Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 71
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 54(6): 402-411, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38343206

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials showed the efficacy of 300 mg/4 weeks of omalizumab (OMA) during 6 months in patients with severe chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Nevertheless, in real life, many patients require higher doses and/or longer treatment. This study assesses the real-life performance of OMA in severe CSU and identifies factors associated with the response. METHODS: CSU patients eligible for OMA were recruited prospectively. Clinical data and a blood test were collected before OMA initiation. Urticaria Activity Score 7 (UAS7) was calculated at baseline and every 3 months during OMA treatment. CSU control was defined as UAS7 <7 points. This work was partially sponsored by OMA manufacturer. RESULTS: Eighty-nine adults (19.1% males) with severe CSU were recruited. Median duration of CSU prior to OMA initiation was 2 years, and median severity by UAS7 at baseline was 24 points (range 10-42 points). OMA controlled 94.4% of patients, but 17.9% of responders required doses >300 mg/4 weeks. A blood basophil count >20 cells/µL (OR 13.33; 95% CI 3.32-52.63; p < .001) and the absence of hypothyroidism (OR 3.65; 95% CI 0.78-16.95; p = .099) were identified as predictive factors to achieve control with 300 mg/4 weeks. Twelve patients were able to stop OMA during the study (responders in remission, RR). RR had received OMA for a median of 29 months (12-53 months). Conversely, 32 patients had been on OMA for >29 months at the end of the study (active responders, AR). AR had received OMA for a median of 45 months (30-100 months). There were no significant differences in clinical or analytical factors between RR and AR patients. CONCLUSIONS: Low blood basophil count and the presence of hypothyroidism might serve as biomarkers for the controller dose of OMA in severe CSU patients.


Asunto(s)
Antialérgicos , Biomarcadores , Urticaria Crónica , Omalizumab , Humanos , Omalizumab/administración & dosificación , Omalizumab/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Urticaria Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Urticaria Crónica/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Biomarcadores/sangre , Antialérgicos/administración & dosificación , Antialérgicos/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto Joven , Estudios Prospectivos , Basófilos/inmunología
2.
Allergy ; 78(7): 1794-1809, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37002709

RESUMEN

Atopy has been long used as the screening method for airway allergy. Nevertheless, aeroallergens can trigger respiratory symptoms not only in atopic patients (atopic respiratory allergy, ARA), but also in non-atopic subjects (local respiratory allergy, LRA). Moreover, ARA and LRA can coexist in the same patient, and this clinical scenario has been called dual respiratory allergy (DRA). When the clinical history cannot determine the relevance of sensitizations in ARA patients, nasal, conjunctival or bronchial allergen challenges (NAC, CAC, and BAC, respectively) should be conducted. Moreover, these tests are required to identify patients with LRA and DRA. The clarification of the allergic triggers of airway diseases has a profound impact on the management strategies the patients can be offered. Importantly, allergen immunotherapy (AIT) remains as the only disease-modifying intervention for ARA. Recent data indicate that AIT might have a similar effect on LRA patients. Nevertheless, AIT success relies largely on the correct phenotyping of allergic individuals, and NAC, CAC, and BAC are very helpful tools in this regard. In this review, we will summarize the main indications and methodology of CAC, NAC, and BAC. Importantly, the clinical implementation of these tests might translate into precision medicine approaches and better health outcomes for patients with airway allergy.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad Inmediata , Hipersensibilidad , Humanos , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad/terapia , Hipersensibilidad/etiología , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/etiología
3.
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol ; 54(6): 277-283, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34313088

RESUMEN

Summary: Objective. The association of allergic conjunctivitis (AC) with rhinitis and/or asthma is poorly understood. The objective of this study was to apply the Consensus Document for Allergic Conjunctivitis (DECA) criteria for the classification of AC to a population of patients with AC to assess the association between the severity and duration of AC and rhinitis and/or asthma. Methods. Patients with ocular symptoms of AC who participated in the 'Alergológica 2015' study were included. The demographics, classification according to the DECA criteria, etiology, and comorbidities were evaluated by age groups (less or equal than 14 and greater than 14 years). Results. A total of 2,914 patients (age range, 1-90 years) were included in the "Alergológica 2015" study. Of these, 965 patients (33.1%) were diagnosed with AC (77.5% > 14 years). AC was classified as severe, moderate, or mild in 1.8%, 46.4%, and 51.8%, respectively; and as intermittent or persistent in 51.6% and 48.4% of the patients. AC alone occurred in 4% of patients. AC was mainly associated with rhinitis (88.4%), asthma (38.2%), food allergy (8.3%) and atopic dermatitis (3.5%). In allergic respiratory disease rhinitis preceded AC and asthma developed later. The severity and duration of AC was significantly associated with severity and duration of rhinitis (p less than 0.001 for both age groups) and asthma (p less than 0.001 only in adults). Conclusions. The application of the new DECA classification for AC reveals a direct relationship between AC, rhinitis and asthma respect to severity and duration. These relationships suggest that AC should be considered an integral part of the "one airway, one disease" hypothesis.


Asunto(s)
Asma , Conjuntivitis Alérgica , Dermatitis Atópica , Rinitis Alérgica , Rinitis , Adulto , Humanos , Lactante , Preescolar , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Conjuntivitis Alérgica/diagnóstico , Conjuntivitis Alérgica/epidemiología , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/epidemiología , Rinitis Alérgica/epidemiología , Dermatitis Atópica/epidemiología
4.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep ; 20(7): 23, 2020 05 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32430550

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIESW: Local respiratory allergy (LRA) is an eosinophilic phenotype of chronic airway disease. Three entities have been described within the LRA spectrum: local allergic rhinitis (LAR) and local allergic asthma (LAA) in non-atopic patients, and dual allergic rhinitis (DAR) in atopic patients (coexistence of LAR and allergic rhinitis). In this article, we aim to review the current evidence on the therapeutic options for LRA. RECENT FINDINGS: No controlled study has assessed the effect of standard therapy (oral antihistamines, intranasal or inhaled corticosteroids, bronchodilators) in LRA subjects. Three randomized clinical trials and one observational study demonstrated that allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is able to control nasal and ocular symptoms, decrease the need for rescue medication, and improve quality of life in LAR individuals. Nasal or inhaled steroids can be expected to improve eosinophilic inflammation in LRA patients but cannot change the natural course of the disease. Moreover, the long-term and disease-modifying effects of AIT in LRA subjects need to be investigated.


Asunto(s)
Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Rinitis Alérgica/terapia , Humanos , Rinitis Alérgica/inmunología
5.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 49(1): 6-16, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29900607

RESUMEN

A significant proportion of rhinitis patients without systemic IgE-sensitisation tested by skin prick test and serum allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) display nasal reactivity upon nasal allergen provocation test (NAPT). This disease phenotype has been termed local allergic rhinitis (LAR). LAR is an underdiagnosed entity affecting children and adults from different parts of the world, with moderate-to-severe symptoms, impairment of quality of life and rapid progression to symptom worsening. LAR is a stable phenotype and not merely an initial state of AR. Allergic rhinitis and LAR share many clinical features including a positive NAPT response, markers of type 2 nasal inflammation including sIgE in nasal secretions and a significant rate of asthma development. LAR should be considered as a differential diagnosis in those subjects of any age with symptoms suggestive of AR but no evidence of systemic atopy. Although LAR pathophysiology is partially unknown, in some patients sIgE can be demonstrated directly in the nasal secretions and/or indirectly via positive responses in basophil activation test (BAT). LAR can coexist with other rhinitis phenotypes, especially AR. The diagnosis currently relies on the positivity of NAPT to a single or multiple allergens. NAPT has high sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility, and it is considered the gold standard. BAT and the measurement of nasal sIgE can also contribute to LAR diagnosis. LAR patients benefit from the same therapeutic strategies than AR individuals, including the avoidance of allergen exposure and the pharmacotherapy. Moreover, several recent studies support the effectiveness and safety of allergen immunotherapy for LAR, which opens a window of treatment opportunity in these patients.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/inmunología , Desensibilización Inmunológica , Inmunoglobulina E/inmunología , Rinitis Alérgica , Humanos , Rinitis Alérgica/diagnóstico , Rinitis Alérgica/inmunología , Rinitis Alérgica/patología , Rinitis Alérgica/terapia , Pruebas Cutáneas
6.
Allergy ; 73(2): 470-478, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28833265

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The knowledge about the natural history of local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is limited. One unmet question is to demonstrate whether LAR should be considered the first step in the development of allergic rhinitis (AR) or an independent phenotype. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the natural history of a population with LAR, the potential conversion to AR with systemic atopy and the development of asthma during 10 years. METHODS: This is the second phase of a 10-year follow-up study of a cohort of 176 patients with LAR of recent onset and 115 age- and sex-matched healthy controls prospectively evaluated from 2005 to 2016. Clinical-demographic questionnaire, spirometry, skin prick test and specific IgE were evaluated yearly. Nasal allergen provocation tests (NAPT) with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Alternaria alternata, Olea europaea and grass pollen were performed at baseline, and after 5 and 10 years. RESULTS: After 10-year LAR, patients experienced a significant and clinically relevant worsening of the rhinitis, with increase in emergency assistance, development of asthma, loss of allergen tolerance and impairment of the quality of life. This worsening became significant after 5 years and progressed throughout 10 years. A similar rate of development of AR with systemic atopy was detected in patients and controls (9.7% vs 7.8%, log-rank P=.623). In 5 patients, conversion to systemic atopy occurred >10 years (3%). CONCLUSIONS: LAR is a well-differentiated clinical entity with a low rate of development of systemic atopy, a natural evolution towards worsening and a risk factor for suffering asthma.


Asunto(s)
Progresión de la Enfermedad , Rinitis Alérgica/diagnóstico , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Pruebas de Provocación Nasal , Fenotipo , Estudios Prospectivos , Rinitis Alérgica/sangre , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , España
7.
Allergy ; 73(4): 905-915, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29168570

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Allergen immunotherapy has been shown to be an effective treatment for local allergic rhinitis (LAR) to house dust mites. Studies with pollen allergen immunotherapy are limited to observational studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Phleum pratense subcutaneous immunotherapy (Phl-SCIT) in LAR. METHODS: In a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study, 56 patients with moderate-severe LAR to grass pollen received Phl-SCIT with a depigmented polymerized pollen vaccine or placebo for the first year, and Phl-SCIT the second one. The blind was maintained throughout the study. Primary outcome was combined symptom medication score (CSMS) during grass pollen season (GPS). Secondary clinical outcomes included organ-specific symptoms, medication-free days, rhinitis severity and asthma control. Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ), nasal allergen provocation test (NAPT), skin testing, serum levels of specific IgG4 and specific IgE and safety were also evaluated. RESULTS: Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) had a short-term and sustained effect with significant improvements of all primary and secondary clinical outcomes and RQLQ score. SCIT significantly increased serum sIgG4 levels and allergen tolerance, from the 6th to 24th months of treatment. At the end of the study, 83% of patients treated with ≥6 months of SCIT tolerated a concentration of P. pratense over 50 times higher than baseline, and 56% gave a negative NAPT. SCIT was well tolerated; six mild local reactions occurred, and there were no serious adverse events related to the study medication. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous immunotherapy with depigmented polymerized allergen extracts is a safe and clinically effective treatment for LAR to P. pratense.


Asunto(s)
Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/prevención & control , Adulto , Alérgenos/administración & dosificación , Alérgenos/inmunología , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Phleum , Extractos Vegetales/administración & dosificación , Extractos Vegetales/inmunología , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Allergy ; 73(8): 1597-1608, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29377177

RESUMEN

Nasal allergen challenge (NAC) is an important tool to diagnose allergic rhinitis. In daily clinical routine, experimentally, or when measuring therapeutic success clinically, nasal allergen challenge is fundamental. It is further one of the key diagnostic tools when initiating specific allergen immunotherapy. So far, national recommendations offered guidance on its execution; however, international divergence left many questions unanswered. These differences in the literature caused EAACI to initiate a task force to answer unmet needs and find a consensus in executing nasal allergen challenge. On the basis of a systematic review containing nasal allergen challenges of the past years, task force members reviewed evidence, discussed open issues, and studied variations of several subjective and objective assessment parameters to propose a standardized way of a nasal allergen challenge procedure in clinical practice. Besides an update on indications, contraindications, and preparations for the test procedure, main recommendations are a bilaterally challenge with standardized allergens, with a spray device offering 0.1 mL per nostril. A systematic catalogue for positivity criteria is given for the variety of established subjective and objective assessment methods as well as a schedule for the challenge procedure. The task force recommends a unified protocol for NAC for daily clinical practice, aiming at eliminating the previous difficulty of comparing NAC results due to unmet needs.


Asunto(s)
Comités Consultivos , Alérgenos/administración & dosificación , Pruebas de Provocación Nasal/normas , Pruebas de Provocación Nasal/tendencias , Rinitis Alérgica/diagnóstico , Administración Intranasal , Cuidados Posteriores , Anafilaxia , Alemania , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Mucosa Nasal/inmunología , Obstrucción Nasal/inmunología , Pruebas de Provocación Nasal/métodos , Rociadores Nasales , Prurito/inmunología , Pruebas Cutáneas , Estornudo/inmunología
9.
Allergy ; 72(1): 24-34, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27439024

RESUMEN

In the past years, several investigators have demonstrated the existence of local nasal responses in some patients with typical allergic rhinitis symptoms but without atopy and have defined a new phenotype called local allergic rhinitis (LAR) or 'entopy'. In a percentage of LAR subjects, the upper airway disease is also associated with lower airway symptoms. After the description of this phenotype, the differential diagnosis between LAR and nonallergic rhinitis (NAR) has become a challenge for the clinician. To correctly identify LAR patients is of high importance for treatment and management of these patients, and for an appropriate inclusion of patients in clinical trials and genetics studies. The treatment of LAR patients, in contrast with NAR, is oriented to allergen avoidance and specific treatment. Allergen immunotherapy, the aetiological treatment for allergic respiratory diseases, has demonstrated to be an effective and safe treatment in LAR, increasing immunological tolerance, and reducing the clinical symptoms and the use of medication. In this article, the important and novel aspects of LAR in terms of mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment will be discussed. Also, the involvement of the lower airway and the potential role of IgE in the bronchial disease will be also reviewed.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Respiratorias/etiología , Rinitis/etiología , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/etiología , Basófilos/inmunología , Basófilos/metabolismo , Biomarcadores , Moléculas de Adhesión Celular/metabolismo , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/inmunología , Mucosa Nasal/inmunología , Mucosa Nasal/metabolismo , Fenotipo , Enfermedades Respiratorias/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Respiratorias/metabolismo , Enfermedades Respiratorias/terapia , Rinitis/diagnóstico , Rinitis/metabolismo , Rinitis/terapia
10.
Allergy ; 72(10): 1485-1498, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28387947

RESUMEN

Ocular allergy (OA) includes a group of common and less frequent hypersensitivity disorders frequently misdiagnosed and not properly managed. The diagnosis of OA is usually based on clinical history and signs and symptoms, with the support of in vivo and in vitro tests when identification of the specific allergen is required. To date, no specific test is available for the diagnosis of the whole spectrum of the different forms of OA. The lack of recommendations on diagnosis of OA is considered a medical need not only for allergists but also for ophthalmologists. This position paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the currently available tools for diagnosing OA to promote a common nomenclature and procedures to be used by different specialists. Questionnaires, sign and symptom grading scales, tests, and potential biomarkers for OA are reviewed. We also identified several unmet needs in the diagnostic tools to generate interest, increase understanding, and inspire further investigations. Tools, recommendations, and algorithms for the diagnosis of OA are proposed for use by both allergists and ophthalmologists. Several unmet needs in the diagnostic tools should be further improved by specific clinical research in OA.


Asunto(s)
Oftalmopatías/diagnóstico , Oftalmopatías/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad/inmunología , Algoritmos , Alérgenos/inmunología , Biomarcadores , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Oftalmopatías/epidemiología , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/epidemiología , Pruebas Inmunológicas , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Evaluación de Síntomas , Pruebas de Visión
11.
Allergy ; 72(1): 43-54, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27430124

RESUMEN

Conjunctival allergen provocation test (CAPT) reproduces the events occurring by instilling an allergen on the ocular surface. This paper is the compilation of a task force focussed on practical aspects of this technique based on the analysis of 131 papers. Main mechanisms involved are reviewed. Indications are diagnosing the allergen(s)-triggering symptoms in IgE-mediated ocular allergy in seasonal, acute or perennial forms of allergic conjunctivitis, especially when the relevance of the allergen is not obvious or in polysensitized patients. Contraindications are limited to ongoing systemic severe pathology, asthma and eye diseases. CAPT should be delayed if receiving systemic steroids or antihistamines. Local treatment should be interrupted according to the half-life of each drug. Prerequisites are as follows: obtaining informed consent; evidencing of an allergen by skin prick tests and/or serum-specific IgE dosages; being able to deal with an unlikely event such as acute asthma exacerbation, urticaria or anaphylaxis, or an exacerbation of allergic conjunctivitis. Allergen extracts should be diluted locally prior to administration. Positive criteria are based on itching or quoted according to a composite score. An alternative scoring is based on itching. CAPT remains underused in daily practice, although it is a safe and simple procedure which can provide valuable clinical information.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/inmunología , Conjuntivitis Alérgica/diagnóstico , Conjuntivitis Alérgica/inmunología , Pruebas Cutáneas , Alérgenos/administración & dosificación , Contraindicaciones , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pruebas Cutáneas/efectos adversos , Pruebas Cutáneas/métodos
12.
Allergy ; 72(6): 959-966, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27886391

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite the socioeconomic importance of allergic rhinitis (AR), very few prospective studies have been performed under conditions of clinical practice and with a sufficiently long observation period outside the clinical trial scenario. We prospectively estimated the direct and indirect costs of AR in patients attending specialized clinics in Spain. METHODS: Patients were recruited at random from allergy outpatient clinics in 101 health centers throughout Spain over 12 months. We performed a multicenter, observational, prospective study under conditions of clinical practice. We analyzed direct costs from a funder perspective (healthcare costs) and from a societal perspective (healthcare and non-healthcare costs). Indirect costs (absenteeism and presenteeism [productivity lost in the workplace]) were also calculated. The cost of treating conjunctivitis was evaluated alongside that of AR. RESULTS: The total mean cost of AR per patient-year (n = 498) was €2326.70 (direct, €553.80; indirect, €1772.90). Direct costs were significantly higher in women (€600.34 vs €484.46, P = 0.02). Total costs for intermittent AR were significantly lower than for persistent AR (€1484.98 vs €2655.86, P < 0.001). Total indirect costs reached €1772.90 (presenteeism, €1682.71; absenteeism, €90.19). The direct costs of AR in patients with intermittent asthma (€507.35) were lower than in patients with mild-persistent asthma (€719.07) and moderate-persistent asthma (€798.71) (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The total cost of AR for society is considerable. Greater frequency of symptoms and more severe AR are associated with higher costs. Indirect costs are almost threefold direct costs, especially in presenteeism. A reduction in presenteeism would generate considerable savings for society.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Rinitis Alérgica/economía , Absentismo , Humanos , Presentismo/economía , Estudios Prospectivos , España
13.
Allergy ; 72(11): 1657-1665, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28474799

RESUMEN

This EAACI position paper aims at providing a state-of-the-art overview on nonallergic rhinitis (NAR). A significant number of patients suffering from persistent rhinitis are defined as nonallergic noninfectious rhinitis (NANIR) patients, often denominated in short as having NAR. NAR is defined as a symptomatic inflammation of the nasal mucosa with the presence of a minimum of two nasal symptoms such as nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, sneezing, and/or itchy nose, without clinical evidence of endonasal infection and without systemic signs of sensitization to inhalant allergens. Symptoms of NAR may have a wide range of severity and be either continuously present and/or induced by exposure to unspecific triggers, also called nasal hyperresponsiveness (NHR). NHR represents a clinical feature of both AR and NAR patients. NAR involves different subgroups: drug-induced rhinitis, (nonallergic) occupational rhinitis, hormonal rhinitis (including pregnancy rhinitis), gustatory rhinitis, senile rhinitis, and idiopathic rhinitis (IR). NAR should be distinguished from those rhinitis patients with an allergic reaction confined to the nasal mucosa, also called "entopy" or local allergic rhinitis (LAR). We here provide an overview of the current consensus on phenotypes of NAR, recommendations for diagnosis, a treatment algorithm, and defining the unmet needs in this neglected area of research.


Asunto(s)
Mucosa Nasal/patología , Rinitis/diagnóstico , Humanos , Inflamación , Fenotipo , Rinitis/patología , Rinitis/terapia
14.
Allergy ; 71(7): 1057-61, 2016 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27008542

RESUMEN

The effects of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) on local allergic rhinitis (LAR) are largely unknown. We conducted the first randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (DBPC), phase II trial of D. pteronyssinus (DP) subcutaneous AIT (DP-AIT) on LAR (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02123316). Thirty-six LAR patients received Pangramin PLUS DP or placebo for 24 months. The primary endpoints were symptoms, medication scores, and medication-free days. The secondary included skin test, serum specific IgE and IgG4, nasal allergen provocation test (NAPT), and adverse events. AIT-DP produced significant improvements in both primary and secondary endpoints vs placebo. After 12 months of AIT-DP, we detected a significant and marked increase in allergen tolerance with negative NAPT in 50% of patients, and significant increases of serum sIgG4. Immunotherapy was well tolerated; no systemic reactions were reported. This study demonstrated that AIT-DP is a safe and clinically effective treatment for LAR, confirming that LAR is a new indication for AIT.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/inmunología , Antígenos Dermatofagoides/inmunología , Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus/inmunología , Desensibilización Inmunológica , Rinitis Alérgica/inmunología , Rinitis Alérgica/terapia , Alérgenos/administración & dosificación , Animales , Antígenos Dermatofagoides/administración & dosificación , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27164623

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is a phenotype of allergic rhinitis characterized by the presence of a localized immune response in the nasal mucosa of patients with negative skin prick test (SPT) results and undetectable serum specific IgE (sIgE). It unknown whether LAR is limited to areas with low or moderate aeroallergen exposure. OBJECTIVE: To explore the presence of LAR and the clinical and immunological characteristics of this entity in geographic areas with high grass pollen loads. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was carried out in 2 hospitals in central Spain (Madrid and Ciudad Real). Sixty-one patients with seasonal rhinitis and negative SPT results and undetectable serum sIgE were evaluated using a clinical questionnaire, determination of serum total IgE, and a nasal allergen provocation test (NAPT) with Phleum species. The response to NAPT was monitored using assessment of nasal symptoms, acoustic rhinometry, and determination of sIgE, tryptase, and eosinophil cationic protein in the nasal cavity. RESULTS: Seasonal LAR was detected in 37 patients (61%) using the techniques described above. Eleven percent of patients with LAR were adolescents or children, and 14% reported onset of rhinitis in childhood. Most patients reported persistent-moderate seasonal nasal symptoms, and 41% reported worsening of the disease during the last 2 years. Conjunctivitis was the most common comorbidity, affecting 95% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: LAR to grass pollen is relevant in patients with seasonal symptoms indicative of allergic rhinitis but with a negative skin test result who live in areas with high allergenic pollen loads. This entity should be included the differential diagnosis of rhinitis.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/inmunología , Conjuntivitis/inmunología , Mucosa Nasal/inmunología , Polen/inmunología , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/inmunología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Conjuntivitis/sangre , Conjuntivitis/complicaciones , Conjuntivitis/patología , Estudios Transversales , Proteína Catiónica del Eosinófilo/genética , Proteína Catiónica del Eosinófilo/inmunología , Femenino , Expresión Génica , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mucosa Nasal/patología , Pruebas de Provocación Nasal , Phleum/química , Phleum/inmunología , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/sangre , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/complicaciones , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/patología , Estaciones del Año , Pruebas Cutáneas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Triptasas/genética , Triptasas/inmunología
17.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 44(3): 263-75, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26316421

RESUMEN

Food allergy and respiratory allergy are two frequently associated diseases and with an increasing prevalence. Several reports show the presence of respiratory symptoms in patients with food allergy, while certain foods may be related to the development or exacerbation of allergic rhinitis and asthma. The present update focuses on this relationship, revealing a pathogenic and clinical association between food and respiratory allergy. This association is even more intense when the food hypersensitivity is persistent or starts in the early years of life. Food allergy usually precedes respiratory allergy and may be a risk factor for allergic rhinitis and asthma, becoming a relevant clinical marker for severe atopic asthma. Furthermore, the presence of co-existing asthma may enhance life-threatening symptoms occurring during a food allergic reaction. Recommendations for dietary restrictions during pregnancy and breastfeeding to prevent the development of respiratory allergy are controversial and not supported by consistent scientific data. Current recommendations from medical societies propose exclusive breastfeeding during the first four months of life, with the introduction of solid food in the fourth to the seventh month period of life. A delayed introduction of solid food after this period may increase the risk of developing subsequent allergic conditions. Further studies are encouraged to avoid unjustified recommendations involving useless dietary restrictions.


Asunto(s)
Asma/epidemiología , Lactancia Materna , Dieta Saludable/métodos , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/epidemiología , Rinitis Alérgica/epidemiología , Asma/etiología , Asma/prevención & control , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/etiología , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/prevención & control , Humanos , Embarazo , Prevalencia , Rinitis Alérgica/etiología , Rinitis Alérgica/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo
18.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 45(5): 872-881, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25495772

RESUMEN

Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is characterized by the presence of a nasal Th2 inflammatory response with local production of specific IgE antibodies and a positive response to a nasal allergen provocation test (NAPT) without evidence of systemic atopy. The prevalence has been shown to be up to 25% in subjects affected with rhinitis with persistence, comorbidity and evolution similar to allergic rhinitis. LAR is a consistent entity that does not evolve to allergic rhinitis with systemic atopy over time although patients have significant impairment in quality of life and increase in the severity of nasal symptoms over time. Lower airways can be also involved. The diagnosis of LAR is based mostly on demonstration of positive response to NAPT and/or local synthesis of specific IgE. Allergens involved include seasonal or perennial such as house dusts mites, pollens, animal epithelia, moulds (alternaria) and others. Basophils from peripheral blood may be activated by the involved allergens suggesting the spill over of locally synthesized specific IgE to the circulation. LAR patients will benefit from the same treatment as allergic patients using antihistamines, inhaled corticosteroids and IgE antagonists. Studies on immunotherapy are ongoing and will determine its efficacy in LAR in terms of symptoms improvement and evolution of the natural course of the disease.


Asunto(s)
Inmunoglobulina E/inmunología , Rinitis/inmunología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Pruebas de Provocación Nasal , Fenotipo , Prevalencia , Rinitis/diagnóstico , Rinitis/epidemiología , Rinitis/terapia , Rinitis Alérgica/diagnóstico , Rinitis Alérgica/inmunología , Células Th2/inmunología , Células Th2/metabolismo
19.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 45(10): 1542-53, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26032922

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although specific immunotherapy is the only aetiological treatment for allergic disorders, the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Specific immunotherapy induces changes in lymphocyte Th subsets from Th2 to Th1/Treg. Whether differences in immunological patterns underlie patient response to immunotherapy has not yet been established. OBJECTIVES: We studied the immunological changes occurring during a 1-year period of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP) immunotherapy and their relation with clinical outcome. METHODS: We included 34 patients with DP allergy who received subcutaneous specific immunotherapy (SCIT) for 1 year. Following treatment, patients were classified as responders or non-responders. Fourteen allergic subjects who did not receive SCIT were included as controls. Peripheral blood was obtained at 0, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months and cultured with nDer p 1. Phenotypic changes, cytokine production and basophil response were analysed by flow cytometry; transcription factors were measured by mRNA quantification. Serum immunoglobulin levels were also measured. RESULTS: After 1 year of SCIT, 82% of cases showed improved symptoms (responders). Although increases in sIgG4 were observed, BAT reactivity was not modified in these patients. Increases in T-BET/FOXP3 as well as nDer p 1-specific Th1/Treg frequencies were also observed, along with a decrease in Th2, Th9 and Th17. These changes corresponded to changes in cytokine levels. CONCLUSION: Patients who respond well to DP-SCIT show immunological differences compared to non-responders. In responders, basal differences include a lower frequency of Th1 and higher frequencies of Th2, Th9 and Th17 cells. After 1 year of treatment, an increased production of sIgG4 was observed in responders, along with a change in Th2 response towards Th1/Treg.


Asunto(s)
Citocinas/inmunología , Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus/inmunología , Desensibilización Inmunológica , Rinitis Alérgica/inmunología , Rinitis Alérgica/terapia , Linfocitos T Colaboradores-Inductores/inmunología , Adulto , Animales , Citocinas/sangre , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Rinitis Alérgica/sangre , Linfocitos T Colaboradores-Inductores/metabolismo
20.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 45(11): 1703-12, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26221871

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the in vivo and in vitro responses to nOle e 1 in allergic rhinitis (AR) and local allergic rhinitis (LAR) patients sensitized to olive tree pollen (OL) confirmed by nasal allergen provocation test (NAPT). METHODS: Twelve subjects with AR, 12 with LAR and 12 subjects as control group (CG) were selected. Skin testing and NAPT with nOle e 1 were performed. Eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) and tryptase were measured in nasal lavages before and after NAPT. Serum IgE to OL allergens was measured by ELISA. Basophil activation tests (BAT) with OL and nOle e 1 and dendritic cell maturation/proliferation studies were carried out. RESULTS: All AR (12/12) and 10/12 (83%) of LAR had a +NAPT to nOle e 1. ECP levels in nasal lavages were significantly increased after NAPT in both AR and LAR compared with CG at 15 min (P < 0.05). Serum IgE was positive only in AR. All AR had +BAT responses to OL and 10/12 to nOle e 1 (83%); 8/12 LAR (66.6%) had a +BAT to OL and 4/12 (33%) to nOle e 1, with only one subject of the CG with a +BAT to both OL and nOle e 1 (8%). Dendritic cell proliferation to nOle e 1 was increased in AR compared to LAR and CG (P = 0.019 and P = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both AR and LAR had a similar in vivo response to nOle e 1 with release of inflammatory mediators. Specific basophil activation with OL and nOle e 1 was observed in LAR confirming previous data obtained with dust mites.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/inmunología , Antígenos de Plantas/inmunología , Olea/efectos adversos , Rinitis Alérgica/inmunología , Adolescente , Adulto , Prueba de Desgranulación de los Basófilos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Células Dendríticas/inmunología , Células Dendríticas/metabolismo , Proteína Catiónica del Eosinófilo/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Inmunoglobulina E/inmunología , Activación de Linfocitos/inmunología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas de Provocación Nasal , Polen/inmunología , Rinitis Alérgica/diagnóstico , Rinitis Alérgica/metabolismo , Pruebas Cutáneas , Triptasas/metabolismo , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA