Dexmedetomidine-related atrial standstill and loss of capture in a pediatric patient after congenital heart surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Dexmedetomidine (DEX; Precedex) is an alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonist that produces anxiolysis and sleep-like sedation without narcosis or respiratory depression and has relatively few cardiovascular side effects. Given its favorable sedative properties combined with its limited effects on hemodynamic and respiratory function, it is widely used in pediatric intensive care and anesthesia settings. DESIGN: Case report. SETTING: Pediatric intensive care unit. PATIENT: A three-yr-old girl was admitted after mitral valve replacement for persistent severe mitral insufficiency. Her prior history was significant for tetralogy of Fallot which was repaired at nine months of age. A year later the patient developed mitral and tricuspid valve insufficiency and subsequently underwent mitral and tricuspid valve repair, pulmonary valve replacement, and a maze procedure (the latter was performed for persistent atrial flutter). Following that operation she developed sinus node dysfunction and had a permanent epicardial dual-chamber pacemaker implanted. Due to remaining severe mitral insufficiency the patient had increasing pulmonary symptoms, necessitating the most recent surgery to replace her mitral valve. INTERVENTIONS: On postoperative day two the patient was hemodynamically stable and weaning off mechanical ventilation. Tracheal extubation was anticipated to occur within the next 24 hrs. A DEX infusion of 0.6 mcg/kg/hr was initiated. A pacemaker interrogation performed on postoperative day three, 21 hrs after the initiation of DEX, revealed unsuccessful atrial capture. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Dexmedetomidine was subsequently discontinued and the patient's pacemaker was reinterrogated. The interrogation findings were similar to those seen prior to the initiation of DEX. CONCLUSION: As a result of these findings, caution is warranted in the administration of DEX to patients with predisposing conduction abnormalities and patients who are pacemaker-dependent.

Surgical approaches to epicardial pacemaker placement: does pocket location affect lead survival?

Permanent cardiac pacing in pediatric patients presents challenges related to small patient size, complex anatomy, electrophysiologic abnormalities, and limited access to cardiac chambers. Epicardial pacing currently remains the conventional technique for infants and patients with complex congenital heart disease. Pacemaker lead failure is the major source of failure for such epicardial systems. The authors hypothesized that a retrocostal surgical approach would reduce the rate of lead failure due to fracture compared with the more traditional subrectus and subxiphoid approaches. To evaluate this hypothesis, a retrospective chart review analyzed patients with epicardial pacemaker systems implanted or followed at Rady Children's Hospital San Diego between January 1980 and May 2007. The study cohort consisted of 219 patients and a total of 620 leads with epicardial pacemakers. Among these patients, 84% had structural congenital heart disease, and 45% were younger than 3 years at time of the first implantation. The estimated lead survival was 93% at 2 years and 83% at 5 years. The majority of leads failed due to pacing problems (54%), followed by lead fracture (31%) and sensing problems (14%). When lead failure was adjusted for length of follow-up period, no significant differences in the rates of failure by pocket location were found.

Long-term follow-up shows excellent transmural atrial lead performance in patients with complex congenital heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with congenital heart disease require permanent pacing for rhythm management but cannot undergo transvenous lead placement. In others, epicardial scarring prohibits adequate sensing and pacing thresholds using epicardial leads. This study describes long-term lead performance using a transmural atrial (epicardial to endocardial) pacing approach in patients with congenital heart disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: For transmural atrial (TMA) lead access, a bipolar, steroid-eluting transvenous lead was placed from the epicardium via purse-string incision or atriotomy and affixed to atrial endocardium. Records were reviewed for patient data and acute and long-term lead performance for TMA leads placed 1998 to 2004. Forty-two of 48 TMA leads remain active at last follow-up. Two leads fractured, 4 were functional at >5-year follow-up but no longer active. Freedom from lead failure 98% (95% confidence interval, 86%-100%) at mean follow-up 7.8 years. TMA leads gave excellent sensing and pacing characteristics at implant and chronically. Median acute and chronic sensing thresholds were 3 and 2.8 mV, respectively; median acute and chronic pacing thresholds at 0.5 ms were 0.9 and 0.7 V, respectively. TMA leads performed similarly in Fontan patients. Overdrive pacing for intra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia was successful in 7 of 8 patients. One patient with high baseline risk died of stroke 7 years after implant. No lead-associated thrombi were observed. CONCLUSIONS: TMA pacing leads had excellent longevity, initial, and chronic functional properties and provide an alternative to epicardial leads in patients with congenital heart disease. Patients who cannot receive transvenous leads, have epicardial scarring or have intra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia could benefit most from routine use of this technique.