Outcomes and long-term follow-up by treatment type for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer managed at a tertiary cancer center: A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Team Ovary study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess long-term outcomes of patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer by treatment type. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed stage III-IV ovarian cancer who underwent primary treatment at our tertiary cancer center from 01/01/2015-12/31/2015 were included. We reviewed electronic medical records for clinicopathological, treatment, and survival characteristics. RESULTS: Of 153 patients, 88 (58%) had stage III and 65 (42%) stage IV disease. Median follow-up was 65.8 months (range, 3.6-75.3). Eighty-nine patients (58%) underwent primary debulking surgery (PDS), 50 (33%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS), and 14 (9%) received chemotherapy alone, without surgery (NSx). Median PFS to first recurrence was 26.2 months (range, 20.1-36.2), 13.5 months (range, 12-15.1), and 4.2 months (range, 1.1-5.8) in the PDS, IDS, and NSx groups, respectively (P < .001). At first recurrence/progression, 80 patients (72.7%) were treated with chemotherapy, 28 (25.5%) underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) followed by chemotherapy, and 2 (1.8%) received no treatment. Seven patients (4.6%) underwent palliative surgery for malignant bowel obstruction. Overall, 62.7% received 1-3 lines of chemotherapy. The 5-year OS rates were 53.2% (95% CI: 44.7%-61%) for the entire cohort, 71.5% (95% CI: 60.2%-80%) for the PDS group, 35.2% (95% CI: 22.2-48.5%) for the IDS group, and 7.9% (95% CI: 0.5%-29.9%) for the NSx group. CONCLUSION: The longitudinal treatment modalities and outcomes of patients with advanced ovarian cancer described here can be useful for patient counseling, long-term planning, and future comparison studies.

Diagnosing and managing adrenal crisis in pregnancy: A case report.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency in pregnancy is relatively rare. Further, making this diagnosis can be challenging as many of the symptoms overlap with normal symptoms of pregnancy. Given the potential for severe maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality, early recognition and prompt comprehensive treatment are critical. CASE: A 24-year-old woman, G3 P2002, at 17 + 1 weeks of gestation with unremarkable prenatal course was admitted to hospital for hyperemesis gravidarum in the setting of parainfluenza with a notable blood glucose of 20 mg/dL. On hospital day two, she was transferred to intensive care after developing significant hypotension, hyponatremia, and a new finding of hypothyroidism. During her evaluation in the ICU, she was diagnosed with adrenal crisis and she showed significant improvement with glucocorticoid therapy. CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of literature regarding diagnosing adrenal insufficiency in pregnancy. Adrenal crisis in pregnancy can present with symptoms similar to severe nausea and vomiting of pregnancy or hyperemesis gravidarum. Additionally, several critical laboratory tests to support the proper diagnosis require time that acute patients cannot always afford. In this patient's case, the diagnosis was made empirically with improvement after glucocorticoid administration, and was later confirmed by laboratory testing. This case highlights the importance of including adrenal insufficiency in the differential diagnosis of hyperemesis patients in order to quickly manage and treat these often acutely and severely ill patients.

Speed Mentoring: An Effective & Efficient Path to Development of Mentor Relationships in a Military Obstetrics & Gynecology Residency.

INTRODUCTION: With a deficit of effective military residency mentorships, a paucity of research on successful mentorship programs, and growing reports on innovative mentoring programs, we developed a "Speed Mentoring" event for the National Capital Consortium OBGYN Residency. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The development, implementation, and follow-up responses through participant surveys were designed as an institutional review board (IRB)-approved evidence-based quality improvement project at our institution. Our event coordinated mentorship opportunities between residents and faculty from a wide range of specialties, leadership roles, and research experiences. Residents were matched with faculty that aligned with self-identified goals. Surveys were distributed prior to the event and at follow-up intervals to demonstrate the lasting impact and areas for improvement. RESULTS: Prior to our first event, every resident reported by survey that they desired more mentorship opportunities. However, only 55% could identify a specific mentor, citing limited time and difficulty establishing a relationship. Immediately following the event, 90% of residents scheduled a follow-up with at least one mentor. Forty-seven percent of residents reported inspiration to initiate a new research project. Meanwhile, faculty felt valued and gained satisfaction by "giving back" to their profession. After 1 month, half of the residents and faculty had already conducted at least one meeting. At 3 months, 76% of meetings centered on research and 23% on quality improvement projects. Fifty-seven percent of participants reported future scheduled meetings. At 6 months, 75% of residents reported meaningful mentorship relationships. CONCLUSIONS: After demonstrating a need for improved mentorship opportunities, we implemented an efficient way to foster mentorship while expanding resident involvement in research, QI projects, and fellowship applications. This "Speed Mentorship" program can be easily adapted to all residency programs.