A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Pan-PPAR Agonist Lanifibranor in NASH.

BACKGROUND: Management of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is an unmet clinical need. Lanifibranor is a pan-PPAR (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor) agonist that modulates key metabolic, inflammatory, and fibrogenic pathways in the pathogenesis of NASH. METHODS: In this phase 2b, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, patients with noncirrhotic, highly active NASH were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive 1200 mg or 800 mg of lanifibranor or placebo once daily for 24 weeks. The primary end point was a decrease of at least 2 points in the SAF-A score (the activity part of the Steatosis, Activity, Fibrosis [SAF] scoring system that incorporates scores for ballooning and inflammation) without worsening of fibrosis; SAF-A scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more-severe disease activity. Secondary end points included resolution of NASH and regression of fibrosis. RESULTS: A total of 247 patients underwent randomization, of whom 103 (42%) had type 2 diabetes mellitus and 188 (76%) had significant (moderate) or advanced fibrosis. The percentage of patients who had a decrease of at least 2 points in the SAF-A score without worsening of fibrosis was significantly higher among those who received the 1200-mg dose, but not among those who received the 800-mg dose, of lanifibranor than among those who received placebo (1200-mg dose vs. placebo, 55% vs. 33%, P = 0.007; 800-mg dose vs. placebo, 48% vs. 33%, P = 0.07). The results favored both the 1200-mg and 800-mg doses of lanifibranor over placebo for resolution of NASH without worsening of fibrosis (49% and 39%, respectively, vs. 22%), improvement in fibrosis stage of at least 1 without worsening of NASH (48% and 34%, respectively, vs. 29%), and resolution of NASH plus improvement in fibrosis stage of at least 1 (35% and 25%, respectively, vs. 9%). Liver enzyme levels decreased and the levels of the majority of lipid, inflammatory, and fibrosis biomarkers improved in the lanifibranor groups. The dropout rate for adverse events was less than 5% and was similar across the trial groups. Diarrhea, nausea, peripheral edema, anemia, and weight gain occurred more frequently with lanifibranor than with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In this phase 2b trial involving patients with active NASH, the percentage of patients who had a decrease of at least 2 points in the SAF-A score without worsening of fibrosis was significantly higher with the 1200-mg dose of lanifibranor than with placebo. These findings support further assessment of lanifibranor in phase 3 trials. (Funded by Inventiva Pharma; NATIVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03008070.).

Randomized Trial of Food Effect on Pharmacokinetic Parameters of ABX464 Administered Orally to Healthy Male Subjects.

ABX464 is an antiviral that provides a novel approach to the reduction and control of HIV infection. Investigation of food influence is important in the optimization of treatment. An open-label, food effect, randomized study which included 2 groups of 24 subjects each was carried out to assess the bioavailability and safety of single (group 1) and repeated (group 2) oral doses of ABX464 (50 mg) under fed or fasted conditions. The maximum concentration (Cmax) and the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) of ABX464 were demonstrated to increase with food after a single dose of ABX464 (219% and 188%, respectively). The apparent terminal elimination half-lives (t1/2s) under fed and fasted conditions were comparable, at about 0.80 h. The median time to maximum concentration (Tmax) was delayed from 1.5 to 2.8 h, and the ratio of the AUC0-∞ obtained under fed conditions to the AUC0-∞ obtained under fasted conditions (Frel) was 2.69. Comparable results were obtained on day 1 and day 10 in group 2. The increases in Cmax and AUC0-∞ of the metabolite ABX464-N-glucuronide (ABX464-NGlc) were, however, much more limited when ABX464 was given with food. The t1/2s were also comparable under the two conditions (around 100 h). Between day 1 and day 10, the Cmax increased by 5% under the fasted condition and by 25% under the fed condition. The most common related treatment-emergent adverse events were headaches, vomiting, and nausea. It was concluded that food has a significant impact on the levels of ABX464 in plasma with a delay in absorption and increased relative bioavailability, with a lesser impact on its biotransformation into ABX464-NGlc. ABX464 was well tolerated under both fasted and fed conditions. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02731885.).

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of ABX464, a novel first-in-class compound to treat HIV infection, in healthy HIV-uninfected subjects.

Background: An anti-HIV compound (ABX464) has been developed with a novel mechanism of activity in that it blocks viral gene expression in cells that are already infected. Objectives: A first-in-man study was conducted to determine the pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of ABX464. This was carried out as an open label, parallel group, single ascending dose, exploratory study. Methods: Twenty-four male subjects in good health without HIV infection, aged from 18 to 55 years old, with BMIs of 18-27 kg/m 2 were included. A single oral dose of ABX464 (50, 100, 150 or 200 mg) was administered on the morning of day 0 after overnight fasting, with follow-up for 45 days. Safety assessments consisted of vital signs, electrocardiogram, physical examination, laboratory tests and urinalysis. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated for ABX464 and its main metabolite ABX-464- N -glucuronide (ABX464-NGlc). The study was registered at https://www.clinicaltrials (trial number NCT02792686). Results: ABX464 was well tolerated; the most frequent related treatment-emergent adverse events were headaches, nausea and vomiting; they were not considered as treatment-limiting effects. ABX464's C max was observed approximately 2 h after administration in all groups. ABX464 was rapidly and substantially metabolized into ABX464-NGlc. The C max of ABX464-NGlc was observed approximately 4 h post-dose and was about 160-fold higher than that of the parent with a much longer t 1/2 (90-110 h). The ratio of metabolite to parent drug was consistent across the complete dose range. Conclusions: These studies confirmed that ABX464 is well tolerated and rapidly and substantially metabolized into ABX464-NGlc in human subjects.

Efficacy and safety of danoprevir-ritonavir plus peginterferon alfa-2a-ribavirin in hepatitis C virus genotype 1 prior null responders.

Danoprevir (DNV) is a hepatitis C virus (HCV) protease inhibitor that achieves high sustained virologic response (SVR) rates in combination with peginterferon alfa-2a-ribavirin in treatment-naive HCV genotype 1 (G1)-infected patients. This study explored the efficacy and safety of ritonavir-boosted DNV (DNVr) plus peginterferon alfa-2a-ribavirin in G1-infected prior peginterferon-ribavirin null responders. Null responders (<2-log10 reduction in HCV RNA level at week 12) were given an open-label combination of 100 mg of ritonavir and 100 mg of DNV (100/100 mg DNVr) every 12 h (q12h) plus peginterferon alfa-2a-ribavirin for 12 weeks. All patients achieving an early virologic response (EVR; ≥2-log10 decrease in HCV RNA by week 12) continued treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a-ribavirin; those without an EVR discontinued all study drugs. Twenty-four prior null responders were enrolled; 16 patients (67%) were infected with HCV G1b, and 8 (33%) were infected with G1a. Ninety-six percent of patients had an IL28B non-CC genotype. A sustained virologic response at 24 weeks posttreatment (SVR24) was achieved in 67% of patients, with a higher rate in G1b-infected (88%) than G1a-infected (25%) patients. Resistance-related breakthrough occurred in 4/8 G1a and 1/16 G1b patients through the DNV resistance-associated variant (RAV) NS3 R155K. NS3 R155K was also detected in 2/2 G1a patients who relapsed. Treatment was well tolerated. Two patients withdrew prematurely from study medications due to adverse events. Two serious adverse events were reported; both occurred after completion of DNVr therapy and were considered unrelated to treatment. No grade 3 or 4 alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevations were observed. DNVr plus peginterferon alfa-2a-ribavirin demonstrated high SVR24 rates in HCV G1b-infected prior null responders and was well tolerated. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01185860.).

Antiviral activity of danoprevir (ITMN-191/RG7227) in combination with pegylated interferon α-2a and ribavirin in patients with hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND: Current therapy options for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection genotype 1 are effective in <50%. Danoprevir (ITMN-191/RG7227) is a potent, selective, and orally active inhibitor of the HCV NS3/4A serine protease. METHODS: The safety and antiviral efficacy of danoprevir was examined over 14 days in combination with pegylated interferon α-2a (180 µg once weekly) and ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/day) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1b, multiple ascending dose study consisting of 6 dose cohorts (400 mg, 600 mg, and 900 mg twice daily and 100 mg, 200 mg, and 300 mg 3 times daily). RESULTS: Danoprevir in combination with pegylated interferon α-2a and ribavirin was safe and generally well tolerated. The median change in HCV RNA level from baseline to the end of treatment with danoprevir at 400 mg, 600 mg, and 900 mg twice daily was -4.7 log(10) IU/mL, -5.4 log(10) IU/mL, and -5.3 log(10) IU/mL, respectively, and at 100 mg, 200 mg, and 300 mg 3 times daily was -5.5 log(10) IU/mL, -5.7 log(10) IU/mL, and -5.6 log(10) IU/mL, respectively. Placebo administered in combination with standard of care resulted in median decrease in HCV RNA level of -2.6 log(10) IU/mL (with twice daily regimen) and -2.0 log(10) IU/mL (with 3 times daily regimen). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed substantial antiviral efficacy of danoprevir in combination with pegylated interferon α-2a and ribavirin. Exploration of the safety and antiviral efficacy of danoprevir in longer clinical studies is warranted.

Antiviral activity, safety, and pharmacokinetics of danoprevir/ritonavir plus PEG-IFN α-2a/RBV in hepatitis C patients.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Danoprevir (RG7227; ITMN-191) is a potent inhibitor of the HCV NS3/4A serine protease. The aims of this double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-ascending dose phase Ib study were to evaluate safety, tolerability, antiviral activity, resistance, and pharmacokinetics of once- and twice-daily danoprevir in the presence of low-dose ritonavir (danoprevir/r) and in combination with peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD)/ribavirin in treatment-naive HCV genotype 1 patients. METHODS: Thirty eligible patients were enrolled into three cohorts and treated with danoprevir/r or placebo/r all in combination with peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD)/ribavirin for 15 days. Cohort 1 received danoprevir/r at 100/100mg twice daily; Cohort 2 200/100mg once daily; and Cohort 3 200/100mg twice daily. RESULTS: The median reductions in HCV RNA from baseline after 14 days of treatment (day 15) were -5.1, -4.8, and -4.6 log(10)IU/ml in Cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and -2.7 log(10) in placebo/r and peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD)/ribavirin recipients. Viral breakthrough was not observed in any patient. On day 15, HCV RNA was undetectable (<15IU/ml) in 6/9 (67%), 4/8 (50%), and 8/8 (100%) patients in Cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. When co-administered with low dose ritonavir, danoprevir concentrations reached a steady state between 6 to 10 days of dosing. Danoprevir exposures increased more than dose proportionally between 100/100mg and 200/100mg. Danoprevir/r plus peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD)/ribavirin was well-tolerated with no safety-related discontinuations. CONCLUSIONS: Danoprevir/r plus peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD)/ribavirin provides profound and robust reductions in serum HCV RNA, at substantially lower systemic exposures compared to those observed with higher doses of danoprevir in the absence of ritonavir. These results support further studies of danoprevir/r.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients with the NS3/4A protease inhibitor danoprevir (ITMN-191/RG7227) leads to robust reductions in viral RNA: a phase 1b multiple ascending dose study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Danoprevir is a potent and selective inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A serine protease. The present study assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antiviral activity of danoprevir in a randomized, placebo-controlled, 14-day multiple ascending dose study in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection. METHODS: Four cohorts of treatment-naïve (TN) patients (100 mg q12 h, 100 mg q8 h, 200 mg q12 h, 200 mg q8 h) and one cohort of non-responders (NR) to prior pegylated interferon alfa-ribavirin treatment (300 mg q12 h) were investigated. RESULTS: Danoprevir was safe and well tolerated; adverse events were generally mild, transient and were not associated with treatment group or dose level. Danoprevir displayed a slightly more than proportional increase in exposure with increasing daily dose and was rapidly eliminated from the plasma compartment. Maximal decreases in HCV RNA were: -3.9 log(10)IU/ml and -3.2 log(10)IU/ml in TN receiving 200 mg q8 h and 200 mg q12 h, respectively. End of treatment viral decline in these two cohorts was within 0.1 log(10)IU/ml of the viral load nadir. HCV RNA reduction in NR was more modest than that observed in upper dose TN cohorts. The overall incidence of viral rebound was low (10/37) and was associated with the R155K substitution in NS3 regardless of the HCV subtype. CONCLUSIONS: Danoprevir was safe and well tolerated when administered for 14 days in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection. Treatment resulted in sustained, multi-log(10) IU/ml reductions in HCV RNA in upper dose cohorts. These results support further clinical evaluation of danoprevir in patients with chronic HCV.

CCR5 blockade in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5), a chemokine receptor expressed on T cells and macrophages, and its ligands are found in inflamed synovial tissue (ST) of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The rationale for testing CCR5 blockade in patients with RA was supported by the effects of a CCR5 antagonist in collagen-induced arthritis in rhesus monkeys. The effects of CCR5 blockade in patients with active RA were explored. METHODS: In this phase Ib randomised, placebo-controlled trial, treatment with an oral CCR5 inhibitor (SCH351125) in patients with active RA was evaluated. Clinical efficacy was assessed using European League Against Rheumatism and American College of Rheumatology response criteria. ST biopsies were taken before and after 28 days of treatment, and analysed for CCR5+ cells. In a subset of patients, MRIs of an inflamed joint were obtained before and after treatment. RESULTS: In all, 32 patients were included; 20 received SCH351125 and 12 placebo. Three patients who received SCH351125 did not complete the study due to adverse events; none of these were serious. No improvement was observed in the active treatment group compared to placebo. Results were consistent for clinical evaluation, ST analysis and MRI. CONCLUSION: This proof of concept study does not support the use of CCR5 blockade as a therapeutic strategy in patients with active RA.

Safety, immunogenicity, and lot-to-lot consistency of a split-virion quadrivalent influenza vaccine in younger and older adults: A phase III randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

Here, we report a randomized multicenter phase III trial assessing the lot-to-lot consistency of the 2014-2015 Northern Hemisphere quadrivalent split-virion inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4; Sanofi Pasteur) and comparing its immunogenicity and safety with that of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3) in younger and older adults (EudraCT no. 2014-000785-21). Younger (18-60 y, n = 1114) and older (>60 y, n = 1111) adults were randomized 2:2:2:1:1 to receive a single dose of one of three lots of IIV4, the licensed IIV3 containing the B Yamagata lineage strain, or an investigational IIV3 containing the B Victoria lineage strain. Post-vaccination (day 21) hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers were equivalent for the three IIV4 lots. For the pooled IIV4s vs. IIV3, hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers were also non-inferior for the A strains, non-inferior for the B strain when present in the comparator IIV3, and superior for the B strain lineage when absent from the comparator IIV3. For all vaccine strains, seroprotection rates were ≥98% in younger adults and ≥90% in older adults. IIV4 also increased seroneutralizing antibody titers against all three vaccine strains of influenza. All vaccines were well tolerated, with no safety concerns identified. Solicited injection-site reactions were similar for IIV4 and IIV3 and mostly grade 1 and transient. This study showed that in younger and older adults, IIV4 had a similar safety profile as the licensed IIV3 and that including a second B strain lineage in IIV4 provided superior immunogenicity for the added B strain without affecting the immunogenicity of the three IIV3 strains.

Immunogenicity and safety of the Southern Hemisphere 2015 formulation of Vaxigrip®.

An inactivated split-virion trivalent influenza vaccine (IIV3; Vaxigrip®, Sanofi Pasteur) has been available globally since 1968. Here, we describe the results of an open-label, post-licensure trial (EudraCT no. 2014-005078-12) to confirm the immunogenicity and safety of the Southern Hemisphere 2015 formulation of IIV3. Adults 18-60 years of age and > 60 years of age (60 per age group) received a single 0.5-ml intramuscular injection of IIV3. Between baseline and day 21 after vaccination, hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) titers for each strain in IIV3 increased, on average, by at least 11-fold for younger adults and at least 5-fold for older adults. After vaccination, 89%-100% of the younger adult participants and 90%-98% of the older adult participants attained seroprotection (HAI titer ≥ 40) for each strain. Also, 66%-81% of younger adults and 45%-63% of older adults seroconverted or had a significant increase in HAI titer for each strain. For both age groups, these post-vaccination immune responses exceeded the criteria of the Committee for Human Medicinal Products former Note for Guidance for influenza vaccines. No serious adverse events were reported, and no new safety signals were detected. In conclusion, this study confirmed that the Southern Hemisphere 2015 formulation of IIV3 was well tolerated, highly immunogenic, and met the criteria for influenza vaccine efficacy and safety.

Safety and tolerability of high-dose formoterol (via Aerolizer) and salbutamol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

To evaluate the safety and tolerability of high-dose formoterol and salbutamol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In this two-way crossover, double-blind, double-dummy study, 17 adults with mild-to-moderate COPD were randomized to receive either formoterol 24 microg (2 x 12 microg via Aerolizer), or salbutamol 600 microg (6 x 100 microg via metered-dose inhaler), and the appropriate double-dummy q.i.d. at 4-h intervals for 3 consecutive days (total daily dose: 96 and 2400 microg, respectively). After a 4-7-day washout period, patients were switched to the other treatment. Treatment with high-dose formoterol and salbutamol was equally well tolerated, with no reports of serious adverse events. Both agents were associated with decreased plasma potassium (mean minimum values: 3.4 and 3.3 mmol/l for formoterol and salbutamol, respectively; P=0.914), increased serum glucose (mean maximum values: 9.0 and 8.7 mmol/l, respectively; P=0.373), and small increases in mean QTc interval (mean maximum 439 ms with both treatments; P=0.813). No clinically relevant between-treatment differences in adverse events or laboratory values occurred. Both drugs improved lung function (mean maximum forced expiratory volume in 1s [FEV(1)] 2.6 l with both treatments; P=0.624), with the improvement being significantly greater with formoterol than with salbutamol on all 3 days of treatment (mean area under the curve [AUC](0-24 h) of FEV(1) formoterol vs. salbutamol on days 1-3, all P<0.05). High-dose formoterol via Aerolizer (up to 96 microg/day) has a comparable tolerability profile to that of salbutamol in patients with mild-to-moderate COPD.

Ritonavir-boosted danoprevir-based regimens in treatment-naive and prior null responders with HCV genotype 1 or 4 and compensated cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Effective and safe antiviral treatment regimens are needed for patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and cirrhosis. METHODS: An international open-label trial was conducted in CHC patients with genotype (G)1/4 infection, compensated cirrhosis, HCV RNA ≥ 50,000 IU/mL and body mass index 18-35 kg/m(2). Treatment-naive patients (Cohort 1) received a triple therapy regimen [danoprevir/r 100/100 mg twice daily (bid), ribavirin 1000/1200 mg/day and peginterferon alfa-2a 180 µg/week] for 24 weeks. Prior null responders (Cohort 2) received a quadruple therapy regimen (danoprevir/r 100/100 mg bid, mericitabine 1000 mg bid and peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin). The primary efficacy outcome was sustained virological response (HCV RNA < limit of quantification, target not detected) at end of the 24-week follow-up period (SVR24). RESULTS: In Cohort 1 (n = 23), 73.9 and 65.2 % of patients had a virological response at Weeks 4 and 24, respectively; 39.1 % achieved SVR24 (G1a = 1/13; G1b = 8/9; G4 = 0/1). In Cohort 2 (n = 20), 100 % achieved virological response at Weeks 4 and 24; 65 % achieved SVR24 (G1a = 4/8; G1b = 7/10; G4 = 2/2). Treatment failure was more common in G1a than G1b-infected patients and less common in patients receiving quadruple therapy. Treatment failure was associated with emergence of resistance to danoprevir, but not mericitabine. The safety profile was typical of that associated with peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin. No deaths/episodes of hepatic decompensation occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with danoprevir/r-based regimens for 24 weeks is safe and well tolerated in CHC patients with compensated cirrhosis. A quadruple therapy regimen (danoprevir/r, mericitabine, peginterferon alfa/ribavirin) produced high SVR24 rates in prior null responders, particularly among G1b patients.

A serum-free, purified vero cell rabies vaccine is safe and as immunogenic as the reference vaccine Verorab for pre-exposure use in healthy adults: results from a randomized controlled phase-II trial.

BACKGROUND: Verorab was licensed in 1985 for both pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis of rabies. The next generation purified Vero cell rabies vaccine (PVRV-NG) is a highly purified vaccine. We performed a phase II clinical study in adults in France to assess its immunological non-inferiority and clinical safety for pre-exposure prophylaxis. METHODS: In a randomized phase-II trial, 384 healthy adult subjects were randomized (2:1) to receive a three-dose primary series of PVRV-NG or Verorab. One year later, the PVRV-NG group received a PVRV-NG booster while the Verorab group participants were randomized to receive a booster of PVRV-NG or Verorab for. Rabies virus neutralizing antibodies (RVNA) were evaluated on days 0, 28 (subgroup), 42, months 6, 12 and 12+14 days. Safety was evaluated for seven days after each dose. Adverse event between doses, until 28 days after the final dose was recorded. Serious adverse events were recorded up to 6 months after the last dose. RESULTS: The criterion for non-inferiority was met in the per-protocol analysis set and confirmed in the full analysis set (FAS). In the FAS, 99.6% and 100% of subjects had RVNA titers ≥0.5 IU/mL in PVRV-NG and Verorab groups, respectively. While RVNA levels gradually decreased over the 12-month period, at 6 and 12 months after vaccination >89% and >77%, respectively, in both groups had RVNA titers ≥0.5 IU/mL. The PVRV-NG booster induced a strong response, irrespective of the vaccine given for the primary series. PVRV-NG was safe and well tolerated and its safety profile was similar to Verorab for unsolicited adverse events and solicited systemic reactions. The incidence of solicited injection-site reactions was lower with PVRV-NG than with Verorab after the primary series and the booster dose. CONCLUSIONS: PVRV-NG was shown to be at least as immunogenic as Verorab and to present a similar safety profile.

Sustained virological response after 14-day treatment with danoprevir and 48-week treatment with pegylated interferon-α2a (40 KD) plus ribavirin.

BACKGROUND: Danoprevir (RG7227) is an inhibitor of the HCV NS3/4A protease. In two Phase Ib studies of treatment-naive patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection, danoprevir administration for 14 days was associated with HCV RNA median reduction reaching 3.8 log(10) in monotherapy and 5.7 log(10) in combination therapy with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN)-α2a (40 KD) plus ribavirin (RBV). After the protocol-defined phase, patients were free to continue with PEG-IFN/RBV. Sustained virological response (SVR) was evaluated in patients who continued treatment with PEG-IFN/RBV. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the patients who received a 14-day monotherapy regimen with danoprevir (100 or 200 mg every 8 or 12 h), or 14-day triple therapy with danoprevir (100, 200 or 300 mg every 8 h, or 400, 600 or 900 mg every 12 h) with PEG-IFN-α2a (40 KD; 180 µg/week subcutaneously) and RBV (1,000-1,200 mg/day) followed by PEG-IFN-α2a (40 KD; 180 µg/week subcutaneously) and RBV (1,000-1,200 mg/day) for 46 weeks (triple therapy group) for a total of 48 weeks (monotherapy group). RESULTS: Data were collected from 15 patients with danoprevir monotherapy and 24 patients with danoprevir-based triple therapy. Virological results are expressed using an intention-to-treat principle. Premature treatment discontinuation occurred in five patients. Rapid virological response (RVR; week 4) rate was 50% and 69.6% and SVR rate was 60% and 70.8% in the monotherapy and triple therapy groups, respectively. RVR was highly predictive of SVR (>90%; HCV RNA<15 IU/ml). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of danoprevir for 14 days to PEG-IFN/RBV treatment results in a high SVR rate in HCV genotype 1 treatment-naive patients.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and antiviral activity of the cyclophilin inhibitor NIM811 alone or in combination with pegylated interferon in HCV-infected patients receiving 14 days of therapy.

BACKGROUND: Cyclophilin inhibitors have shown activity against a variety of viruses, including HCV. NIM811, a novel, non-immunosuppressive cyclophilin inhibitor was studied in ascending doses in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 14-day trial in genotype 1 HCV patients. Doses of 10 up to 600 mg were given orally once or twice daily as monotherapy (9:3 randomization of NIM811:placebo). 600 mg or placebo bid for 14 days was then co-administered with pegylated interferon alpha (PEG-IFN-α) administered on days 1 and 8 to genotype 1 relapsers. RESULTS: NIM811 was well tolerated at all doses. Although lack of antiviral effect was noted in the monotherapy arms, liver transaminase normalization occurred at doses over 75 mg. Mild, clinically non-significant elevations of bilirubin, and significant declines in platelet numbers were observed in the 400 and 600 mg bid groups. In the combination group, the mean HCV RNA decline was 2.85 log, compared to a 0.56 log in the PEG-IFN alone arm. The mean ALT (alanine transaminase) declined significantly by day 14 in the combination, but was unchanged in the PEG-IFN alone group. In the combination therapy group, the mean platelets were 203×10(9)/L at baseline and fell to 105×10(9)/L by day 14; for patients treated with PEG-IFN the values were 177×10(9)/L and 139×10(9)/L. There was a significant increase in bilirubin, although this did not reach clinically concerning levels. There were no severe or serious adverse events. The pharmacokinetics in both monotherapy and combination arms were dose linear and not affected by PEG-INF. CONCLUSION: NIM811 monotherapy resulted in a normalization of liver transaminases in the absence of significant virological response. The combination of NIM811 and pegylated interferon alpha showed significant antiviral activity compared to interferon alone in genotype 1 HCV relapsers. The use of oral cyclophilin inhibitors as part of a combination regime for treatment of hepatitis C, especially to deter resistance, holds promise.

Short-term administration of the CCR5 antagonist vicriviroc to patients with HIV and HCV coinfection is safe and tolerable.

OBJECTIVE: CCR5 antagonists block HIV cell entry through competitive binding to the CCR5 receptor present on the surface of CD4(+) cells. The CCR5 receptor is also present on CD8(+) cells involved in clearing hepatitis C virus (HCV). The goal of the present study was to examine the short-term safety of a CCR5 antagonist, vicriviroc, in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind trial was conducted in 28 HIV/HCV-coinfected subjects with compensated liver disease and plasma HIV RNA below 400 copies/mL. All subjects were receiving a ritonavir-enhanced protease inhibitor regimen, to which vicriviroc (5, 10, or 15 mg/day) or placebo was added for 28 days. Clinical and laboratory evaluations were performed 21 days beyond the treatment period. RESULTS: Treatment with vicriviroc resulted in no clinically meaningful changes in HCV or HIV viral load or any immune parameters. Adverse events were equally distributed among placebo and vicriviroc groups. Transaminase elevations of grade 1 or more were reported as AEs in 1 subject receiving 10-mg vicriviroc and 1 placebo subject. Vicriviroc plasma concentrations were similar to those observed in healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term treatment with vicriviroc as part of a ritonavir-containing protease inhibitor-based regimen was safe and well tolerated in HIV/HCV-coinfected subjects. HIV/HCV coinfection also did not affect vicriviroc pharmacokinetics.

The chemokine CCL5 regulates the in vivo cell surface expression of its receptor, CCR5.

The efficiency of CCR5 as an HIV coreceptor is strongly dependent on its level of cell surface expression. Therefore, it is of major importance to identify the factors that regulate cell surface density of CCR5. Among the chemokines that bind to CCR5, and induce its internalization, CCL5 is the most abundant in vivo. We show that the level of CCL5 production is a main factor determining CD4+ T cell surface CCR5 density.

SCH 503034, a novel hepatitis C virus protease inhibitor, plus pegylated interferon alpha-2b for genotype 1 nonresponders.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: SCH 503034 is a novel and potent oral hepatitis C virus (HCV) protease inhibitor. In this phase Ib study, we assessed safety parameters and virologic response of combination of SCH 503034 plus pegylated (PEG) interferon (IFN) alpha-2b in patients with HCV genotype 1 infections who were previously nonresponders to PEG-IFN-alpha-2b +/- ribavirin therapy. METHODS: This was a multicenter, open-label, 2-dose level, 3-way crossover, randomized (to crossover sequence) study carried out in 3 medical centers in Europe. Adult patients received SCH 503034 200 mg (n = 14) or 400 mg (n = 12) 3 times daily orally and PEG-IFN-alpha-2b 1.5 microg/kg subcutaneously once each week. Patients received SCH 503034 as monotherapy for 1 week, PEG-IFN-alpha-2b as monotherapy for 2 weeks, and combination therapy for 2 weeks with washout periods between each treatment period. RESULTS: Combination therapy with SCH 503034 and PEG-IFN-alpha-2b was well tolerated, with no clinically significant changes in safety parameters. Mean maximum log(10) changes in HCV RNA were -2.45 +/- 0.22 and -2.88 +/- 0.22 for PEG-IFN-alpha-2b plus 200 mg and 400 mg SCH 503034, respectively, compared with -1.08 +/- 0.22 and -1.61 +/- 0.21 for SCH 503034 200 mg and 400 mg, respectively, and -1.08 +/- 0.22 and -1.26 +/- 0.20 for PEG-IFN-alpha-2b alone in the 200 mg and 400 mg SCH 503034 groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SCH 503034 plus PEG-IFN-alpha-2b was well tolerated in patients with HCV genotype 1 nonresponders to PEG-IFN-alpha-2b +/- ribavirin. These preliminary results of antiviral activity of the combination suggest a potential new therapeutic option for this hard-to-treat, nonresponder patient population.