Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 51
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Electrocardiol ; 81: 214-217, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37832325

RESUMEN

We present the case of a 42 year old patient with a history of childhood lymphoma treated with chemotherapy and radiation who underwent combined aortic and mitral valve replacements and who postoperatively developed an interesting ECG which showed complete heart block and an alternating left bundle branch and narrow complex QRS pattern at a heart rate of 69 beats per minute (bpm). We discuss potential mechanisms for this interesting pattern.


Asunto(s)
Bloqueo Atrioventricular , Bloqueo de Rama , Humanos , Adulto , Electrocardiografía , Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco , Frecuencia Cardíaca
2.
Am Heart J ; 246: 21-31, 2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34968442

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are recommended for patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) with an indication for pacing, prior ventricular arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, or left ventricular ejection fraction <35%, but data on outcomes are limited. METHODS: Using data from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD Registry between April 1, 2010 and December 31, 2015, we evaluated a propensity matched cohort of CS patients implanted with ICDs versus non-ischemic cardiomyopathies (NICM). We compared mortality using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: We identified 1,638 patients with CS and 8,190 propensity matched patients with NICM. The rate of death at 1 and 2 years was similar in patients with CS and patients with NICM (5.2% vs 5.4%, P = 0.75 and 9.0% vs 9.3%, P = 0.72, respectively). After adjusting for other covariates, patients with CS had similar mortality at 2 years after ICD implantations compared with NICM patients (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.87-1.23). Among patients with CS, multivariable logistic regression identified 6 factors significantly associated with increased 2-year mortality: presence of heart failure (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.44-3.22), New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III heart failure (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.16-2.45), NYHA Class IV heart failure (HR 3.08, 95% CI 1.49-6.39), atrial fibrillation/flutter (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.17-2.35), chronic lung disease (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.17-2.29), creatinine >2.0 mg/dL (HR 4.07, 95% CI 2.63-6.30), and paced rhythm (HR 2.66, 95% CI 1.07-6.59). CONCLUSION: Mortality following ICD implantation was similar in CS patients compared with propensity matched NICM patients. Presence of heart failure, NYHA class, atrial fibrillation/flutter, chronic lung disease, renal dysfunction, and paced rhythm at time of implantation were all predictors of increased 2-year mortality among CS patients with ICDs.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Desfibriladores Implantables , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Miocarditis , Sarcoidosis , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/epidemiología , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/etiología , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sarcoidosis/complicaciones , Volumen Sistólico , Función Ventricular Izquierda
3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 72(1): e1-e48, 2021 01 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33417672

RESUMEN

This evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of Lyme disease was developed by a multidisciplinary panel representing the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the American Academy of Neurology (AAN), and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). The scope of this guideline includes prevention of Lyme disease, and the diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease presenting as erythema migrans, Lyme disease complicated by neurologic, cardiac, and rheumatologic manifestations, Eurasian manifestations of Lyme disease, and Lyme disease complicated by coinfection with other tick-borne pathogens. This guideline does not include comprehensive recommendations for babesiosis and tick-borne rickettsial infections, which are published in separate guidelines. The target audience for this guideline includes primary care physicians and specialists caring for this condition such as infectious diseases specialists, emergency physicians, internists, pediatricians, family physicians, neurologists, rheumatologists, cardiologists and dermatologists in North America.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Transmisibles , Enfermedad de Lyme , Neurología , Reumatología , Animales , Humanos , Enfermedad de Lyme/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Lyme/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Lyme/prevención & control , América del Norte , Estados Unidos
4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 72(1): 1-8, 2021 01 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33483734

RESUMEN

This evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of Lyme disease was developed by a multidisciplinary panel representing the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the American Academy of Neurology (AAN), and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). The scope of this guideline includes prevention of Lyme disease, and the diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease presenting as erythema migrans, Lyme disease complicated by neurologic, cardiac, and rheumatologic manifestations, Eurasian manifestations of Lyme disease, and Lyme disease complicated by coinfection with other tick-borne pathogens. This guideline does not include comprehensive recommendations for babesiosis and tick-borne rickettsial infections, which are published in separate guidelines. The target audience for this guideline includes primary care physicians and specialists caring for this condition such as infectious diseases specialists, emergency physicians, internists, pediatricians, family physicians, neurologists, rheumatologists, cardiologists and dermatologists in North America.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Transmisibles , Enfermedad de Lyme , Neurología , Reumatología , Animales , Humanos , Enfermedad de Lyme/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Lyme/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Lyme/prevención & control , América del Norte , Estados Unidos
5.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 32(1): 9-15, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33146938

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in a significant decrease in volume of electrophysiology (EP) procedures. There has been concern that trainees may not achieve the procedural numbers required to graduate as independent electrophysiologists within the usual timeline. We sought to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the percentage of clinical cardiac EP (CCEP) fellows in jeopardy of not meeting procedural volume requirements and overall sentiments regarding preparedness of fellows for independent practice. METHODS: We surveyed CCEP fellows and program directors about baseline procedural volumes, curriculum changes due to the pandemic, and attitudes about preparedness for board examinations and independent practice. RESULTS: Ninety-nine fellows and 27 program directors responded to the survey. Ninety-eight percent of responding fellows reported a decrease in procedural volume as a result of the pandemic. Program directors reported an overall decrease in annual number of ablations and device procedures performed by each fellow during the 2019-2020 academic year compared to the preceding year. Despite this, a minority of fellows and program directors reported concerns about meeting Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education procedural requirements for devices (9% and 4%, respectively) and ablation (19% and 9%) or preparedness for independent practice after a 2-year fellowship. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a decrease in procedural volume for CCEP trainees, but the majority of fellows and program directors do not anticipate major barriers to timely graduation. This may change with COVID-19 resurgence and further interruptions in training.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Electrofisiología Cardíaca/educación , Cardiólogos/educación , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Técnicas Electrofisiológicas Cardíacas , Adulto , Electrofisiología Cardíaca/tendencias , Cardiólogos/tendencias , Competencia Clínica , Curriculum , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/tendencias , Técnicas Electrofisiológicas Cardíacas/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Carga de Trabajo
8.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 41(12): 1687-1690, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30088279

RESUMEN

We report the case of a patient who received both appropriate and inappropriate shocks from an entirely subcutaneous implantable defibrillator (S-ICD). The inappropriate shocks were due to oversensing of chest compressions in the setting of a profound postshock bradycardia. It is important to recognize that the therapy from the S-ICD can not only be withheld, as previously described, but can also be inappropriately delivered during chest compressions.


Asunto(s)
Bradicardia/etiología , Bradicardia/terapia , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/efectos adversos , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Análisis de Falla de Equipo , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo
12.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 39(3): 275-81, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26647906

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Interrogation/interpretation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is frequently required in the emergency department (ED) or perioperative areas (OR) where resources to do this are often not available. CareLink Express (CLE; Medtronic, plc, Mounds View, MN, USA) is a technician-supported real-time remote interrogation system for Medtronic CIEDs. Using data from 136 US locations, this retrospective study was designed to assess CLE efficiency compared to traditional device management, and examine its findings. METHODS: All 7,044 US CLE transmissions from the ED and OR (January 2012-October 2014) were compared to 217 traditional requests where CIED interrogations/interpretations were performed by calling industry representatives to these sites. RESULTS: CLE reduced the time to device interrogation/interpretation by 78%: 100 ± 140-22 ± 14 minutes, P < 0.0001, improving response time and consistency; ED: 82 ± 103-23 ± 18 minutes, P, ≤ 0.01; OR: 127 ± 181-17 ± 10 minutes, P < 0.0001. Actionable events (AE) (arrhythmia, device/lead abnormalities) were infrequent: 9.1% overall (ED: 9.9%; OR: 4.1%). Only 6.5% of patients with syncope/presyncope and 13.6% with a perceived shock had AE. AEs were more common in those with suspected device problems (30.4%) or audible alerts (52.6%). They were more likely in patients not enrolled in long-term remote monitoring (23.9% vs 8.2%, P < 0.0001) and in those with older CIED systems (7.4% in year 1 vs 31.0% after 10 years). CONCLUSIONS: The many patients with CIEDs, and the ability to quickly identify the minority with high-risk AE from the no/low-risk majority, strongly support CLE use in the ED and OR, sites which are expensive and prioritize efficiency.


Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Falla de Equipo/estadística & datos numéricos , Marcapaso Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Telemetría/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Diseño de Equipo , Análisis de Falla de Equipo/instrumentación , Análisis de Falla de Equipo/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Atención Perioperativa/instrumentación , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Atención Perioperativa/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos Piloto , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Telemedicina/instrumentación , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemetría/instrumentación , Estados Unidos , Revisión de Utilización de Recursos
15.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 24(8): 1691-700, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26255580

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is substantial and increasing. Stroke is common in AF and can have devastating consequences. Oral anticoagulants are effective in reducing stroke risk, but are underutilized. OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize the impact of stroke on AF patients and their caregivers, gaps in knowledge and perspective between physicians and patients, and barriers to effective communication and optimal anticoagulation use. METHODS: A survey was administered to AF patients with and without history of stroke, caregivers of stroke survivors, and physicians across the range of specialties caring for AF and stroke patients. RESULTS: While AF patients (n = 499) had limited knowledge about stroke, they expressed great desire to learn more and take action to reduce their risk. They were often dissatisfied with the education they had received and desired high-quality written materials. Stroke survivors (n = 251) had poor functional outcomes and often underestimated the burden of caring for them. Caregivers (n = 203) also wished they had received more information about reducing stroke risk before their survivor's event. They commonly felt overwhelmed and socially isolated. Physicians (n = 504) did not prescribe anticoagulants as frequently as recommended by guidelines. Concerns about monitoring anticoagulation and patient compliance were commonly reported barriers. Physicians may underestimate patient willingness to take anticoagulants. CONCLUSION: We identified significant knowledge gaps among patients, caregivers, and physicians in relation to AF and stroke. Furthermore, gaps in perspective often lead to suboptimal communication and decision making. Increased education and better communication between all stakeholders are needed to reduce the impact of stroke in AF.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Conocimiento , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Prevalencia , Medición de Riesgo
16.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 37(7): 820-7, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24484075

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Remote monitoring (RM) of defibrillators (implantable cardioverter defibrillators [ICDs]) and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices (CRTDs) has been shown to be cost effective, convenient, and associated with reduced mortality and a reduction in the time to physician intervention for actionable events. However, patient compliance with monitoring over time and what factors might influence such compliance have not been well described. This study sought to identify factors contributing to patient noncompliance with RM of ICDs and CRTDs in a large real-world population. METHODS: Deidentified data on U.S. patients enrolled in the Medtronic CareLink RM system were used to compare patients with no (noncompliant, n = 14,848) and with ≥ 2 RM transmissions (compliant, n = 103,284) during a 14-month period. RESULTS: Overall noncompliance with RM was 21%. Younger age (≤ 40), female sex, wanded device, Medicare Census Division, and small clinic size all predicted patient noncompliance (P < 0.01). Device type (ICD vs CRTD) did not (P = 0.52). Multivariate analysis suggested clinically important predictors of noncompliance to be: age ≤ 40, odds ratio (OR) 2.64 (95% confidence interval, 2.42-2.88); Medicare Census Division (Mountain vs West North Central), OR 2.15 (1.96-2.37); and small clinic size (1-4 vs >100 patients), OR 4.38 (3.92-4.91). CONCLUSIONS: There is room for improvement in RM usage among enrolled patients. Younger patients, smaller clinics, and certain geographic areas may be targets for research into interventions to further improve the use of RM.


Asunto(s)
Dispositivos de Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Desfibriladores Implantables , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Tecnología de Sensores Remotos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
19.
J Clin Med ; 12(3)2023 Jan 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36769531

RESUMEN

(1) Background: The opioid epidemic has led to an increase in cardiac surgery for infective endocarditis (IE-CS) related to injection use of opioids (OUD) and other substances and a call for a coordinated approach to initiate substance use disorder treatment, including medication for OUD (MOUD), during IE-CS hospitalizations. We sought to determine the effects of the initiation of a multi-disciplinary endocarditis evaluation team (MEET) on MOUD use, electrocardiographic QTc measurements and cardiac arrests due to ventricular fibrillation (VF) in patients with OUD. (2) Methods and Results: A historical group undergoing IE-CS at Yale-New Haven Hospital prior to MEET initiation, Group I (43 episodes of IE-CS, 38 patients) was compared to 24 patients undergoing IE-CS after MEET involvement (Group II). Compared to Group l, Group II patients were more likely to receive MOUD (41.9 vs. 95.8%, p < 0.0001), predominantly methadone (41.9 vs. 79.2%, p = 0.0035) at discharge. Both groups had similar QTcs: approximately 30% of reviewed electrocardiograms had QTcs ≥ 470 ms and 17%, QTcs ≥ 500 ms. Cardiac arrests due to VF were not uncommon: Group I: 9.3% vs. Group II: 8.3%, p = 0.8914. Half occurred in the 1-2 months after surgery and were contributed to by pacemaker malfunction/ management and half were related to opioid use. (3) Conclusions: MEET was associated with increased MOUD (predominantly methadone) use during IE-CS hospitalizations without an increase in QTc prolongation or cardiac arrest due to VF compared to Group I, but events occurred in both groups. These arrests were associated with pacemaker issues or a return to opioid use. Robust follow-up of IE-CS patients is essential, as is further research to clarify the longer-term effects of MEET on outcomes.

20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37457438

RESUMEN

Cardiovascular disease and cancer are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the US. Despite the significant progress made in cancer treatment leading to improved prognosis and survival, ventricular arrhythmias (VA) remain a known cardiovascular complication either exacerbated or induced by the direct and indirect effects of both traditional and novel cancer treatments. Although interruption of cancer treatment because of VA is rarely required, knowledge surrounding this issue is essential for optimising the overall care of patients with cancer. The mechanisms of cancer-therapeutic-induced VA are poorly understood. This review will discuss the ventricular conduction (QRS) and repolarisation abnormalities (QTc prolongation), and VAs associated with cancer therapies, as well as existing strategies for the identification, prevention and management of cancer-treatment-induced VAs.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA