Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Universal Screening for Biliary Atresia in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of universal newborn screening using stool color card or direct bilirubin (DB) testing when comparing with no screening for biliary atresia in Japanese setting. STUDY DESIGN: A decision analytic Markov microsimulation model was developed to evaluate the universal screening for biliary atresia. Our screening strategies included stool color card, DB, or no screening. The outcomes of all newborns undergoing 3 strategies were simulated to analyze event-free life-years defined as liver transplant-free survival, costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) over a 25-year period with an annual discount rate of 2% applied for both costs and outcomes. A 1-way sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the uncertainty. RESULTS: There were 941 000 newborn infants in our cohort and 114 cases of biliary atresia. The base case analysis showed that the stool color card strategy was $14 927 337 higher than no screening with an increase in 44 more event-free life-years gained, resulting in an ICER of $339 258 per event-free life-year gained. The DB screening strategy compared with stool color card was $138 994 060 higher with an increase in 271 more event-free life-years gained and an ICER of $512 893 per event-free life-year gained. The DB screening strategy compared with no screening resulted in an ICER of $488 639 per event-free life-year gained. The DB screening resulted in 16 fewer liver transplants than stool color card and stool color card had 2 fewer liver transplants than no screening. CONCLUSIONS: Universal screening for biliary atresia could be cost-effective depending on the willingness to pay thresholds for health benefits.

Age at surgery and native liver survival in biliary atresia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Biliary atresia (BA) is a childhood rare disease of the liver and bile ducts that requires prompt surgical intervention. Age at surgery is an important prognostic factor; however, controversy exists with regard to the benefit of early Kasai procedure (KP). We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the relationship between the age at KP and native liver survival (NLS) of BA patients. We performed the electronic database search using Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Ichushi Web and included all relevant studies published from 1968 up to May 3, 2022. Studies that examined the timing of KP at ages 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 120, and/or 150 days were included. The outcome measures of interest were NLS rates at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 years post-KP and the hazard ratio or risk ratio for NLS. The quality assessment was used using the ROBINS-I tool. Among 1653 potentially eligible studies, nine articles met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis for hazard ratios revealed that there was a significantly faster time to liver transplantation in the group of patients who had KP at later timing as compared with earlier KP (HR = 2.12, 95% CI 1.51-2.97). The risk ratio comparing KP ≤ 30 days and KP ≥ 31 days on native liver survival was 1.22 (95% CI 1.13-1.31). The sensitivity analysis showed that comparing KP ≤ 30 days and KP 31-60 days, the risk ratio was 1.13, 95% CI 1.04-1.22.  Conclusion: Our meta-analysis showed the importance of early diagnosis and surgical interventions ideally before 30 days of life in infants with BA on native liver survival on 5, 10, and 20 years. Therefore, effective newborn screening of BA targeting KP ≤ 30 days is needed to ensure prompt diagnosis of affected infants. What is Known: • Age at surgery is an important prognostic factor. What is New: • Our study performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the relationship between age at Kasai procedure and native liver survival in patients with BA.

Strategies for cost-effectiveness analysis of rehabilitation for older patients with acute heart failure.

The prevalence of heart failure (HF) is increasing in the ageing world population, and its burden on the medical and health economic fields is enormous. Rehabilitation is an essential component of the nonpharmacological treatment of patients with HF; however, its efficacy and cost-effectiveness for patients with acute HF remain unclear. A trial assessed the cost-effectiveness of acute cardiac rehabilitation among older adults. Herein, we discussed strategies for the cost-effectiveness analysis of acute cardiac rehabilitation using the rehabilitation therapy in older acute heart failure patients trial.

Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for impairment and disability in people after stroke.

BACKGROUND: Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) is a non-invasive treatment method that can penetrate to deeper structures with painless stimulation to improve motor function in people with physical impairment due to brain or nerve disorders. rPMS for people after stroke has proved to be a feasible approach to improving activities of daily living and functional ability. However, the effectiveness and safety of this intervention for people after stroke remain uncertain. This is an update of the review published in 2019. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of rPMS for improving activities of daily living and functional ability in people after stroke. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Specialised Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE; Embase; the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL); PsycINFO; the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED); OTseeker: Occupational Therapy Systematic Evaluation of Evidence; the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro); Ichushi-Web; and six ongoing trial registries on 5 October 2021. We screened reference lists and contacted experts in the field. We placed no restrictions on the language or date of publication when searching the electronic databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted to assess the therapeutic effect of rPMS for people after stroke. The following comparisons were eligible for inclusion: 1) active rPMS only compared with 'sham' rPMS (a very weak form of stimulation or a sound only); 2) active rPMS only compared with no intervention; 3) active rPMS plus rehabilitation compared with sham rPMS plus rehabilitation; and 4) active rPMS plus rehabilitation compared with rehabilitation only. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion in the review. The same review authors assessed methods and risk of bias, undertook data extraction, and evaluated the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. We contacted trial authors to request unpublished information if necessary. Any disagreements were resolved through discussion. MAIN RESULTS: We included four trials (three parallel-group RCTs and one cross-over trial) involving a total of 139 participants. This result was unchanged from the review published in 2019. Blinding of participants and physicians was well reported in three trials, with no information on whether personnel were blinded in one trial. We judged the overall risk of bias across trials as low. Only two trials (with 63 and 18 participants, respectively) provided sufficient information to be included in the meta-analysis. We found no clear effect of rPMS on activities of daily living at the end of treatment (mean difference (MD) -3.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -16.35 to 10.35; P = 0.66; 1 trial; 63 participants; low-certainty evidence) and at the end of follow-up (MD -2.00, 95% CI -14.86 to 10.86; P = 0.76; 1 trial; 63 participants; low-certainty evidence) when comparing rPMS plus rehabilitation versus sham rPMS plus rehabilitation. We found no statistical difference in improvement of upper limb function at the end of treatment (MD 2.00, 95% CI -4.91 to 8.91; P = 0.57; 1 trial; 63 participants; low-certainty evidence) and at the end of follow-up (MD 4.00, 95% CI -2.92 to 10.92; P = 0.26; 1 trial; 63 participants; low-certainty evidence) when comparing rPMS plus rehabilitation versus sham rPMS plus rehabilitation. We observed a decrease in spasticity of the elbow at the end of follow-up (MD -0.41, 95% CI -0.89 to 0.07; 1 trial; 63 participants; low-certainty evidence) when comparing rPMS plus rehabilitation versus sham rPMS plus rehabilitation. In terms of muscle strength, rPMS treatment was not associated with improved muscle strength of the ankle dorsiflexors at the end of treatment (MD 3.00, 95% CI -2.44 to 8.44; P = 0.28; 1 trial; 18 participants; low-certainty evidence) when compared with sham rPMS. No studies provided information on lower limb function or adverse events, including death. Based on the GRADE approach, we judged the certainty of evidence related to the primary outcome as low, owing to the small sample size of the studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to permit the drawing of any conclusions about routine use of rPMS for people after stroke. Additional trials with large sample sizes are needed to provide robust evidence for rPMS after stroke.

Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for impairment and disability in people after stroke.

BACKGROUND: Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) is a non-invasive treatment method that can penetrate to deeper structures with painless stimulation to improve motor function in people with physical impairment due to brain or nerve disorders. rPMS for people after stroke has proved to be a feasible approach to improving activities of daily living and functional ability. However, the effectiveness and safety of this intervention for people after stroke currently remain uncertain. This is an update of the review published in 2017. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of rPMS in improving activities of daily living and functional ability in people after stroke. SEARCH METHODS: On 7 January 2019, we searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE; Embase; the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL); PsycINFO; the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED); Occupational Therapy Systematic Evaluation of Evidence (OTseeker); the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro); ICHUSHI Web; and six ongoing trial registries. We screened reference lists, and we contacted experts in the field. We placed no restrictions on the language or date of publication when searching electronic databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted to assess the therapeutic effect of rPMS for people after stroke. Comparisons eligible for inclusion were (1) active rPMS only compared with 'sham' rPMS (a very weak form of stimulation or a sound only); (2) active rPMS only compared with no intervention; (3) active rPMS plus rehabilitation compared with sham rPMS plus rehabilitation; and (4) active rPMS plus rehabilitation compared with rehabilitation only. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion. The same review authors assessed methods and risk of bias, undertook data extraction, and used the GRADE approach to assess the quality of evidence. We contacted trial authors to request unpublished information if necessary. We resolved all disagreements through discussion. MAIN RESULTS: We included four trials (three RCTs and one cross-over trial) involving 139 participants. Blinding of participants and physicians was well reported within all trials. We judged the overall risk of bias across trials as low. Only two trials (with 63 and 18 participants, respectively) provided sufficient information to be included in the meta-analysis. We found no clear effect of rPMS on activities of daily living at the end of treatment (mean difference (MD) -3.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -16.35 to 10.35; P = 0.66; 1 trial; 63 participants; low-quality evidence) and at the end of follow-up (MD -2.00, 95% CI -14.86 to 10.86; P = 0.76; 1 trial; 63 participants; low-quality evidence) when comparing rPMS plus rehabilitation versus sham plus rehabilitation. We found no statistical difference in improvement of upper limb function at the end of treatment (MD 2.00, 95% CI -4.91 to 8.91; P = 0.57; 1 trial; 63 participants; low-quality evidence) and at the end of follow-up (MD 4.00, 95% CI -2.92 to 10.92; P = 0.26; 1 trial; 63 participants; low-quality evidence) when comparing rPMS plus rehabilitation versus sham plus rehabilitation. We observed a significant decrease in spasticity of the elbow at the end of follow-up (MD -0.48, 95% CI -0.93 to -0.03; P = 0.03; 1 trial; 63 participants; low-quality evidence) when comparing rPMS plus rehabilitation versus sham plus rehabilitation. In terms of muscle strength, rPMS treatment was not associated with improved muscle strength of the ankle dorsiflexors at the end of treatment (MD 3.00, 95% CI -2.44 to 8.44; P = 0.28; 1 trial; 18 participants; low-quality evidence) when compared with sham rPMS. No studies provided information on lower limb function or adverse events, including death. Based on the GRADE approach, we judged the quality of evidence related to the primary outcome as low, owing to the small sample size of the studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Available trials provided insufficient evidence to permit any conclusions about routine use of rPMS for people after stroke. Additional trials with large sample sizes are needed to provide robust evidence for rPMS after stroke.

Tongue Strength is Associated with Grip Strength and Nutritional Status in Older Adult Inpatients of a Rehabilitation Hospital.

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate whether tongue strength observed in older adult inpatients of a rehabilitation hospital is associated with muscle function, nutritional status, and dysphagia. A total of 174 older adult inpatients aged 65 years and older in rehabilitation (64 men, 110 women; median age, 84 years; interquartile range, 80-89 years) who were suspected of having reduced tongue strength due to sarcopenia were included in this study. Isometric tongue strength was measured using a device fitted with a disposable oral balloon probe. We evaluated age, muscle function as assessed by the Barthel index and grip strength, nutritional status as measured by the Mini Nutritional Assessment-short form (MNA-SF), body mass index, serum albumin, controlling nutritional status, and calf circumference and arm muscle area to assess muscle mass. In addition, the functional oral intake scale (FOIS) was used as an index of dysphagia. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that isometric tongue strength was independently associated with grip strength (coefficient = 0.33, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.12-0.54, p = 0.002), MNA-SF (coefficient = 0.74, 95 % CI 0.12-1.35, p = 0.019), and FOIS (coefficient = 0.02, 95 % CI 0.00-0.15, p = 0.047). To maintain and improve tongue strength in association with sarcopenic dysphagia, exercise therapy and nutritional therapy interventions, as well as direct interventions to address tongue strength, may be effective in dysphagia rehabilitation in older adult inpatients.

Impact of Motivation for Eating Habits, Appetite and Food Satisfaction, and Food Consciousness on Food Intake and Weight Loss in Older Nursing Home Patients.

BACKGROUND: This study analyzed data from the Long-term care Information system For Evidence (LIFE) database to examine the effects of motivation to eat, appetite and food satisfaction, and food consciousness on food intake and weight loss. METHODS: Of the 748 nursing home residents enrolled in the LIFE database, 336 met the eligibility criteria for this cross-sectional study. Motivation to eat, appetite and food satisfaction, and food consciousness were rated on five-point Likert scales (e.g., good, fair, normal, not so good, and not good). We applied Spearman rank correlation coefficient and multiple regression analyses to analyze the relationships between these three items, daily energy and protein intake, and body weight loss over 6 months. RESULTS: The mean participant age was 87.4±8.1 years and 259 (77%) were female. The required levels of care included-level 1, 1 (0%); level 2, 4 (1%); level 3, 107 (32%); level 4, 135 (40%); and level 5, 89 (27%). The mean daily energy intake was 28.2±7.8 kcal/kg. The mean daily protein intake was 1.1±0.3 g/kg. The mean weight loss over six months was 1.2±0.7 kg. We observed strong positive correlations among motivation to eat, appetite and food satisfaction, and food consciousness (r>0.8). These three items were significantly associated with higher daily energy intake but not with daily protein intake. Only appetite and food satisfaction were significantly associated with lower weight loss over six months. CONCLUSION: The observed associations of appetite and food satisfaction suggest that these factors may be more important to assess than motivation to eat or food consciousness among older adult residents of long-term care facilities.

Safety and Feasibility of Fan Therapy for Dyspnea: A Scoping Review.

Fan therapy is a non-pharmacological approach useful in terminally ill patients that relieves dyspnea by directing a fan to blow air on one side of the patient's face. To date, there has been no systematic review of fan therapy for critically ill patients in the intensive care unit. This scoping review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of fan therapy studies published to date, clarify the therapeutic intervention methods of fan therapy, evaluate its safety according to existing literature, and explore its potential use in critically ill patients. A scoping review was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. This scoping review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension of the scoping reviews statement. All published studies conducted on patients who received fan therapy regardless of age, disease, setting, phase, country, or follow-up duration were included. The data sources included Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Literature databases. Of the 685 studies obtained, 15 were included, comprising patients with terminal cancer and chronic lung diseases. The most common intervention was a single five-minute intervention for dyspnea at rest. The studies on patients receiving oxygen therapy did not report adverse events or worsening of blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, or SpO2 levels. However, there are no studies in the literature on the use of fan therapy for critically ill patients. Nevertheless, previous studies suggest that fan therapy is safe.

Development of a Model for Quantitative Assessment of Newborn Screening in Japan Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process.

Whether or not conditions should be included in publicly funded newborn screening (NBS) programs should be discussed according to objective and transparent criteria. Certain criteria have been developed for the introduction of NBS programs in the context of individual countries; however, there are no standard selection criteria for NBS programs in Japan. This study aimed to develop a quantitative scoring model to assess newborn screening that incorporates the views of a variety of stakeholders in Japan. The five recommended eligibility criteria for NBS were stratified based on previous studies and expert opinions, using the analytic hierarchy process. We conducted a cross-sectional, web-based questionnaire targeting a wide range of people involved in NBS to investigate pairwise comparisons of the evaluation items between February and April of 2022. There were 143 respondents. Most of our respondents (44.1%) were physicians. Fifty-eight respondents (40.6%) had been engaged in NBS-related research or work for more than 10 years. The distribution of allocation points was the highest for 'intervention', 'screening test', 'follow-up setting', 'economic evaluation', and 'disease/condition', in that order. The algorithm in this study will guide decision makers in collecting and evaluating objective data, thus enabling transparent discussions to occur.

Association of Oral Function and Dysphagia with Frailty and Sarcopenia in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Studies investigating the associations of oral function and dysphagia with frailty and sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults are increasing; however, they have not been systematically summarized. We conducted a systematic review to investigate these associations. We searched electronic databases and synthesized relevant data using conventional (frequentist-style) and Bayesian meta-analyses. Twenty-four studies were found to be eligible for our review, including 20 cross-sectional and four prospective cohort studies. Older adults with frailty or sarcopenia had lower tongue pressure, according to the results of conventional meta-analysis (mean difference [95% confidence interval or credible interval]: -6.80 kPa [-10.22 to -3.38] for frailty and -5.40 kPa [-6.62 to -4.17] for sarcopenia) and Bayesian meta-analysis (-6.90 kPa [-9.0 to -4.8] for frailty, -5.35 kPa [-6.78 to -3.89] for sarcopenia). People with frailty had a higher odds ratio (OR) for dysphagia according to the results of conventional meta-analysis (3.99 [2.17 to 7.32]) and Bayesian meta-analysis (1.38 [0.77 to 1.98]). However, the results were inconclusive for people with sarcopenia. A prospective association could not be determined because of the lack of information and the limited number of studies. Decreased oral function and dysphagia can be important characteristics of frailty and sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults.

A Machine Learning-Based Screening Test for Sarcopenic Dysphagia Using Image Recognition.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenic dysphagia, a swallowing disorder caused by sarcopenia, is prevalent in older patients and can cause malnutrition and aspiration pneumonia. This study aimed to develop a simple screening test using image recognition with a low risk of droplet transmission for sarcopenic dysphagia. METHODS: Older patients admitted to a post-acute care hospital were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. As a main variable for the development of a screening test, we photographed the anterior neck to analyze the image features of sarcopenic dysphagia. The studied image features included the pixel values and the number of feature points. We constructed screening models using the image features, age, sex, and body mass index. The prediction performance of each model was investigated. RESULTS: A total of 308 patients participated, including 175 (56.82%) patients without dysphagia and 133 (43.18%) with sarcopenic dysphagia. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the precision-recall curve (PR-AUC) values of the best model were 0.877, 87.50%, 76.67%, 66.67%, 92.00%, and 0.838, respectively. The model with image features alone showed an ROC-AUC of 0.814 and PR-AUC of 0.726. CONCLUSIONS: The screening test for sarcopenic dysphagia using image recognition of neck appearance had high prediction performance.

Nutritional Assessment in Adult Patients with Dysphagia: A Scoping Review.

Malnutrition negatively affects the quality of life of patients with dysphagia. Despite the need for nutritional status assessment in patients with dysphagia, standard, effective nutritional assessments are not yet available, and the identification of optimal nutritional assessment items for patients with dysphagia is inadequate. We conducted a scoping review of the use of nutritional assessment items in adult patients with oropharyngeal and esophageal dysphagia. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched to identify articles published in English within the last 30 years. Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Seven nutritional assessment categories were identified: body mass index (BMI), nutritional screening tool, anthropometric measurements, body composition, dietary assessment, blood biomarkers, and other. BMI and albumin were more commonly assessed in adults. The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM), defining new diagnostic criteria for malnutrition, includes the categories of BMI, nutritional screening tool, anthropometric measurements, body composition, and dietary assessment as its required components, but not the blood biomarkers and the "other" categories. We recommend assessing nutritional status, including GLIM criteria, in adult patients with dysphagia. This would standardize nutritional assessments in patients with dysphagia and allow future global comparisons of the prevalence and outcomes of malnutrition, as well as of appropriate interventions.

Semi-Solid Nutrients for Prevention of Enteral Tube Feeding-Related Complications in Japanese Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The aim of this systematic review was to assess the best available evidence on semi-solid nutrients for prevention of complications associated with enteral tube feeding (ETF). PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial, Ichushi-web, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform databases were searched for relevant articles. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cluster RCTs, and crossover trials comparing the effects of semi-solid nutrients with those of control interventions in patients on ETF were included in the review. The primary outcome was development of gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Eight RCTs and five crossover trials involving 889 study participants in total were examined via meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that semi-solid nutrients significantly decreased the risk of GER (risk ratio 0.39; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21 to 0.73) and the GER index (mean difference -2.93; 95% CI -5.18 to -0.68). Dwell time in the stomach was significantly shortened (standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.50; 95% CI -0.99 to -0.02), as was care time defined as the time needed to prepare and administer the nutrient solution (SMD -8.02; 95% CI -10.94 to -5.10). Semi-solid nutrients significantly decrease the risk of GER and the dwell time in the stomach in adult patients. .

Submental Muscle Activity and Its Role in Diagnosing Sarcopenic Dysphagia.

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were two-fold: 1) to investigate differences in activity duration and amplitude of the submental muscles during swallowing measured with surface electromyography (sEMG) in older patients with sarcopenic dysphagia compared to those without dysphagia and 2) to examine the diagnostic accuracy of submental sEMG signals for sarcopenic dysphagia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 60) aged ≥65 years participated in this cross-sectional study. The submental muscle activity duration parameters were the duration from the onset of swallowing to the maximum amplitude (duration A), duration from the maximum amplitude to the end of the swallowing activity (duration B), and total duration. The amplitude parameters were mean and maximum amplitude. Maximum lingual pressures were also measured for comparison with sEMG parameters. RESULTS: Duration A was not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.15), but duration B (p < 0.001) and total duration (p < 0.001) were significantly different between the non-dysphagic and sarcopenic dysphagic groups. The mean (p = 0.014) and maximum (p < 0.001) amplitudes were significantly different between the groups. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.94 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-0.98) for duration B, 0.95 (95% CI 0.89-0.99) for total duration, 0.76 (95% CI 0.63-0.87) for maximum amplitude, and 0.61 (95% CI 0.47-0.75) for mean amplitude. The AUC of the total duration was significantly greater than that of lingual pressure (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Patients with sarcopenic dysphagia had longer submental muscle activity duration and higher amplitude during swallowing as assessed using sEMG. The findings of this study can be useful in elucidating the underlying pathophysiology of sarcopenic dysphagia and in diagnosing sarcopenic dysphagia.

Diagnostic accuracy of lip force and tongue strength for sarcopenic dysphagia in older inpatients: A cross-sectional observational study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Dysphagia can be caused by sarcopenia in older adults. Although sarcopenic dysphagia has been reported to be associated with low tongue strength, whether tongue strength can be useful as a diagnostic index for sarcopenic dysphagia remains unclear. In addition, the association between sarcopenic dysphagia and lip force is unknown. The aim of the present study was to clarify the association of lip force and tongue strength with sarcopenic dysphagia, and their diagnostic accuracy for sarcopenic dysphagia. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in consecutive 245 (166 women) inpatients aged ≥65 years in the post-acute phase of illness. The presence of sarcopenic dysphagia, lip force, and tongue strength were assessed. Additional factors were also assessed: cognitive function, nutritional status, comorbidity, oral intake level, occlusion status, physical function, and inflammatory status. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted with the presence of sarcopenic dysphagia as a dependent variable. Lip force and tongue strength were assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to clarify diagnostic accuracy for sarcopenic dysphagia. In addition, the cut-off values of lip force and tongue strength for identifying sarcopenic dysphagia were determined according to sex. RESULTS: In total, 86 patients (35.1%) had sarcopenic dysphagia. Both men and women with sarcopenic dysphagia had lower lip force and tongue strength than men and women without dysphagia or sarcopenic dysphagia (p < 0.001 for all). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, sarcopenic dysphagia was significantly associated with lip force (OR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.53-0.74, p < 0.001) and tongue strength (OR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.87-0.98, p = 0.011). The AUCs for lip force in patients with sarcopenic dysphagia were 0.88 (CI 0.81-0.95, p < 0.001) for men and 0.84 (CI 0.77-0.90, p < 0.001) for women. The AUCs for tongue strength were 0.79 (CI 0.69-0.89, p < 0.001) for men and 0.74 (CI 0.65-0.82, p < 0.001) for women. The cut-off values for sarcopenic dysphagia in men were 10.4 N for lip force and 24.3 kPa for tongue strength; the cut-off values in women were 8.5 N for lip force and 23.9 kPa for tongue strength. CONCLUSION: In older inpatients who are suspected as having dysfunction due to sarcopenia, lip force and tongue strength can be independently useful indices for diagnosing sarcopenic dysphagia, and may be factors that prevent and improve sarcopenic dysphagia.

Relationship between tongue strength, lip strength, and nutrition-related sarcopenia in older rehabilitation inpatients: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to clarify the relationship between tongue strength, lip strength, and nutrition-related sarcopenia (NRS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 201 older inpatients aged ≥65 years (70 men, median age: 84 years, interquartile range: 79-89 years) consecutively admitted for rehabilitation were included in this cross-sectional study. The main factors evaluated were the presence of NRS diagnosed by malnutrition using the Mini-Nutrition Assessment - Short Form, sarcopenia based on the criteria of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia, tongue strength, and lip strength. Other factors such as age, sex, comorbidity, physical function, cognitive function, and oral intake level were also assessed. RESULTS: In all, 78 (38.8%) patients were allocated to the NRS group, and 123 (61.2%) patients were allocated to the non-NRS group. The median tongue strength and lip strength (interquartile range) were significantly lower in the NRS group (tongue: 22.9 kPa [17.7-27.7 kPa] and lip: 7.2 N [5.6-9.8 N]) compared with the non-NRS group (tongue: 29.7 kPa [24.8-35.1 kPa] and lip: 9.9 N [8.4-12.3 N], P<0.001 for both). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that NRS was independently associated with tongue strength (odds ratio [OR] =0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-0.98, P=0.012) and lip strength (OR =0.76, 95% CI 0.66-0.88, P<0.001), even after adjusting for age, sex, comorbidity, physical function, cognitive function, and oral intake level. CONCLUSION: The likelihood of occurrence of NRS decreased when tongue strength or lip strength increased. Tongue strength and lip strength may be important factors for preventing and improving NRS, regardless of the presence of low oral intake level in older rehabilitation inpatients.

Real-world Effectiveness of Speech Therapy Time on Cognitive Recovery in Older Patients with Acute Stroke.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this research was to investigate the real-world effectiveness of speech therapy time on cognitive recovery in older patients with acute stroke. METHODS: The participants of this retrospective cohort study were hospitalized patients with acute stroke registered in the Japan Rehabilitation Database between December 2005 and September 2014. The patients were divided into two groups according to the amount of time they spent undergoing speech therapy, i.e., a high-intensity speech therapy group and a control group. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to assess the association between cognitive Functional Independence Measure efficiency and high-intensity speech therapy. RESULTS: Of the 3341 eligible stroke patients (mean age: 77 years) extracted from the database, 53% received high-intensity speech therapy. Patients in the high-intensity speech therapy group had significantly higher cognitive Functional Independence Measure efficiency scores than those in the control group (mean, 0.17 vs. 0.10, respectively; P < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that cognitive Functional Independence Measure efficiency was significantly and positively correlated with high-intensity speech therapy (coefficient, 0.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.004-0.056; P = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that a large amount of speech therapy time in older patients with acute stroke is a significant predictor of good cognitive recovery. Increased amounts of speech therapy for such patients may lead to better cognitive recovery after stroke.