Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 85
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Lancet ; 403(10422): 147-159, 2024 Jan 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38008109

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) do not achieve complete control of their symptoms with current available treatments. In a dose-finding phase 2b study, ligelizumab improved urticaria symptoms in patients with H1-antihistamine (H1-AH) refractory CSU. Here, we report the efficacy and safety outcomes from two ligelizumab phase 3 studies. METHODS: PEARL-1 and PEARL-2 were identically designed randomised, double-blind, active-controlled and placebo-controlled parallel-group studies. Patients aged 12 years or older with moderate-to-severe H1-AH refractory CSU were recruited from 347 sites in 46 countries and randomly allocated in a 3:3:3:1 ratio via Interactive Response Technology to 72 mg ligelizumab, 120 mg ligelizumab, 300 mg omalizumab, or placebo, dosed every 4 weeks, for 52 weeks. Patients allocated to placebo received 120 mg ligelizumab from week 24. The primary endpoint was change-from-baseline (CFB) in weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) at week 12, and was analysed in all eligible adult patients according to the treatment assigned at random allocation. Safety was assessed throughout the study in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. The studies were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03580369 (PEARL-1) and NCT03580356 (PEARL-2). Both trials are now complete. FINDINGS: Between Oct 17, 2018, and Oct 26, 2021, 2057 adult patients were randomly allocated across both studies (72 mg ligelizumab n=614; 120 mg ligelizumab n=616; 300 mg omalizumab n=618, and placebo n=209). A total of 1480 (72%) of 2057 were female, and 577 (28%) of 2057 were male. Mean UAS7 at baseline across study groups ranged from 29·37 to 31·10. At week 12, estimated treatment differences in mean CFB-UAS7 were as follows: for 72 mg ligelizumab versus placebo, -8·0 (95% CI -10·6 to -5·4; PEARL-1), -10·0 (-12·6 to -7·4; PEARL-2); 72 mg ligelizumab versus omalizumab 0·7 (-1·2 to 2·5; PEARL-1), 0·4 (-1·4 to 2·2; PEARL-2); 120 mg ligelizumab versus placebo -8·0 (-10·5 to -5·4; PEARL-1), -11·1 (-13·7 to -8·5; PEARL-2); 120 mg ligelizumab versus omalizumab 0·7 (-1·1 to 2·5; PEARL-1), -0·7 (-2·5 to 1·1; PEARL-2). Both doses of ligelizumab were superior to placebo (p<0·0001), but not to omalizumab, in both studies. No new safety signals were identified for ligelizumab or omalizumab. INTERPRETATION: In the phase 3 PEARL studies, ligelizumab demonstrated superior efficacy versus placebo but not versus omalizumab. The safety profile of ligelizumab was consistent with previous studies. FUNDING: Novartis Pharma.


Asunto(s)
Antialérgicos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Urticaria Crónica , Urticaria , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Antialérgicos/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Crónica , Urticaria Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Método Doble Ciego , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos H1/uso terapéutico , Omalizumab/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Urticaria/tratamiento farmacológico
2.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 153(5): 1229-1240, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38141832

RESUMEN

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is an inflammatory skin disorder that manifests with itchy wheals, angioedema, or both for more than 6 weeks. Mast cells and basophils are the key pathogenic drivers of CSU; their activation results in histamine and cytokine release with subsequent dermal inflammation. Two overlapping mechanisms of mast cell and basophil activation have been proposed in CSU: type I autoimmunity, also called autoallergy, which is mediated via IgE against various autoallergens, and type IIb autoimmunity, which is mediated predominantly via IgG directed against the IgE receptor FcεRI or FcεRI-bound IgE. Both mechanisms involve cross-linking of FcεRI and activation of downstream signaling pathways, and they may co-occur in the same patient. In addition, B-cell receptor signaling has been postulated to play a key role in CSU by generating autoreactive B cells and autoantibody production. A cornerstone of FcεRI and B-cell receptor signaling is Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK), making BTK inhibition a clear therapeutic target in CSU. The potential application of early-generation BTK inhibitors, including ibrutinib, in allergic and autoimmune diseases is limited owing to their unfavorable benefit-risk profile. However, novel BTK inhibitors with improved selectivity and safety profiles have been developed and are under clinical investigation in autoimmune diseases, including CSU. In phase 2 trials, the BTK inhibitors remibrutinib and fenebrutinib have demonstrated rapid and sustained improvements in CSU disease activity. With phase 3 studies of remibrutinib ongoing, it is hoped that BTK inhibitors will present an effective, well-tolerated option for patients with antihistamine-refractory CSU, a phenotype that presents a considerable clinical challenge.


Asunto(s)
Agammaglobulinemia Tirosina Quinasa , Urticaria Crónica , Transducción de Señal , Humanos , Agammaglobulinemia Tirosina Quinasa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Urticaria Crónica/inmunología , Urticaria Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Mastocitos/inmunología , Animales , Receptores de IgE/inmunología , Receptores de IgE/metabolismo , Basófilos/inmunología , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico
3.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 154(1): 184-194, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38431226

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by recurrent pruritic wheals (hives) and/or angioedema. Patients with CSU could remain symptomatic despite standard-of-care H1 antihistamines (H1-AH) or anti-IgE (omalizumab) treatment. Dupilumab blocks IL-4/IL-13 signaling and is approved for multiple type 2/atopic indications. OBJECTIVE: We conducted two phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials comparing dupilumab with placebo in patients with symptomatic CSU despite H1-AH. METHODS: In LIBERTY-CSU CUPID Study A, patients were omalizumab-naive (n = 138, aged ≥6 years). In Study B, patients were omalizumab-intolerant/incomplete responders (n = 108, aged ≥12 years). The primary end point was either change from baseline over 7 days in the Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) or Itch Severity Score (ISS7) at week 24, with the other as a key secondary end point, depending on regional regulatory requirements. Studies were pooled for safety assessment. RESULTS: In Study A, UAS7 and ISS7 improved with dupilumab versus placebo (difference -8.5 [95% CI, -13.2 to -3.9; P = .0003] and -4.2 [95% CI, -6.6 to -1.8; P = .0005]). In Study B, tested at α = 0.043 after interim analysis, UAS7 improved (difference -5.8 [95% CI, -11.4 to -0.3; P = .0390]), with a numerical trend in ISS7 (difference -2.9 [95% CI, -5.7 to -0.07; nominal P = .0449, not significant]). Pooled safety data were consistent between dupilumab and placebo and with the known dupilumab safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: Dupilumab reduced urticaria activity by reducing itch and hives severity in omalizumab-naive patients with CSU uncontrolled with H1-AH. Although the primary end point for Study B was not met, dupilumab effects were small in patients who were omalizumab-intolerant/incomplete responders.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Urticaria Crónica , Humanos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Adulto , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Urticaria Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Método Doble Ciego , Adolescente , Omalizumab/uso terapéutico , Omalizumab/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Niño , Prurito/tratamiento farmacológico , Antialérgicos/uso terapéutico
4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38852861

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The benefits and harms of adding antileukotrienes to H1 antihistamines (AHs) for the management of urticaria (hives, itch, and/or angioedema) remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: We sought to systematically synthesize the treatment outcomes of antileukotrienes in combination with AHs versus AHs alone for acute and chronic urticaria. METHODS: As part of updating American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology and American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters urticaria guidelines, we searched Medline, Embase, Central, LILACS, WPRIM, IBECS, ICTRP, CBM, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, US Food and Drug Administration, and European Medicines Agency databases from inception to December 18, 2023, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating antileukotrienes and AHs versus AHs alone in patients with urticaria. Paired reviewers independently screened citations, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Random effects models pooled effect estimates for urticaria activity, itch, wheal, sleep, quality of life, and harms. The GRADE approach informed certainty of evidence ratings. The study was registered at the Open Science Framework (osf.io/h2bfx/). RESULTS: Thirty-four RCTs enrolled 3324 children and adults. Compared to AHs alone, the combination of a leukotriene receptor antagonist with AHs probably modestly reduces urticaria activity (mean difference, -5.04; 95% confidence interval, -6.36 to -3.71; 7-day urticaria activity score) with moderate certainty. We made similar findings for itch and wheal severity as well as quality of life. Adverse events were probably not different between groups (moderate certainty); however, no RCT reported on neuropsychiatric adverse events. CONCLUSION: Among patients with urticaria, adding leukotriene receptor antagonists to AHs probably modestly improves urticaria activity with little to no increase in overall adverse events. The added risk of neuropsychiatric adverse events in this population with leukotriene receptor antagonists is small and uncertain.

5.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38885835

RESUMEN

Chronic urticaria can be divided into two subsets: chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) with skin lesions occurring without a specific trigger and chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) which has an identified specific stimulus. The annual prevalence of CU is 0.5% to 2.3% globally. CSU is a self-limited disorder in most cases, with an average duration of 2 to 5 years, but symptoms persist beyond five years in up to 30% of patients. The first line of treatment is a daily non-sedating, second-generation H1- antihistamines. CSU guidelines recommend using oral non-sedating antihistamines up to 4-fold in patients with CSU unresponsive to standard doses as the next step in treatment. A meta-analysis found that the rate of response in patients with CSU who responded to up-dosing was 63.2%. Therefore, approximately 40% of patients continue to have persistent hives and itching requiring treatment with the biologic omalizumab based on evidence from randomized controlled trials. Although omalizumab has been shown to markedly improve symptoms of CSU, omalizumab is not effective in all patients and has not been shown to induce long-term disease remission. Thus, there is an unmet need for more effective treatments that can lead to cure or long-term remission. In this review, we will provide an overview of new treatment targets and biologics that are under investigation for the treatment of CSU.

6.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38901542

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Topical corticosteroids are widely used as a treatment for itch and wheals (urticaria), but their benefits and harms are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To systematically synthesize the benefits and harms of topical corticosteroids for the treatment of urticaria. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL from database inception to March 23, 2024, for randomized trials addressing comparing topical corticosteroid to placebo for patients with urticaria (either chronic spontaneous or inducible urticaria or acute urticaria elicited from skin/intradermal allergy testing). Paired reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Random-effects meta-analyses addressed urticaria severity, itch severity (numeric rating scale; range 0-10; higher is worse), and adverse events. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach informed certainty of evidence ratings. PROSPERO registration: CRD42023455182. RESULTS: Nineteen RCTs enrolled 379 participants with a median of mean age of 30.1 years (range 21.1 to 44.0). Compared to placebo, topical corticosteroids may reduce wheal size (ratio of means 0.47, 95%CI 0.38 to 0.59; low certainty) and itch severity (mean difference -1.30, 95%CI -5.07 to 2.46; very low certainty). Topical corticosteroids result in little to no difference in overall adverse events (94 fewer patients per 1000, 95%CrI 172 fewer to 12 more; high certainty). CONCLUSION: Compared to placebo, topical corticosteroids may result in a reduction of wheal size, and result in little to no difference in overall adverse events. Topical corticosteroids may reduce itch severity, but the evidence is very uncertain. Future large, randomized trials addressing the use of topical corticosteroids would further support optimal urticaria management.

7.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 151(1): 192-201, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36223848

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) has been shown to play a central role in the initiation and persistence of allergic responses. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated whether tezepelumab, a human monoclonal anti-TSLP antibody, improved the efficacy of subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) and promoted the development of tolerance in patients with allergic rhinitis. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind parallel design trial in patients with cat allergy. A total of 121 patients were randomized to receive either intravenous tezepelumab plus subcutaneous cat SCIT, cat SCIT alone, tezepelumab alone, or placebo for 52 weeks, followed by 52 weeks of observation. Nasal allergen challenge (NAC), skin testing, and blood and nasal samples were obtained throughout the study. RESULTS: At week 52, the NAC-induced total nasal symptom scores (TNSS) (calculated as area under the curve [AUC0-1h] and as peak score [Peak0-1h] during the first hour after NAC) were significantly reduced in patients receiving tezepelumab/SCIT compared to SCIT alone. At week 104, one year after stopping treatment, the primary end point TNSS AUC0-1h was not significantly different in the tezepelumab/SCIT group compared to SCIT alone, while TNSS Peak0-1h was significantly lower in those receiving combination treatment versus SCIT. Transcriptomic analysis of nasal epithelial samples demonstrated that treatment with the combination of SCIT/tezepelumab, but neither monotherapy, caused persistent downregulation of a gene network related to type 2 inflammation that was associated with improvement in NAC responses. CONCLUSIONS: Inhibition of TSLP augments the efficacy of SCIT during therapy and may promote tolerance after a 1-year course of treatment. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02237196).


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos , Rinitis Alérgica , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Desensibilización Inmunológica , Rinitis Alérgica/terapia , Citocinas , Inyecciones Subcutáneas
8.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 44(3): 208-211, 2023 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37160754

RESUMEN

A 56-year-old man with well-controlled human immunodeficiency virus, anxiety, depression, and hypercholesterolemia developed acute urticaria, lip angioedema, and respiratory distress after consumption of a cheeseburger, French fries, lemonade, and ibuprofen. He was evaluated in the emergency department and, during admission, developed asystole, diaphoresis, pallor, and a brief episode of posturing that was treated with two doses of epinephrine. Results of the initial workup with electrocardiogram, troponin, complete blood cell count, and comprehensive metabolic panel were normal. He was subsequently evaluated by an allergist for further recommendations.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Paro Cardíaco , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paro Cardíaco/diagnóstico , Paro Cardíaco/etiología , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/etiología , Epinefrina , Alergólogos , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico
9.
Allergol Int ; 72(3): 369-374, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37221123

RESUMEN

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a common skin disease without an etiology in the vast majority of cases. The similarity of symptoms and pathology to allergen-induced skin reactions supports that skin mast cell IgE receptor activation is also involved in CSU. Accumulating evidence also supports a role for blood basophils in disease expression. Blood basopenia is noted in active CSU disease with the recruitment of blood basophils to skin lesion sites. Blood basophils further display altered IgE receptor mediated degranulation patterns in two phenotypes that improve in remission. In active CSU subjects, changes in IgE receptor signaling molecule expression levels accompany the altered degranulation function in blood basophils. The success of therapies targeting IgE in CSU patients have also shown that altered blood basophil phenotypes and enumeration have potential use as a disease biomarker.


Asunto(s)
Urticaria Crónica , Urticaria , Humanos , Basófilos/metabolismo , Receptores de IgE/metabolismo , Enfermedad Crónica
10.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 147(6): 2295-2304.e12, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33716077

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Treatment of patients with asthma or food allergy with omalizumab results in several consistent changes in circulating basophils. The multiple basophil phenotypes observed in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) present some unique attributes that may not respond in a similar fashion to patients with asthma or food allergy. As part of a clinical study on the therapeutic outcomes of omalizumab treatment in CSU, the basophil compartment was examined for changes in characteristics predicted by prior studies. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to examine the changes in basophil function and its relationship to auto-antibodies in serum during treatment with omalizumab. METHODS: At multiple time points before and during omalizumab treatment of patients with CSU, basophil surface IgE and FcεRI expression, cellular spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) expression, IgE-mediated histamine release (HR), and the presence of auto-antibodies in serum were determined. RESULTS: Three basophil phenotypes were enumerated in the clinical study and used to group results in this basophil study: subjects with (1) basopenia, (2) normal basophil numbers with normal IgE-mediated HR, and (3) normal basophil numbers with poor HR. Basopenia was highly associated with the presence of auto-antibodies to unoccupied FcεRI and basophil numbers did not change during treatment. Likewise, subjects who are basopenic showed no changes in SYK expression or HR during treatment. In basophils of subjects who are nonbasopenic, increases in SYK expression and HR showed the expected inverse relationship to starting SYK and HR levels. Treatment with omalizumab resulted in similar kinetics for decreases in surface FcεRI and IgE in all 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: A unifying interpretation of the results revolves around the presence of auto-antibodies to FcεRI in CSU. If present, basopenia and an absence of changes in basophils during omalizumab treatment are observed. If auto-antibodies are absent, the changes in the basophil compartment are consistent with prior studies of asthma and food allergy. These group differences also are related to efficacy of the treatment for clinical outcomes, as found in the parent clinical study.


Asunto(s)
Antialérgicos/uso terapéutico , Basófilos/efectos de los fármacos , Basófilos/inmunología , Urticaria Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Urticaria Crónica/inmunología , Omalizumab/uso terapéutico , Antialérgicos/administración & dosificación , Antialérgicos/efectos adversos , Autoanticuerpos/sangre , Autoanticuerpos/inmunología , Basófilos/metabolismo , Biomarcadores , Urticaria Crónica/diagnóstico , Liberación de Histamina , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/inmunología , Recuento de Leucocitos , Omalizumab/administración & dosificación , Omalizumab/efectos adversos , Receptores de IgE/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal , Quinasa Syk/metabolismo , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 147(6): 2271-2280.e8, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33713769

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The mechanisms underlying disease pathogenesis in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and improvement with omalizumab are incompletely understood. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine whether the rate of clinical remission is concordant with baseline basophil features or the rate of change of IgE-dependent functions of basophils and/or plasmacytoid dendritic cells during omalizumab therapy. METHODS: Adults (n = 18) with refractory CSU were treated with omalizumab 300 mg monthly for 90 days. Subjects recorded daily urticaria activity scores, and clinical assessments with blood sampling occurred at baseline and on days 1, 3, 6, 10, 20, 30, 60, and 90 following omalizumab. At baseline, subjects were categorized by basophil functional phenotypes, determined by in vitro histamine release (HR) responses to anti-IgE antibody, as CSU-responder (CSU-R) or CSU-non-responder (CSU-NR), as well as basopenic (B) or nonbasopenic (NB). RESULTS: CSU-R/NB subjects demonstrated the most rapid and complete symptom improvement. By day 6, CSU-R/NB and CSU-NR/NB had increased anti-IgE-mediated basophil HR relative to baseline, and these shifts did not correlate with symptom improvement. In contrast, CSU-NR/B basophil HR did not change during therapy. The kinetics of the decrease in surface IgE/FcεRI was similar in all 3 phenotypic groups and independent of the timing of the clinical response. Likewise, plasmacytoid dendritic cells' surface IgE/FcεRI decline and TLR9-induced IFN-α responses did not reflect clinical change. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in basophil IgE-based HR, surface IgE, or FcεRI bear no relationship to the kinetics in the change in clinical symptoms. Baseline basophil count and basophil functional phenotype, as determined by HR, may be predictive of responsiveness to omalizumab.


Asunto(s)
Antialérgicos/uso terapéutico , Basófilos/inmunología , Urticaria Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Urticaria Crónica/etiología , Omalizumab/uso terapéutico , Antialérgicos/administración & dosificación , Antialérgicos/efectos adversos , Basófilos/metabolismo , Biomarcadores , Enfermedad Crónica , Urticaria Crónica/diagnóstico , Urticaria Crónica/metabolismo , Células Dendríticas/inmunología , Células Dendríticas/metabolismo , Liberación de Histamina , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Inmunoglobulina E/inmunología , Omalizumab/administración & dosificación , Omalizumab/efectos adversos , Fenotipo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 125(4): 380-387, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31494233

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To review the published literature on current and new treatments for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and to provide guidance on the potential use of these therapeutics. DATA SOURCES: A PubMed search was performed to include English-language articles with the keywords chronic spontaneous urticaria, pathophysiology, quality of life, and treatments, with a preference to those articles written in the last 5 years. ClinicalTrials.gov was reviewed for recent relevant clinical trials related to potential CSU therapeutics. STUDY SELECTIONS: Literature was included if it provided information related to the current understanding of the pathophysiology and management of CSU as well as potential novel therapeutics currently in development. RESULTS: CSU has a significant effect on patients' quality of life. Current therapies include antihistamines, leukotriene receptor antagonists, omalizumab, and immunosuppressants; however, additional treatments are needed. New therapeutics under investigation include IgG1 anti-IgE monoclonal antibodies (ligelizumab), chemoattractant rector-homologous molecule expressed on TH2 cells antagonists (AZD1981), Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (fenebrutinib), anti-siglec-8 monoclonal antibody (AK002), and topical spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitors (GSK2646264). We review the mechanisms of action as well as recently published data from clinical trials regarding the efficacy and safety of these treatments. CONCLUSION: The development of new treatments for CSU will lead to improved options for patients and may assist with improving our understanding of disease pathophysiology.


Asunto(s)
Urticaria Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico
14.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 179(1): 21-30, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30879003

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Approximately 50% of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) experience symptoms that are not fully controlled by antihistamines, indicating an unmet clinical need. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of the selective CRTh2 antagonist AZD1981 on symptoms and targeted leukocytes in adults with persistent CSU despite treatment with H1-antihistamines. METHODS: We performed a single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled study involving adult CSU subjects with symptoms despite daily antihistamines. The subjects underwent a 2-week placebo run-in and 4 weeks of double-blinded therapy with either AZD1981 40 mg TID or placebo, followed by a 2-week placebo washout. The primary objective was to assess the effect of AZD1981 on CSU signs and symptoms. Secondary objectives included the effects of AZD1981 on prostaglandin D2 (PGD2)-induced eosinophil shape change, circulating leukocyte subsets, CRTh2 expression on blood leukocytes, and total blood leukocyte histamine content. RESULTS: Twenty-eight subjects were randomized to AZD1981 or placebo, with 26 subjects completing the study. The urticaria activity scores declined during the treatment phase in both groups, and they were significantly reduced in the AZD1981 group at the end of washout. AZD1981 treatment increased circulating eosinophils and significantly impaired PGD2-mediated eosinophil shape change. CRTh2 surface expression rose significantly on blood basophils during active treatment. No serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to examine the efficacy of a CRTh2 antagonist in antihistamine-refractory CSU. AZD1981 treatment was well tolerated, effectively inhibited PGD2-mediated eosinophil shape change, shifted numbers of circulating eosinophils, and reduced weekly itch scores more than hives during treatment and into washout. Further studies are needed to determine whether inhibition of the PGD2/CRTh2 pathway will be an -effective treatment for CSU.


Asunto(s)
Acetatos/uso terapéutico , Eosinófilos/efectos de los fármacos , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Receptores Inmunológicos/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptores de Prostaglandina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Urticaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Acetatos/administración & dosificación , Acetatos/efectos adversos , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Eosinófilos/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Indoles/administración & dosificación , Indoles/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prostaglandina D2/farmacología , Receptores Inmunológicos/análisis , Receptores de Prostaglandina/análisis , Urticaria/inmunología
15.
Skinmed ; 15(6): 471-472, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29282190

RESUMEN

A 33-year-old woman presented with recurring pruritic, erythematous papules around the mouth and on the hands, of 1.5 years' duration. These flares typically began several days before her menstrual cycle and persisted for approximately 1 week. Physical examination revealed urticarial plaques on the neck. Due to the nature of the eruption, which corresponded with her menstrual cycle, a diagnosis of autoimmune progesterone urticaria was considered and workup pursued.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes/inmunología , Dermatosis Facial/inmunología , Dermatosis de la Mano/inmunología , Progesterona/inmunología , Urticaria/inmunología , Adulto , Dermatosis Facial/patología , Femenino , Dermatosis de la Mano/patología , Humanos , Ciclo Menstrual , Neutrófilos/inmunología , Urticaria/patología
16.
N Engl J Med ; 368(10): 924-35, 2013 Mar 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23432142

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria (also called chronic spontaneous urticaria) do not have a response to therapy with H-antihistamines, even at high doses. In phase 2 trials, omalizumab, an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody [corrected] that targets IgE and affects mast-cell and basophil function, has shown efficacy in such patients. METHODS: In this phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic idiopathic urticaria who remained symptomatic despite H-antihistamine therapy (licensed doses). We randomly assigned 323 patients to receive three subcutaneous injections, spaced 4 weeks apart, of omalizumab at doses of 75 mg, 150 mg, or 300 mg or placebo, followed by a 16-week observation period. The primary efficacy outcome was the change from baseline in a weekly itch-severity score (ranging from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe itching). RESULTS: The baseline weekly itch-severity score was approximately 14 in all four study groups. At week 12, the mean (±SD) change from baseline in the weekly itch-severity score was -5.1±5.6 in the placebo group, -5.9±6.5 in the 75-mg group (P=0.46), -8.1±6.4 in the 150-mg group (P=0.001), and -9.8±6.0 in the 300-mg group (P<0.001). Most prespecified secondary outcomes at week 12 showed similar dose-dependent effects. The frequency of adverse events was similar across groups. The frequency of serious adverse events was low, although the rate was higher in the 300-mg group (6%) than in the placebo group (3%) or in either the 75-mg or 150-mg group (1% for each). CONCLUSIONS: Omalizumab diminished clinical symptoms and signs of chronic idiopathic urticaria in patients who had remained symptomatic despite the use of approved doses of H-antihistamines. (Funded by Genentech and Novartis Pharma; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01292473.).


Asunto(s)
Antialérgicos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Antiidiotipos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Prurito/tratamiento farmacológico , Urticaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Antialérgicos/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Antiidiotipos/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Niño , Enfermedad Crónica , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Omalizumab , Prurito/etiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Urticaria/complicaciones , Adulto Joven
17.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 112(1): 64-70, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24331396

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are limited data regarding alternative treatments for antihistamine refractory chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU). Patients with recalcitrant skin disease often cannot gain satisfactory symptom control with standard therapies and may require prolonged courses of oral corticosteroids. There is a lack of information describing the degree and duration of sulfasalazine's efficacy, the frequency and nature of adverse reactions, and the appropriate safety monitoring parameters. OBJECTIVE: To present a case series detailing the efficacy and safety of sulfasalazine therapy in patients with CIU. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of 39 patients with sulfasalazine-treated CIU evaluated at Johns Hopkins Asthma and Allergy Center from October 2007 to March 2012. Eight patients were excluded from the final analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (83.9%) showed an improvement in symptoms within the first 3 months, with 51.6% of patients (n = 16) becoming asymptomatic within the first 6 months of starting sulfasalazine. Eleven patients (35.4%) achieved complete relief of symptoms after tapering off sulfasalazine therapy. Five of the 31 patients (16.1%) failed treatment, defined as worsening symptoms and pursuit of an alternative therapy. Six of 31 patients (19.4%) had a modified course of sulfasalazine therapy owing to abnormal hematologic parameters. Serious adverse events leading to drug discontinuation occurred in 6.5% of patients (n = 2) and included a patient with drug-induced leukopenia and one with rhabdomyolysis. CONCLUSION: Sulfasalazine is a highly effective treatment for patients with antihistamine resistant CIU. The frequency of adverse events leading to an alteration of sulfasalazine treatment supports the need for close monitoring of these patients.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Sulfasalazina/efectos adversos , Sulfasalazina/uso terapéutico , Urticaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Antialérgicos/efectos adversos , Antialérgicos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
18.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 132(4): 906-11.e1-4, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23791510

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Treatment of allergic patients with omalizumab results in a paradoxical increase in their basophil histamine release (HR) response ex vivo to cross-linking anti-IgE antibody. It is not known whether this change in response is associated with an increase in intrinsic cellular sensitivity, which would be a paradoxical response. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether the increase in response to anti-IgE antibody is a reflection of an increased cellular sensitivity expressed as molecules of antigen-specific IgE per basophil required to produce 50% of the maximal response. METHODS: Patients were treated with omalizumab or placebo for 12 weeks (NCT01003301 at ClinicalTrials.gov), and the metric of basophil sensitivity was assessed at 4 time points: baseline, 6 to 8 weeks, 12 weeks (after which treatment stopped), and 24 weeks (12 weeks after the end of treatment). RESULTS: As observed previously, treatment with omalizumab resulted in a marked increase in the maximal HR induced by cross-linking anti-IgE antibody. This change was accompanied by a marked shift in intrinsic basophil sensitivity, ranging from 2.5- to 125-fold, with an average of 6-fold at the midpoint of the treatment to 12-fold after 12 weeks. The magnitude of the increase in cellular sensitivity was inversely related to the starting sensitivity or the starting maximum HR. The increased cellular sensitivity also occurred when using leukotriene C4 secretion as a metric of the basophil response. Twelve weeks after the end of treatment, cellular sensitivity was found to shift toward the baseline value, although the return to baseline was not yet complete at this time point. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with omalizumab results in a markedly increased sensitivity of basophils to IgE-mediated stimulation in terms of the number of IgE molecules required to produce a given response. These results provide a better quantitative sense of the phenotypic change that occurs in basophils during omalizumab treatment, which has both mechanistic and clinical implications.


Asunto(s)
Antialérgicos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Antiidiotipos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Basófilos/efectos de los fármacos , Basófilos/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/terapia , Inmunoglobulina E/inmunología , Adolescente , Adulto , Antialérgicos/administración & dosificación , Antialérgicos/inmunología , Antialérgicos/farmacología , Anticuerpos Antiidiotipos/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Antiidiotipos/sangre , Anticuerpos Antiidiotipos/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antiidiotipos/farmacología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/inmunología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/inmunología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/farmacología , Femenino , Liberación de Histamina , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Leucotrieno C4/metabolismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Omalizumab , Receptores Fc/metabolismo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
19.
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am ; 44(3): 421-438, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38937007

RESUMEN

Urticaria, also known as hives, is a common condition thought to affect up to 20% of individuals worldwide in their lifetime. This skin condition is characterized by the appearance of pruritic, erythematous papules or plaques with superficial swelling of the dermis. The major complaint is the symptom of pruritus. Angioedema, which involves a deeper swelling of dermal or mucosal tissues, may accompany urticaria. Urticaria can be classified by both time course of symptoms and the underlying etiology.


Asunto(s)
Urticaria Crónica , Humanos , Urticaria Crónica/diagnóstico , Urticaria Crónica/etiología , Prurito/etiología , Prurito/diagnóstico , Urticaria/etiología , Urticaria/diagnóstico
20.
Front Allergy ; 5: 1373511, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38601026

RESUMEN

Mast cells are activated through a variety of different receptors to release preformed granules and mediators synthesized de novo. However, the physiology and function of mast cells are not fully understood. Traditional studies of mast cell activation in humans have utilized cultures of tissue-derived mast cells including CD34+ progenitor cells or well-characterized commercially available cell lines. One limitation of these methods is that mast cells are no longer in a natural state. Therefore, their applicability to human skin disorders may be limited. Human skin explant models have been utilized to investigate the short-term effects of cell mediators, drugs, and irritants on skin while avoiding the ethical concerns surrounding in vivo stimulation studies with non-approved agents. Nonetheless, few studies have utilized intact human tissue to study mast cell degranulation. This "Methods" paper describes the development and application of an intact skin explant model to study human mast cell activation. In this manuscript, we share our protocol for setting up ex vivo human skin explants and describe the results of stimulation experiments and techniques to minimize trauma-induced histamine release. Skin explants were generated using de-identified, full-thickness, non-diseased skin specimens from plastic and reconstructive surgeries. Results were reproducible and demonstrated FcɛRI- and MRGPRX2-induced mediator release which was inhibited with the use of a BTK inhibitor and QWF, respectively. Thus, this explant model provides a quick and accessible method of assessing human skin mast cell activation and inhibition.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA