A pilot adaptive trial of text messages, mailed nicotine replacement therapy, and telephone coaching among primary care patients who smoke.

INTRODUCTION: Sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (SMART) inform the design of adaptive treatment interventions. We tested the feasibility of a SMART to deliver a stepped-care intervention among primary care patients who smoked daily. METHODS: In a 12-week pilot SMART (NCT04020718), we tested the feasibility of recruiting and retaining (>80 %) participants to an adaptive intervention starting with cessation text messages (SMS). The study randomly assigned participants (R1) to assessment of quit status, the tailoring variable, after either 4 or 8 weeks of SMS. The study offered continued SMS alone to those reporting abstinence. Those reporting smoking were randomized (R2) to SMS + mailed NRT or SMS + NRT + brief telephone coaching. RESULTS: During Jan-March and July-Aug 2020, we enrolled 35 patients (>18 years) from a primary care network in Massachusetts. Two (6 %) of 31 participants reported seven-day point prevalence abstinence at their tailoring variable assessment. The 29 participants who continued to smoke at 4 or 8 weeks were randomized (R2) to SMS + NRT (n = 16) or SMS + NRT + coaching (n = 13). Thirty of 35 participants (86 %) completed 12-weeks; 13 % (2/15) of those in 4-week group and 27 % (4/15) of those in 8-week group had CO < 6 ppm at 12-weeks (p = 0.65). Among 29 participants in R2, one was lost to follow-up, 19 % (3/16) of the SMS + NRT group had CO < 6 ppm vs. 17 % (2/12) of SMS + NRT + coaching (p = 1.00). Treatment satisfaction was high (93 %, 28 of 30 who completed 12-weeks). CONCLUSIONS: A SMART exploring a stepped-care adaptive intervention combining SMS, NRT, and coaching for primary care patients was feasible. Retention and satisfaction were high and quit rates were promising.

A qualitative analysis of nicotine replacement therapy uptake, consistent use, and persistence among primary care patients who smoke.

•Adherence can be broken into three processes: uptake, consistent use, and persistence.•Barriers and facilitators to NRT use vary over the three adherence processes.•Information gaps and negative stories about NRT are common barriers to adherence.•NRT adherence may be improved by addressing patient knowledge and concerns.

Impact of parental home smoking policies on policy choices of independently living young adults.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether adolescents living in parental homes where smoking is banned are more likely to move into smoke-free living quarters when they leave home. METHODS: We analysed data on 693 youths from a 4-year, three-wave prospective study of a representative sample of Massachusetts adolescents (aged 12-17). All youths resided in independent living quarters at follow-up. The primary outcome was presence of a smoking ban in the living quarters at follow-up. The primary predictor was presence of a household smoking ban in the parental home, assessed 2 years before the outcome. Generalised linear mixed effects models examined the effect of a parental household smoking ban on the odds of moving into smoke-free living quarters at follow-up overall and stratified by smoking status at follow-up. RESULTS: Youths leaving home had much higher odds of moving to smoke-free living quarters if their parental household had had a smoking ban (odds ratio (OR) = 12.70, 95% CI, 6.19 to 26.04). Other independent predictors included moving into a school or college residence (OR = 3.88, 95% CI 1.87 to 8.05), and not living with smokers at follow-up (OR = 3.91, 95% CI 1.93 to 7.92). CONCLUSIONS: A household smoking ban in the parental home appears to lead youths to prefer smoke-free living quarters once they leave home.

Proactive text messaging (GetReady2Quit) and nicotine replacement therapy to promote smoking cessation among smokers in primary care: A pilot randomized trial protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Most smokers see a physician each year, but few use any assistance when they try to quit. Text messaging programs improve smoking cessation in community and school settings; however, their efficacy in a primary care setting is unclear. The current trial assesses the feasibility and preliminary clinical outcomes of text messaging and mailed nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) among smokers in primary care. METHODS: In this single-center pilot randomized trial, eligible smokers in primary care are offered brief advice by phone and randomly assigned to one of four interventions: (1) Brief advice only, (2) text messages targeted to primary care patients and tailored to quit readiness, (3) a 2-week supply of nicotine patches and/or lozenges (NRT), and (4) both text messaging and NRT. Randomization is stratified by practice and intention to quit. The text messages (up to 5/day) encourage those not ready to quit to practice a quit attempt, assist those with a quit date through a quit attempt, and promote NRT use. The 2-week supply of NRT is mailed to patients' homes. RESULTS: Feasibility outcomes include recruitment rates, study retention, and treatment adherence. Clinical outcomes are assessed at 1, 2, 6, and 12-weeks post-enrollment. The primary outcome is ≥1self-reported quit attempt(s). Secondary clinical outcomes include self-reported past 7- and 30-day abstinence, days not smoked, NRT adherence, and exhaled carbon monoxide. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot assesses text messaging plus NRT, as a proactively offered intervention for smoking cessation support in smokers receiving primary care and will inform full-scale randomized trial planning. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT03174158.

Integration of tobacco cessation and tuberculosis management by NGOs in urban India: a mixed-methods study.

Setting and objectives: Tobacco use compromises tuberculosis (TB) treatment outcomes. Tobacco cessation is beneficial to TB patients at the individual level and from the perspective of a larger spectrum of non-communicable diseases associated with tobacco use. We assessed feasibility, effectiveness and provider perceptions on integrating brief tobacco cessation advice into routine TB care by DOTS providers from 27 TB treatment centres run by three non-governmental organisations (NGOs) in urban India. Design: A mixed-methods study (triangulation design) involving analysis of programme data and semi-structured interviews (quantitative) and thematic analysis of focus group discussions of TB treatment providers (qualitative) regarding brief advice and cessation support provided to self-reported tobacco users from August 2015 to July 2017. Results: All 27 centres initiated tobacco cessation. Of 2132 registered TB patients, 377 (18%) were tobacco users, 333 (88%) of whom used smokeless tobacco. There was a progressive drop in documentation of tobacco status at each visit, reaching respectively 36% and 30% at the end of treatment for new and retreatment TB patients. Seven-day point prevalence abstinence at 6 months was 32% among new and 15% among retreatment cases. Enablers for integration included NGO collaboration, supervision and capacity building. Challenges included providers spending 15-45 min per patient (10 min recommended), multiple addictions, documentation load, self-reporting and social normalisation of tobacco. Conclusions: Integration of tobacco cessation into routine TB care in an urban NGO setting was feasible, although without continued support, rigour in documentation declined. This should be scaled up with special attention paid to tackling smokeless tobacco and related operational challenges.

Contexte : La consommation de tabac compromet les résultats du traitement de la tuberculose (TB). L'arrêt du tabac est bénéfique aux patients TB au niveau individuel et dans la perspective plus large des maladies non transmissibles associées à la consommation de tabac.Objectif : Evaluer la faisabilité, l'efficacité et les perceptions des prestataires de soins concernant l'intégration d'un bref conseil relatif à l'arrêt du tabac dans la prise en charge de routine de la TB par les prestataires de DOTS de 27 centres de traitement de la TB gérés par trois organisations non gouvernementales (ONG) dans des zones urbaines d'Inde.Schéma : Une étude à méthodes mixtes (schéma de triangulation) impliquant l'analyse de données de programme et des entretiens semi structurés (quantitatifs) et une analyse thématique des discussions en groupe focal de prestataires de traitement de TB (qualitatifs) relatifs à un conseil bref et à un soutien à l'arrêt du tabac offert aux fumeurs auto déclarés d'août 2015 à juillet 2017.Résultats : Les 27 centres ont mis en route l'arrêt du tabac. Sur 2132 patients TB enregistrés, 377 (18%) étaient des fumeurs, dont 333 (88%) recouraient à du tabac sans fumée. Il y a eu une diminution progressive de la documentation de la consommation de tabac lors de chaque consultation, atteignant 36% et 30% en fin de traitement pour les patients nouveaux et ceux en retraitement, respectivement. La prévalence ponctuelle de 7 jours d'abstinence à 6 mois a été de 32% parmi les nouveaux patients et de 15% parmi les cas en retraitement. Les facteurs favorables à cette intégration ont inclus la collaboration, la supervision et le renforcement des capacités des ONG. Les défis ont inclus les 15­45 min passées par les prestataires de soins auprès de chaque patient (10 min étaient recommandées), les addictions multiples, la charge administrative, l'auto déclaration et la normalisation sociale du tabac.Conclusion : L'intégration de l'arrêt du tabac dans la prise en charge de routine de la TB dans un contexte d'ONG urbaine s'est avérée faisable, mais sans un soutien continu, la rigueur de la documentation a diminué. Cette stratégie devrait être étendue en portant une attention particulière vis-à-vis du tabac sans fumée et des défis opérationnels.

Marco de referencia y objetivos: El consumo de tabaco pone en peligro el desenlace del tratamiento de la tuberculosis (TB). El abandono del tabaco es útil para los pacientes con TB desde el punto de vista individual y desde la perspectiva más amplia de las enfermedades no transmisibles que se asocian con el tabaquismo. En el presente estudio se evaluó la factibilidad, la eficacia y las percepciones de los proveedores de atención de salud con respecto a la integración de un asesoramiento breve sobre el abandono del tabaco en la atención corriente de la TB, practicado por quienes proveen el DOTS en 27 centros de tratamiento de la tuberculosis de tres organizaciones no gubernamentales (ONG) en una zona urbana de la India.Métodos: Fue este un estudio de métodos mixtos (técnica de triangulación) que comportó un análisis de los datos del programa y entrevistas semiestructuradas (evaluación cuantitativa) y análisis temáticos en sesiones de grupos de opinión con los proveedores de tratamiento antituberculoso (evaluación cualitativa), sobre el asesoramiento breve y el apoyo al abandono del tabaquismo dirigidos a los pacientes que comunicaban su consumo de tabaco; el estudio tuvo lugar de agosto del 2015 a julio del 2017.Resultados: Los 27 centros iniciaron el apoyo al abandono del tabaquismo. De los 2132 pacientes con TB registrados, 377 (18%) eran consumidores de tabaco y de ellos 333 (88%) utilizaban el tabaco sin humo. Se observó una disminución progresiva de la verificación del tabaquismo en cada consulta y al final del tratamiento, solo se practicaba en un 36% de los casos nuevos y un 30% de los pacientes en retratamiento. La prevalencia puntual de abstinencia durante 7 días a los 6 meses fue 32% en los casos nuevos y 15% en los casos de retratamiento. Entre los factores mencionados como facilitadores de la integración se destacaron la colaboración con una ONG, la supervisión y el mejoramiento de la capacidad. Las dificultades a la integración consistieron en que cada proveedor debe utilizar 15­45 min por paciente (10 min recomendados), las adicciones múltiples, la carga que representa verificar el tabaquismo, la validación del abandono autonotificado y la normalización social del consumo de tabaco.Conclusiones: Se demostró que es factible integrar el apoyo al abandono del tabaco en la atención corriente de la TB en un centro urbano administrado por una ONG; no obstante, sin un apoyo continuo disminuye el rigor en la documentación del consumo. Se recomienda ampliar la escala de aplicación de estas iniciativas, con una atención especial en el tabaco sin humo y las dificultades operativas.

Interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients.

BACKGROUND: An admission to hospital provides an opportunity to help people stop smoking. Individuals may be more open to help at a time of perceived vulnerability, and may find it easier to quit in an environment where smoking is restricted or prohibited. Initiating smoking cessation services during hospitalisation may help more people to make and sustain a quit attempt. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of interventions for smoking cessation that are initiated for hospitalised patients. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group register which includes papers identified from CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PSYCINFO in January 2007, and CINAHL in August 2006 for studies of interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients, using terms including (hospital and patient*) or hospitali* or inpatient* or admission* or admitted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and quasi-randomized trials of behavioural, pharmacological or multicomponent interventions to help patients stop smoking, conducted with hospitalised patients who were current smokers or recent quitters (defined as having quit more than one month before hospital admission). The intervention had to start in the hospital but could continue after hospital discharge. We excluded studies of patients admitted for psychiatric disorders or substance abuse, studies that did not report abstinence rates and studies with follow up of less than six months. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors extracted data independently for each paper, with disagreements resolved by consensus. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-three trials met the inclusion criteria. Intensive counselling interventions that began during the hospital stay and continued with supportive contacts for at least one month after discharge increased smoking cessation rates after discharge (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.44 to 1.90; 17 trials). No statistically significant benefit was found for less intensive counselling interventions. The one study that tested a single brief (<=15 minutes) in-hospital intervention did not find it to be effective (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.67). Counselling of longer duration during the hospital stay was not associated with a higher quit rate (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.29, eight trials). Even counselling that began in the hospital but had less than one month of supportive contact after discharge did not show significant benefit (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.31, six trials). Adding nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) did not produce a statistically significant increase in cessation over what was achieved by intensive counselling alone (OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.35, five studies). The one study that tested the effect of adding bupropion to intensive counselling had a similar nonsignificant effect (OR 1.56, 95% CI 0.79 to 3.06). A similar pattern of results was observed in smokers admitted to hospital because of cardiovascular disease (CVD). In this subgroup, intensive intervention with follow-up support increased the odds of smoking cessation (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.54 to 2.15, 11 trials), but less intensive interventions did not. One trial of intensive intervention including counselling and pharmacotherapy for smokers admitted with CVD assessed clinical and health care utilization endpoints, and found significant reductions in all-cause mortality and hospital readmission rates over a two-year follow-up period. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: High intensity behavioural interventions that begin during a hospital stay and include at least one month of supportive contact after discharge promote smoking cessation among hospitalised patients. These interventions are effective regardless of the patient's admitting diagnosis. lnterventions of lower intensity or shorter duration have not been shown to be effective in this setting. There is insufficient direct evidence to conclude that adding NRT or bupropion to intensive counselling increases cessation rates over what is achieved by counselling alone, but the evidence of benefit for NRT has strengthened in this update and the point estimates are compatible with research in other settings showing that NRT and bupropion are effective.

Rates of U.S. physicians counseling adolescents about smoking.

BACKGROUND: The health care system provides an important opportunity for addressing tobacco use among youths, but there is little information about how frequently physicians discuss smoking with their adolescent patients. We analyzed data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys to assess the prevalence and the predictors of physicians' identification of smoking status and counseling about smoking at office visits by adolescents. METHODS: From 1991 through 1996, 5087 physicians recorded data on 16 648 visits by adolescents aged 11-21 years. We determined the proportion of office visits at which physicians identified an adolescent's smoking status and counseled about smoking and then identified predictors of these outcomes with logistic regression. Statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: In 1991, physicians identified an adolescent's smoking status at 72.4% of visits but provided smoking counseling at only 1.6% of all adolescent visits and 16.9% of visits by adolescents identified as smokers. These proportions did not increase from 1991 through 1996. Compared with specialists, primary care physicians were more likely to identify smoking status (odds ratio [OR] = 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.53-1.89) and to counsel about smoking (OR = 3.43; 95% CI = 2.18-5.38). Patients with diagnoses of conditions potentially complicated by smoking were more likely to have their smoking status identified and to be counseled about smoking. Younger and nonwhite adolescents were less likely to be counseled about smoking than older and white teens. CONCLUSIONS: We found that physicians frequently identified adolescents' smoking status but rarely counseled them about smoking. Physicians' practices did not improve in the first half of the 1990s, despite a clear consensus about the importance of this activity and the publication of physician guidelines targeting this population. Physicians treating adolescents are missing opportunities to discourage tobacco use among teens.

Effect of local restaurant smoking regulations on progression to established smoking among youths.

BACKGROUND: While smoke-free restaurant laws are intended to protect the public from secondhand smoke exposure, they may also discourage smoking among adolescents. There is no evidence from longitudinal studies to test this hypothesis. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of local restaurant smoking regulations on progression to established smoking among adolescents. DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS: A cohort of 2623 Massachusetts youths, ages 12-17 years at baseline, was interviewed via random digit dial telephone survey in 2001-2002 and followed up two years later. A generalised estimating equations (GEE) logistic regression analysis was used and controlled for potential individual, household, and town level confounding factors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Progression to established smoking during the two year follow up period (defined as having smoked 100 or more cigarettes in one's life). RESULTS: Compared to youths living in towns with weak regulations, those living in towns with strong regulations (complete restaurant smoking bans) had less than half the odds of progression to established smoking (odds ratio (OR) 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24 to 0.66). The association was stronger for youths in towns with strong regulations in effect for two or more years (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.37), although it was still present for those in towns with strong regulations in effect for less than two years (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.90). No relationship was found between living in a town with a medium restaurant smoking regulation (restriction of smoking to enclosed, separately ventilated areas) and rates of progression to established smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Local restaurant smoking bans may be an effective intervention to prevent youth smoking.

Relationship between smoking and weight control efforts among adults in the united states.

BACKGROUND: The effect of weight control concerns on smoking among adults is unclear. We examined the association between smoking behavior and weight control efforts among US adults. METHODS: A total of 17 317 adults responded to the Year 2000 Supplement of the 1995 National Health Interview Survey (83% combined response rate). Respondents provided sociodemographic and health information, including their smoking history and whether they were trying to lose weight, maintain weight, or gain weight. RESULTS: Rates of smoking were lower among adults who were trying to lose or maintain weight than among those not trying to control weight (25% vs 31%; P<.001). After adjustment for sex, race, education, income, marital status, region of the country, and body mass index, the relationship between trying to lose weight and current smoking varied according to age. Among adults younger than 30 years, those trying to lose weight were more likely to smoke currently (odds ratio, 1.36 [95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.70]), whereas older adults trying to lose weight were as likely or less likely to smoke compared with adults not trying to control weight. After adjustment, smokers of all ages who were trying to lose weight were more likely to express a desire to quit smoking. Results were similar after stratification by sex and body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: Adults younger than 30 years are more likely to smoke if they are trying to lose weight. However, smokers of all ages who are trying to lose weight are more likely to want to stop smoking. Patients' weight control efforts should not discourage clinicians from counseling about smoking cessation. Education about smoking and healthy weight control methods should target young adults.

Efficacy of a smoking cessation program for hospital patients.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalization may be an opportune time to change smoking behavior because it requires smokers to abstain from tobacco at the same time that illness can motivate them to quit. A hospital-based intervention may promote smoking cessation after discharge. METHODS: We tested the efficacy of a brief bedside smoking counseling program in a randomized controlled trial at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. The 650 adult smokers admitted to the medical and surgical services were randomly assigned to receive usual care or a hospital-based smoking intervention consisting of (1) a 15-minute bedside counseling session, (2) written self-help material, (3) a chart prompt reminding physicians to advise smoking cessation, and (4) up to 3 weekly counseling telephone calls after discharge. Smoking status was assessed 1 and 6 months after hospital discharge by self-report and validated at 6 months by measurement of saliva cotinine levels. RESULTS: One month after discharge, more intervention than control patients were not smoking (28.9% vs 18.9%; P=.003). The effect persisted after multiple logistic regression analyses adjusted for baseline group differences, length of stay, postdischarge smoking treatment, and hospital readmission (adjusted odds ratio, 2.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-3.57). At 6 months, the intervention and control groups did not differ in smoking cessation rate by self-report (17.3% vs 14.0%; P=.26) or biochemical validation (8.1% vs 8.7%; P=.72), although the program appeared to be effective among the 167 patients who had not previously tried to quit smoking (15.3% vs 3.7%; P=.01). CONCLUSIONS: A low-intensity, hospital-based smoking cessation program increased smoking cessation rates for 1 month after discharge but did not lead to long-term tobacco abstinence. A longer period of telephone contact after discharge might build on this initial success to produce permanent smoking cessation among hospitalized smokers.

Frequency of bulimic behaviors and associated social maladjustment in female graduate students.

A questionnaire survey of 550 female medical, business and law students revealed that 12% met criteria for bulimia. The bulimic students reported significantly more social maladjustment than their non-eating disordered peers. Frequency of binging and purging was associated with the degree of social impairment, with significant social dysfunction being noted on the overall scale at a minimum binging/purging frequency of once weekly. This finding suggests that the proposed DSM-III frequency criterion may be too restrictive.

Cigarette use by college students in smoke-free housing: results of a national study.

BACKGROUND: Cigarette-smoking rates have increased in recent years among college students. Smoke-free residences offer a possible means of reducing or preventing smoking. However, their use has as yet not been evaluated. This paper examines whether students residing in smoke-free residences are less likely to smoke cigarettes than students in other campus residences, and if such lower rates apply to all types of students and colleges. METHODS: The Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study surveyed a nationally representative sample of college students at 128 U.S. 4-year colleges regarding tobacco use and related behaviors in the spring of 1999. The responses of students living in smoke-free and unrestricted residences at 101 campuses were compared. RESULTS: Current smoking prevalence was significantly lower among residents of smoke-free housing (21.0%) as compared with residents of unrestricted housing (30.6%, p<0.0001). The lower rate of current cigarette use was consistent with all types of student and college characteristics with few exceptions. Current cigarette use was significantly lower for those living in smoke-free housing than for residents of unrestricted housing among students who were not regular smokers before age 19 (10% vs 16.9%, p<0.0001), but not among students who smoked regularly before age 19. CONCLUSIONS: Smoke-free residences may help protect those students who were not regular smokers in high school from smoking in college. However, the difference in smoking rates may be due to self-selection of students into smoke-free residences. Since smoke-free options also protect students from second-hand smoke and dormitory fires, colleges should provide these types of residences for all students who request them, and should also encourage others to choose them.

Child hospitalization: an opportunity for parental smoking intervention.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalization with tobacco-related illness increases smokers' interest in cessation. Because parental smoking increases the child's risk of developing respiratory and other illnesses, a child's hospitalization might motivate a smoking parent to consider changing smoking behavior. It is unclear if parents would be receptive to smoking-cessation interventions at the time when their child is hospitalized. METHODS: In March 1999, parents of 298 consecutive children admitted to the medical services at Children's Hospital Boston were interviewed to determine the smoking status of household members. Smoking parents were invited to complete a 35-item questionnaire regarding personal smoking history and acceptability of three types of cessation interventions. RESULTS: Sixty-five smoking parents were identified among the 298 admissions; 62 of 65 (95%) participated in the survey. Among respondents, only 15% had ever participated in any smoking-cessation program, and only 31% had ever used a medication to try to quit. Although 78% of parents were willing to speak with a counselor about their smoking while their child was in the hospital, and 74% would enroll in a telephone-based smoking-cessation program, only 26% were interested in a free program requiring travel back to the hospital. All parents believed that pediatricians should offer parental smokers the chance to participate in a smoking-cessation program. CONCLUSIONS: At the time of a child's hospitalization, parents are willing to enroll in smoking interventions that include in-hospital and telephone counseling but not to travel back to the hospital. A child's hospitalization may provide a unique opportunity to enroll parents who smoke into cessation programs.

The use of nicotine-replacement therapy by hospitalized smokers.

BACKGROUND: No-smoking policies are mandatory in U.S. hospitals. Consequently, smokers who are hospitalized must temporarily stop smoking. Nicotine-replacement therapy (NRT) could help hospitalized smokers relieve nicotine withdrawal symptoms, comply with no-smoking policies, and sustain tobacco abstinence after discharge. The extent of NRT use in the hospital setting is unknown. We describe the prevalence and patterns of NRT use in hospitalized smokers. DESIGN: Prospective observational study within a randomized smoking-intervention trial. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred fifty adult smokers admitted to the medical and surgical services of a large urban teaching hospital that prohibits smoking in all indoor areas. Follow-up was at 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Inpatient pharmacy records of nicotine patch or gum use. RESULTS: Only 34 of 650 smokers (5.2%) received NRT during their hospital stay, including only 9.6% of smokers who reported difficulty refraining from smoking while hospitalized and 9.0% of hospitalized smokers with nicotine withdrawal. NRT was more likely to be prescribed to patients with nicotine withdrawal (OR 2.23; 95% CI: 1.01, 4.90), a higher daily cigarette consumption (OR 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.06), and a longer hospitalization (OR 1.05; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.10). NRT use was independent of a patient's intention to quit smoking after discharge and was not associated with smoking cessation 1 and 6 months after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: NRT was rarely used in this hospital, even among those who could have benefited from it to treat nicotine-withdrawal symptoms. When NRT was used, relief of nicotine withdrawal, rather than assistance with smoking cessation, appeared to be the primary goal. Greater use of NRT could benefit the estimated 6.5 million smokers who are hospitalized annually by reducing nicotine withdrawal, encouraging smoking cessation, and ensuring compliance with hospital no-smoking policies.

Public policy for the control of tobacco-related disease.

Public policies concerning tobacco shape the environment of the smoker and nonsmoker alike. These policies use diverse means to achieve the common goal of reducing tobacco use and its attendant health consequences. Educational interventions such as warning labels, school curricula, and public service announcements serve to inform the public about the hazards of tobacco smoke. These are countered by the pervasive marketing of tobacco products by the tobacco industry, despite a ban on tobacco advertising on radio and television. Further restrictions on tobacco advertising and promotion have been proposed and await action. Cigarette excise taxes and smoker-nonsmoker insurance premium differentials discourage smoking by making it more costly to purchase cigarettes. Conversely, health insurance reimbursement for smoking cessation programs could reduce the cost of giving up the habit and might encourage cessation. Restricting or banning smoking in public places and workplaces decreases a smoker's opportunities to smoke, further inhibiting this behavior. Reducing the availability of cigarettes to children and adolescents may help to prevent them from starting to smoke. The environment of the smoker is conditioned by this pastiche of influences. Physicians who become involved in tobacco-control issues have the opportunity to alter the environmental influences on their patients. This is likely to be synergistic with physicians' efforts inside the office to encourage individual smokers to quit. As a first step toward advocacy outside the office, physicians can help to create a smoke-free health-care facility in their own institution. Beyond that, advocacy groups or the voluntary health organizations (e.g., American Lung Association) provide avenues for physicians to take a stand on community issues relevant to tobacco control. Physicians who take these steps to alter the environment of smokers beyond the office are likely to magnify the effect of their work with individual patients who smoke.

Cigarette smoking and coronary heart disease: risks and management.

Tobacco smoking is the leading preventable cause of death in the United States and an important cause of CHD. The effect of smoking on the cardiovascular system and coronary risk factors is pervasive. Unfavorable effects include acute increases in blood pressure and coronary vascular resistance, reduction in oxygen delivery, enhancement of platelet aggregation, increased fibrinogen, and depression of HDL cholesterol. Smoking cessation reduces cardiovascular morbidity and mortality rates relatively rapidly, even among individuals who stop smoking only after the age of 65 or after developing the clinical manifestations of CHD including myocardial infarction. Behavioral smoking-cessation programs and nicotine-replacement therapy each have been demonstrated to be effective for the treatment of smoking. The most effective treatment currently available is to combine the two. Nicotine-replacement therapy is safe and effective in patients with stable coronary heart disease. Although the threat or diagnosis of CHD is a powerful stimulus to spontaneous smoking cessation, many smokers continue to smoke after events such as myocardial infarction or CABG surgery. Studies have demonstrated that physician advice to stop smoking, supplemented by brief counseling by a nurse and follow-up, dramatically increases the smoking-cessation rate of patients hospitalized with myocardial infarction and is highly cost effective. In the outpatient setting, physician advice and counseling is also effective in helping smokers with or without CHD to stop smoking. This article outlines a simple protocol that has been demonstrated to be effective for counseling smokers.

Students' opinion of tobacco control policies recommended for US colleges: a national survey.

OBJECTIVE: Comprehensive tobacco control policies for US colleges and universities have been proposed by several groups in order to counter the rising use of tobacco by students enrolled in these institutions. Student opinion of these policies is not known, and concern about student opposition is one barrier that deters administrators from adopting the policies. This study measured student support for recommended college tobacco control policies. DESIGN: Mailed survey of US college students (2001 Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study). SETTING: 119 nationally representative, four-year colleges and universities in the USA. PARTICIPANTS: 10,904 randomly selected undergraduate students enrolled at participating schools. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Students' opinion of 7 proposed tobacco control policies. RESULTS: A majority of students supported each policy. Over three quarters of students favoured smoke-free policies for all college buildings, residences, and dining areas, while 71% supported prohibiting tobacco advertising and sponsorship of campus social events, 59% favoured prohibiting tobacco sales on campus, and 51% supported smoke-free campus bars. All policies had more support among non-smokers than smokers (p < 0.001). Among smokers, support for policies was inversely related to intention to quit and intensity of tobacco consumption. Because college students' tobacco consumption is low, a majority of smokers favoured banning smoking in college buildings and dining areas and prohibiting tobacco marketing on campus. CONCLUSIONS: Student support for proposed campus tobacco control policies is strong, even among smokers, and broadly based across demographic subgroups. These findings should provide reassurance to college administrators who are considering adopting these policies.

Relation between local restaurant smoking regulations and attitudes towards the prevalence and social acceptability of smoking: a study of youths and adults who eat out predominantly at restaurants in their town.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation between strength of local restaurant smoking regulations and smoking related social norms among youths and adults. DESIGN: We used generalised estimating equations logistic regression analysis to examine the relation between regulation strength and youths' and adults' perceptions of adult smoking prevalence and the social acceptability of smoking in their town, while controlling for baseline anti-smoking sentiment in the town. SETTING: Each of the 351 Massachusetts towns were classified as having strong (complete smoking ban), medium (restriction of smoking to enclosed, separately ventilated areas), or weak (all others) restaurant smoking regulations. SUBJECTS: 1147 Massachusetts youths ages 12-17 years and 2116 adults who reported that they often or always eat out in their own town, drawn from a random digit dial survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perceived adult smoking prevalence and perceived social acceptability of smoking in restaurants, in bars, or in general. RESULTS: Compared to youths from towns with weak regulations, youths from towns with strong regulations were more likely to perceive lower adult smoking prevalence (odds ratio (OR) 1.71; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02 to 2.84) and social unacceptability of adult smoking (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.29 to 3.08) in their town. Adults from towns with strong regulations were not more likely to perceive lower adult smoking prevalence, but had more than twice the odds of perceiving that smoking was unacceptable in restaurants (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.58 to 3.02) or bars (OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.90 to 3.31). CONCLUSIONS: Strong local restaurant smoking regulations are associated with favourable smoking related social norms among youths and adults.

Interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients.

BACKGROUND: An admission to hospital provides an opportunity to help people stop smoking. Individuals may be more open to help at a time of perceived vulnerability, and may find it easier to quit in an environment where smoking is restricted or prohibited. Providing smoking cessation services during hospitalisation may help more people to attempt and sustain a quit attempt. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group register, CINAHL and the Smoking and Health database in March 2002 for studies of interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients, using terms including (hospital and patient*) or hospitali* or inpatient* or admission* or admitted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of behavioural, pharmacological or multicomponent interventions to help patients stop smoking conducted with hospitalised patients who were current smokers or recent quitters. We excluded studies of patients admitted for psychiatric disorders or substance abuse, those that did not report abstinence rates and those with follow-up of less than six months. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors extracted data independently for each paper, with disagreements resolved by consensus. MAIN RESULTS: Seventeen trials met the inclusion criteria. Intensive intervention (inpatient contact plus follow-up for at least one month) was associated with a significantly higher quit rate compared to control (Peto Odds Ratio 1.82, 95% CI 1.49-2.22, six trials). Interventions with less than a month of follow-up did not show evidence of significant benefit (Peto Odds Ratio 1.09, 95% CI 0.91-1.31, seven trials). There was no evidence to judge the effect of very brief (<20 minutes) interventions delivered only during the hospital stay. Longer interventions delivered only during the hospital stay were not significantly associated with a higher quit rate (Peto Odds Ratio 1.07, 95% CI 0.79-1.44, three trials). Although the interventions increased quit rates irrespective of whether nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) was used, the results for NRT were compatible with other data indicating that it increases quit rates. There was no strong evidence that clinical diagnosis affected the likelihood of quitting. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: High intensity behavioural interventions that include at least one month of follow-up contact are effective in promoting smoking cessation in hospitalised patients. The findings of the review were compatible with research in other settings showing that NRT increases quit rates.