preexisting left ventricular (LV) dysfunction on potential anti-ischemic properties is unknown. We performed a double-blind trial in 25 patients with exercise-induced ischemia. The effects of perindoprilat on pacing-induced myocardial ischemia were examined. Fourteen patients received perindoprilat and 11 patients received placebo. Based on LV function, 2 subgroups were formed in the perindoprilat group: 7 patients with LV dysfunction (LV ejection fraction <0.40), and 7 patients with normal LV function. After receiving the study medication, the pacing test was repeated. During the first pacing test both groups developed ischemia. After perindoprilat administration, the increase in systemic vascular resistance and LV end-diastolic pressure were significantly blunted (p <0.05). Further, the ischemia-induced increase in arterial and cardiac uptake of norepinephrine was inhibited by perindoprilat, and the increase in atrial natriuretic peptide was less pronounced; also, ST-segment depression was reduced by 32% compared with placebo (all p <0.05). In the group with LV dysfunction, perindoprilat reduced LV end-diastolic pressure significantly by 67% and myocardial lactate production was prevented, but this did not happen in the group with normal LV function. In addition, the increase in arterial norepinephrine was reduced by 74% and 33%, respectively (p <0.05). These results indicate that perindoprilat reduced acute, pacing-induced ischemia in normotensive patients. In patients with (asymptomatic) LV dysfunction these effects were more pronounced than in patients with normal LV function.

Low vitamin B6 status in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

The vitamin B6 status of 84 patients with acute myocardial infarction was compared with that of 84 control subjects. Pyridoxal and pyridoxal 5'-phosphate (PLP) in plasma and erythrocytes, as well as the basal and total potential activity of the PLP-dependent enzyme aspartate aminotransferase in erythrocytes, were measured for a comprehensive assessment of vitamin B6 status. The mean levels of all vitamin B6 indexes (except pyridoxal) were lower in the patients than in the control subjects. The differences were statistically significant, except for erythrocyte PLP and total potential enzyme activity. The adjusted relative odds of a myocardial infarction for subjects in the lowest quartile of plasma PLP was about 5 times higher when compared with those in the highest quartile (relative odds = 5.2, 95% confidence interval = 1.4 to 18.9). Similar findings were found with the other vitamin B6 indexes. No significant association between infarct size, as estimated by creatine kinase level, and the vitamin B6 indexes was observed.