The Revised R Status is an Independent Predictor of Postresection Survival in Pancreatic Cancer After Neoadjuvant Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the oncological outcomes of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who had an R 0 or R 1 resection based on the revised R status (1 mm) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). BACKGROUND: The revised R status is an independent prognostic factor in upfront-resected PDAC; however, the significance of 1 mm margin clearance after NAT remains controversial. METHODS: Patients undergoing pancreatectomy after NAT for PDAC were identified from 2 prospectively maintained databases. Clinicopathological and survival data were analyzed. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and pattern of recurrence in association with R 0 >1 mm and R 1 ≤1 mm resections. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-seven patients with PDAC were included after NAT and subsequent pancreatic resection. Two hundred eight patients (58.3%) received FOLFIRINOX, 41 patients (11.5%) received gemcitabine-based regimens, and 299 individuals (83.8%) received additional radiotherapy. R 0 resections were achieved in 272 patients (76.2%) and 85 patients (23.8%) had R 1 resections. Median OS after R 0 was 41.0 months, compared with 20.6 months after R 1 resection ( P = 0.002), and even longer after additional adjuvant chemotherapy ( R 0 44.8 vs R1 20.1 months; P = 0.0032). Median RFS in the R 0 subgroup was 17.5 months versus 9.4 months in the R 1 subgroup ( P < 0.0001). R status was confirmed as an independent predictor for OS ( R 1 hazard ratio: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.07-2.26) and RFS ( R 1 hazard ratio: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.14-2.0). In addition, R 1 resections were significantly associated with local but not distant recurrence ( P < 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: The revised R status is an independent predictor of postresection survival and local recurrence in PDAC after NAT. Achieving R 0 resection with a margin of at least 1 mm should be a primary goal in the surgical treatment of PDAC after NAT.

FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine-based Chemotherapy for Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Multi-institutional, Patient-Level, Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer often presents as locally advanced (LAPC) or borderline resectable (BRPC). Neoadjuvant systemic therapy is recommended as initial treatment. It is currently unclear what chemotherapy should be preferred for patients with BRPC or LAPC. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and multi-institutional meta-analysis of patient-level data regarding the use of initial systemic therapy for BRPC and LAPC. Outcomes were reported separately for tumor entity and by chemotherapy regimen including FOLFIRINOX (FIO) or gemcitabine-based. RESULTS: A total of 23 studies comprising 2930 patients were analyzed for overall survival (OS) calculated from the beginning of systemic treatment. OS for patients with BRPC was 22.0 months with FIO, 16.9 months with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (Gem/nab), 21.6 months with gemcitabine/cisplatin or oxaliplatin or docetaxel or capecitabine (GemX), and 10 months with gemcitabine monotherapy (Gem-mono) (p < 0.0001). In patients with LAPC, OS also was higher with FIO (17.1 months) compared with Gem/nab (12.5 months), GemX (12.3 months), and Gem-mono (9.4 months; p < 0.0001). This difference was driven by the patients who did not undergo surgery, where FIO was superior to other regimens. The resection rates for patients with BRPC were 0.55 for gemcitabine-based chemotherapy and 0.53 with FIO. In patients with LAPC, resection rates were 0.19 with Gemcitabine and 0.28 with FIO. In resected patients, OS for patients with BRPC was 32.9 months with FIO and not different compared to Gem/nab, (28.6 months, p = 0.285), GemX (38.8 months, p = 0.1), or Gem-mono (23.1 months, p = 0.083). A similar trend was observed in resected patients converted from LAPC. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with BRPC or LAPC, primary treatment with FOLFIRINOX compared with Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy appears to provide a survival benefit for patients that are ultimately unresectable. For patients that undergo surgical resection, outcomes are similar between GEM+ and FOLFIRINOX when delivered in the neoadjuvant setting.

Long-Term Follow-Up after Surgery for Chronic Pancreatitis: A Bicentric Retrospective Experience.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of surgery on nutritional status, pancreatic function, and symptoms of patients affected by chronic pancreatitis (CP) has not been unequivocally determined. This study aimed to evaluate clinical follow-up after surgery for CP in an Italian-Austrian population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients operated for CP at two high-volume centers between 2000 and 2018 were analyzed. The following parameters were compared between the pre- and postoperative period: nutritional status, endocrine and exocrine pancreatic functions, and chronic pain. RESULTS: Overall, 186 patients underwent surgery for CP. Among these, 68 (40%) answered a specific follow-up questionnaire. The body mass index showed a significant increase between pre- and postoperative assessments (21.1 vs. 22.5 p = 0.003). Furthermore, a 60% decrease in the prevalence of chronic pain (81 vs. 21%, p < 0.001) was observed. On the contrary, both exocrine and endocrine pancreatic functions pointed toward a worsening after surgery, with consistent higher rates of patients presenting with diabetes mellitus, as well as patients requiring insulin therapy and oral intake of pancreatic enzymes. The analysis of body composition performed on 40 (24%) patients with a complete imaging pack revealed no significant change in the nutritional status after surgery. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Despite the good results observed in terms of pain relief, the surgical approach led to a consistent worsening of the global pancreatic function. No significant influence of surgery on the nutritional status of patients was detected.

Surgery for chronic pancreatitis: the comparison of two high-volume centers reveals lack of a uniform operative management.

PURPOSE: Many aspects of surgical therapy for chronic pancreatitis (CP), including the correct indication and timing, as well as the most appropriate operative techniques, are still a matter of debate in the surgical community and vary widely across different centers. The aim of the present study was to uncover and analyze these differences by comparing the experiences of two specialized surgical units in Italy and Austria. METHODS: All patients operated for CP between 2000 and 2018 at the two centers involved were included in this retrospective analysis. Data regarding the clinical history and the pre- and perioperative surgical course were analyzed and compared between the two institutions. RESULTS: Our analysis showed a progressive decrease in the annual rate of pancreatic surgical procedures performed for CP in Verona (no. = 91) over the last two decades (from 3% to less than 1%); by contrast, this percentage increased from 3 to 9% in Vienna (no. = 77) during the same time frame. Considerable differences were also detected with regard to the timing of surgery from the first diagnosis of CP - 4 years (IQR 5.5) in the Austrian series vs two (IQR 4.0) in the Italian series -, and of indications for surgery, with a 12% higher prevalence of groove pancreatitis among patients in the Verona cohort. CONCLUSION: The comparison of the surgical attitude towards CP between two surgical centers proved that a consistent approach to this pathology still is lacking. The identification of common guidelines and labels of surgical eligibility is advisable in order to avoid interinstitutional treatment disparities.

Correction to: The Prognostic Index Independently Predicts Survival in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Undergoing Resection.

In the original article there are errors in the authors' affiliations.

The Prognostic Index Independently Predicts Survival in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Undergoing Resection.

BACKGROUND: Cancer-related inflammation is associated with tumour proliferation, maintenance and dissemination. It therefore impacts pancreatic cancer survival. The goal of this study was to examine the Prognostic Index (PI) as a prognostic biomarker for survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In addition, we explored factors known to interact with the immune and inflammation cascade that might interfere with the PI's strength for prognostication. METHODS: Patients with PDAC undergoing resection were analysed retrospectively. The PI was calculated from preoperatively derived C-reactive protein levels and white blood count. Data were subject to correlation and survival analysis. RESULTS: Of 357 patients, 235 (65.8%) patients had a PI 0, 108 (30.3%) PI 1, and 14 (3.9%) PI 2. Median (quartiles) survival with a high PI (group 1 + 2) was 13.2 months (7.7-27.0), compared with 18.7 months (10.2-35.4) with a low PI (group 0; p = 0.012). The PI proved to be an independent prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival (p = 0.003) adjusted for conventional prognostic factors. Prognostic strength was influenced by the presence of a bile stent (p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: The PI is a strong and solid independent prognostic tool for survival in patients with PDAC undergoing resection. Preoperative survey of inflammatory activity as provided by the use of a biomarker like the PI may help to identify those patients at risk of a poor prognosis.

Long-term Risk of Pancreatic Malignancy in Patients With Branch Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm in a Referral Center.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Little is known about the development of branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs). We evaluated long-term outcomes of a large cohort of patients with BD-IPMNs to determine risk of malignancy and define a subset of low-risk BD-IPMNs. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 577 patients with suspected or presumed BD-IPMN under surveillance at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Patients underwent cross-sectional imaging analysis at 3 months or later after their initial diagnosis. The diagnosis of BD-IPMN was based on the presence of unilocular or multilocular cysts of the pancreas and a non-dilated main pancreatic duct (<5 mm). We collected demographic, clinical, and pathology data. Cysts were characterized at the time of diagnosis and during the follow-up period. Follow-up duration was time between initial cyst diagnosis and date of last visit or death for patients without development of pancreatic cancer, date of surgery for patients with histologically confirmed malignancy, or date of first discovery of malignancy by imaging analysis for patients with unresectable tumors or who underwent neoadjuvant treatment before surgery. The primary outcome was risk of malignancy, with a focus on patients followed for 5 years or more, compared with that of the US population, based on standardized incidence ratio. RESULTS: Of the 577 patients studied, 479 (83%) were asymptomatic at diagnosis and 363 (63%) underwent endoscopic ultrasound at least once. The median follow-up time was 82 months (range, 6-329 months) for the entire study cohort; 363 patients (63%) underwent surveillance for more than 5 years, and 121 (21%) for more than 10 years. Malignancies (high-grade dysplasia or invasive neoplasm) developed after 5 years in 20 of 363 patients (5.5%), and invasive cancer developed in 16 of 363 patients (4.4%). The standardized incidence ratio for patients with BD-IPMNs without worrisome features of malignancy at 5 years was 18.8 (95% confidence interval, 9.7-32.8; P < .001). One hundred and eight patients had cysts ≤1.5 cm for more than 5 years of follow-up; only 1 of these patients (0.9%) developed a distinct ductal adenocarcinoma. By contrast, among the 255 patients with cysts >1.5 cm, 19 (7.5%) developed malignancy (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective analysis of patients with BD-IPMNs under surveillance, their overall risk of malignancy, almost 8%, lasted for 10 years or more, supporting continued surveillance after 5 years. Cysts that remain ≤1.5 cm for more than 5 years might be considered low-risk for progression to malignancy.

IPMN involving the main pancreatic duct: biology, epidemiology, and long-term outcomes following resection.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) with predominant involvement of the main pancreatic duct (MPD), analyzing predictors for survival and recurrence. BACKGROUND: IPMNs involving the MPD harbor a high likelihood of malignancy and different biological features. The appropriateness of including cases with minimal noncircumferential MPD involvement has been challenged because these show clinicopathological features that are similar to branch duct IPMN. Accordingly, their exclusion has led to a redefinition of MPD IPMN (MD-IPMN). METHODS: Retrospective review of resected MD-IPMN from 1990 to 2013. All slides were reviewed by a single pancreatic pathologist and classified on the basis of epithelial type and invasive component. RESULTS: A total of 223 patients underwent resection for IPMN involving the MPD. Of these, 50 were excluded because of minimal MPD involvement. Among the 173 patients analyzed, median age was 68 years and 55% were males. Predominant epithelial phenotype was intestinal (50%). Forty-eight patients (28%) had low- or intermediate-grade dysplasia, whereas 125 (72%) had either high-grade dysplasia (33%) or invasive carcinoma (39%). Of the 67 invasive IPMNs, 39 were tubular carcinomas (58%) and invasion was minimal (<5 mm) in 28 (42%). The 5-year overall survival rate was 69% and the disease-specific survival rate was 83%. The estimated recurrence rate at 10 years was 25%. Size and type of the invasive component, lymph node positivity, and a positive resection margin were predictors for both survival and recurrence (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MD-IPMN is mainly intestinal-type and malignant. After resection, it has a very favorable prognosis, especially in the absence of macroscopic invasive carcinoma.

Effects of Comorbidities on Outcomes of Patients With Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas occur mostly in older individuals. Individual life expectancy and risk of death from other factors must be carefully considered in analyzing the risks that IPMNs pose. We investigated whether there is a subset of patients with IPMNs and a high risk of dying from other causes who would not benefit from pancreatic surgery. METHODS: We collected data from 725 patients at Massachusetts General Hospital who underwent resection or have been under observation for IPMNs from 1992 through 2012. Comorbidities were classified according to the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (CACI). Causes of death were recorded, and survival data were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The patients' median CACI score was 3; 10% of patients had CACI of 7 or more. Of the entire cohort, 55% underwent resection, and the remaining 45% have been under observation. After a median follow-up period of 5 years, 177 patients died (24%, 55% of deaths within 5 years of diagnosis); 78% of deaths were not related to IPMNs. The median survival time for all patients with CACI score of 7 or more was 43 months. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that the chance of non-IPMN-related death within 3 years of diagnosis is 11-fold higher for patients with CACI score of 7 or more than for patients with lower scores. CONCLUSIONS: The CACI can be used to identify patients with a high risk of death from factors other than IPMNs within a few years after diagnosis. These patients are therefore not likely to benefit from further IPMN observation or pancreatic resection.

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Our understanding of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas has remarkably grown within the last decade; nonetheless there is still an ongoing controversy if the majority of these potentially malignant neoplasms need to be resected or if observation in a subset is well tolerated. RECENT FINDINGS: Novel cyst fluid biomarkers, like Gnas mutations or mab DAS-1, could play a pivotal role in the distinction of IPMN vs. other cystic lesions, in the sub-classification of IPMN and in the detection of IPMN with high-grade dysplasia or invasive cancer. Other recent studies focused on natural history of minimal- and extensive-mixed IPMN and the safety of the 2012 AIP guidelines. Small series also described that observation can be an option in selected frail patients with MD-IPMN. Further, data from a large European multicenter study analysis indicated that patients with IPMN do not have an increased frequency of extrapancreatic malignancies. SUMMARY: Increasing knowledge about the nature of IPMN and their subtypes has resulted in an individualized approach in diagnosis and treatment. Owing to the availability of accurate diagnostic instruments, timing and indication for pancreatic resection have become more selective, sparing patients with harmless IPMN from major surgery.

Impact of the reconstruction method on delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is of considerable concern in patients undergoing pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD). Prolonged hospital stay, increased cost, and decreased quality of life add on to interventions needed to treat DGE. This study was conducted to determine if performing duodenojejunostomy via the antecolic rather than the retrocolic route improved incidence of DGE. METHODS: Patients undergoing PPPD between April 2007 and November 2009 were randomized for either antecolic or retrocolic reconstruction of the duodenojejunostomy. DGE was then assessed by clinical criteria on postoperative day (POD) 10. A paracetamol absorption test was also administered with a liquid meal, and serial plasma levels of intestinal peptides were measured. RESULTS: Overall, 64 patients were amenable for analysis: 36 in the antecolic group and 28 in the retrocolic group. The incidences of DGE on POD 10 were 17.6 and 23.1 % (antecolic vs. retrocolic, respectively) (p = 0.628). The two groups did not differ in regard to their median (interquartile range) postoperative hospital length of stay [13.0 (10.0­17.5) vs. 12.5 (11.0­17.0) days; p = 0.446], time to regular diet [5 (5­7) vs. 5 (4­6) days; p = 0.353], or morbidity (52.9 vs. 50.0 %; p = 0.777). The median length of nasogastric tube decompression was similar in the two groups [4 (3­7) vs. 3 (3­5) days; p = 0.600]. Levels of paracetamol and glucagon-like peptide-1 were markedly decreased in patients with DGE. CONCLUSIONS: Antecolic reconstruction after PPPD does not improve the occurrence/the incidence of DGE and is similar to retrocolic reconstruction with regard to secondary outcome parameters.

Preparing for prospective clinical trials: a national initiative of an excellence registry for consecutive pancreatic cancer resections.

BACKGROUND: Despite significant improvements in perioperative mortality as well as response rates to multimodality treatment, results after surgical resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with respect to long-term outcomes remain disappointing. Patient recruitment for prospective international trials on adjuvant and neoadjuvant regimens is challenging for various reasons. We set out to assess the preconditions and potential to perform perioperative trials for pancreatic cancer within a well-established Austrian nationwide network of surgical and medical oncologists (Austrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group). METHODS: From 2005 to 2010 five high-volume centers and one medium-volume center completed standardized data entry forms with 33 parameters (history and patient related data, preoperative clinical staging and work-up, surgical details and intraoperative findings, postoperative complications, reinterventions, reoperations, 30-day mortality, histology, and timing of multimodality treatment). Outside of the study group, in Austria pancreatic resections are performed in three "high-volume" centers (>10 pancreatic resections per year), three "medium-volume" centers (5­10 pancreatic resections per year), and the rest in various low-volume centers (<5 pancreatic resections per year) in Austria. Nationwide data for prevalence of and surgical resections for pancreatic adenocarcinoma were contributed by the National Cancer Registry of Statistics of Austria and the Austrian Health Institute. RESULTS: In total, 492 consecutive patients underwent pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma. All postoperative complications leading to hospital readmission were treated at the primary surgical department and documented in the database. Overall morbidity and pancreatic fistula rate were 45.5 % and 10.1 %, respectively. Within the entire cohort there were 9.8 % radiological reinterventions and 10.4 % reoperations. Length of stay was 16 days in median (0­209); 12 of 492 patients died within 30 days after operation, resulting in a 30-day mortality rate of 2.4 %. Seven of the total 19 deaths (36.8 %) occurred after 30 days, during hospitalization at the surgical department, resulting in a hospital mortality rate of 3.9 % (19/492). With a standardized histopathological protocol, there were 70 % (21/30) R0 resections, 30 % (9/30) R1 resections, and no R2 resections in Vienna and 62.7 % (32/51) R0 resections, 35.3 % (18/51) R1 resections, and 2 % (1/51) R2 resections in Salzburg. Resection margin status with nonstandardized protocols was classified as R0 in 82 % (339/411), R1 in 16 % (16/411), and R2 in 1.2 % (5/411). Perioperative chemotherapy was administered in 81.1 % of patients (8.3 % neoadjuvant; 68.5 % adjuvant; 4.3 % palliative); chemoradiotherapy (1.6 % neoadjuvant; 3 % adjuvant; 0.2 % palliative), in 4.9 % of patients. The six centers that contributed to this registry initiative provided surgical treatment to 40 % of all Austrian patients, resulting in a median annual recruitment of 85 (51­104) patients for the entire ABCSG-group and a median of 11.8 (0­38) surgeries for each individual department. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical quality data of the ABCSG core pancreatic group are in line with international standards. With continuing centralization the essential potential to perform prospective clinical trials for pancreatic adenocarcinoma is given in Austria. Several protocol proposals aiming at surgical and multimodality research questions are currently being discussed

Prevalence and long-term implications of preoperative anemia in patients undergoing elective general surgery: a retrospective cohort study at a university hospital.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the prevalence of anaemia in a cohort of patients undergoing elective general surgery at a university hospital. Furthermore, the authors investigated the influence of anaemia on short-term and long-term postoperative outcome. BACKGROUND: Awareness of the negative impact of preoperative anaemia on perioperative morbidity and mortality is rising. Anaemia is a potentially modifiable factor, and its therapy might improve patient outcome in elective surgery. Nevertheless, patients with preoperative anaemia frequently undergo elective surgery without receiving adequate preoperative treatment. METHODS: In this single-centre cohort study, the authors analyzed 6908 adult patients who underwent elective general surgery. Patients undergoing day-clinic surgery were excluded. In all patients, preoperative haemoglobin concentration and haematocrit was available. RESULTS: Of all patients analyzed, 32.9% were anaemic (21.0% mild, 11.8% moderate, 1.1% severe). Median time to last follow-up was 5.2 years. During the whole study period, 27.1% of patients died (1.2% died during the hospital stay); median time to death was 1.3 years. Patients with preoperative anaemia had significantly higher mortality rates ( P <0.001) and a higher probability of postoperative complications ( P <0.001). Likewise, receiving blood transfusions was associated with a higher risk of death ( P <0.001). CONCLUSION: This retrospective single-centre analysis confirmed that preoperative anaemia is common, and is a significant risk factor for unfavourable postoperative outcome. As anaemia is a modifiable risk factor, the implementation of a patient blood management concept is crucial to reduce detrimental postoperative events associated with anaemia.

Prognostic impact of resection margin status on survival after neoadjuvant treatment for pancreatic cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: A greater than 1 mm tumour-free resection margin (R0 >1 mm) is a prognostic factor in upfront-resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. After neoadjuvant treatment (NAT); however, the prognostic impact of resection margin (R) status remains controversial. METHODS: Randomised and non-randomised studies assessing the association of R status and survival in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after NAT were sought by systematic searches of MEDLINE, Web of Science and CENTRAL. Hazard ratios (HR) and their corresponding 95% CI were collected to generate log HR using the inverse-variance method. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed and the results presented as weighted HR. Sensitivity and meta-regression analyses were conducted to account for different surgical procedures and varying length of follow-up, respectively. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies with a total of 4929 patients were included. Based on univariable data, R0 greater than 1 mm was significantly associated with prolonged overall survival (OS) (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.57-1.97; P<0.00001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.39-1.97; P<0.00001). Using adjusted data, R0 greater than 1 mm was significantly associated with prolonged OS (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.39-1.97; P<0.00001) and DFS (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.30-2.39; P=0.0003). Results for R1 direct were comparable in the entire cohort; however, no prognostic impact was detected in sensitivity analysis including only partial pancreatoduodenectomies. CONCLUSION: After NAT, a tumour-free margin greater than 1 mm is independently associated with improved OS as well as DFS in patients undergoing surgical resection for pancreatic cancer.

Branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: does cyst size change the tip of the scale? A critical analysis of the revised international consensus guidelines in a large single-institutional series.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to critically analyze the safety of the revised guidelines, with focus on cyst size and worrisome features in the management of BD-IPMN. BACKGROUND: The Sendai guidelines for management of branch duct (BD) intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) espouse safety of observation of asymptomatic cysts smaller than 3 cm without nodules (Sendai negative). Revised international consensus guidelines published in 2012 suggest a still more conservative approach, even for lesions of 3 cm or larger. By contrast, 2 recent studies have challenged the safety of both guidelines, describing invasive carcinoma or carcinoma in situ in 67% of BD-IPMN smaller than 3 cm and in 25% of "Sendai-negative" BD-IPMN. METHODS AND RESULTS: Review of a prospective database identified 563 patients with BD-IPMN. A total of 240 patients underwent surgical resection (152 at the time of diagnosis and 88 after being initially followed); the remaining 323 have been managed by observation with median follow-up of 60 months. No patient developed unresectable BD-IPMN carcinoma during follow-up. Invasive cancer arising in BD-IPMN was found in 23 patients of the entire cohort (4%), and an additional 21 patients (3.7%) had or developed concurrent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. According to the revised guidelines, 76% of resected BD-IPMN with carcinoma in situ and 95% of resected BD-IPMN with invasive cancer had high-risk stigmata or worrisome features. The risk of high-grade dysplasia in nonworrisome lesions smaller than 3 cm was 6.5%, but when the threshold was raised to greater than 3 cm, it was 8.8%, and 1 case of invasive carcinoma was found. CONCLUSIONS: Expectant management of BD-IPMN following the old guidelines is safe, whereas caution is advised for larger lesions, even in the absence of worrisome features.

Prognostic significance of mean corpuscular volume in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and multimodal treatment.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Mean corpuscular volume (MCV) has shown mounting evidence as a prognostic indicator in a number of malignancies. The aim of this study was to examine the prognostic potential of pretherapeutic MCV among patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who underwent upfront resection or resection after neoadjuvant treatment (NT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with PDAC who underwent pancreatic resection between 1997 and 2019 were included in this study. Neoadjuvantly treated patients' serum MCV was measured before NT and before surgery. In patients undergoing upfront resection serum MCV was measured before surgery. Median MCV values were used as cut-off to distinguish high from low MCV values. RESULTS: Five hundred and forty-nine (438 upfront resected and 111 neoadjuvantly treated) patients were included in this study. Multivariate analysis revealed, that high MCV before and after NT, were independent negative prognostic factors for overall survival (P<0.01, respectively). Furthermore, the median MCV value from before to after NT increased significantly (P<0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) and was (P=0.03, Wilcoxon rank sum test) associated with tumor response to NT. CONCLUSION: High MCV is an independent adverse prognostic factor in patients with resectable neoadjuvantly treated PDAC and may qualify as useful indicator to help physicians to provide personalized prognostication.

Smoking impairs the effect of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX on postresection survival in pancreatic cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Smoking plays an important role in carcinogenesis, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, little is known about the association between smoking status and prognosis in resected PDAC. METHODS: All patients who underwent resection for PDAC were identified from two prospective institutional databases. Clinicopathologic data as well as demographics including smoking status were extracted. Survival analysis and multivariable Cox regression modelling was performed. Restricted cubic splines were used for linear data to define cut-off points. RESULTS: Out of 848 patients, 357 (42.1%) received neoadjuvant treatment (NAT), 491 upfront resection (57.9%), and 475 (56%) adjuvant therapy. The median overall survival (OS) was 27.8 months, 36.1 months, and 23.0 months for the entire cohort, after NAT and upfront resection. 464 patients were never smokers (54.7%), 250 former smokers (29.5%), and 134 active smokers (15.8%). In the multivariable model, the interaction of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and active smoking was associated with the highest risk for decreased OS (harzard ratio (HR) 2.35; 95% confidence interval 1.13-4.90) and strongly mitigated the benefit of FOLFIRNOX (HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.25-0.63). Adjusted median OS in NAT patients with FOLFIRINOX was not reached for never and former smokers, compared to 26.2 months in active smokers. Based on the model, a nomogram was generated to illustrate the probability of 5-year survival after PDAC resection. CONCLUSION: The present study confirms that neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX is associated with excellent survival and demonstrates that active smoking reduces its benefit. The nomogram can assist in daily clinical practice and emphasises the importance of smoking cessation in patients with PDAC, especially prior to NAT with FOLFIRINOX.

Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced 3.0-T MR imaging versus multiphasic 64-detector row CT: prospective evaluation in patients suspected of having pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance (detection, local staging) of multiphasic 64-detector row computed tomography (CT) with that of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients suspected of having pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this prospective study, and all patients provided written informed consent. Multidetector CT and MR imaging were performed in 89 patients (48 women aged 46-89 years [mean, 65.6 years] and 41 men aged 46-86 years [mean, 65.3 years]) suspected of having pancreatic cancer on the basis of findings from clinical examination or previous imaging studies. Two readers independently assessed the images to characterize lesions and determine the presence of focal masses, vascular invasion, distant metastases, and resectability. Findings from surgery, biopsy, endosonography, or follow-up imaging were used as the standard of reference. Logistic regression, the McNemar test, and κ values were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Focal pancreatic masses were present in 63 patients; 43 patients had adenocarcinoma. For reader 1, the sensitivities and specificities in the detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma were 98% (42 of 43 patients) and 96% (44 of 46 patients), respectively, for CT and 98% (42 of 43 patients) and 96% (44 of 46 patients) for MR imaging. For reader 2, the sensitivities and specificities were 93% (40 of 43 patients) and 96% (44 of 46 patients), respectively, for CT and 95% (41 of 43 patients) and 96% (44 of 46 patients) for MR imaging. Vessel infiltration was determined in 22 patients who underwent surgery, and reader 1 obtained sensitivities and specificities of 90% (nine of 10 vessels) and 98% (119 of 122 vessels), respectively, for CT and 80% (eight of 10 vessels) and 96% (117 of 122 vessels) for MR imaging; for reader 2, those values were 70% (seven of 10 vessels) and 98% (120 of 122 vessels) for CT and 50% (five of 10 vessels) and 98% (120 of 122 vessels) for MR imaging. Both readers correctly assessed resectability in 87% (13 of 15 patients) of cases with CT and 93% (14 of 15 patients) of cases with MR imaging. Nonresectability was assessed correctly with CT in 75% (six of eight patients) of cases by reader 1 and 63% (five of eight patients) of cases by reader 2; nonresectability was correctly assessed with MR imaging in 75% (six of eight patients) of cases by reader 1 and 50% (four of eight patients) of cases by reader 2. None of the differences between modalities and readers were statistically significant (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Both CT and MR imaging are equally suited for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.11101189/-/DC1.

NeoGemTax: gemcitabine and docetaxel as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced nonmetastasized pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: About 30% of patients with pancreatic cancer suffer from locally advanced nonmetastatic carcinoma at the time of diagnosis. We conducted a prospective phase II clinical trial using neoadjuvant chemotherapy, consisting of gemcitabine and docetaxel, to assess the rate of complete radical resection and overall survival. METHODS: Gemcitabine (900 mg/m2) and docetaxel (35 mg/m2) were given on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Two cycles were administered for a preoperative treatment duration of 8 weeks. Patients experiencing tumor regression or stable disease and improved performance status subsequently underwent surgical exploration and pancreatic resection, if feasible. All patients were followed postoperatively to assess long-term survival. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients were eligible and included in the intent-to-treat and evaluable population. Thirteen patients had unresectable disease at inclusion and 12 patients had borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Finally, 8 of 25 (32%) patients underwent resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy; 7 (87%) of these patients had R0 resection. The median overall survival of patients who underwent resection was 16 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8-24 months) compared to 12 months (95% CI, 8-16 months) for those without resection (p=0.276). The median recurrence-free survival rate after resection was 12 months (95% CI, 2-21 months). CONCLUSIONS: NeoGemTax was safe and resection was feasible in a number of patients after systemic neoadjuvant treatment. Further randomized clinical trials are needed to identify novel multimodal regimens that would be able to increase the percentage of patients undergoing curative pancreatic cancer surgery despite advanced tumor stage at the time of diagnosis.