Multicenter Study of the Real-World Use of Ceftaroline versus Vancomycin for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.

The objective of this study was to determine if real-world ceftaroline treatment in adults hospitalized for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) is associated with decreased infection-related length of stay (LOSinf) compared to that with vancomycin. This was a retrospective, multicenter, cohort study from 2012 to 2017. Cox proportional hazard regression, propensity score matching, and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to determine the independent effect of treatment group on LOSinf The patients were adults hospitalized with ABSSSI and treated with ceftaroline or vancomycin for ≥72 h within 120 h of diagnosis at four academic medical centers and two community hospitals in Arizona, Florida, Michigan, and West Virginia. A total of 724 patients were included (325 ceftaroline treated and 399 vancomycin treated). In general, ceftaroline-treated patients had characteristics consistent with a higher risk of poor outcomes. The unadjusted median LOSinf values were 5 (interquartile range [IQR], 3 to 7) days and 6 (IQR, 4 to 8) days in the vancomycin and ceftaroline groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.866; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.747 to 1.002). The Cox proportional hazard model (adjusted HR [aHR], 0.891; 95% CI, 0.748 to 1.060), propensity score-matched (aHR, 0.955; 95% CI, 0.786 to 1.159), and IPTW (aHR, 0.918; 95% CI, 0.793 to 1.063) analyses demonstrated no significant difference in LOSinf between groups. Patients treated with ceftaroline were significantly more likely to meet criteria for discharge readiness at day 3 in unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Although discharge readiness at day 3 was higher in ceftaroline-treated patients, LOSinf values were similar between treatment groups. Clinical and nonclinical factors were associated with LOSinf.

Impact of High-Level Daptomycin Resistance in the Streptococcus mitis Group on Virulence and Survivability during Daptomycin Treatment in Experimental Infective Endocarditis.

Among the viridans group streptococci, the Streptococcus mitis group is the most common cause of infective endocarditis. These bacteria have a propensity to be ß-lactam resistant, as well as to rapidly develop high-level and durable resistance to daptomycin (DAP). We compared a parental, daptomycin-susceptible (DAPs) S. mitis/S. oralis strain and its daptomycin-resistant (DAPr) variant in a model of experimental endocarditis in terms of (i) their relative fitness in multiple target organs in this model (vegetations, kidneys, spleen) when animals were challenged individually and in a coinfection strategy and (ii) their survivability during therapy with daptomycin-gentamicin (an in vitro combination synergistic against the parental strain). The DAPr variant was initially isolated from the cardiac vegetations of animals with experimental endocarditis caused by the parental DAPs strain following treatment with daptomycin. The parental strain and the DAPr variant were comparably virulent when animals were individually challenged. In contrast, in the coinfection model without daptomycin therapy, at both the 106- and 107-CFU/ml challenge inocula, the parental strain outcompeted the DAPr variant in all target organs, especially the kidneys and spleen. When the animals in the coinfection model of endocarditis were treated with DAP-gentamicin, the DAPs strain was completely eliminated, while the DAPr variant persisted in all target tissues. These data underscore that the acquisition of DAPr in S. mitis/S. oralis does come at an intrinsic fitness cost, although this resistance phenotype is completely protective against therapy with a potentially synergistic DAP regimen.

Defining daptomycin resistance prevention exposures in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium and E. faecalis.

Daptomycin is used off-label for enterococcal infections; however, dosing targets for resistance prevention remain undefined. Doses of 4 to 6 mg/kg of body weight/day approved for staphylococci are likely inadequate against enterococci due to reduced susceptibility. We modeled daptomycin regimens in vitro to determine the minimum exposure to prevent daptomycin resistance (Dapr) in enterococci. Daptomycin simulations of 4 to 12 mg/kg/day (maximum concentration of drug in serum [Cmax] of 57.8, 93.9, 123.3, 141.1, and 183.7 mg/liter; half-life [t1/2] of 8 h) were tested against one Enterococcus faecium strain (S447) and one Enterococcus faecalis strain (S613) in a simulated endocardial vegetation pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model over 14 days. Samples were plated on media containing 3× the MIC of daptomycin to detect Dapr. Mutations in genes encoding proteins associated with cell envelope homeostasis (yycFG and liaFSR) and phospholipid metabolism (cardiolipin synthase [cls] and cyclopropane fatty acid synthetase [cfa]) were investigated in Dapr derivatives. Dapr derivatives were assessed for changes in susceptibility, surface charge, membrane depolarization, cell wall thickness (CWT), and growth rate. Strains S447 and S613 developed Dapr after simulations of 4 to 8 mg/kg/day but not 10 to 12 mg/kg/day. MICs for Dapr strains ranged from 8 to 256 mg/liter. Some S613 derivatives developed mutations in liaF or cls. S447 derivatives lacked mutations in these genes. Dapr derivatives from both strains exhibited lowered growth rates, up to a 72% reduction in daptomycin-induced depolarization and up to 6-nm increases in CWT (P<0.01). Peak/MIC and AUC0-24/MIC ratios (AUC0-24 is the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h) associated with Dapr prevention were 72.1 and 780 for S447 and 144 and 1561 for S613, respectively. Daptomycin doses of 10 mg/kg/day may be required to prevent Dapr in serious enterococcal infections.

Novel combinations of vancomycin plus ceftaroline or oxacillin against methicillin-resistant vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) and heterogeneous VISA.

We demonstrated a significant inverse correlation between vancomycin and beta-lactam susceptibilities in vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) and heterogeneous VISA (hVISA) isolates. Using time-kill assays, vancomycin plus oxacillin or ceftaroline was synergistic against 3 of 5 VISA and 1 of 5 hVISA isolates or 5 of 5 VISA and 4 of 5 hVISA isolates, respectively. Beta-lactam exposure reduced overall vancomycin-Bodipy (dipyrromethene boron difluoride [4,4-difluoro-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene] fluorescent dye) binding but may have improved vancomycin-cell wall interactions to improve vancomycin activity. Further research is warranted to elucidate the mechanism behind vancomycin and beta-lactam synergy.

Independent risk factors for the co-colonization of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the region most endemic for vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolation.

In the majority of cases of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis (VR E. faecalis) served as the vanA donor to S. aureus. Previous studies that evaluated the risk factors for co-colonization with VRE and MRSA did not differentiate between VR E. faecalis and VR E. faecium. This study aimed to identify variables associated with VR E. faecalis and MRSA co-colonization. A retrospective case-control study from January 2008 to December 2009 was conducted at the Detroit Medical Center. Data were extracted from charts and pharmacy records. Unique patients co-colonized with VR E. faecalis and MRSA (defined as isolation of MRSA within 7 days of VR E. faecalis isolation) were compared with patients with VR E. faecalis who were not co-colonized with MRSA. A total of 546 patients with VR E. faecalis isolation were identified. 85 (15.6 %) VR E. faecalis patients were co-colonized with MRSA and 461 (84.4 %) VR E. faecalis patients were not co-colonized with MRSA. The mean age of the study cohort was 65.9 ± 16.4 years, 424 (77.7 %) were African-American, and 270 (49.5 %) were residing in long-term care institutions. Independent predictors of co-colonization of VR E. faecalis and MRSA were male gender, impaired consciousness, ICU stay prior to VR E. faecalis isolation, indwelling devices, and isolation of VR E. faecalis from wounds. MRSA was frequently isolated from the same culture specimen as VR E. faecalis (n = 39, 45.9 %), most commonly from wounds. This large study of patients with VR E. faecalis identified the severity of illness, indwelling devices, and chronic wounds as independent predictors of co-colonization with VR E. faecalis and MRSA.

Successful treatment of a left ventricular assist device infection with daptomycin non-susceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: case report and review of the literature.

Recipients of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are highly susceptible to the development of infections with multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms. We describe the case of a patient with an LVAD who developed a device-related, daptomycin non-susceptible, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection, highlighting this patient population as highly vulnerable to the development of such antimicrobial resistance. This report includes a thorough review of the literature on the mechanisms of development of daptomycin non-susceptibility and suggests ways to prevent its emergence. We also provide and underscore the appropriate guidelines to abide by when attempting to control infections with such resistant isolates. This case also demonstrates the importance of definitive treatment with LVAD removal and transplantation as a component of appropriate management of invasive LVAD infections. In addition, we suggest that even infections with MDR organisms may not adversely affect post-transplant outcomes.

The efficacy and safety of daptomycin: first in a new class of antibiotics for Gram-positive bacteria.

In the face of increasing resistance to currently available antibiotics, there is a continued interest in the development of new drugs to treat Gram-positive infections. One such agent is the cyclic lipopeptide daptomycin-licensed in the USA for treatment of Gram-positive complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs) in 2003 and currently awaiting European approval for a similar indication (complicated skin and soft tissue infections). Daptomycin exerts its rapid bactericidal effect through insertion into and subsequent depolarisation of the bacterial cell membrane, a mode of action unlike that of any other available antibiotic. This novel mechanism of action makes the development of cross-resistance between daptomycin and other antibiotic classes unlikely. Daptomycin is highly active in vitro against a range of Gram-positive pathogens, including both susceptible and multidrug-resistant staphylococci and enterococci. Bactericidal activity has also been demonstrated against both growing and stationary-phase organisms, suggesting potential utility in the treatment of deep-seated infections. Two pivotal clinical studies comparing daptomycin 4 mg/kg per day intravenously with vancomycin or oxacillin-class antibiotics demonstrated the efficacy of daptomycin for treatment of cSSSIs. Daptomycin was well tolerated, with most adverse events considered to be unrelated to study medication, of mild-to-moderate intensity, and with a frequency and distribution similar to those associated with comparator antibiotics. The favourable clinical profile and low potential for development of resistance combine to make daptomycin a promising alternative to current agents for treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infections.

Ofloxacin clinical pharmacokinetics.

Ofloxacin is a new fluoroquinolone with a spectrum of activity similar to other fluoroquinolones with activity which includes Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycobacterium spp., Mycoplasma spp. and Legionella pneumophila. Through its additional mechanisms of action, ofloxacin may be less susceptible to the development of resistance from Staphylococcus aureus commonly seen with currently available fluoroquinolones. The impact of these findings cannot be evaluated without further clinical experience. The pharmacokinetics of ofloxacin are characterised by almost complete bioavailability (95 to 100%), peak serum concentrations in the range of 2 to 3 mg/L after a 400mg oral dose and an average half-life of 5 to 8h. In comparison with other available quinolones, elimination is more highly dependent on renal clearance, which may lead to more frequent dosage adjustments in patients with impaired renal function. Ofloxacin appears less likely to affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs (e.g. theophylline) which commonly interact with fluoroquinolones such as ciprofloxacin and enoxacin. The properties of ofloxacin make it a therapeutic alternative to currently available fluoroquinolones.

Inhibition of drug metabolism by quinolone antibiotics.

A number of quinolone antibiotics have been found to reduce the hepatic clearance of coadministered drugs such as theophylline. Enoxacin appears to be the most potent inhibitor, consistently decreasing theophylline clearance by more than 50%, while a single study suggests a similar degree of inhibition with pipemidic acid. Ciprofloxacin and pefloxacin reduce theophylline clearance to a smaller extent (approximately 20 to 30%). However, with ciprofloxacin, larger changes and theophylline toxicity have been reported in some subjects. Norfloxacin, ofloxacin and nalidixic acid appear to have minimal effects on theophylline clearance. Enoxacin and ciprofloxacin have also been found to reduce the clearance of caffeine, while ofloxacin has no effect. Few other substrates have been studied. Enoxacin decreases the clearance of R-warfarin with no effect on S-warfarin. In addition, enoxacin has been reported to reduce the clearance of antipyrine, with no effect on chlorpropamide, glibenclamide (glyburide) or phenytoin. The mechanism of these interactions is largely unexplored. It has been suggested that inhibition may be related to the production of 4-oxoquinolone metabolites; however, this hypothesis has not been confirmed. No unique structural feature has been identified to date which explains differences between these compounds in their propensity to affect drug metabolism. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effects of these drugs on other substrates not yet examined and to assess whether or not inhibition is dose related. Clinically, caution is advised when using a quinolone, particularly enoxacin, pipemidic acid, ciprofloxacin or pefloxacin, in combination with theophylline. Close monitoring of theophylline concentrations is recommended in any patient receiving these drugs. The clinical significance of inhibited metabolism of other substrates remains unclear at present. Until further data are available, clinicians should be aware of the possibility of reduced drug clearance resulting in adverse effects whenever the fluoroquinolones are coadministered with drugs that depend on hepatic metabolism for their elimination.

Emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with intermediate glycopeptide resistance: clinical significance and treatment options.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is a pathogen that is associated with serious infections that pose a significant risk of morbidity and mortality because of their multidrug resistant nature. Until recently, therapeutic options were limited to vancomycin, making the use of this drug widespread. Unfortunately, the continued application of this drug has led to the emergence of glycopeptide intermediate susceptible S. aureus (GISA). By definition, these organisms demonstrated a vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of >4 mg/L and <32 mg/L. However, although the mechanism of resistance is not fully elucidated at this time, GISA strains have demonstrated thickened or aggregated cell walls, an increase in penicillin binding proteins and greater autolytic activity. At present, the overall number of reported cases of GISA is relatively low. In most cases, thus far, prolonged courses of vancomycin were reported. A few cases reported monitoring serum vancomycin concentrations but because of limited information, no association with outcome can be made. Whether these GISA strains will become more widespread or evolve into fully glycopeptide resistant strains is unknown at this time. Although there are a number of new agents that possess activity against these pathogens, there is no consensus regarding specific recommendations for treatment. Strict infection control practices, routine screening for resistance and controlled use of antibacterial agents, especially vancomycin, are critical steps in preventing the further development of resistance among staphylococci.

Combination antimicrobial therapy for bacterial infections. Guidelines for the clinician.

Therapy with antimicrobial combinations has been used as long as antimicrobials have been available. Combinations of antibiotics are often used to take advantage of different mechanisms of action and/or toxicity profiles. Well established indications for combination antimicrobial therapy include: (a) empirical treatment of life-threatening infections; (b) treatment of polymicrobial infections; (c) prevention of the emergence of bacterial resistance; and (d) for synergism. Disadvantages of combination therapy include: (a) increased expense; (b) increased risk of adverse effects; (c) antagonism; and (d) superinfection. Combination antimicrobial therapy should be considered for the treatment of serious Gram-negative infections caused by Enterobacter cloacae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Serratia marcescens, and certain Gram-positive infections caused by Enterococcus spp. and Staphylococcus spp. Selection of agents should be dependent upon local susceptibility patterns, clinical experience, site of infection, potential toxicities and cost.

Oxazolidinones: new players in the battle against multi-resistant Gram-positive bacteria.

For many years the pharmaceutical industry did not pursue the development of antimicrobial agents that specifically targeted Gram-positive bacteria. Semi-synthetic penicillins and vancomycin were the mainstays of therapy for methicillin-susceptible and -resistant strains of staphylococci, respectively, as was penicillin for Streptococcus pneumoniae and beta-lactam-aminoglycoside combinations for serious enterococcal infections. In the 1980s enterococci resistant to glycopeptides emerged, followed shortly thereafter by a dissemination of penicillin-insensitive S. pneumoniae and, more recently, the occurrence of vancomycin-intermediately susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. The emergence of fully glycopeptide-resistant S. aureus is clearly on the horizon. Multi-resistant Gram-positive bacteria now pose an important therapeutic challenge for clinicians. New drugs with activity against some of these dangerous pathogens have recently been pursued, and linezolid, the first member of the oxazolidinone class, has now been licensed for clinical use in many countries. This drug has excellent in vitro and in vivo activity against all clinically relevant multi-resistant Gram-positive cocci and fills an important void in infectious disease chemotherapy.

Therapeutic options for Gram-positive infections.

Gram-positive infections impose a major burden on patients and the healthcare systems globally. The need to treat these infections correctly in an empirical fashion is of paramount importance. Further complicating this changing aetiology is the emergence of resistant strains which are no longer predictably susceptible to standard first-line antimicrobials such as oxacillin or vancomycin. Thus new agents such as linezolid have been developed to assist with initial empirical prescribing in infections where Gram-positive pathogens may be present. The characteristics of linezolid, including spectrum of activity, pharmacodynamic profile, tolerablility and overall efficacy should strengthen confidence when considering initial antimicrobial therapy in patients in risk areas. Future agents also being developed to fight multi-resistant Gram-positive infections include oritavancin, daptomycin and the glycylcyclines; however, these are still in the development phase.

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are a major problem in numerous institutions in the United States. Most VRE are resistant to all available antimicrobial agents, resulting in serious therapeutic dilemmas. The resistance genes are transmitted on transposons, so the potential for dissemination to other species is significant. Risk factors associated with VRE infection and colonization are vancomycin and cephalosporin use, but numerous patient-related factors also contribute. Although resistant strains appear to arise from the patient's endogenous flora, VRE may be spread through direct contact with contaminated environmental surfaces and hands of caregivers. Published guidelines for preventing such spread suggest implementing infection-control practices and vancomycin restrictions. The ideal drug regimen for the treatment of VRE is unknown. Various drug combinations have been studied in the laboratory, but patient treatment data are scarce. There is an urgent need for new antimicrobial agents.

Pharmacologic and bacteriologic properties of SCH-27899 (Ziracin), an investigational antibiotic from the everninomicin family.

SCH-27899 is an investigational antibiotic from the everninomicin family, a group of oligosaccharide antibiotics produced by Micromonospora carbonacea. Information regarding the pharmacology, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and toxicity of this agent was obtained from a MEDLINE search and a review of abstracts presented at recent scientific meetings. SCH-27899 has in vitro bacteriostatic activity against a wide variety of gram-positive organisms, including highly resistant organisms such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-intermediate-sensitivity S. aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae (both penicillin-susceptible and -nonsusceptible), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. In vitro data, animal studies, and preliminary human studies indicate that it is effective and fairly well tolerated. Its place in therapy remains to be determined, and clinical trials continue.

The pharmacologic and bacteriologic properties of oxazolidinones, a new class of synthetic antimicrobials.

The oxazolidinones are a new synthetic class of antimicrobials structurally unrelated to any agent presently marketed. Data pertaining to these compounds, with respect to their pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, mechanism of action, and bacteriologic activity, focusing on the analogs linezolid (PNU 100766) and eperezolid (PNU 100592), were retrieved by MEDLINE search and review of relevant abstracts presented at recent clinical conferences. Since the drugs are still investigational, we obtained in vitro and animal data as well as available human studies. The oxazolidinones have bacteriostatic activity against a number of important pathogens including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. They appear to be efficacious and well tolerated both orally and parenterally. Their role remains to be elucidated by clinical trials.

The triazole antifungal agents: a review of itraconazole and fluconazole.

Fluconazole and itraconazole are two investigational triazole antifungal agents that are currently undergoing clinical trials in the United States. Both are active orally, have favorable pharmacokinetics (i.e., good bioavailability, long half-life, low plasma protein binding), and possess activity against several systemic fungal pathogens. In addition, preliminary information suggests that these agents are substantially less toxic than currently available azole compounds. Fluconazole and, to a lesser degree, itraconazole have been shown to be highly effective for the treatment of cryptococcal meningitis. The potential for drug interactions is much lower with these agents compared to drugs such as ketoconazole.

Spiramycin in the treatment of cryptosporidiosis.

Spiramycin, a macrolide antibiotic, has been advocated for the treatment of cryptosporidiosis. The disease most commonly occurs in patients with AIDS and can be debilitating, as diarrhea and malnutrition may be contributing factors in the death of these patients. Until recently, treatment for cryptosporidiosis has been largely symptomatic. Response rates with drug therapy such as metronidazole, quinidine-clindamycin, and pentamidine have been extremely poor. Although response to spiramycin has appeared promising, there have been several reported cases of treatment failure. Further investigation with the agent is advocated to determine its role in the treatment of cryptosporidiosis.

Epidemiology, resistance, and outcomes of Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia treated with imipenem-cilastatin or ampicillin-sulbactam.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate epidemiology, resistance, and treatment outcomes of Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia treated with imipenem-cilastatin or ampicillin-sulbactam for 72 hours or longer. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Forty-eight patients with A. baumannii bacteremia. INTERVENTION: Evaluation of susceptibility and clinical data from 48 patients treated with either ampicillin-sulbactam or imipenem-cilastatin from 1987-1999. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Comparing ampicillin-sulbactam and imipenem-cilastatin, there were no differences between days of bacteremia (4 vs 2 days, p=0.05), days to resolution of temperature or white blood cell count, success or failure during or at end of treatment, or intensive care unit total or antibiotic-related length of stay (13 vs 10 days, p=0.05). Patients treated with ampicillin-sulbactam had significantly decreased antibiotic treatment costs (1500 dollars vs 500 dollars, p=0.004). CONCLUSION: Ampicillin-sulbactam is at least as effective as imipenem-cilastatin based on clinical response at days 2, 7, and end of treatment and is a cost-effective alternative for treatment of A. baumannii infections.

Rhodococcus equi pneumonia in a patient with human immunodeficiency virus: case report and review.

Rhodococcus equi is a facultative, intracellular, gram-positive coccobacillus increasingly reported as an opportunistic pathogen in patients positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). An HIV-positive man developed R. equi pneumonia and sepsis. He failed to improve despite surgical drainage of localized infection and many empiric antibiotics. Time-kill studies of R. equi isolated from the patient were performed against various antimicrobial agents to optimize therapy. Levofloxacin seemed to offer excellent in vitro bactericidal activity. Antagonism was observed with certain antibiotic combinations. Our anecdotal case report suggests that fluoroquinolones such as levofloxacin may offer superior efficacy to standard therapy in rhodococcal infections; their clinical utility deserves further investigation. In view of potential antagonism, prospective susceptibility testing for various drugs and drug combinations should be considered when clinically indicated.