Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Trauma ; 69(3): 699-707, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20065878

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nonoperative fracture treatment has been used for millennia, but there has been no demographic study of its use for half a century. In the last 50 to 60 years, there has been an increased interest in operative fracture fixation and in many specialized Trauma hospitals nonoperative management is less frequently used. However, these specialized hospitals do not reflect fracture treatment in the whole community, and we have undertaken a study to investigate the current prevalence of nonoperative fracture treatment. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 7,863 consecutive fractures in a defined population was undertaken. The use of nonoperative management in different fractures was assessed as was the influence of fracture severity, mode of injury, multiple fractures and social deprivation in the choice of treatment. A comparison of current treatment with that of the 1940s and 1950s was undertaken. RESULTS: The prevalence of nonoperative treatment was 74.6% with 91.6% of children and 67.6% of adults being treated nonoperatively. There were significant differences in upper and lower limb fractures in both children and adults. The major determinant of nonoperative management was age, although the severity of fracture, mode of injury, and presence of multiple fractures were also important. Social deprivation was not a significant factor except in adult metacarpal fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Nonoperative treatment remains the most widely used method of fracture management. Its prevalence decreases with age, particularly in lower limb fractures. In children, there is a bimodal operative treatment distribution and an increasing prevalence of operative treatment. In some adult fractures, the prevalence of surgery is increasing, but in others, we operate no more frequently than in the 1950s, despite improved operative techniques.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Traumatismos del Brazo/epidemiología , Traumatismos del Brazo/terapia , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Fijación de Fractura/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Humanos , Traumatismos de la Pierna/epidemiología , Traumatismos de la Pierna/terapia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Traumatismo Múltiple/epidemiología , Traumatismo Múltiple/terapia , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Escocia/epidemiología
2.
Eur J Emerg Med ; 11(3): 154-7, 2004 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15167176

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the 'LEMON' method, devised by the developers of the US National Emergency Airway Management Course, is an easily applied airway assessment tool in patients undergoing treatment in the emergency department resuscitation room. METHODS: One hundred patients treated in the resuscitation room of a UK teaching hospital between June 2002 and January 2003 were assessed on criteria based on the 'LEMON' method. RESULTS: All seven criteria of the 'Look' section of the method could be adequately assessed. Data for the 'Evaluate' section could not be obtained in 10 patients, with inter-incisor distance being the most problematical item. The 'Mallampatti' score was unavailable in 43 patients, and had to be assessed in the supine position in 32 of the remaining 57 patients. Assessment for airway 'Obstruction' and 'Neck mobility' could be performed in all patients. CONCLUSION: The 'Look', 'Obstruction' and 'Neck mobility' components of the 'LEMON' method are the easiest to assess in patients undergoing treatment in the emergency department resuscitation room. The 'Evaluate' and 'Mallampatti' components are less easily applied to the population that present to the resuscitation room, and assessment of these is more problematical and prone to inaccuracy. We suggest that the 'LEMON' airway assessment method may not be easily applied in its entirety to unselected resuscitation room patients, and that information on the 'Evaluate' and 'Mallampatti' parameters may not always be available.


Asunto(s)
Obstrucción de las Vías Aéreas/diagnóstico , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Resucitación/métodos , Humanos , Boca/anatomía & histología , Cuello/fisiopatología , Faringe/anatomía & histología , Examen Físico/métodos , Postura , Estudios Prospectivos , Rango del Movimiento Articular
3.
Injury ; 41(8): 834-8, 2010 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20546743

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine the epidemiology of sports-related fractures in adolescents aged 10-19 years. METHODS: All fractures in adolescents presenting to the Royal Hospital for Sick Children and the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh in a one-year period were prospectively documented and all sports-related fractures retrospectively examined. These two hospitals have a defined population facilitating epidemiological studies. RESULTS: There were 408 adolescent sports-related fractures giving an overall incidence of 5.63/1000/year. The gender ratio was 87/13% male/female and 84% were upper limb fractures. Thirty sports produced 22 different fracture types. Football, rugby and skiing accounted for 66.2% of the fractures. The commonest fractures were in the finger phalanges (28.7%), distal radius and ulna (23.0%) and metacarpus (12.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Sport-related fractures are common in adolescents, particularly in males. They tend to be low-energy injuries affecting the upper limb in particular. Few require operative treatment although their frequency means that they impose significant demands on orthopaedic surgeons and health systems.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas/epidemiología , Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Curación de Fractura , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Ropa de Protección , Estudios Retrospectivos , Escocia/epidemiología , Distribución por Sexo , Adulto Joven
4.
Injury ; 38(8): 913-22, 2007 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17628559

RESUMEN

A retrospective study of all paediatric fractures presenting to hospital in Edinburgh, Scotland in 2000 was undertaken. It showed that the incidence of fractures was 20.2/1000/year and that 61% of children's fractures occurred in males. Analysis of paediatric fractures shows that there are six basic fracture distribution curves with six fractures showing a bimodal distribution but most having a unimodal distribution affecting younger or older children. The incidence of fractures increases with age with falls from below bed height (<1m) being the commonest cause of fracture. The majority of fractures in children involve the upper limb. Lower limb fractures are mainly caused by twisting injuries and road traffic accidents. The incidence of fractures in cyclists and pedestrians remains relatively high whereas the incidence in vehicle occupants is low suggesting that road safety programs have been successful. Similar programs should be instituted for young cyclists. The importance of accident prevention programmes in the home is also highlighted.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Accidentes por Caídas/estadística & datos numéricos , Accidentes de Tránsito/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Distribución por Edad , Traumatismos en Atletas/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Fracturas Óseas/clasificación , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Escocia/epidemiología , Distribución por Sexo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA