Comparative Mutagenesis of Pseudorabies Virus and Epstein-Barr Virus gH Identifies a Structural Determinant within Domain III of gH Required for Surface Expression and Entry Function.

UNLABELLED: Herpesviruses infect cells using the conserved core fusion machinery composed of glycoprotein B (gB) and gH/gL. The gH/gL complex plays an essential but still poorly characterized role in membrane fusion and cell tropism. Our previous studies demonstrated that the conserved disulfide bond (DB) C278/C335 in domain II (D-II) of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) gH has an epithelial cell-specific function, whereas the interface of D-II/D-III is involved in formation of the B cell entry complex by binding to gp42. To extend these studies, we compared gH of the alphaherpesvirus pseudorabies virus (PrV) with gH of the gammaherpesvirus EBV to identify functionally equivalent regions critical for gH function during entry. We identified several conserved amino acids surrounding the conserved DB that connects three central helices of D-III of PrV and EBV gH. The present study verified that the conserved DB and several contacting amino acids in D-III modulate cell surface expression and thereby contribute to gH function. In line with this finding, we found that DB C404/C439 and T401 are important for cell-to-cell spread and efficient entry of PrV. This parallel comparison between PrV and EBV gH function brings new insights into how gH structure impacts fusion function during herpesvirus entry. IMPORTANCE: The alphaherpesvirus PrV is known for its neuroinvasion, whereas the gammaherpesvirus EBV is associated with cancer of epithelial and B cell origin. Despite low amino acid conservation, PrV gH and EBV gH show strikingly similar structures. Interestingly, both PrV gH and EBV gH contain a structural motif composed of a DB and supporting amino acids which is highly conserved within the Herpesviridae. Our study verified that PrV gH uses a minimal motif with the DB as the core, whereas the DB of EBV gH forms extensive connections through hydrogen bonds to surrounding amino acids, ensuring the cell surface expression of gH/gL. Our study verifies that the comparative analysis of distantly related herpesviruses, such as PrV and EBV, allows the identification of common gH functions. In addition, we provide an understanding of how functional domains can evolve over time, resulting in subtle differences in domain structure and function.

Mutations in Pseudorabies Virus Glycoproteins gB, gD, and gH Functionally Compensate for the Absence of gL.

UNLABELLED: Entry of herpesviruses depends on the combined action of viral glycoprotein B (gB) and the heterodimeric gH/gL complex, which are activated by binding of the virion to specific cellular receptors. While gB carries signatures of a bona fide fusion protein, efficient membrane fusion requires gH/gL. However, although gB and gH/gL are essential for entry, the alphaherpesvirus pseudorabies virus (PrV) is capable of limited cell-to-cell spread in the absence of gL. To understand gH/gL function in more detail, the limited spread of PrV-ΔgL was used for reversion analyses by serial cell culture passages. In a first experiment, an infectious gL-negative mutant in which gL function was replaced by generation of a gD-gH hybrid protein was isolated (B. G. Klupp and T. C. Mettenleiter, J Virol 73:3014-3022, 1999). In a second, independent experiment PrV-ΔgLPassB4.1, which also replicated productively without gL, was isolated. Sequence analysis revealed mutations in gH but also in gB and gD. In a transfection-based fusion assay, two amino acid substitutions in the N-terminal part of gH(B4.1) (L(70)P and W(103)R) were found to be sufficient to compensate for lack of gL, while mutations present in gB(B4.1) enhanced fusogenicity. Coexpression of gB(B4.1) with the homologous gH(B4.1) resulted in strongly increased syncytium formation, which was further augmented by truncation of the gB(B4.1) C-terminal 29 amino acids. Nevertheless, gH was still required for membrane fusion. Surprisingly, coexpression of gD(B4.1) blocked syncytium formation in the fusion assays, which could be attributed to a V(106)A substitution within the ectodomain of gD(B4.1). IMPORTANCE: In contrast to many other enveloped viruses, herpesviruses rely on the concerted action of four viral glycoproteins for membrane fusion during infectious entry. Although the highly conserved gB shows signatures of a fusion protein, for fusion induction it requires the gH/gL complex, whose role is still elusive. Here we demonstrated fusion activation by gH in the absence of gL after reversion analysis of gL-deleted pseudorabies virus. This gL-independent fusion activity depended on single amino acid exchanges affecting the gL-binding domain in gH, increasing fusogenicity in gB and allowing negative fusion regulation by gD. Thus, our results provide novel information on the interplay in the fusion machinery of herpesviruses.

The highly conserved proline at position 438 in pseudorabies virus gH is important for regulation of membrane fusion.

UNLABELLED: Membrane fusion in herpesviruses requires viral glycoproteins (g) gB and gH/gL. While gB is considered the actual fusion protein but is nonfusogenic per se, the function of gH/gL remains enigmatic. Crystal structures for different gH homologs are strikingly similar despite only moderate amino acid sequence conservation. A highly conserved sequence motif comprises the residues serine-proline-cysteine corresponding to positions 437 to 439 in pseudorabies virus (PrV) gH. The PrV-gH structure shows that proline(438) induces bending at the end of an alpha-helix, thereby placing cysteine(404) and cysteine(439) in juxtaposition to allow formation of a strictly conserved disulfide bond. However, PrV vaccine strain Bartha unexpectedly carries a serine at this conserved position. To test the influence of this substitution, we constructed different gH chimeras carrying proline or serine at position 438 in gH derived from either PrV strain Kaplan or strain Bartha. Mutants expressing gH with serine(438) showed reduced fusion activity in transient-fusion assays and during infection, with delayed penetration kinetics and a small-plaque phenotype which indicates that proline(438) is important for efficient fusion. A more drastic effect was observed when disulfide bond formation was completely blocked by mutation of cysteine(404) to serine. Although PrV expressing gHC(404)S was viable, plaque size and penetration kinetics were drastically reduced. Alteration of serine(438) to proline in gH of strain Bartha enhanced cell-to-cell spread and penetration kinetics, but restoration of full activity required additional alteration of aspartic acid to valine at position 59. IMPORTANCE: The role of the gH/gL complex in herpesvirus membrane fusion is still unclear. Structural studies predicted a critical role for proline(438) in PrV gH to allow the formation of a conserved disulfide bond and correct protein folding. Functional analyses within this study corroborated these structural predictions: mutation of this residue resulted in a drastic impairment of membrane fusion kinetics not only in vitro in transient transfection-fusion assays but also during virus infection. Elimination of formation of the disulfide bond yielded the same phenotype in transient assays but had a more drastic effect on virus replication. Thus, our studies add important information to structure-function analyses of herpesvirus gH.

Transient Transfection-based Fusion Assay for Viral Proteins.

Membrane fusion is vital for entry of enveloped viruses into host cells as well as for direct viral cell-to-cell spread. To understand the fusion mechanism in more detail, we use an infection free system whereby fusion can be induced by a minimal set of the alphaherpesvirus pseudorabies virus (PrV) glycoproteins gB, gH and gL. Here, we describe an optimized protocol of a transient transfection based fusion assay to quantify cell-cell fusion induced by the PrV glycoproteins.