Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 77
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Breast Cancer Res ; 26(1): 15, 2024 01 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38254178

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The birth cohort effect has been suggested to influence the rate of breast cancer incidence and the trends of associated reproductive and lifestyle factors. We conducted a cohort study to determine whether a differential pattern of associations exists between certain factors and breast cancer risk based on birth cohorts. METHODS: This was a cohort study using pooled data from 12 cohort studies. We analysed associations between reproductive (menarche age, menopause age, parity and age at first delivery) and lifestyle (smoking and alcohol consumption) factors and breast cancer risk. We obtained hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the Cox proportional hazard regression analysis on the 1920s, 1930s, 1940s and 1950s birth cohorts. RESULTS: Parity was found to lower the risk of breast cancer in the older but not in the younger birth cohort, whereas lifestyle factors showed associations with breast cancer risk only among the participants born in the 1950s. In the younger birth cohort group, the effect size was lower for parous women compared to the other cohort groups (HR [95% CI] 0.86 [0.66-1.13] compared to 0.60 [0.49-0.73], 0.46 [0.38-0.56] and 0.62 [0.51-0.77]). Meanwhile, a higher effect size was found for smoking (1.45 [1.14-1.84] compared to 1.25 [0.99-1.58], 1.06 [0.85-1.32] and 0.86 [0.69-1.08]) and alcohol consumption (1.22 [1.01-1.48] compared to 1.10 [0.90-1.33], 1.15 [0.96-1.38], and 1.07 [0.91-1.26]). CONCLUSION: We observed different associations of parity, smoking and alcohol consumption with breast cancer risk across various birth cohorts.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Cohorte de Nacimiento , Estudios de Cohortes , Japón , Factores de Riesgo , Estilo de Vida , China , República de Corea
2.
Int J Cancer ; 155(2): 240-250, 2024 Jul 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38478921

RESUMEN

The female predominance of gallbladder cancer (GBC) has led to a hypothesis regarding the hormone-related aetiology of GBC. We aimed to investigate the association between female reproductive factors and GBC risk, considering birth cohorts of Asian women. We conducted a pooled analysis of 331,323 women from 12 cohorts across 4 countries (China, Japan, Korea, and Singapore) in the Asia Cohort Consortium. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the association between reproductive factors (age at menarche, parity, age at first delivery, breastfeeding, and age at menopause) and GBC risk. We observed that a later age at menarche was associated with an increased risk of GBC (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.16-1.70 for 17 years and older vs. 13-14 years), especially among the cohort born in 1940 and later (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.50-4.35). Among the cohort born before 1940, women with a later age at first delivery showed an increased risk of GBC (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.08-2.24 for 31 years of age and older vs. 20 years of age and younger). Other reproductive factors did not show a clear association with GBC risk. Later ages at menarche and at first delivery were associated with a higher risk of GBC, and these associations varied by birth cohort.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar , Menarquia , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto , Asia/epidemiología , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Historia Reproductiva , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Menopausia , Factores de Edad , Adolescente , Paridad
3.
Int J Cancer ; 154(7): 1174-1190, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37966009

RESUMEN

Body fatness is considered a probable risk factor for biliary tract cancer (BTC), whereas cholelithiasis is an established factor. Nevertheless, although obesity is an established risk factor for cholelithiasis, previous studies of the association of body mass index (BMI) and BTC did not take the effect of cholelithiasis fully into account. To better understand the effect of BMI on BTC, we conducted a pooled analysis using population-based cohort studies in Asians. In total, 905 530 subjects from 21 cohort studies participating in the Asia Cohort Consortium were included. BMI was categorized into four groups: underweight (<18.5 kg/m2 ); normal (18.5-22.9 kg/m2 ); overweight (23-24.9 kg/m2 ); and obese (25+ kg/m2 ). The association between BMI and BTC incidence and mortality was assessed using hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by Cox regression models with shared frailty. Mediation analysis was used to decompose the association into a direct and an indirect (mediated) effect. Compared to normal BMI, high BMI was associated with BTC mortality (HR 1.19 [CI 1.02-1.38] for males, HR 1.30 [1.14-1.49] for females). Cholelithiasis had significant interaction with BMI on BTC risk. BMI was associated with BTC risk directly and through cholelithiasis in females, whereas the association was unclear in males. When cholelithiasis was present, BMI was not associated with BTC death in either males or females. BMI was associated with BTC death among females without cholelithiasis. This study suggests BMI is associated with BTC mortality in Asians. Cholelithiasis appears to contribute to the association; and moreover, obesity appears to increase BTC risk without cholelithiasis.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar , Colelitiasis , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/epidemiología , Sobrepeso/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios de Cohortes , Asia/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/epidemiología , Colelitiasis/complicaciones , Colelitiasis/epidemiología , Índice de Masa Corporal
4.
Int J Cancer ; 155(5): 854-870, 2024 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38661292

RESUMEN

There has been growing evidence suggesting that diabetes may be associated with increased liver cancer risk. However, studies conducted in Asian countries are limited. This project considered data of 968,738 adults pooled from 20 cohort studies of Asia Cohort Consortium to examine the association between baseline diabetes and liver cancer incidence and mortality. Cox proportional hazard model and competing risk approach was used for pooled data. Two-stage meta-analysis across studies was also done. There were 839,194 subjects with valid data regarding liver cancer incidence (5654 liver cancer cases [48.29/100,000 person-years]), follow-up time and baseline diabetes (44,781 with diabetes [5.3%]). There were 747,198 subjects with valid data regarding liver cancer mortality (5020 liver cancer deaths [44.03/100,000 person-years]), follow-up time and baseline diabetes (43,243 with diabetes [5.8%]). Hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval [95%CI]) of liver cancer diagnosis in those with vs. without baseline diabetes was 1.97 (1.79, 2.16) (p < .0001) after adjusting for baseline age, gender, body mass index, tobacco smoking, alcohol use, and heterogeneity across studies (n = 586,072; events = 4620). Baseline diabetes was associated with increased cumulative incidence of death due to liver cancer (adjusted HR (95%CI) = 1.97 (1.79, 2.18); p < .0001) (n = 595,193; events = 4110). A two-stage meta-analytic approach showed similar results. This paper adds important population-based evidence to current literature regarding the increased incidence and mortality of liver cancer in adults with diabetes. The analysis of data pooled from 20 studies of different Asian countries and the meta-analysis across studies with large number of subjects makes the results robust.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Incidencia , Asia/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios de Cohortes , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Anciano
5.
Cancer Sci ; 115(4): 1346-1359, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38310695

RESUMEN

Mounting evidence suggests that body mass index (BMI) is inversely associated with the risk of lung cancer. However, relatively few studies have explored this association in Asian people, who have a much lower prevalence of obesity than Caucasians. We pooled data from 10 prospective cohort studies involving 444,143 Japanese men and women to address the association between BMI and the risk of lung cancer. Study-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated in each cohort using the Cox proportional hazards model. A meta-analysis was undertaken by combining the results from each cohort. Heterogeneity across studies was evaluated using Cochran's Q and I2statistics. During 5,730,013 person-years of follow-up, 6454 incident lung cancer cases (4727 men and 1727 women) were identified. Baseline BMI was inversely associated with lung cancer risk in men and women combined. While leanness (BMI <18.5) was associated with a higher risk of lung cancer (HR 1.35; 95% CI, 1.16-1.57), overweight and obesity were associated with a lower risk, with HRs of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.71-0.84) and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.45-1.07), respectively. Every 5 kg/m2 increase in BMI was associated with a 21% lower risk of lung cancer (HR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.75-0.83; p < 0.0001). Our pooled analysis indicated that BMI is inversely associated with the risk of lung cancer in the Japanese population. This inverse association could be partly attributed to residual confounding by smoking, as it was more pronounced among male smokers.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Índice de Masa Corporal , Japón/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/epidemiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales
6.
Blood ; 139(2): 217-227, 2022 01 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34428282

RESUMEN

Epidemiological data have provided limited and inconsistent evidence on the relationship between radiation exposure and lymphoid neoplasms. We classified 553 lymphoid neoplasm cases diagnosed between 1950 and 1994 in the Life Span Study cohort of atomic bomb survivors into World Health Organization subtypes. Mature B-cell neoplasms represented 58%, mature T-cell and natural killer (NK)-cell neoplasms 20%, precursor cell neoplasms 5%, and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) 3%, with the remaining 15% classified as non-Hodgkin lymphoid (NHL) neoplasms or lymphoid neoplasms not otherwise specified. We used Poisson regression methods to assess the relationship between radiation exposure and the more common subtypes. As in earlier reports, a significant dose response for NHL neoplasms as a group was seen for males but not females. However, subtype analyses showed that radiation dose was strongly associated with increased precursor cell neoplasms rates, with an estimated excess relative risk per Gy of 16 (95% Confidence interval: 7.0, >533) at age 50. The current data based primarily of tissue-based diagnoses suggest that the association between radiation dose and lymphoid neoplasms as a group is largely driven by the radiation effect on precursor cell neoplasms while presenting no evidence of a radiation dose response for major categories of mature cell neoplasms, either B- or T-/NK-cell, or more specific disease entities (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, plasma cell myeloma, adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma) or HL.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes a la Bomba Atómica , Leucemia Linfoide/etiología , Linfoma/etiología , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Leucemia Linfoide/patología , Linfoma/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/patología , Ceniza Radiactiva/efectos adversos , Riesgo , Organización Mundial de la Salud , Adulto Joven
7.
J Epidemiol ; 34(2): 94-103, 2024 Feb 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36843108

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While tall stature has been linked to an increase in the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), its association with cancer in the colorectum and its subsites remains unclear among Asians. METHODS: We conducted a pooled analysis of 10 population-based cohort studies among adults in Japan. Each study estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for CRC incidence associated with adult height were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression with adjustment of the same set of covariates were then pooled to estimate summary HRs incidence using random-effect models. RESULTS: We identified 9,470 CRC incidences among 390,063 participants during 5,672,930 person-years of follow-up. Men and women with tall stature had a higher risk of CRC and colon cancer. HRs for CRC, colon cancer, and distal colon cancer for the highest versus lowest height categories were 1.23 (95% CI, 1.07-1.40), 1.22 (95% CI, 1.09-1.36), and 1.27 (95% CI, 1.08-1.49), respectively, in men and 1.21 (95% CI, 1.09-1.35), 1.23 (95% CI, 1.08-1.40), and 1.35 (95% CI, 1.003-1.81), respectively, in women. The association with proximal colon cancer and rectal cancer was less evident in both sexes. CONCLUSION: This pooled analysis confirms the link between tall stature and a higher risk of CRC and colon cancer (especially distal colon) among the Japanese and adds evidence to support the use of adult height to identify those at a higher risk of CRC.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Masculino , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Japón/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Colon/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Colon/etiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios de Cohortes
8.
Cancer Sci ; 114(7): 2961-2972, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37013939

RESUMEN

The effect of body mass index (BMI) on esophageal and gastric carcinogenesis might be heterogeneous, depending on subtype or subsite. However, findings from prospective evaluations of BMI associated with these cancers among Asian populations have been inconsistent and limited, especially for esophageal adenocarcinoma and gastric cardia cancer. We performed a pooled analysis of 10 population-based cohort studies to examine this association in 394,247 Japanese individuals. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate study-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), then pooled these estimates to calculate summary HRs with a random effects model. During 5,750,107 person-years of follow-up, 1569 esophageal cancer (1038 squamous cell carcinoma and 86 adenocarcinoma) and 11,095 gastric (728 cardia and 5620 noncardia) cancer incident cases were identified. An inverse association was observed between BMI and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (HR per 5-kg/m2 increase 0.57, 95% CI 0.50-0.65), whereas a positive association was seen in gastric cardia cancer (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.00-1.32). A nonsignificant and significant positive association for overweight or obese (BMI ≥25 kg/m2 ) relative to BMI <25 kg/m2 was observed with esophageal adenocarcinoma (HR 1.32, 95% CI 0.80-2.17) and gastric cardia cancer (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.05-1.46), respectively. No clear association with BMI was found for gastric noncardia cancer. This prospective study-the largest in an Asian country-provides a comprehensive quantitative estimate of the association of BMI with upper gastrointestinal cancer and confirms the subtype- or subsite-specific carcinogenic impact of BMI in a Japanese population.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Índice de Masa Corporal , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Japón/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/epidemiología , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo
9.
J Epidemiol ; 33(11): 582-588, 2023 11 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36310059

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although cigarette smoking is an established risk factor for bladder cancer, assessment of smoking impact on bladder cancer in Asian populations has been hindered by few cohort studies conducted in Asian populations. Therefore, we investigated the risk of bladder cancer associated with smoking status, cumulative smoking intensity, and smoking cessation in Japan. METHODS: We analyzed data for 157,295 men and 183,202 women in 10 population-based cohort studies in Japan. The risk associated with smoking behaviors was estimated using Cox regression models within each study, and pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the incidence of bladder cancer were calculated. RESULTS: During 4,729,073 person-years of follow-up, 936 men and 325 women developed bladder cancer. In men, former smokers (HR 1.47; 95% CI, 1.18-1.82) and current smokers (HR 1.96; 95% CI, 1.62-2.38) had higher risk than never smokers. In women, current smokers had higher risk than never smokers (HR 2.35; 95% CI, 1.67-3.32). HRs in men linearly increased with increasing pack-years. Risk decreased with increasing years of smoking cessation in men, with a significant dose-response trend. Former smokers with a duration of more than 10 years after smoking cessation had no significantly increased risk compared with never smokers (HR 1.26; 95% CI, 0.97-1.63). CONCLUSION: Data from a pooled analysis of 10 population-based cohort studies in Japan clearly show an association between cigarette smoking and bladder cancer risk. The risk of smokers may approximate that of never smokers following cessation for many years.


Asunto(s)
Fumar Cigarrillos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Japón/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/etiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Factores de Riesgo
10.
Int J Cancer ; 151(7): 1068-1080, 2022 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35616624

RESUMEN

Sleep duration is emerging as an important modifiable risk factor for morbidity and mortality. We assessed the association between sleep duration and cancer incidence and mortality among Japanese adults using data from six population-based cohorts with 271 694 participants. During a total follow-up period of about 5.9 million person-years, we identified 40 751 incident cancer cases and 18 323 cancer deaths. We computed study-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using Cox proportional hazards regression models and pooled the estimates using random-effects meta-analysis. Sleep duration of ≥10 hours (vs 7 hours) was associated with increased risk of cancer incidence among women (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.02-1.38), but not men, and increased risk of cancer mortality among men (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.00-1.39) and women (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.20-1.73). Sleep duration of ≤5 hours (vs 7 hours) was not associated with cancer incidence and mortality. However, among postmenopausal women, sleep durations of both ≤5 and ≥10 hours (vs 7 hours) were associated with an increased risk of cancer mortality. Among Japanese adults, sleep duration of ≥10 hours is associated with increased risk of cancer incidence and mortality among women and cancer mortality among men.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Sueño , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Japón/epidemiología , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Factores de Riesgo
11.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 52(4): 322-330, 2022 Apr 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34969070

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The association between adult-attained height and risk of colorectal cancer remains elusive among the Japanese population. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies in Japan. METHODS: We systematically searched the MEDLINE (PubMed) and Ichushi databases and complemented it with manual search to identify eligible studies. We extracted relative risks or odds ratios from the selected studies and conducted meta-analysis to estimate the summary relative risk with 95% confidence interval. We made the final judgment based on a consensus of the research group members considering both epidemiological evidence and biological plausibility. RESULTS: This systematic review identified four cohort and one case-control studies among the Japanese. The meta-analysis of these five studies showed the summary relative risk of 1.21 (95% confidence interval: 1.07-1.35) of overall colorectal cancer for the highest vs. lowest categories of height. In the analysis by the cancer subsite, the association was significant for colon cancer with a summary relative risk of 1.26 (95% confidence interval: 1.10-1.45) but not for rectal cancer 1.05 (95% confidence interval: 0.71-1.54). In the analysis by sex, tall stature was associated with a significantly increased risk of overall colorectal cancer in both sexes; the summary relative risk was 1.21 (95% confidence interval: 1.04-1.41) in men and 1.20 (95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.44) in women, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence to support that adult-attained height is associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer (colon cancer) among the Japanese population is 'probable'.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Pueblo Asiatico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo
12.
J Epidemiol ; 32(Suppl_XII): S11-S22, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36464295

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: One of the components of the Fukushima Health Management Survey (FHMS) is the Basic Survey, which estimates individual external doses for the first 4 months after the 2011 nuclear power plant accident. However, external exposure continues long-term. According to estimations by international organizations, the external dose during the first year accounts for a significant part of the long-term dose. Thus, the present study was intended to estimate the first-year doses by extrapolating the Basic Survey results. METHODS: For most municipalities of non-evacuated areas, ambient dose rate had been continuously measured for at least one designated point in each municipality after the accident. In the present study, a municipality-average dose received by residents for a period was assumed to be proportional to the ambient dose measured at the designated point of that municipality during the same period. Based on this assumption, 4-month municipality-average doses calculated from the Basic Survey results were extrapolated to obtain first-year doses. RESULTS: The extrapolated first-year doses for 49 municipalities in the non-evacuated areas had a good correlation with those estimated by UNSCEAR, although the extrapolated doses were generally higher (slope of the regression line: 1.23). The extrapolated municipality-average doses were in reasonable agreement (within 30%) with personal dosimeter measurements, suggesting that the extrapolation was reasonable. CONCLUSION: The present paper reports the first 4-month average doses for all 59 municipalities of Fukushima Prefecture and the extrapolated first-year doses for 49 municipalities. The extrapolated doses will be the basis for future epidemiological studies related to the FHMS.


Asunto(s)
Accidente Nuclear de Fukushima , Humanos , Ciudades , Estudios Epidemiológicos , Encuestas Epidemiológicas
13.
Radiat Environ Biophys ; 61(1): 59-72, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35175360

RESUMEN

A previous study of peripheral blood lymphocyte translocations around age 40 among atomic-bomb survivors exposed in utero revealed no overall association with radiation dose-despite a clear association between translocations and dose among their mothers-but the data suggested an increase at doses below 100 mGy with a definite peak. That analysis of the in utero-exposed survivors did not adjust for their subsequent smoking behavior, an established cause of chromosomal aberrations, or their subsequent exposures to medical irradiation, a potential mediator. In addition, atomic-bomb survivor radiation dose estimates have subsequently been updated and refined. We therefore re-estimated the dose response using the latest DS02R1 dose estimates and adjusting for smoking as well as for city and proximal-distal location at the time of exposure to the atomic bomb. Sex of the survivor, mother's age around the time of conception, and approximate trimester of gestation at the time of exposure were also considered as explanatory variables and modifiers. Precision of the estimated dose response was slightly lower due to greater variability near zero in the updated dose estimates, but there was little change in evidence of a low-dose increase and still no suggestion of an overall increase across the entire dose range. Adjustment for smoking behavior led to a decline in background number of translocations (the dose-response intercept), but smoking did not interact with dose overall (across the entire dose range). Adjustment for medical irradiation did not alter the association between dose and translocation frequency. Sex, mother's age, and trimester were not associated with number of translocations, nor did they interact with dose overall. Interactions with dose in the low-dose range could not be evaluated because of numerical instability.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación , Guerra Nuclear , Adulto , Aberraciones Cromosómicas , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Humanos , Japón , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Dosis de Radiación , Fumar , Sobrevivientes
14.
Am J Epidemiol ; 190(11): 2323-2333, 2021 11 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33847738

RESUMEN

From 1948 to 1954, the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission conducted a study of pregnancy outcomes among births to atomic bomb survivors (Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan) who had received radiation doses ranging from 0 Gy to near-lethal levels. Past reports (1956, 1981, and 1990) on the cohort did not identify significant associations of radiation exposure with untoward pregnancy outcomes, such as major congenital malformations, stillbirths, or neonatal deaths, individually or in aggregate. We reexamined the risk of major congenital malformations and perinatal deaths in the children of atomic bomb survivors (n = 71,603) using fully reconstructed data to minimize the potential for bias, using refined estimates of the gonadal dose from Dosimetry System 2002 and refined analytical methods for characterizing dose-response relationships. The analyses showed that parental exposure to radiation was associated with increased risk of major congenital malformations and perinatal death, but the estimates were imprecise for direct radiation effects, and most were not statistically significant. Nonetheless, the uniformly positive estimates for untoward pregnancy outcomes among children of both maternal and paternal survivors are useful for risk assessment purposes, although extending them to populations other than the atomic bomb survivors comes with uncertainty as to generalizability.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes a la Bomba Atómica/estadística & datos numéricos , Anomalías Congénitas/epidemiología , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Mortalidad Perinatal , Embarazo , Dosis de Radiación
15.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 36(4): 415-428, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33492551

RESUMEN

We examined the mortality risks among 2463 individuals who were exposed in utero to atomic bomb radiation in Hiroshima or Nagasaki in August 1945 and were followed from October 1950 through 2012. Individual estimates of mother's weighted absorbed uterine dose (DS02R1) were used. Poisson regression method was used to estimate the radiation-associated excess relative risk per Gy (ERR/Gy) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for cause-specific mortality. Head size, birth weight, and parents' survival status were evaluated as potential mediators of radiation effect. There were 339 deaths (216 males and 123 females) including deaths from solid cancer (n = 137), lymphohematopoietic cancer (n = 8), noncancer disease (n = 134), external cause (n = 56), and unknown cause (n = 4). Among males, the unadjusted ERR/Gy (95% CI) was increased for noncancer disease mortality (1.22, 0.10-3.14), but not for solid cancer mortality (- 0.18, < - 0.77-0.95); the unadjusted ERR/Gy for external cause mortality was not statistically significant (0.28, < - 0.60-2.36). Among females, the unadjusted ERRs/Gy were increased for solid cancer (2.24, 0.44-5.58), noncancer (2.86, 0.56-7.64), and external cause mortality (2.57, 0.20-9.19). The ERRs/Gy adjusted for potential mediators did not change appreciably for solid cancer mortality, but decreased notably for noncancer mortality (0.39, < - 0.43-1.91 for males; 1.48, - 0.046-4.55 for females) and external cause mortality (0.10, < - 0.57-1.96 for males; 1.38, < - 0.46-5.95 for females). In conclusion, antenatal radiation exposure is a consistent risk factor for increased solid cancer mortality among females, but not among males. The effect of exposure to atomic bomb radiation on noncancer disease and external cause mortality among individuals exposed in utero was mediated through small head size, low birth weight, and parental loss.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes a la Bomba Atómica/estadística & datos numéricos , Feto/efectos de la radiación , Exposición Materna/efectos adversos , Mortalidad , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/mortalidad , Exposición a la Radiación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo/efectos de la radiación , Factores de Riesgo
16.
Int J Cancer ; 146(3): 635-645, 2020 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30873589

RESUMEN

Radiation effects on colorectal cancer rates, adjusted for smoking, alcohol intake and frequency of meat consumption and body mass index (BMI) by anatomical subsite (proximal colon, distal colon and rectum) were examined in a cohort of 105,444 atomic bomb survivors. Poisson regression methods were used to describe radiation-associated excess relative risks (ERR) and excess absolute rates (EAR) for the 1958-2009 period. There were 2,960 first primary colorectal cancers including 894 proximal, 871 distal and 1,046 rectal cancers. Smoking, alcohol intake and BMI were associated with subsite-specific cancer background rates. Significant linear dose-responses were found for total colon (sex-averaged ERR/Gy for 70 years old exposed at age 30 = 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34; 0.98), proximal [ERR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.32; 1.44] and distal colon cancers [ERR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.04; 0.97], but not for rectal cancer [ERR = 0.023, 95% CI: -0.081; 0.13]. The ERRs for proximal and distal colon cancers were not significantly different (p = 0.41). The ERR decreased with attained age for total colon, but not for proximal colon cancer, and with calendar year for distal colon cancer. The ERRs and EARs did not vary by age at exposure, except for decreasing trend in EAR for proximal colon cancer. In conclusion, ionizing radiation is associated with increased risk of proximal and distal colon cancers. The ERR for proximal cancer persists over time, but that for distal colon cancer decreases. There continues to be no indication of radiation effects on rectal cancer incidence in this population.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes a la Bomba Atómica/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias del Colon/epidemiología , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Recto/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/efectos adversos , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Índice de Masa Corporal , Niño , Preescolar , Colon/efectos de la radiación , Neoplasias del Colon/etiología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Mucosa Intestinal/efectos de la radiación , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Carne/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Neoplasias del Recto/etiología , Recto/efectos de la radiación , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar/efectos adversos , Fumar/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
17.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 35(6): 591-600, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31982981

RESUMEN

Radiation exposure is among the few factors known to be associated with risk of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. However, the patterns of radiation risk by histological type, sex or age are unclear. We evaluated radiation risks of first primary glioma, meningioma, schwannoma, and other or not otherwise specified (other/NOS) tumors in the Life Span Study cohort of atomic bomb survivors. Cases diagnosed between 1958 and 2009 were ascertained through population-based cancer registries in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. To estimate excess relative risk per Gy (ERR/Gy), we fit rate models using Poisson regression methods. There were 285 CNS tumors (67 gliomas, 107 meningiomas, 49 schwannomas, and 64 other/NOS tumors) among 105,444 individuals with radiation dose estimates to the brain contributing 3.1 million person-years of observation. Based on a simple linear model without effect modification, ERR/Gy was 1.67 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.12 to 5.26) for glioma, 1.82 (95% CI: 0.51 to 4.30) for meningioma, 1.45 (95% CI: - 0.01 to 4.97) for schwannoma, and 1.40 (95% CI: 0.61 to 2.57) for all CNS tumors as a group. For each tumor type, the dose-response was consistent with linearity and appeared to be stronger among males than among females, particularly for meningioma (P = 0.045). There was also evidence that the ERR/Gy for schwannoma decreased with attained age (P = 0.002). More than 60 years after the bombings, radiation risks for CNS tumors continue to be elevated. Further follow-up is necessary to characterize the lifetime risks of specific CNS tumors following radiation exposure.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes a la Bomba Atómica/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/epidemiología , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/epidemiología , Exposición a la Radiación/efectos adversos , Adulto , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/etiología , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/patología , Estudios de Cohortes , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Femenino , Glioma/epidemiología , Glioma/etiología , Glioma/patología , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Longevidad , Masculino , Meningioma/epidemiología , Meningioma/etiología , Meningioma/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neurilemoma/epidemiología , Neurilemoma/etiología , Neurilemoma/patología , Sistema de Registros , Medición de Riesgo
18.
Am J Epidemiol ; 187(8): 1623-1629, 2018 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29617935

RESUMEN

In the Life Span Study cohort of atomic bomb survivors, differences in urbanicity between high-dose and low-dose survivors could confound the association between radiation dose and adverse outcomes. We obtained data on the population distribution in Hiroshima and Nagasaki before the 1945 bombings and quantified the impact of adjustment for population density on radiation risk estimates for mortality (1950-2003) and incident solid cancer (1958-2009). Population density ranged from 4,671 to 14,378 people/km2 in the urban region of Hiroshima and 5,748 to 19,149 people/km2 in the urban region of Nagasaki. Radiation risk estimates for solid cancer mortality were attenuated by 5.1% after adjustment for population density, but those for all-cause mortality and incident solid cancer were unchanged. There was no overall association between population density and adverse outcomes, but there was evidence that the association between density and mortality differed according to age at exposure. Among survivors who were 10-14 years of age in 1945, there was a positive association between population density and risk of all-cause mortality (per 5,000-people/km2 increase, relative risk = 1.053, 95% confidence interval: 1.027, 1.079) and solid cancer mortality (per 5,000-people/km2 increase, relative risk = 1.069, 95% confidence interval: 1.025, 1.115). Our results suggest that radiation risk estimates from the Life Span Study are not sensitive to unmeasured confounding by urban-rural differences.


Asunto(s)
Mortalidad , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/epidemiología , Densidad de Población , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Medición de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
19.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 32(12): 1055-1063, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29204903

RESUMEN

In cohort studies, unbiased estimation of exposure-outcome associations requires selection of an appropriate reference group of unexposed individuals. We illustrate strategies for analyzing cohort data with multiple potential reference groups. We analyzed the association between radiation exposure and incidence of first primary solid cancer among 105,444 participants of the Life Span Study (Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan, 1958-2009). Potential reference groups included zero-dose survivors at different ground distances from the hypocenter (internal) and city residents who were not in either city at the time of the bombings (external). DS02R1 weighted absorbed colon doses were estimated by the DS02 dosimetry system. Piecewise constant hazard models estimated excess relative risks of first primary solid cancer. We focused on sex-averaged excess relative risks and the shape of the dose-response curve. A model with internal standardization provided a sex-averaged excess relative risk of 0.510, 95% confidence interval: (0.414, 0.612) per gray of weighted absorbed colon dose, as well as strong evidence of a curvilinear dose response among males (P = 0.008). Selection of not-in-city residents as the reference group resulted in a larger excess relative risk of 0.560, 95% confidence interval: (0.467, 0.657) per gray, and reduced evidence of a curvilinear dose response among males (P = 0.042). These differences were particularly apparent at weighted absorbed colon doses < 1 gray. In cohort studies, selection of an appropriate reference group requires understanding of the nature of unmeasured confounding to which the results could be sensitive.


Asunto(s)
Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/epidemiología , Armas Nucleares/estadística & datos numéricos , Exposición a la Radiación/efectos adversos , Traumatismos por Radiación , Sobrevivientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Exposición a la Radiación/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
20.
J Radiol Prot ; 37(3): 584-605, 2017 Sep 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28617669

RESUMEN

After the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident, the Fukushima Health Management Survey (FHMS) was launched. The Basic Survey, a component of FHMS, is a questionnaire used to survey residents across the Fukushima Prefecture about their behaviour in the first 4 months after the accident. The questionnaire findings are used to determine individual external doses by linking behaviour data to a computer programme with daily gamma ray dose rate maps, drawn after the accident. Through 30 June 2015, the response rate was only 27.2% (558 550 population), indicating that the findings might not be generalisable because of poor representativeness of the population. The objective of this study was to clarify if the data from the FHMS Basic Survey were representative of the entire population, by conducting a new survey to compare the external doses between non-respondents and respondents in the previous survey. A total of 5350 subjects were randomly selected from 7 local regions of Fukushima Prefecture. An interview survey was conducted with the non-respondents to the FHMS Basic Survey. A total of 990 responses were obtained from the previous non-responders by interview survey. For the regions Kempoku, Kenchu, Kennan, Aizu, Minami-Aizu, Soso, and Iwaki, differences in mean effective dose (95% confidence interval) in mSv between the non-responders and previous responders were 0.12 (0.01-0.23), -0.09 (-0.21-0.03), -0.06 (-0.18-0.07), 0.05 (-0.04-0.14), 0.01 (-0.01-0.02), 0.09 (0.01-0.17), 0.09 (0.00-0.17), respectively. The differences fall neither within the interval (-∞, -0.25) nor within the interval (0.25, ∞). These findings imply that mean effective doses between the previous and new respondents were not different, with a significantly indifferent region of 0.25 mSv according to equivalence tests. The present study indicates that the dose distribution obtained from about one-quarter of Fukushima residents represents the dose distribution for the entire Fukushima Prefecture.


Asunto(s)
Accidente Nuclear de Fukushima , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Dosis de Radiación , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Monitoreo de Radiación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA