Morbidity and Outcomes Following Axillary Lymphadenectomy for Melanoma: Weighing the Risk of Surgery in the Era of MSLT-II.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist characterizing complications after axillary lymphadenectomy for melanoma. With high rates of complications reported after dissection for breast cancer and data suggesting that completion lymphadenectomy may have limited therapeutic benefit, this study characterized morbidity to facilitate clinical decision-making. METHODS: Using a broad definition for complications, patients who underwent axillary dissection for melanoma at a single center (from 2003 to 2015) were assessed through retrospective chart review. Patients were stratified by potential risk factors for complications; outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-four axillary dissections in 239 patients were identified. Assessed risk factors for complications included age > 55 years (n = 133, 52%), body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 (n = 90, 40%), diabetes (n = 40, 16%), smoking (n = 81, 32%), extremity primary (n = 71, 28%), therapeutic lymphadenectomy (n = 105, 41%), and adjuvant radiation (n = 33, 13%). Wound complications were observed in 51 patients with 38 (15%) seromas, 3 (1%) dehiscences, and 10 (4%) hematomas. There were 5 (2%) reoperations, all for hematoma. Thirty-day readmission rate was 6% (n = 14). Importantly, lymphedema occurred in only 13 (5%) patients. Wound dehiscence occurred only in smokers (p = 0.03) and was associated with adjuvant radiation (p = 0.04). Twenty-eight (11%) patients developed frozen shoulder, which was related to smoking (p = 0.02). Lymphedema was more likely in patients after therapeutic dissection (p = 0.04). All other risk factors were not associated with increased complications. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis supports historical data that axillary dissection for melanoma is a low-risk procedure, with smoking, therapeutic lymphadenectomy, and adjuvant radiation associated with increased morbidity. Although morbidity of lymphadenectomy is often cited as a reason to alter surgical approach or even forgo intervention, this may be less of a concern for axillary dissection.

Salivary levels of angiopoietin-2 in infants with infantile haemangiomas treated with and without systemic propranolol.

Infantile haemangiomas (IHs) with functional or cosmetic concerns necessitate systemic treatment for which propranolol is the preferred treatment. However, the mechanism of action is unknown. Mouse models suggest the angiopoietin-2 (Ang2)/Tie-2 system is implicated. Ang2 can promote endothelial growth or induce apoptosis depending on the presence of vascular endothelial growth factor. This pilot study investigates the saliva Ang2 levels in infants with IH treated with and without systemic propranolol. Patients with clinically confirmed IHs were recruited from an academic paediatric dermatology centre. Treatment was based on clinical evaluation. Saliva samples were collected over 6 months. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay determined Ang2 levels. Ang2 levels were detectable in 45% of samples. However, by the late time point, only 28% had detectable levels. There were no changes of Ang2 over time, and there were no differences in Ang2 levels between groups. However, Ang2 levels were correlated with baseline size and changes in size from baseline. Ang2 is detectable in saliva of affected infants, but does not decrease with propranolol treatment. However, Ang2 levels are positively correlated with size and changes in size. Thus, Ang2 is not the primary factor in the mechanism of propranolol resulting in IH reduction.